Travis 2 NYC

[gilbert]

It's been awhile since I've been been to the "Daddy's" site. However, checking the reviews today I discovered a new review (8-31) for Travis 2 in NYC with a picture I hadn't seen before. This was of interest to me, because a couple months ago I was seriously thinking about seeking his services for a trip to New York City in the upcoming months. At that time things I was hearing suggested that this guy might no be all he was cracked up to be, so I backed off. Now, there is a new glowing review of him that includes a VERY hot picture of him which I have never seen before. After the glowing review is a not so glowing review to which Travis 2 responds, and insists he's 25 years old and that all the pictures were current pictures. He even gives gives the address of another site you can go to (http://www.bigmuscle.com) to see current pictures of him (his ID at this site is 68128). The pictures include the dates indicating when they were taken. I would really like to believe this guy is the real deal, because in his pictures he is DAMN cute, with a body that is DAMN hot!!!! This is the type of body and face I'm really attracted to. Does anyone have any insight concerning this individual?

[tsgarp]

The conventional wisdom seems to be this guy is a LOT older than he claims...but if that doesn't bother you, why not? Personally, he's not for me, but doesn't mean he's not for you!

[Irtwo]

Never met him, but you may want to read this prior thread. It appears there was controversy about his real age even seven years ago. But as tsgarp says, if the age thing doesn't bother you, then fine, since that seemed to be the main complaint.

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?88411-Travis-2&highlight=travis

[dutchal]

It's been awhile since I've been been to the "Daddy's" site. However, checking the reviews today I discovered a new review (8-31) for Travis 2 in NYC with a picture I hadn't seen before. This was of interest to me, because a couple months ago I was seriously thinking about seeking his services for a trip to New York City in the upcoming months. At that time things I was hearing suggested that this guy might no be all he was cracked up to be, so I backed off. Now, there is a new glowing review of him that includes a VERY hot picture of him which I have never seen before. After the glowing review is a not so glowing review to which Travis 2 responds, and insists he's 25 years old and that all the pictures were current pictures. He even gives gives the address of another site you can go to (http://www.bigmuscle.com) to see current pictures of him (his ID at this site is 68128). The pictures include the dates indicating when they were taken. I would really like to believe this guy is the real deal, because in his pictures he is DAMN cute, with a body that is DAMN hot!!!! This is the type of body and face I'm really attracted to. Does anyone have any insight concerning this individual?

 

Might just be the dates when the pics were posted.

[JT Brooklyn]

This dude ain't giving it up! As "Time Goes By" maybe Formaldehide is a great preservative?

[robberbaron4u]

Keep in mind that the celebrated Sereen is yet "19". Travis, in my opinion, should go to "ash blonde" as a more complimentary hair color; the blonde coloring he now has is a tat "harsh" in its appearance.

[robberbaron4u]

To resolve the "age" question with regard to "Travis", I saw him several times in 2001 and 2002, and, we had a dialogue of sorts for a time. I was privy to his birth date, 1982, and, at this writing, he is 30 years of age. The photographs which are posted to sundry websites were in circulation in the period that I had an acquaintance with him, and, he "went blonde" toward the end of our acquaintance. His pictures are studio photographs and enhanced, but, the photographs are representative of his physical appearance at that time: he was a good-looking, well-built lad.

[bbowlgt]

I wrote the one of the more recent, and less than glowing reviews, so if you have any questions you can send me an e-mail and I'll do my best to answer them. What I wanted to get across in the review was that he wasn't a bad guy and if you are looking for someone in their mid thirties or so (my guess as his age) then he would likely be an OK choice for you. In fact, based on the discussion around here it would seem that he is quite an experienced (as in long serving) escort, which many seen to place a premium on versus say a more "youthful" look. If however you want an escort who is in fact a young 20's something college jock type, I would be hard pressed to believe that you will be satisfied and or pleased with your choice. Given NYC has more escort options that just about anywhere else in North America to choose from, I would think it possible to keep looking to find exactly what you want. Just my 2 cents.

[robberbaron4u]

In my opinion, this last post by bbowlgt is a fair assessment of "Travis" as he is in the here and now. Not to "harp", but, as I have often made remark, gravity wins the game in the end when it comes to the physique. Of course, "talent" can compensate for diminishing good looks and pecs that have become hanging "boobs", and, for myself, I have a preference for an "experienced" escort in his thirties.