First Review Brett is at it again!

[N13]

Suggest looking up past threads on Brett before wasting your money.

 

N13

[Decatur Guy]

Suggest looking up past threads on Brett before wasting your money.

 

N13

 

Yeah, I saw that.

[rossthebosssf]

I thought the reviews that are submitted are confirmed to be authentic. There's no way these can be real.

[Guy Fawkes]

Almost 24% of your threads (5 of 21) you've started are about Brett. A little bit obsessed are you?

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?84045-First-Review-Brett-is-at-it-again!

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?81593-Another-ist-review-for-Brett

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?80588-Brett-4-and-another-phony-review

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?80167-Brett-People-never-learn

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?78766-Brett-Again!

 

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQN4tJ2_vL5DFwspVHDinQ5uGwZuM1LEASBShzfdLawJiMmBM45

 

Suggest looking up past threads on Brett before wasting your money.

[N13]

I just hate to see someone that was as bad as he was keep trying to rope in other people with what appear to be fake reviews. I thought the point of this forum was to help us make wise decisions. If I appear to be obsessed it is only because I have an aversion to being scammed.

[orbital sander]

I just hate to see someone that was as bad as he was keep trying to rope in other people with what appear to be fake reviews. I thought the point of this forum was to help us make wise decisions. If I appear to be obsessed it is only because I have an aversion to being scammed.

 

Just a couple of technical notes.... every review on this guy, including the negative ones are first reviews. I am not sure how you define what is "fake". Since the reviewer has the option of listing the review as his 1st, 2nd,3rd 4th, or 5 or more review, one would think that some of the "fake" reviews would have been listed as 4th or 5th reviews.

[JT Brooklyn]

Just a couple of technical notes.... every review on this guy, including the negative ones are first reviews. I am not sure how you define what is "fake". Since the reviewer has the option of listing the review as his 1st, 2nd,3rd 4th, or 5 or more review, one would think that some of the "fake" reviews would have been listed as 4th or 5th reviews.

 

The man does make a point! I do believe on the Old "Hooboy" site when saying you had past Reviews on "Working Guys" their Names were listed.. to give a little more "Credibility" to the Review when possible

[LouieD]

Brett was a complete disappointment for me a year or so ago. A waste of time and money. He really doesn't want to do anything, except talk to keep the clock running. He's only interested in taking your money. He keeps running this scam for years now. Easy money for him I guess. I cannot believe this current review.

[seeker630]

Brett was a complete disappointment for me a year or so ago. A waste of time and money. He really doesn't want to do anything, except talk to keep the clock running. He's only interested in taking your money. He keeps running this scam for years now. Easy money for him I guess. I cannot believe this current review.

Did you post a review?

 

Based on the comments here, I'd expect to see more negative reviews than 2.

 

More people check the reviews than follow this Message Center. Posting a review probably has more impact than posting here.

[Guy Fawkes]

...And you don't think that DADDY MAY OBJECT TO THE WORDS "FAKE REVIEWS?"

 

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ZiDEq2bTJyM/TH9-CR5dVOI/AAAAAAAABZo/sQfmdWajKyE/s400/Calvin-bad-mood.gif

 

I just hate to see someone that was as bad as he was keep trying to rope in other people with what appear to be fake reviews. I thought the point of this forum was to help us make wise decisions. If I appear to be obsessed it is only because I have an aversion to being scammed.

[instudiocity]

Brett was a complete disappointment for me a year or so ago.

 

Just a couple of technical notes.... every review on this guy, including the negative ones are first reviews.

 

I just hate to see someone that was as bad as he was keep trying to rope in other people with what appear to be fake reviews. I thought the point of this forum was to help us make wise decisions. If I appear to be obsessed it is only because I have an aversion to being scammed.

[/indent][/indent]A quick perusal of said Brett #4's reviews indicates just a few things:

No review signed by N13.

No review signed by LouieD.

A response from Brett4 about a bad review.

