Jump to content
THIS IS A TEST/QA SITE

Changes the 'deal'


N13
This topic is 4151 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

"Getting what I want" is why I insisted upon an interview, usually drinks and lunch at a restaurant of his choice, with the escort before a "hire" as it provided an excellent venue to discern as to whether or not we would "click" betweenst the sheets. If the escort declined the interview, I did not take umbrage as the escort car lots, if you will, are packed with models, and, in the end, the reality of the thing is that the "business" is a buyer's market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Six AM, Thursday morning, sleep-deprived and sitting on a plane departing LAX, it finally hit me. What really bothers me about our art dealer's posts - I admit I fell into his terminology trap, too. He called the escort's responses to 'negative' reviews REBUTTALS. I don't know what that means in art dealer-ease, but in most applications of the word rebuttal, it's lawyer-ease for a response to an argument put forth by the opponent in a legal dispute.

 

REALLY? Should we actually see the Review and Response on Daddy's Reviews as the client arguing against an escort? And the escort's response as a legal rebuttal arguing against the facts as presented by the client?

 

I admit, I fell into the terminology confusion presented by N13. I came back here to correct that misunderstanding. A client's REVIEW and an escort's RESPONSE is not a legal proceeding. It's two people writing after the fact about their date. It's two different perspectives regarding a shared experience. No one is sworn to tell the truth. There is no jeopardy of perjury. Just two guys reporting from their perspectives some facts, some emotions, and sometimes some negatives.

 

But I stand by what I've written before - everyone should read the reviews and responses from the perspective of who's telling the truth? When an escort responds is he gracious, willing to make amends, and HONEST or justifying (and possibly admitting to) his bad behavior?

 

It seems N13 wants a clear winner in every controversy - either he wins or he disengages, and goes home unhappy. But there are no clear winners. One man's prince is another man's asshole. But shared information should make for more accurate experiences.

 

N13, don't get it all twisted up in your head. Your wrongheadedness shows in your adversarial thinking. You are making issues out of nothing. Find the right guy by reading reviews and hire HIM!

 

The word 'rebuttal' seems appropriate to me in this instance-' reply ', 'response', or many other words would serve as well. I doubt anyone on the Forum would mistake the OP's meaning or expect that either reply was anything but personal opinions on each part.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The word 'rebuttal' seems appropriate to me in this instance-' reply ', 'response', or many other words would serve as well. I doubt anyone on the Forum would mistake the OP's meaning or expect that either reply was anything but personal opinions on each part.

 

Gman

 

Thank you. I am purposely not responding to Instudiocity. I don't know what triggered his initial, in my opinion, nasty comments and, seeming, vendetta- but I don't want to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. I am purposely not responding to Instudiocity. I don't know what triggered his initial, in my opinion, nasty comments and, seeming, vendetta- but I don't want to play.

 

I wish we could learn how to play nicely together. I mean I am far from perfect. But in general I try not to pick fights on here. I've failed sometimes- or when I feel I've been attacked for expressing honest opinions. But I do try. After writing this, I want to try to do even better.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish we could learn how to play nicely together. I mean I am far from perfect. But in general I try not to pick fights on here. I've failed sometimes- or when I feel I've been attacked for expressing honest opinions. But I do try. After writing this, I want to try to do even better.

 

Gman

 

I could not have said it better myself.

 

N13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you. I am purposely not responding to Instudiocity. I don't know what triggered his initial, in my opinion, nasty comments and, seeming, vendetta- but I don't want to play.
Thank you for agreeing with me.

 

Nothing you did triggered my initial comments - only you have posted your offense at what are direct, matter-of-fact comments. But then, I repeat myself.

 

I still stand by my last post. You've turned the review/response system into a some sort of judicial process. I'm not conducting a vendetta here, I'm posting honest reflections on the thread. I never name-called you, you name-called me, and again in this post calling me nasty and having a vendetta. It's an anonymous board... who cares who I am or who you are? We live 4 time zones and a few thousand miles away from each other. It your posts read like when you think you are right everyone else must be wrong.

 

After your sniveling in this post about 'not responding to' me, I repeat myself again...

N13, don't get it all twisted up in your head. Your wrongheadedness shows in your adversarial thinking.
Do you realize that you agreed that you where hiring the wrong escorts, after you slammed me? The first item in my 'nasty' post was: YOU'RE HIRING THE WRONG ESCORTS. But I repeat myself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...