Todays Coverboy Taylor

[CF]

Glad to see Taylor has made coverboy. He's a good time remembered, and I will be seeing him in NYC while he's visiting there after March 10th. Boy is fun and not lacking below the equator. I'm sure he'll do well on his visit to The City!!!! CF

[+ Axiom2001]

Glad to see Taylor has made coverboy. He's a good time remembered, and I will be seeing him in NYC while he's visiting there after March 10th. Boy is fun and not lacking below the equator. I'm sure he'll do well on his visit to The City!!!! CF

 

Please write a one paragraph review! I'm not being facetious! Thanks!

[CF]

I did not perceive you that way Axiom. If you go to Taylor's reviews, I posted his very first one a few years ago. Saw him recently, but did not want to repeat myself. CF

[instudiocity]

I did not perceive you that way Axiom. If you go to Taylor's reviews, I posted his very first one a few years ago. Saw him recently, but did not want to repeat myself. CF

You should repeat yourself. Even if you say, I reviewed him in review #1 and it's just as good as ever, it's a more current review and everyone else knows he's been RECENTLY reviewed by a multiple reviewer.

[CF]

Instudiocity, I did think about it. The one thing that came to mind was reading a blog a few years back, where a reviewer had posted a review of the same escort three times. All of a sudden there were comments on how there was a possible link with this reviewer romantically with the escort, followed by comment it was a phoney review, then a critique of this posters other reviews, which led to some nasty exchanges. So, I opted not to post a second review.

However, I do get your point and appreciate it. CF

[instudiocity]

Instudiocity, I did think about it. The one thing that came to mind was reading a blog a few years back, where a reviewer had posted a review of the same escort three times. All of a sudden there were comments on how there was a possible link with this reviewer romantically with the escort, followed by comment it was a phoney review, then a critique of this posters other reviews, which led to some nasty exchanges. So, I opted not to post a second review.

However, I do get your point and appreciate it. CF

 

First, you're limited by daddysreviews to posting a review of the same escort to just once every six months.

Second, most of the supposedly phoney reviews are written by first time reviewers. I trust Daddy's vetting of reviews so to me it's a non-issue.

Third, drama happens here in all the time. For more stupid reasons than your example. But to post on the MF about an escort and not file a review with Daddy's Reviews is the very opposite of why these two sites exist.

[CF]

Yes, you are definitely right. As I said before, I did get your point and appreciate it.

I'd imagine the attitude I should have taken, was to post whatever I needed to relate, while sticking to the rules set by Daddy's site.

We all know that not everyone is going to see things the same way. Hell, I'd imagine that's why this forum exists. In saying that, your comment-Let's agree to disagree, without being disagreeable- is right on the money.

Thanks for sharing some thoughts with me Instudiocity.