411 Jesse McDonald--Chicago

[Guest badboy11]

Any word on Jesse in Chicago??

http://www.rentboy.com/Listing.aspx?lid=206161&scid=61355459&sp=3&pos=55&locid=1459&iid=88580

[JT Brooklyn]

Hey Newbie..In certain areas of the Country this could be considered a Sting AD!

 

The KID is barely Legal and wants to be Corrupted! HaHa

 

IF you go for it I suggest you check the Birth Certificate and don't show him the money First!

[Diverdan]

WAY TOO Young to be in that business. I second Brooklyn Guy's comments.

[Guest badboy11]

You would be worried about him not being legit?? Can you tell me why?

[bigvalboy]

The fact that you have to even ask that question is of GREAT concern.

[Guest badboy11]

ok...let me try again. the answer is soooo clear to everyone about this. Pray tell----educate me !! dont give me an answer that assumes the answer is so widely known...why do you say that it is suspicious

[+ azdr0710]

 

read diver and brooklyn's replies.....though maybe/probably not a "sting" ad, he's appealing to men who like "boys" and guys who possibly want to abuse/fantasize about abusing them.....plus he's too young to already be trying this.....but you knew all this already, didn't you???

[JT Brooklyn]

You would be worried about him not being legit?? Can you tell me why?

 

LOL.. I'm not worried he's not on my Hunk List! But I'm guessing your interests lie in the "Extremely Young and Corruptable"! Good Luck with that!

[bigvalboy]

Any more questions? I think we have been very clear hear Badboy. You do get it, right?

[+ deej]

You would be worried about him not being legit?? Can you tell me why?

 

There is a very loud contingent who have declared themselves the arbiter of "old enough". If a young man doesn't look "old enough" (to them) they declare it to be so based solely on THEIR opinions.

 

It is, unfortunately, an attitude that prudes have used against all elements of the adult industry since time began. It's at the center of the federal record keeping requirement that governs all porn and even affects this site.

 

Our self-appointed nannies have decided they have the right to judge you just like the church ladies who want to outlaw legal porn. It is exactly the same argument. Take it for what it's worth.

[+ sam.fitzpatrick]

You would be worried about him not being legit?? Can you tell me why?

 

I think my 4-year-old nephew has the same underoos as in his third pic.

[josephga]

I think my 4-year-old nephew has the same underoos as in his third pic.

 

lmao

[Guest badboy11]

Thanks Deej...I appreciate your thoughts !!!

[bigvalboy]

Well badboy, no one is judging you here, only offering advice that has accumulated over the many decades of just living and partaking in this sort of activity. And based on your responses and questions, I am guessing you are just a wee bit naive, but it sounds like what you really wanted was some approval here...and you got it. So jump in with both feet, but when you run into trouble down the road, and most likely you will if you continue on this path, just remember what the 'self appointed nannies' warned you about.

[jgoo]

The only real advice to the OP question, in my view, was the original post from Brooklyn Guy. Specifically be careful of a possible sting (solid advice for hiring any escort who hasn't been reviewed before), check ID because of possible concern with legal age and don't pay up front. Most of the other comment/replies are just personal viewpoints that is clearly not shared by the OP so they don't add any value or useful information to what he is seeking (namely feedback from anyone who had direct experience with the escort in question).

 

And regarding bigvalboy's comment that it sounds like what the OP really wanted was some approval here, I certainly don't see (interpret) it that way at all. When I post a 411 on an escort I want to know if he is legit, provides the services promised, looks like his pics, etc and in no way am I interested in getting validation from people on my interest in the escort. From reviewing the OP's posts on this thread I really can't see how to reach the conclusion he wants approval.

[RexAll]

There is a very loud contingent who have declared themselves the arbiter of "old enough". If a young man doesn't look "old enough" (to them) they declare it to be so based solely on THEIR opinions.

 

It is, unfortunately, an attitude that prudes have used against all elements of the adult industry since time began. It's at the center of the federal record keeping requirement that governs all porn and even affects this site.

