Jump to content
THIS IS A TEST/QA SITE

One of the most fake-looking reviews I've seen in a while


Unicorn
This topic is 4368 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

The experience you have with an escort in NO way resembles whar a REAL LIFE experience with someone you meet randomly would be. Firstly, you are paying, and what you are paying for is the Fantasy, and the luxury of having the upper hand in the encounter and orchestrating it to YOUR particular needs and wants. Price for some is relevant, for some not, but I suppose you can say the greater the Price, the greater the Fantasy, since alot of members still equate Price with Quality and expertise.... As far as gushing goes, I guess if You are a "gusher", you GUSH...

and for alot of men hiring, its a first time experience with a man, so like many other first time experiences that leave you in euphoria, you GUSH... However I do also believe that for alot of NON-first timers, the "gushing" helps them "validate" the act in their own mind. (Well it turned out AWESOME, and he was a Great guy, so it must be fine ?) . Personally I dont think there is anything wrong with hiring if you need/want to, and it certainly doesn't need validating. But I often read the reviews and think "Does this guy really talk like that", and what is he trying to prove ? and to Whom ??? (and often it appears moreso when their chosen escort is one that might appear "less than attractive" to the viewing public)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Seeker is right. We've seen other inexperienced clients write "gushing" reviews and have other contributors to the board ridicule the writer.

 

While some of our posters have more experience hiring escorts, it appears they forget how big of a hurdle it was even think about hiring, the months of looking at ads and hanging up on the first ring, and the second thoughts about hiring in the time leading up to the encounter. And to have a first hiring session that goes well, it is easy to see how expectations are exceeded. And who is this person going to tell about the great experience? Daddy's Reviews provides a great forum to relive the experience when you can't simply tell your best friend that you hired an escort.

 

When I started reading this forum, it was to learn about hiring. I came to learn about being a better client, what should my expectations be, and what is assumed and what to ask for. I've learned quite a bit; but if my first posts or review had been attacked, it is likely I would have climbed back into the closet and never opened the door.

 

I think that's, in the main, true but not always. I've been hiring guys for many years and when I have a great experience I always write a "gushing" review. I like to think of it as the ability to still be excited and pleased by an amazing experience even after years of hiring, cynicism and gravity have taken their toll :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have followed this back and forth, and the previous thread on Marc D also, and find some of the comments fascinating, and with Marc now actively engaged in the conversation it adds a new dimension.

 

FULL DISCLOSURE - tried a few times to contact Marc for a hire when he was in NYC, never got a response one way or the other. If the guy does not respond, I usually just walk away and figure also, with Marc's looks and talents, I am sure he can cull through dozens of requests and concentrate on those he finds more appealing, which for me is absolutely fione, and which is why I always tell a perspective escort up front my age, weight, height, looks etc... so HE has an idea of what he is getting into. So I am not writing to "get back" at Marc at all -- I still think he has something in his look and demeanor I find very attractive and very sexy and wish him the best.

 

I have to say to Marc what others have said that he is priced on the "high end" whether he wants to agree or not. Most escorts on the East Coast can be hired for from $200-$250; those who have a public porn career or name recognition usually demand $300 and upwards for the privilege of meeting them, and IMHO the encounter no way resembles what I see in and through the fantasy of porn.

 

