Im back!

[citylaw1]

ahhh...yes that is IT!

Two posts in it makes Perfect sense.

Lets see...he joined on 6/26/2012...Hmmm

 

City Law's first post was on 5/19/2012...about one week after someone went on vacation 5/11/2012

And the similar picking on JJ seems interestingly coincidental...

 

Why have just one identity...when you can have two..or three..or..

 

I assume that you're referring to my having multiple identities on here? You are incorrect.

[citylaw1]

More than a dozen posts on the topic in a span of two hours is more than curiosity. It's an obsession bordering on a crusade.

 

Try a cold shower instead.

 

My posts were directed at statements that were being made by posters over the span of 2 hours. I was looking for responses to questions. and, as usual, there were few answers. I have never met Mr. Driver, and harbor no agenda. I do think that he and the other posters that filled enormous bandwidth shit talking him when the news surfaced, might owe some live talk here.

[instudiocity]

My posts were directed at statements that were being made by posters over the span of 2 hours.

Seriously? After a 3 day time-out, a sentence already served, you're still arguing your case? REALLY? Are you sure you have a life?

[maxwellissmart]

My posts were directed at statements that were being made by posters over the span of 2 hours. I was looking for responses to questions. and, as usual, there were few answers. I have never met Mr. Driver, and harbor no agenda. I do think that he and the other posters that filled enormous bandwidth shit talking him when the news surfaced, might owe some live talk here.

 

I will happily play devil's advocate about someone who sullies escorting and is the epitome of the A-NUMBER-ONE THING we tell clients to avoid—which is being abused or being taken advantage of. There are many, many of us who go well out of our way to make sure a client has a good time and gets what he's paid for—if not more—and it's disturbing and insulting when someone who doesn't play by the rulebook comes back with a new name, a sassy attitude and the promise of restitution and gets fawned over.

 

People get timed-out for a variety of infractions. In my opinion—ND should get a lifetime ban for what he did.

 

There—done with the conversation.

[citylaw1]

Seriously? After a 3 day time-out, a sentence already served, you're still arguing your case? REALLY? Are you sure you have a life?

 

I am responding to posts that were written after my silencing.

 

You're right here with me dear, so clearly we're in the same boat. Actually, You're a "Count" so your life must be worse.

[citylaw1]

I for one did not "shit talk" Mr. Driver. My feelings about his return were posted a couple of times publicly. I think that is more than enough from one member. I stated my opinion and moved on.....

 

Settle down dear, it's hot outside.

[citylaw1]

I will happily play devil's advocate about someone who sullies escorting and is the epitome of the A-NUMBER-ONE THING we tell clients to avoid—which is being abused or being taken advantage of. There are many, many of us who go well out of our way to make sure a client has a good time and gets what he's paid for—if not more—and it's disturbing and insulting when someone who doesn't play by the rulebook comes back with a new name, a sassy attitude and the promise of restitution and gets fawned over.

 

People get timed-out for a variety of infractions. In my opinion—ND should get a lifetime ban for what he did.

 

There—done with the conversation.

 

This is the best reasoning so far. Very nicely done.

[maxwellissmart]

This is the best reasoning so far. Very nicely done.

 

That said, clients will make up their own minds about ND.

 

Caveat emperor.

[instudiocity]

Well, his admission here 14 months ago and 3 days ago for a coupla starts. Where have you been?

 

Everyone here is anonymous. ND made an admission but my dear highly educated mouthpiece there is as always, no proof! Proven? No. Accused? Admitted? Yes.

 

But the funniest thing is your statement, "proven thief & liar!" The admitted thief is a liar so how can you believe it since he's a liar?

 

But then you're the lecturer on logic here at chez daddy.

[citylaw1]

Everyone here is anonymous. ND made an admission but my dear highly educated mouthpiece there is as always, no proof! Proven? No. Accused? Admitted? Yes.

 

But the funniest thing is your statement, "proven thief & liar!" The admitted thief is a liar so how can you believe it since he's a liar?

 

But then you're the lecturer on logic here at chez daddy.

 

Whatever. This logic mirrors the Tea Party statements when they are proven wrong. Everybody can't be smart.

[maxwellissmart]

Whatever. This logic mirrors the Tea Party statements when they are proven wrong. Everybody can't be smart.

 

Let's close this thread. Everyone has made their argument.

[seeker630]

Let's close this thread. Everyone has made their argument.

 

[citylaw1]

Everyone has made their argument.

 

Some more proficiently than others.

[essjay]

Another false start? Has anyone heard from Noah?

[citylaw1]

Another false start? Has anyone heard from Noah?

 

Of course not. He's busy making those paybacks:)