Ink #2

[doitb4ugo]

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_macucaB7641qe74sio1_500.jpg

[Bosguy]

It appears the guy in back/left has enough to make it interesting, but the guy in front/right is too much. Just my opinion

 

Boston Bill

[adriano46]

Too much for me on both. Seeing it in b/w does not make it better; my imaginaton tells me foreground would be like laying with one of my '70's disco shirts.

[bigvalboy]

Though it appears to be exquisitely done, I need to see a little more skin. When I can't see the definition of the muscle then I lose interest.

[Guest countryboywny]

my imaginaton tells me foreground would be like laying with one of my '70's disco shirts.

 

LOL Good one!

[+ Axiom2001]

Too much for me on both. Seeing it in b/w does not make it better; my imaginaton tells me foreground would be like laying with one of my '70's disco shirts.

 

I wholeheartedly concur!

[Diverdan]

WAY TOOOOOOOOOOOO Much for my taste... it is a turn OFF, not a turn on... and they will look terrible in a few years as the skin reacts to the ink and ages.

[justaguy]

Have to agree on the amount of ink. But I'm also wondering if it would make a difference if the models were more muscular. I'm finding that the more muscular types can get away with more ink. On the other hand, it could simply be that the more attractive I find the body the less I'm distracted by the body art. :-)