Patrick Bateman/NYC REVIEW or Lack of

[JT Brooklyn]

Todays Review..IF I was to ever lay out $400 for One Hour with a Working Guy... I definitely would be giving DETAILS!

 

This Review reads like nothing more than an AD..IMHO of course!

 

I'd much rather DO Today's cute Cover Guy Diego/FT Laud for 2 Hours and tell the tale!

[tsgarp]

You're right; that review is pretty meager.

[cooldemo03]

I agree, the review was too general, but I do have to say I agree with the reviewer. I've been with Pat, and although I never wrote a review, I do have to say I would recommend him.

[ross06]

I agree, the review was too general, but I do have to say I agree with the reviewer. I've been with Pat, and although I never wrote a review, I do have to say I would recommend him.

 

I second that -- I was with Pat a few times and always had a hot experience with him

[TruthBTold]

Would you say that the pics are pretty recent?

[jjkrkwood]

It was a Basic, average review, by a Basic average guy who enjoyed himself. Did I miss anything ?

[ross06]

Would you say that the pics are pretty recent?

 

No - His pics are kind out old --- But he still looks as hot

[JT Brooklyn]

No - His pics are kind out old --- But he still looks as hot

 

It has always been my thinking that a Dude who puts himself in the "Top Tier Rate Wise" better keep Current Pix's in his AD!

 

We as Clients are Paying Big Bucks for the NOW not the WHEN looks wise! Still looking Hot does not cut it..Maybe at $200 it might for some...

[Guest Magnus]

He has two RB adds, one in his name (where one pic looks like he's smoking' weed):

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=276846&scid=73322079&sp=1&pos=0&locid=0&iid=134364

 

and another under Dorian Grey:

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=306909&scid=73321990&sp=1&pos=0&locid=0&iid=155753

[JT Brooklyn]

2 ADS running at the same time on Rentboy plus whatever other sites..This dude has an Exspensive Marketing Plan that the $400 an Hour guys SEEM TO BE supporting :confused

 

"Dorian Grey"? Strange Stage Name Choice as that Name always relates to a much Older Guy than he looks? Unless Bateman isn't 29 anymore

[jjkrkwood]

He has two RB adds, one in his name (where one pic looks like he's smoking' weed):

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=276846&scid=73322079&sp=1&pos=0&locid=0&iid=134364

 

and another under Dorian Grey:

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=306909&scid=73321990&sp=1&pos=0&locid=0&iid=155753

 

Wow, maybe he's really "sybil" ????

[robgold]

I'm the one who posted the review of Pat Bateman. Sorry if it was too general or uninformative. I'm pretty new here and am not sure what else needs to be said. Happy to provide more info if you'd like.

[cooldemo03]

Pat is great, but I guess for those who have never been with him want to hear a few more details about the encounter maybe? Especially because 400 is a bit steep for an escort, so maybe just saying basically "he was great" is too general.

[seeker630]

I'm the one who posted the review of Pat Bateman. Sorry if it was too general or uninformative. I'm pretty new here and am not sure what else needs to be said. Happy to provide more info if you'd like.

 

Welcome, robgold. There's lot of debate about how much detail to put in a review, and different people have different comfort levels. The purpose of a review, in my opinion, is to share your experience in such a way as to allow readers to determine if THEY would likely have a satisfying encounter with the escort. Most readers will want to know if the escort was a good kisser, oral, top and/or bottom, etc., I think. What an escort adverstises is not always what he actually does, so it's good to have confirmation. People also want to know about attitude, hygiene, and how the reality measured up to the ad (both pictures and text).

 

Think about a restaurant review. "I had a good meal at the China Garden" vs. "I had the dumplings and they were excellent, as was the Kung Pao chicen and the Mongolian beef, which was moderately spicy'."

 

I believe that the more details you provide, the better. And that goes for what you say about yourself as well - top, bottom, versatile, oral only? If you only say YOU were plaesed, but we don't know your preferences, we can't infer much. Bateman advertises as versatile but there's much of a clue in your review as to what he actually did to you or for you.

 

Just some things to think about when you write your next review.

[maxwellissmart]

Welcome, robgold. There's lot of debate about how much detail to put in a review, and different people have different comfort levels. The purpose of a review, in my opinion, is to share your experience in such a way as to allow readers to determine if THEY would likely have a satisfying encounter with the escort. Most readers will want to know if the escort was a good kisser, oral, top and/or bottom, etc., I think. What an escort adverstises is not always what he actually does, so it's good to have confirmation. People also want to know about attitude, hygiene, and how the reality measured up to the ad (both pictures and text).

 

Think about a restaurant review. "I had a good meal at the China Garden" vs. "I had the dumplings and they were excellent, as was the Kung Pao chicen and the Mongolian beef, which was moderately spicy'."

 

I believe that the more details you provide, the better. And that goes for what you say about yourself as well - top, bottom, versatile, oral only? If you only say YOU were plaesed, but we don't know your preferences, we can't infer much. Bateman advertises as versatile but there's much of a clue in your review as to what he actually did to you or for you.

 

Just some things to think about when you write your next review.

 

I really wish this escort had given a little more thought into choosing his name—every time I see this thread it gives me a twinge of unease. And especially with Twinky Von Psycho making the rounds...

[seeker630]

I really wish this escort had given a little more thought into choosing his name—every time I see this thread it gives me a twinge of unease. And especially with Twinky Von Psycho making the rounds...

 

The name wass unfamiliar to me until I Googled it - i never saw the movie or read the movie.

 

His new name is equally weird. Perhaps meant to imply he retains his youthful looks, but as someone else pointed out, it also implies he might be MUCH older than he appears.

[maxwellissmart]

The name wass unfamiliar to me until I Googled it - i never saw the movie or read the movie.

 

His new name is equally weird. Perhaps meant to imply he retains his youthful looks, but as someone else pointed out, it also implies he might be MUCH older than he appears.

 

My initial reaction to seeing the name for the first time was: "is this a joke?" It would be the equivalent of naming yourself Charles Manson, Escort. And while I suppose there's a small chance he might not be familiar with his fictional counterpart—I doubt it. And that makes the idea of hiring him that much creepier.

[Guest Magnus]

My initial reaction to seeing the name for the first time was: "is this a joke?" It would be the equivalent of naming yourself Charles Manson, Escort. And while I suppose there's a small chance he might not be familiar with his fictional counterpart—I doubt it. And that makes the idea of hiring him that much creepier.

 

Yeah, but Christian Bale was smoking' HOT in that movie....

http://a1.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/profile01/151/16a42b1657574424aa81085bd6c68788/p.jpg

 

http://intothegloss.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads2/2012/03/shower.jpg

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pHOkId-M_Ig/T1ScdUOX6kI/AAAAAAAABMs/kqqXsZTdg3Q/s640/christian-bale-american-psycho-la-guarida-de-kovack.jpg

[maxwellissmart]

Yeah, but Christian Bale was smoking' HOT in that movie....

http://a1.ec-images.myspacecdn.com/profile01/151/16a42b1657574424aa81085bd6c68788/p.jpg

 

http://intothegloss.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads2/2012/03/shower.jpg

 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pHOkId-M_Ig/T1ScdUOX6kI/AAAAAAAABMs/kqqXsZTdg3Q/s640/christian-bale-american-psycho-la-guarida-de-kovack.jpg

 

Nope. Creeeeepyyyy. NO like, no like!