Today's Coverboy Thanos Oxford

[BaronArtz]

In fact, any escort has the option to write a rebuttal right here, in this forum. So I don't see writing something a bit negative as a 'cruxifiction'. On the contrary, I find it helpful when seen in the right context - one person's opinion about a single encounter.

[bigvalboy]

There are always going to be those with a different opinion. Should you let them dictate your actions?

 

You are absolutely right, however in this case, what is unknown to most is that both Steven and BB had other motivations for their unwarranted attack. Sometimes I can stomach it, other times I can't. Today I am feeling like perhaps I will answer the requests for pm information...Thank you ML for your post.

[+ Billsboy4]

Every time I see a review of Thanos, I always wonder....how do these reviewers get him to return a phone call or email? The reason I say that is because over the years I have tried several times to contact him and never get a reply. I don't take this personally because 2 other friends of mine have had the same experience with him.

 

Anyone else had a similar experience with him?

 

Boys, Boys, Boys......can we please get back on topic which is about Thanos and not about how BigValBoy chooses to share his experience.

[+ Travis69]

If he doesn't return your phone calls and also the phone calls of your friends why would you want to contact him now?

[Bosguy]

You are absolutely right, however in this case, what is unknown to most is that both Steven and BB had other motivations for their unwarranted attack. Sometimes I can stomach it, other times I can't. Today I am feeling like perhaps I will answer the requests for pm information...Thank you ML for your post.

 

My post is about how to properly address issues regarding client/escort rights so that both parties are treated fairly. Nothing more/nothing less. I stand by my post and have no intention of altering it. I strongly feel it was not handled in the best manner.

 

I have no idea why you feel that Steven and I have "other motivations for their unwarranted attacks". Steven and I have met socially on 2 occasions. I met you in Palm Springs and contacted each other about a possible Forum get together in Boston. If you want to talk about unwarranted generalized attacks, this is a perfect example.

 

Boston Bill

[runthemhoes]

his apt smelled and he was just plain weird. wouldnt do anything he said he would do and was NOT in the shape he said he was. his voice on his voicemail was so strange too. felt like a straight guy method acting as a gay guy. was a nutty nutty experience and when it was done he had to walk you down to the parking spot in his apt's garage. was awkward. definitely a NO tip. i shoulda left.

[bigvalboy]

his apt smelled and he was just plain weird. wouldnt do anything he said he would do and was NOT in the shape he said he was. his voice on his voicemail was so strange too. felt like a straight guy method acting as a gay guy. was a nutty nutty experience and when it was done he had to walk you down to the parking spot in his apt's garage. was awkward. definitely a NO tip. i shoulda left.

 

Now you've done it RTH! Bosguy is really going to be appalled at this....and yes, that parking spot in his garage. As I backed out, the top was down. I was trying to turn the car around so that I could leave without backing out, and he was bent over the balcony yelling at me. I kept thinking he was going to throw something at me from the upper floor..God I forgot about that. LOL

[Bosguy]

Now you've done it RTH! Bosguy is really going to be appalled at this....and yes, that parking spot in his garage. As I backed out, the top was down. I was trying to turn the car around so that I could leave without backing out, and he was bent over the balcony yelling at me. I kept thinking he was going to throw something at me from the upper floor..God I forgot about that. LOL

 

Not appalled at all. Nice to see truth from someone.

 

Boston Bill

[bigvalboy]

Not appalled at all. Nice to see truth from someone.

 

Boston Bill

 

It would behoove you to put personal feelings aside. For the record, I always tell the truth, and your insinuation to the contrary is insulting.

[vabballfan]

Damned if you don't....

 

You posted valuable information about your encounter with a much reviewed escort of interest... but because of the nature of this place....(shoot the messenger)... you were reluctant to elaborate with the details. But we (me) all wanted to know, so you availed yourself of the private messaging system. Big fucking deal?

 

If you could have actually posted your real thoughts without being crucified here, then the PM system wouldn't have been your only other option. We asked, you obliged. No abuse.

 

Hooboy set this place up as a place for clients to talk to clients about escorts... a gentleman's club to have open discussions about escorts... BUT... we don't really do that.

 

Sure, when it's great (with Juan and Thor and Justice, most recently) that's easy... but when some guy really fucks you over... nobody really wants to hear it.

 

It's a witch hunt and it's all the client's fault until next thing you know, his is newcomer of the year. Vomit.