JJ made a comment that I felt myself nodding "YES!" to -- pick ups in real life, no money exchanged, but still random are and remain my HOTTEST experiences (I once was picked up in one of those XXX video booths around Times Square by a tall, handsome black guy in business suit at least 10 years younger who went wild for thick cut cock (which I have) and invited me back to his very expensive hotel room where we had wild sex for 4 hours!) Or the Egyptian hotel worker I picked up in a movie theatre in Rome; we went for a drive and had such wild sex when I shot my load it actually hit the roof of the car! I had a heck of a time cleaning that up. Or the Turkish student cruising the video stores Station a few years ago; we ended up in a $30 room on 9th and 42nd St for 4 hours of sweaty sex. He was a hungry hot, sexy otter -- rapacious and with the most beautiful furry ass -- two beach balls firm and begging to be used over and over. In none of these encounters was money exchanged, and except for 2 or 3 guys I have hired as escorts (all Europeans) the sex was much better than most guys I hire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly it has become apparent that certain persons here do not wish for others to voice opinions that they do not agree with. I have nothing against Marc Dylan as a person and this is not a vendetta. The review in question does look fake, the statement we've pointed out IS odd, and there are more than a couple of people who share these observations. The original poster didn't even participate in the previous thread about MD. What I find to be disconcerting AGAIN are the personal attacks and epithets being hurled in defense, as if the totally juevenile name calling will in some way alter the facts or change the perceptions of those who are commenting. There is nothing bitter, mean-spirited or aggressive in pointing out and commenting on a questionable review, and doing so does not constitute that the writer is an unhappy person living a sad life in his mother's basement (a comment that has been made several times in threads concerning Marc Dylan). As is often the case with weak intellects and personalities when an argument cannot be made intelligently they lash out in order to cover up what is lacking. And I would like to state that I am NOT refering to Marc himself whom I have found to be a nice person who contributes positively here - the one exception being his post begining "Boy, you are a sad excuse for a person" - but he deserves a pass because it must not be easy to have to deal with all of this when you're the person in question.

 

Blah, blah, blah, blah ... like an aging actor in summer stock you don't realize you long ago lost your audience. You say one thing but your words and actions say something else. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's obviously you. You have yet to provide one iota of back-up for all your accusations which have gone on for weeks now. You remain an "Apprentice" because you have contributed little to the many forums on this blog with the exception being your obvious hang-up about Marc Dylan.

 

Just get a life already ... or get laid ... or maybe, get lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plenty of experienced reviewers gush (as some have admitted here), but that doesn't mean that we have to beleive them, nor does it mean that we have to take a mocking tone, although FFF could be bitingly funny when he did it. Most of the time it merely seems crude.

 

And gushers can be fairly cavalier about negative experiences (including one of the posters here). I've experienced the fanboys in the past when I've done middling or negative reviews in the past--and I tried to be as reasonable as possible about the guy in question.

 

One or two negative reviews in a long list can be helpful--you see what someone is like on an off day, with poor chemistry, or the like. I had an experience not unlike the one that led to the recent negative review of Xander.Like a lot of younger guys in business (this one or otherwise), he needs to get a better idea of putting the business ahead of everything else. In contrast, gushing doesn't add much unless it's a rare experience in a client's reviews.

 

The experience that clients are paying for is fantasy, but gushing sometimes suggests a little too much involvement in that fantasy. Escorts have wound up dealing with needy, controlling, and otherwise problematic clients who blur the line; it may provide a lot of income for awhile, but other problemsin the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you may be honest in other spheres in your life, but in this case you are simply factually incorrect. Of course, rates in NYC and LA are irrelevant to this discussion, but I looked up the rates of the 111 escorts currently advertising in SF on rentboy. Of these, exactly 7 are asking for $300, and there is one and only one escort who is asking for more (MarcusMojo is asking for $600--good luck on that). There are three and a half times as many escorts advertising on rentboy in SF at this time who are asking for less than $200, 24 to be exact. $200 is by far the most common asking rate. Of course, I'm not one to say that a particular escort might not be worth $300. But the statement that $300-$350 is the going rate in SF is simply a false statement. Fewer than one in ten escorts is asking for $300, and almost none more than that.

 

Wrong again troll, im not being dishonest. in LA there are 35 escorts asking $300 or more and here is the kicker , thats not counting all the ask me rates. Nor did I just find the ones who have the higher out call rate. That is 300 minimum incall. Now on to NYC, 56 escorts with a minimum incall rate of 300 again not counting the "ask me, rates" now on to SF, you are probably right that 300 is not the going rate there but I STILL get it and so do others , although you didnt take into account the ask me rates, and do you think the guys who visit SF that charge 300+ elsewhere drop there rate when in SF? On to Marcus Mojo I sense some hostility there to, I can assure you he doesnt need your "Good Luck" wish. I am certain there are guys with plenty of money to spare that would love to experience him. The fact you would throw a negitive comment about his rate into a discussion about me shows how sad you are, just plain bitter. You probably think any and everyone should rock your world for 150 bucks , my guess is you probably feel you are getting ripped off at 250. Just because you can't/wont pay it, dont knock the guys who charge it or the guys who pay it.