 

Our self-appointed nannies have decided they have the right to judge you just like the church ladies who want to outlaw legal porn. It is exactly the same argument. Take it for what it's worth.

 

C'mon Deej,

 

Although the record keeping requirements might be a pain, surely you can't be against rules that are there in part to prevent minors from being exploited and used in ways that are inappropriate at the least and harmful at the worst. And while you might argue what the legal age of consent ought to be, 18 is a good compromise since some are mature at 16 and some still immature at 40.

 

Rex

[Guest badboy11]

NO dont want "approval." I saw a guy I liked, and he was 18. Its a sexual preference. I like smooth younger types. I was trying to find out why that was a red flag PER SE? What makes it more so than a grizzley buffed-up hair-God who is unreviewed and 22?? Saying "watch out" is helpful, but saying "watch out...and you get it, right?" was certainly made by experienced guys here but was short on details as to WHY? Hiring anyone under 18 would be a realll problem ....so I can appreciate the thoughts on the AGE....so....I thank you. I decided to pass on the guy anyway.....maybe go for higher age...maybe a thin smoothie 18 1/2 !!!!

[Guest Connoisseur]

Hi badboy11 - check out Nick at infinityboys.com. I had a bad experience with this agency but it involved companion travel and it wasn't related to Nick. Since you are local maybe you want to check this guy out and the risk if he's not as represented is minimal. Good luck and if you meet up with Nick, please do a review.

[+ azdr0710]

and just a quick, but obvious, reminder to any other "newbies" here.....get the $$ thing, and what you hope to do at the meet, squared away before any in-person encounter with an unknown.....and never talk $$ at the meet at all.....if he brings up a so-called "a la carte" menu ($$ for this act, $$ for that), act sheepish or something......while stings are rare, the money-for-sex thing is, of course, what undercover LE is trying to get you to agree to (and say on video)....with unknowns, always pay only at the end and tell him that you'll do that in the pre-meet planning.....and you're paying for time only.....

 

..this is all very obvious to many here, but wanted to do what I can....

[wayout]

....check out Nick at infinityboys.com. I had a bad experience with this agency but it involved companion travel and it wasn't related to Nick. Since you are local maybe you want to check this guy out and the risk if he's not as represented is minimal. Good luck and if you meet up with Nick, please do a review.

 

Nick looks very hot and could be a great option. The rates at Infinityboys seems a bit on the high side (even considering they get their cut, but then again I haven't used agencies before so it is just speculation on my part that they are high, even for Chicago). In any case, depending on how secure you want to feel for the hire (safety, reliability, accuracy of representation) it could be worth the extra bucks.

[bigvalboy]

The original op stated simply 411 on Jesse. The reason I felt that he was seeking approval is because the very next post referred to the possibility of and underage youth and a stink operation. When babboy seemed oblivious to what we were talking about I and others felt obligated clue him in. I thought that a responsible thing to do. The only person he thanked for there comments was NOT us, rather deej, who I believed called us a "large contingent of nannies", He clearly appreciated the support from deej. I for one, at this point do not care what the man does. But he seems quite naive and is going down a very slippery slope here. There are decades of solid sound advice in this forum, and while myself and others tend to use sarcasim and humor to get a point across on occasion, you cannot discount the fact the it is VERY sound advice indeed. And to assume that we do not have his best interest at heart is irresponsible.

[Guest badboy11]

I do appreciate all the comments and will learn from all of them

[bigvalboy]

Thank you...

[mattb]

Hi badboy11 - check out Nick at infinityboys.com. I had a bad experience with this agency but it involved companion travel and it wasn't related to Nick. Since you are local maybe you want to check this guy out and the risk if he's not as represented is minimal. Good luck and if you meet up with Nick, please do a review.

 

If it's any consolation badboy, I'll be hiring Nick within the next 2 weeks or so and will let you know how everything goes. This is the first solid guy that Kennedy has had in a few years (IMHO) so I'm looking forward to the meet.

[Guest badboy11]

Thanks...Id like to see Nick...