Escort Jake Review on 3/25/2013

[Gar1eth]

I hope the reviewer was invested in the review because no one else will really be. He gave almost no information at all that would be helpful. What's the point of going to all the trouble of writing a review if you aren't going to say anything? Now he was the 2nd reviewer. The 1st reviewer from 3/5/2013 gives us a little more info about his encounter. It seems that they enjoyed 'romantic' dry kissing. Yes I'm sure the majority of us who like to kiss will be panting over that one.

 

So from the narrative of the 2 reviews, the list of what he gets into, and the almost no information on his Rentboy ad when I've looked at it before, I think it all adds up to a straight escort- or if bisexual/gay then a very limited one. I don't understand why straight guys think they can fool us by not listing 'position' or much in their list of likes. Or maybe they aren't trying to fool us and expect us to realize they are straight by the lack of information given in the ad?

 

Anyway- the guy has a beautiful physique. I'm sure those of you who love to meet barely interactive straight men will love him- because as we all know- 'there can be no arguing about individual tastes'. Sorry if I seem a little testy. I had insomnia last night. I was hoping for a pick me up from the Reviews- and I run into that one.

 

Gman

[maninsoma]

I agree that today's review says so little that I don't even understand why it was posted. What I found most amusing about the first review is that next to "frot" it says "gets." Really? I assume this is referring to frottage, and I don't understand how one body can rub against another without the reciprocal also taking place.

[seeker630]

I agree that today's review says so little that I don't even understand why it was posted. What I found most amusing about the first review is that next to "frot" it says "gets." Really? I assume this is referring to frottage, and I don't understand how one body can rub against another without the reciprocal also taking place.

 

There have been many times that I lay on top of someone and ground/rubbed my cock against their cock or ass - as the more active participant, I would consider myself the 'giver'.

[Bob]

I just love, "I will leave the details to your imagination." Are we playing guessing games here? I want all the details spelled out very clearly.

[MikeBauer]

So-called "reviews" like this are of little or no help, agreed.

[bigvalboy]

So-called "reviews" like this are of little or no help, agreed.

 

In all fairness to the reviewer however, we do not really know the circumstances behind the vague review. On several occasions I have been asked by escorts to tone down a review, and to only post something that is without detail. Airing all the dirty, juicy little details that goes on behind closed doors is not for everyone, there are those escorts that do not want that sort of thing posted publicly. I am not saying that is what happened here, only that it is a possibility.

 

That being said, I am in agreement, these kinds of reviews create more questions than they answer, and I often tend not to believe reviews that are brief and without particulars....

[Bart]

First is a review meant for advertising or give a reliable account about the gentleman. For myself personally the review is very ho hum and I would love more and I always write way more to the point of almost erotic story. But when I look who is being reviewed, oh I know him, I will return to that.

Second, at least the review confirms the gentleman is breathing, stats are reliable and they both had their expectations met. So the basics are there for you to at least inquire.

To maninsoma I loved your post, please unless the person you are lying on is a corpse I dont know how you can not get a response.

Now to the gentlemen well gee the reviews fit to who I met two-three years ago. He was a recent addition at the time the and had the forum crackling. So I jumped and for me the boring review is what I got. Not much to review on he was okay. So why you see little details in these reviews that is because I think he has fine tuned his skills to very vanilla and lots of people like vanilla. So what I gleen from these reviews is vanilla and a nice guy, I concur. Yawn!

[JT Brooklyn]

I just love, "I will leave the details to your imagination." Are we playing guessing games here? I want all the details spelled out very clearly.

 

Apparently since the Working Guy says YES to almost "No Interaction" we can all save our imaginations!

 

"He delivered all I asked for" Really like showing up!

 

IF he is just "Muscle Worship" period "say it"! BUT even alot of Muscle Worship guys are somewhat interactive!

[corndog]

I think that a review like this has a certain amount of value by just confirming that the escort is real, didn't try to pull off any scams or steal anything. So, I don't think we should discourage ANY review, no matter how brief.

 

On the other hand this review as well as the other review of this escort are both from first time reviewers. I know that Daddy attempts to verify first time reviewers, but I doubt that his methods are foolproof. In the final analysis, I don't think we really know anything about this escort. It is entirely possible that he wrote both of these reviews himself.

[Newly]

One of the reasons reviews are so worthwhile on Amazon is the numbers that they have. Some reviews are better, but when a critical mass is reached it makes it less likely that the review is a fake. I'll agree that this review is a bit lacking, but it lets me know that the client was happy with what he got. If multiple reviews like this appear it makes it unlikely that the escort is a scam. Besides the fact that some escorts may not want intimate details reported some reviewers may have a different amount of modesty and not feel comfortable reporting on what went where - that doesn't make them right or wrong, people just have different sensibilities. Quite honestly if I were the reviewer I would hesitate before ever posting a review here again. No offense but between the contempt shown by many to first time reviews and this type of extreme criticizing maybe we'll end up with only the same "experts" submitting reviews on their favorite escorts. That will certainly bring in a lot of new blood.

[corndog]

...between the contempt shown by many to first time reviews ...

 

Just to clarify, I don't think we have contempt for first time reviews, just a little suspicion. I agree with the point that you're making, that all reviews should be welcomed and encouraged.

[Gar1eth]

One of the reasons reviews are so worthwhile on Amazon is the numbers that they have. Some reviews are better, but when a critical mass is reached it makes it less likely that the review is a fake. I'll agree that this review is a bit lacking, but it lets me know that the client was happy with what he got. If multiple reviews like this appear it makes it unlikely that the escort is a scam. Besides the fact that some escorts may not want intimate details reported some reviewers may have a different amount of modesty and not feel comfortable reporting on what went where - that doesn't make them right or wrong, people just have different sensibilities. Quite honestly if I were the reviewer I would hesitate before ever posting a review here again. No offense but between the contempt shown by many to first time reviews and this type of extreme criticizing maybe we'll end up with only the same "experts" submitting reviews on their favorite escorts. That will certainly bring in a lot of new blood.

 

The purpose of the reviews is to disperse information. I don't need to know what it felt like every time a thrust was made. But some type of narrative with the dissemination of information is imperative. Otherwise why waste the time. I quit the Muscle Service Station Forum mainly because information was almost never really given out. I'm sorry, but I'm not good at innuendo. The only thing this review really tells us is that the escort showed up, was breathing, and the reviewer was happy although we aren't quite sure what the reviewer was happy about. There is so little information here- it might as well have been an ad written by the escort himself. In this case we probably really do know what is going on with this escort from the lack of information. If he is for real and not a scam- then he is most likely straight and has decided he's going to make some money off of his physique with as many gay guys as possible.

 

Gman

[corndog]

The only thing this review really tells us is that the escort showed up, was breathing, and the reviewer was happy ...

 

That information, in my opinion, is much better than nothing.