 

I dont know why you have this hostility towards me for my rate or the fact I stay busy with it and lots of people having nice things to say about me , but its probably reflective of your overall negitive attitude in general, I recommend you take Oprah's life class, it will do wonders for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly it has become apparent that certain persons here do not wish for others to voice opinions that they do not agree with. I have nothing against Marc Dylan as a person and this is not a vendetta. The review in question does look fake, the statement we've pointed out IS odd, and there are more than a couple of people who share these observations. The original poster didn't even participate in the previous thread about MD. What I find to be disconcerting AGAIN are the personal attacks and epithets being hurled in defense, as if the totally juevenile name calling will in some way alter the facts or change the perceptions of those who are commenting. There is nothing bitter, mean-spirited or aggressive in pointing out and commenting on a questionable review, and doing so does not constitute that the writer is an unhappy person living a sad life in his mother's basement (a comment that has been made several times in threads concerning Marc Dylan). As is often the case with weak intellects and personalities when an argument cannot be made intelligently they lash out in order to cover up what is lacking. And I would like to state that I am NOT refering to Marc himself whom I have found to be a nice person who contributes positively here - the one exception being his post begining "Boy, you are a sad excuse for a person" - but he deserves a pass because it must not be easy to have to deal with all of this when you're the person in question.

 

No, just like you I am stating my opinion. I do think you are a sad person, not to mention the fact you are calling me a liar and implying i wrote my own review, for the record i did not! Nor did I have any one else write it . What makes you a sad person in my eyes, is you just cant believe someone would have a great time and write the "gushing review" and feel they got a good deal at the rate they paid. Its ok not to have anything nice to say about someone, it can be a bit mean spirited to say negitive things about someone, but when you start assailing OTHER people's NICE comments thats just plain sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah, blah, blah, blah ... like an aging actor in summer stock you don't realize you long ago lost your audience. You say one thing but your words and actions say something else. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's obviously you. You have yet to provide one iota of back-up for all your accusations which have gone on for weeks now. You remain an "Apprentice" because you have contributed little to the many forums on this blog with the exception being your obvious hang-up about Marc Dylan.

 

Thank you for confirming the exact point I was trying to make. I couldn't have created your response any better had I written it myself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, just like you I am stating my opinion. I do think you are a sad person, not to mention the fact you are calling me a liar and implying i wrote my own review, for the record i did not! Nor did I have any one else write it . What makes you a sad person in my eyes, is you just cant believe someone would have a great time and write the "gushing review" and feel they got a good deal at the rate they paid. Its ok not to have anything nice to say about someone, it can be a bit mean spirited to say negitive things about someone, but when you start assailing OTHER people's nice comments thats just plain sad.

 

To be clear Marc no one said they could not believe a client would have a great time with you and write a good review; we said THIS review seemed fake. There wasn't any comment made about you personally as an escort. And I agree that if someone were to assail a nice review that would be mean...if it were perceived as a truthful review. That is not the case here. We are not tearing you down saying you don't deserve nice reviews. We are saying we don't believe this review in it's entirety. There is a difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong again troll, im not being dishonest... you are probably right that 300 is not the going rate...
I didn't say your were dishonest. What I said is that you made a statement about a fact which was untrue. I leave it to others to see the "elephant in the room." When someone makes a factually incorrect statement, there are two possibilities. Either the person who made the incorrect statement is ignorant and oblivious, or he is lying. If you want my personal opinion, I think that it's highly unlikely that an escort doesn't go through websites such as rentboy in order to see what others are charging, but I'll leave it up to others to come to their own conclusions. I also leave it to others to come to their own conclusions as to whether someone who would misrepresent such an easily verifiable fact such as going rates in SF might also be prone to misrepresentations in other spheres.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear Marc no one said they could not believe a client would have a great time with you and write a good review; we said THIS review seemed fake. There wasn't any comment made about you personally as an escort. And I agree that if someone were to assail a nice review that would be mean...if it were perceived as a truthful review. That is not the case here. We are not tearing you down saying you don't deserve nice reviews. We are saying we don't believe this review in it's entirety. There is a difference.