 

Seriously. Sometimes you just can't win.

 

Okie

 

Amen brother!!!

 

I saw Andrew Justice last night - what a fucking dream!!! Now I know why you include him in just about any "scene" you set up.

 

I was disappointed that Kristian will be in DC next week and that his trip didn't coincide with Justice's. I guess Andrew emailed Kristian and asked him to try to coordinate with him in the future. Andrew said they could split hotel costs and that there were a lot of clients that would want to do three ways with the two of them. I told Andrew to reserve a spot for me when they come to DC together.

 

Shit - I'd like to do Heath Jordan and Andrew Justice together. I think it would be pretty intense to see Andrew "lay pipe" to Heath and there might be some tag team action - because I love topping Heath.

 

Andrew is so hot and so good...

[MiamiLooker]

My post is about how to properly address issues regarding client/escort rights so that both parties are treated fairly. Nothing more/nothing less. I stand by my post and have no intention of altering it.

 

You stand by your post? How? Steven Draker already pointed out to you that your suggestion that BVB post a review was not an option since it is not allowed if the meeting never took place. So, please elaborate…if you can.

[Steven_Draker]

Ignore!

[Bosguy]

You stand by your post? How? Steven Draker already pointed out to you that your suggestion that BVB post a review was not an option since it is not allowed if the meeting never took place. So, please elaborate…if you can.

 

As I said, I stand by my post and feel it could have been handled better. There is no need for further discussion on my part. I don't have to change my personal opinions to conform to what you or BVB think and will not respond to this post again.

 

Boston Bill

[seeker630]

You stand by your post? How? Steven Draker already pointed out to you that your suggestion that BVB post a review was not an option since it is not allowed if the meeting never took place. So, please elaborate…if you can.

 

"No show" reviews are not allowed, but if you actually meet someone and decline to proceed because of appearance, etc...is that the same thing? Seems to me that it's not.

 

I wish Daddy would weigh in here.

[bigvalboy]

"No show" reviews are not allowed, but if you actually meet someone and decline to proceed because of appearance, etc...is that the same thing? Seems to me that it's not.

 

I wish Daddy would weigh in here.

 

Seek I sent you a pm...

[seeker630]

Seek I sent you a pm...

 

Thanks. For the record, I was NOT attacking your approach. The issue of how much we can/should say here is a very grey area.

[+ Billsboy4]

This post is about experiences about Thanos. Please talk about other stuff on another post about private messages or anything else.

[bigvalboy]

This post is about experiences about Thanos. Please talk about other stuff on another post about private messages or anything else.

 

Fair enough, may I refer you then to the post made by 'runthemhoes'...it is most accurate!

[MiamiLooker]

"No show" reviews are not allowed, but if you actually meet someone and decline to proceed because of appearance, etc...is that the same thing? Seems to me that it's not.

 

I wish Daddy would weigh in here.

 

Doesn’t the below FAQ seem to indicate that if a session didn’t happen, there should be no review?

 

"FAQ — Subbmitting a Review

Hooboy once said: "Folks, if you didn't eat at the restaurant, I don't think you can write about the sashimi. If you don't like the way the menu looks or if the staff has an attitude problem, move on. Do not try to dish the dish.""

[seeker630]

Doesn’t the below FAQ seem to indicate that if a session didn’t happen, there should be no review?

 

"FAQ — Subbmitting a Review

Hooboy once said: "Folks, if you didn't eat at the restaurant, I don't think you can write about the sashimi. If you don't like the way the menu looks or if the staff has an attitude problem, move on. Do not try to dish the dish.""

 

MiamiLooker, Thanks for digging that up. The specific 'question' this answers is "What if I don't like his attitude'.

 

This does seem to indicate a review might not be accepted if there was no actual 'session'. Although I think it's legitimate to report if you decline to dine at at a restaurant because you find the sanitation to be poor or they don't offer the advertised specials.

 

Interestingly, under the FAQ "Do you take "No-Show" reviews?":

 

In general we look at these on a case-by-case basis. In general we "Hold" these type of reviews because it is very difficult to verify this type of situation.

[MiamiLooker]

MiamiLooker, Thanks for digging that up. The specific 'question' this answers is "What if I don't like his attitude'.

 

This does seem to indicate a review might not be accepted if there was no actual 'session'. Although I think it's legitimate to report if you decline to dine at at a restaurant because you find the sanitation to be poor or they don't offer the advertised specials.