 

Conclusions: N13 thinks he can more effectively warn potential clients through the lesser used Message-Forum than through the more highly visited DaddysReviews. DaddysReviews reviews escorts. No matter how great an aversion you have to being scammed, you'd be more successful WRITING A REVIEW.

 

Orbital Sander and I both are struck by the fact that Brett #4 has only first-time reviewers. I believe something is rotten in the state of Brett's reviews.

 

Who repealed "Buyer Beware"? I can beware reading Brett #4's reviews, except 'um, without missing reviews by N13 and LouieD.

 

The thing I keep returning to is this: This is Daddy's site. Daddy has communicated with Brett #4 about his negative reviews as indicated by Brett's response to a bad review. Daddy probably knows more than he's saying about IP addresses and email addresses of everyone here than we can possibly know. So if Daddy posts it, it is a review. WHO THE HELL AM I TO QUESTION IT?

[+ Charlie]

Many posters here use a different handle when reviewing escorts, so that lack of reviews signed by "N13" or "LouieD" doesn't mean much.

[seeker630]

Many posters here use a different handle when reviewing escorts, so that lack of reviews signed by "N13" or "LouieD" doesn't mean much.

 

Which is why I asked them. I'm sure they'll tell us if they did.

[instudiocity]

Many posters here use a different handle when reviewing escorts, so that lack of reviews signed by "N13" or "LouieD" doesn't mean much.

Really? If they had reviewed Brett #4, why haven't they pointed that out? I don't believe their anonymity in reviewing takes away from what I've said, because they have claimed zero ownership to any review of Brett #4 while posting on the M-F. LouieD was so in-specific as to say, "a year or so ago". If he'd reviewed Brett #4, he'd have a DATE of that review!

[N13]

I did post a review, but it was years ago. At some point the review disappeared as did a number of other reviews I had done.

 

I don't mean to anger Daddy, but I did say "appear to be" fake reviews.

 

N13

[Guy Fawkes]

The point is that just because other people don't share your view on Brett does not means that they're to be automatically considered a "Fake Review."

 

It really pisses me off when you say such a thing, and I do another audit only find that your contention is unfounded. I have access to a hell of a lot more information that you do and I routinely post what I find on both sides of the fence.

 

If your review "Disappeared" it means that it was a Hooboy era review which is tied up because of the estate. That means you've been holding a grudge for almost seven years. If not, you need to be talking to me privately so that we can track down your reviews.

 

I want to know when your going to give it a rest and move on.

 

I did post a review, but it was years ago. At some point the review disappeared as did a number of other reviews I had done.

 

I don't mean to anger Daddy, but I did say "appear to be" fake reviews.

 

N13

[+ glutes]

I have access to a hell of a lot more information that you do and I routinely post what I find on both sides of the fence.

 

 

And if you don't believe Daddy, look at today's review of Justin 'Bieber' Baylor. The reviewer was right on the mark, and let Justin respond...

[orbital sander]

And if you don't believe Daddy, look at today's review of Justin 'Bieber' Baylor. The reviewer was right on the mark, and let Justin respond...

 

You really have a thing about name calling, don't you?

[seeker630]

And if you don't believe Daddy, look at today's review of Justin 'Bieber' Baylor. The reviewer was right on the mark, and let Justin respond...

 

It's my understanding that Daddy gives the escort an opportunity to respond.

 

When you say 'the reviewer was right on the mark', does that mean you had an identical experience?

[hornytwells]

It's my understanding that Daddy gives the escort an opportunity to respond.

 

When you say 'the reviewer was right on the mark', does that mean you had an identical experience?

 

Yes, I don't understand-are you endorsing that bad review of Justin baylor based on other knowledge? Am interested, because up until that review he sounds perfect for me, but smokers are the biggest turn off for me, so it would be crucial for me to know if that were true-hesitant to hire otherwise

[+ glutes]

Well then H.T. Wells, go for him!

 

http://laniersbooks.com/wp2010/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/youngvictoria1.jpg

[crok]

And if you don't believe Daddy, look at today's review of Justin 'Bieber' Baylor. The reviewer was right on the mark, and let Justin respond...

 

Right on, Glutehole!