Nate - New York City

[tsgarp]

I like the forthright quality of this guy...anyone have an experience to report?

 

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=309405&scid=72566551&sp=9&pos=179&locid=1569&iid=157388

[+ Axiom2001]

I like the forthright quality of this guy...anyone have an experience to report?

 

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=309405&scid=72566551&sp=9&pos=179&locid=1569&iid=157388

 

 

...no experience, but I, too, like what he wrote in his ad which has NEVER pertained to me because I read then make contact and go from there.

[Decatur Guy]

I'm all for being forthright, but that's a little too forthright for me.

[rvwnsd]

After reading that ad, there should be no questions about what he will or will not do.

[jjkrkwood]

I would speculate his "forthrightness" is about 8.5 x 7"

[tony]

This looks like Devin Moss from porn videos. Big uncut dicked twink. I have seen him top and bottom. Anyone else think this is him, or at least his pictures? He also did some Corbin Fisher videos under the name Jamie if I am not mistaken.

[jjkrkwood]

This looks like Devin Moss from porn videos. Big uncut dicked twink. I have seen him top and bottom. Anyone else think this is him, or at least his pictures? He also did some Corbin Fisher videos under the name Jamie if I am not mistaken.

 

Didnt look like Devin to me....

[seeker630]

This looks like Devin Moss from porn videos. Big uncut dicked twink. I have seen him top and bottom. Anyone else think this is him, or at least his pictures? He also did some Corbin Fisher videos under the name Jamie if I am not mistaken.

 

I thought so too -especially the first photo. But after looking at pix of Devin, I think it's probably not. Shape of the dick looks a little different. i think Devin has exited the adult entertainment business? (Hs web site says so, anyway.) The stats don't match (Devin is shorter than this), but of course someone could be using his pix.

 

Haven't had time to do an image search of the pix.

[jjkrkwood]

I thought so too -especially the first photo. But after looking at pix of Devin, I think it's probably not. Shape of the dick looks a little different. i think Devin has exited the adult entertainment business? (Hs web site says so, anyway.) The stats don't match (Devin is shorter than this), but of course someone could be using his pix.

 

Haven't had time to do an image search of the pix.

 

See if you can get the guy on th phone. Devins voice is VERY distinct....

[citylaw1]

A few years back his FAQ condescending paragraph would have turned me off. Now I actually appreciate this, and, I imagine, it is due to 10 emails back and forth answering questions you've already answered.

[+ bigjoey]

A number of escorts I know complain about wasted time answering questions where the answer is clearly listed in the ad. It is like people just look at the picture and email or call without reading anything. Clearly Nate has reached his limit on such people.

[jjkrkwood]

A number of escorts I know complain about wasted time answering questions where the answer is clearly listed in the ad. It is like people just look at the picture and email or call without reading anything. Clearly Nate has reached his limit on such people.

 

Yeah its really a big deal and an imposition to answer a simple question. Especially if the escort has shown you his gaping asshole. I mean, what more would you need to know ?

[citylaw1]

Yeah its really a big deal and an imposition to answer a simple question. Especially if the escort has shown you his gaping asshole. I mean, what more would you need to know ?

 

I really think this has everything to do with flakes that are there to waste time. I hire a lot and the guys tell me constantly about how they go back and forth 10 or more times with someone, answering already answered questions. There are a large number of people that don't intend to book, and are looking for email chatting to fill their lives. This hurts my hiring personally, in that I like to communicate everthing prior to an extended date.

[jjkrkwood]

I really think this has everything to do with flakes that are there to waste time. I hire a lot and the guys tell me constantly about how they go back and forth 10 or more times with someone, answering already answered questions. There are a large number of people that don't intend to book, and are looking for email chatting to fill their lives. This hurts my hiring personally, in that I like to communicate everthing prior to an extended date.

 

I think everything must be taken into perspective when it comes to communication. The escort can quickly assess if the potential client is simply a "time waster" with no intention of hiring, but I do believe everyone should be allowed 1 opportunity to ask about, or clarify information that is already provided by the escort.

[citylaw1]

I think everything must be taken into perspective when it comes to communication. The escort can quickly assess if the potential client is simply a "time waster" with no intention of hiring, but I do believe everyone should be allowed 1 opportunity to ask about, or clarify information that is already provided by the escort.

 

Out of his FAQ's, which FAQ would you imagine requires more clarification?

[jjkrkwood]

Out of his FAQ's, which FAQ would you imagine requires more clarification?

 

Thats irrelevant. I think basically asking is just a test to be sure the person on the Other end IS the same person that placed, and is in Ad.

[citylaw1]

Thats irrelevant. I think basically asking is just a test to be sure the person on the Other end IS the same person that placed, and is in Ad.

 

He is saying in his ad that he is the person that placed the ad, is in the pics, etc. How would an additional email asking the same questions provide further proof? Obviously emailing for a booking and availability is perfectly fine and expected. He is simply attempting to limit the bullshit and get to the meeting. I don't see any problem here.