 

I agree, though it’s not 100% clear that a review would not be accepted, I think the scales kinda tip in that direction. In the scheme of things, does it really matter in this situation? A couple of posters were critical of the way BVB handled it, but neither offered a viable alternative.

[bigvalboy]

A couple of posters were critical of the way BVB handled it, but neither offered a viable alternative.

 

ML is absolutely correct. They didn't offer a viable alternative because there isn't one. Though both poster will deny it, I still maintain that in the end, it was never about the proper way to post a negative comment about an escort or when a negative comment transcends into a review, it was clearly personal. Which is fine, I understand that not everyone here is going to sit around and sing 'campfire songs' together, but don't air that personal 'dirty laundry' in the public forum in the disguise of some manufactured criticism.

[Steven_Draker]

In general we look at these on a case-by-case basis. In general we "Hold" these type of reviews because it is very difficult to verify this type of situation.

 

The FAQ doesn't say anything about walking/running away. My guess is that someone who runs away won't be the first in line to write a review.

 

For the record, I was NOT attacking your approach.

 

I was wondering the same thing. Since when anyone who disagrees with bigvalboy and his Modus Operandi is considered "unwarranted attack"? His over-sensitivity to the subject monopolizing this thread and his über-defensiveness regarding any remark; seeking validation for his actions with each post are quite interesting, to say the least. Relax!

[Decatur Guy]

I had never really thought about this until now, but I do have a legitimate and earnest question about the proper way for this to be handled:

 

You answer an escort ad. You meet. You never initiate the session because of photo misrepresentation, sketchy behavior, body odor and/or really dirty living quarters.

 

Exactly how is one expected to convey this information to other members? As far as I'm concerned, it's something I would want to know. Just because I didn't lose the actual money to be paid the escort, there's the issue of lost time and lost money if you've traveled to another city to see him, etc. Some of us don't have the money or leisure time to waste this way. Warnings such as these, it seems to me, to go to heart of the purpose of the site. Chats about TV shows, celebs, hotels, traveling, photos of hot guys -- all that's nice, but info about this kind of thing is the primary reason to come here.

 

As for using the restaurant review analogy, if a reviewer showed up to a place and was expected to pay the bill upfront and then walked inside and there were roaches crawling around and the place didn't look anything like the photos on the place's website, I'm pretty sure there would still be a review even though the reviewer never ordered a meal.

 

Sorry to once again take this away from Thanos, but here we are. I would like to know how we're expected to proceed. It seems to me our hands are tied. Can't write a review because an actual full encounter didn't happen. And you can't talk about it here in any meaningful detail because it strays into review territory. Seems to me that kind of funnels the information flow toward the PM conduit or else we let potential shady operators continue operating because we can't speak of it as it falls into the "doughnut hole," so to speak.

[seeker630]

I had never really thought about this until now, but I do have a legitimate and earnest question about the proper way for this to be handled:

 

You answer an escort ad. You meet. You never initiate the session because of photo misrepresentation, sketchy behavior, body odor and/or really dirty living quarters.

 

Exactly how is one expected to convey this information to other members? As far as I'm concerned, it's something I would want to know. Just because I didn't lose the actual money to be paid the escort, there's the issue of lost time and lost money if you've traveled to another city to see him, etc. Some of us don't have the money or leisure time to waste this way. Warnings such as these, it seems to me, to go to heart of the purpose of the site. Chats about TV shows, celebs, hotels, traveling, photos of hot guys -- all that's nice, but info about this kind of thing is the primary reason to come here.

 

As for using the restaurant review analogy, if a reviewer showed up to a place and was expected to pay the bill upfront and then walked inside and there were roaches crawling around and the place didn't look anything like the photos on the place's website, I'm pretty sure there would still be a review even though the reviewer never ordered a meal.

 

Sorry to once again take this away from Thanos, but here we are. I would like to know how we're expected to proceed. It seems to me our hands are tied. Can't write a review because an actual full encounter didn't happen. And you can't talk about it here in any meaningful detail because it strays into review territory. Seems to me that kind of funnels the information flow toward the PM conduit or else we let potential shady operators continue operating because we can't speak of it as it falls into the "doughnut hole," so to speak.

 

I think it's worth noting that neither the admins nor Daddy have stepped in - the only complaints have come from members.