 

The original post calls the review "a review that seems pretty much written by the escort...". If I were Marc, I would feel that my reputation had been impugned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't say your were dishonest. What I said is that you made a statement about a fact which was untrue. I leave it to others to see the "elephant in the room." When someone makes a factually incorrect statement, there are two possibilities. Either the person who made the incorrect statement is ignorant and oblivious, or he is lying. If you want my personal opinion, I think that it's highly unlikely that an escort doesn't go through websites such as rentboy in order to see what others are charging, but I'll leave it up to others to come to their own conclusions. I also leave it to others to come to their own conclusions as to whether someone who would misrepresent such an easily verifiable fact such as going rates in SF might also be prone to misrepresentations in other spheres.

 

 

Lol you are such a troll, and the fact that you wont put my entire quote up in your reply shows that for some reason you enjoy trying to make me look bad . Sorry its not working , I think most people can see that. Its pretty obvious you are one of those people that enjoys knocking other people down, especially people who are happy and confident . Walk over to the mirror, look at your self and ask why are you so unhappy and why do you enjoy being mean spirited . Maybe if you spend more time thinking about that and less time knocking other people you can work through your issues. Ive always believed People who are constantly discussing your life are usually not happy with their own. No reason to keep myself in a negitive conversation so I'm done replying to you. Remember try and smile :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a bit baffled by this arbitrary dollar amount of $300 dollars an hour. While many guys in LA, NYC, etc. ask that amount, many many clients not only pay more but think that 300+ for someone like Marc or Marcus is not out of the norm. Like I mentioned in an earlier post, I have friends who fly guys in from Europe, without even a second thought as to the cost. I can't afford that, but they feel that life is short, so play now while you can.

 

Agree or disagree with Marc's pricing, what is on the "high end" for some is not for others. I have seen ads for 500-600 dollars an hour, and I just pass. I certainly don't belittle the escort for asking such a rate. It is his choice. I was asked many times during my working years to cut my commission, I rarely did. Only once that I can recall, and it was for a friend. I considered myself a professional and the percentage I received was my fee, period. Don't want to hire me, not a problem, but my fee was what it was. Why the animosity towards Marc is a bit baffling. I think that he has been unfairly targeted here, and those that have read the reviews have stated their opinions. Some think they are fake, I personally do not. I have been hiring for the better part of (ahem) 40 years, and the last review I wrote was really "gushing".. because I had a fantastic time. I sent the escort a copy, and he asked me to tone it down. He thought it was a bit much, so I did, but that was how I honestly felt. So believe the review or not, your choice, but attacking each other is not likely to change anyones mind.

 

I personally feel that his fee is perfectly normal. Those that are complaining here the most would have most likely never have hired him in the first place. At any rate, this is a heck-of-way to start a new week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a bit baffled by this arbitrary dollar amount of $300 dollars an hour. While many guys in LA, NYC, etc. ask that amount, many many clients not only pay more but think that 300+ for someone like Marc or Marcus is not out of the norm. Like I mentioned in an earlier post, I have friends who fly guys in from Europe, without even a second thought as to the cost. I think that an escort adjusting his prices per what is expected of him in a hire is perfectly normal. I have hired visiting porn stars from out of town for 300+ and hour. They have stayed in very upscales hotels in the LA area and I would imagine their cost per visit is something that has to be taken into consideration.

 

Agree or disagree with Marc's pricing, what is on the "high end" for some is not for others. I have seen ads for 500-600 dollars an hour, and I just pass. I certainly don't belittle the escort for asking such a rate. It is his choice. I was asked many times during my working years to cut my commission, I never did. I considered myself a professional and the percentage I received was my fee, period. Don't want to hire me, not a problem, but my fee was what it was. Why the animosity towards Marc is a bit baffling. I think that he has been unfairly targeted here, and those that have read the reviews have stated their opinions and not much else is likely to change anyones mind.