[seeker630]

Out of his FAQ's, which FAQ would you imagine requires more clarification?

 

"Do you kiss, Probably not". In all fairness, I probably wouldn't contact him because the answer is likely to be 'No', but he leaves some wiggle room here..

 

But if I did, I'd feel more comfortable laying out what I like and then saying something like "Your ad indicates you're ok with these activities - can you confirm?"

[jjkrkwood]

He is saying in his ad that he is the person that placed the ad, is in the pics, etc. How would an additional email asking the same questions provide further proof? Obviously emailing for a booking and availability is perfectly fine and expected. He is simply attempting to limit the bullshit and get to the meeting. I don't see any problem here.

 

Oh CL, I never said there WAS any problem. I was merely defending the clients right to ask a simple question ONCE, eventhough the answer might already SEEM obvious from the Ad...

We all know escorts are undoubtedly 100% Trustworthy and Truthful.

[bigvalboy]

He is saying in his ad that he is the person that placed the ad, is in the pics, etc. How would an additional email asking the same questions provide further proof? Obviously emailing for a booking and availability is perfectly fine and expected. He is simply attempting to limit the bullshit and get to the meeting. I don't see any problem here.

 

Interesting citylaw, I happen to agree with you. As it so happens, I have had this conversation with a few escorts over time, and it is always surprising to me how they tell of the endless phones calls and emails from guys who are doing exactly as you say, trying to fill their life up. Constantly asking for stats when they are clearly posted, begging for pics when the escorts says that he will not send any out, and asking escorts to travel absurd distances at ungodly hours without additional compensation.

 

Time and time again we hear escorts complain about this aspect of the business. I am oblivious to much of this, as it would never occur to me to engage in such ridiculous behavior. I try and read all ads carefully and take note of any additional questions, so that emails are kept to a minimum.

 

When negotiating a hire, I try and keep all communication as simple as possible.....except that just now I realized I might have hijacked this thread...LOL my apologies to the OP.

[citylaw1]

Oh CL, I never said there WAS any problem. I was merely defending the clients right to ask a simple question ONCE, eventhough the answer might already SEEM obvious from the Ad...

We all know escorts are undoubtedly 100% Trustworthy and Truthful.

 

So asking a simple question that was already answered is verified by re-answering the same question by the same person? I fail to see the logic here. Would it go like: "Dear, Escort, I see that you mention that you are white, 25, 6'2" and available for outcalls. Please let me know how old you are, how tall you are, and if you're available for outcalls. I realize that you answer all of these questions in your ad, however, when I hear things twice I tend to believe the answers more. Thank you for your time."

[jjkrkwood]

So asking a simple question that was already answered is verified by re-answering the same question by the same person? I fail to see the logic here. Would it go like: "Dear, Escort, I see that you mention that you are white, 25, 6'2" and available for outcalls. Please let me know how old you are, how tall you are, and if you're available for outcalls. I realize that you answer all of these questions in your ad, however, when I hear things twice I tend to believe the answers more. Thank you for your time."

 

Basically. Whats the fuckin hurry anyway. ? Firstly, I dont engage in endless back and forth conversations, nor do I condone that behavior. that was not what my copmment was suggesting. But if I did have a question I wanted confirmed, although the escort may have answwered it in their laundry list, i dont see the Big deal. If I am potentially shelling out $300 an hour, based on an answer, I think thats a good deal for the escort. Its no different than reading a menu in a restaurant which describes a dish, and then asking the waitress to tell you whats in the dish. People do it, and should expect an answer.

[N13]

so asking a simple question that was already answered is verified by re-answering the same question by the same person? I fail to see the logic here. Would it go like: "dear, escort, i see that you mention that you are white, 25, 6'2" and available for outcalls. Please let me know how old you are, how tall you are, and if you're available for outcalls. I realize that you answer all of these questions in your ad, however, when i hear things twice i tend to believe the answers more. Thank you for your time."

 

bravo!!!

[jjkrkwood]

Well I am sure citylaw appreciates the 1 man cheering section in N13, but not everyone behaves the same way, nor should they be expected to. I doubt anyone goes to purchase a time share, and after reading a very in depth, detailed brochure in which EVERYTHING was covered, will then plunk down their money without asking a question, whether its been covered in the brochure or not. Only fools do that !

[instudiocity]

A number of escorts I know complain about wasted time answering questions where the answer is clearly listed in the ad. It is like people just look at the picture and email or call without reading anything. Clearly Nate has reached his limit on such people.

 

LOL! Maybe he has reached his limit - but his FAQ paragraph describes my interaction with customers CONSTANTLY. It's almost like they cannot process the most basic information. Teachers/Sales people are always 1)Telling 'em what your gonna tell 'em, 2) Tellin' 'em, 3)then Tellin' 'em what you already told them. It's the cycle of learning.