 

I personally feel that his fee is perfectly normal. Those that are complaining here the most would have most likely never have hired him in the first place. At any rate, it is a heck of way to start a new week.

 

I couldnt agree with you more , but im really about to kick start my week the right way Pizza time :) hope ya have a great Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol you are such a troll, and the fact that you wont put my entire quote up in your reply shows that for some reason you enjoy trying to make me look bad ...

 

 

Your post is available for everyone to see. The reason I re-post only a portion of the post is for others understand to which of your many posts I'm responding, and to which part of the post. For the record, though, your little quip in that post that suggested I feel ripped off if an escort charges $250, and that I feel an escort must "rock my world" for $150 is also factually incorrect. In this case, though, I think we can chalk it up to being ignorant and oblivious to the ignorance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your post is available for everyone to see. The reason I re-post only a portion of the post is for others understand to which of your many posts I'm responding, and to which part of the post. For the record, though, your little quip in that post that suggested I feel ripped off if an escort charges $250, and that I feel an escort must "rock my world" for $150 is also factually incorrect. In this case, though, I think we can chalk it up to being ignorant and oblivious to the ignorance.

 

Hope you have a great day :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. I just about spit my decaf espresso right out of my mouth ... I doubt if Apprentice James stood on the street corner naked that he could get even 5 cents for his bitterness. Bitterness is usually free.

 

I thought "bitterness" came at a high price after many wasted opportunities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does that include me?! We burned those Vegas sheets up pretty well all those years ago. :-)

 

How could I ever forget -- you were far more superior than most of the US guys and I remember fondly that overnight. I learned a lot and more amazed knowing that it was over a dozen years ago, right? But the memory is still in my mind - fondly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your post is available for everyone to see. The reason I re-post only a portion of the post is for others understand to which of your many posts I'm responding, and to which part of the post. For the record, though, your little quip in that post that suggested I feel ripped off if an escort charges $250, and that I feel an escort must "rock my world" for $150 is also factually incorrect. In this case, though, I think we can chalk it up to being ignorant and oblivious to the ignorance.

 

wow. the more you post, the more angry you appear against those escorts who charge what their market will bear

 

marc, your respose to this was the right way to go. find solace in success, not fighting with those who will never do a thing for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In one thread, Perez Hilton is put down for losing weight, and here an escort gets put down for getting a good review. What is happening to this site?

 

Lucky, you are a consistent fool, and your constant need to stir the pot with untruths is really getting tiring... Perez was NOT put down for losing weight, he was put down for his "grandstanding" about it. Can you understand the difference ? Probably not, so go find someone else to blow the whistle on. Seems thats all you do around here these days, and with little resolve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess this BULLSHIT about Marc Dylan is simply never going to end. There are 2, maybe 3 people here who obviously have real issues (with themselves, not Marc) and they have chosen him as their online target. It's sad. .

 

Sadly, Targets are like assholes here. EVERYBODY has one. !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blah, blah, blah, blah ... like an aging actor in summer stock you don't realize you long ago lost your audience. You say one thing but your words and actions say something else. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it's obviously you. You have yet to provide one iota of back-up for all your accusations which have gone on for weeks now. You remain an "Apprentice" because you have contributed little to the many forums on this blog with the exception being your obvious hang-up about Marc Dylan.

 

Thank you for confirming the exact point I was trying to make. I couldn't have created your response any better had I written it myself!

 

Get back to us when you start making sense. We'll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holly fuck, are we still talking about this? Blah blah blah, Marc Dylan is a reputable escort with great reviews and good referrences and lots of regulars and good business and for some indiscernable reason he had to make a short, badly written review of himself because surely he gets no compliments from strangers in his bed every other night and he's that desperate to boost his ego. And conveniently the people who caught it are the ones who had a previous beef with him. Sure. THAT'S plausible!

 

Or maybe he was shitfaced and he really did. Lay off it already. I have better things to do than listen to you queens, I'm still trying to decide between Parker and Jack!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

This topic is 4368 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...