How Do Escorts REALLY Feel About Married Guys

[MiamiLooker]

I am gratified to learn that 5% is a high proportion. I have always thought that 10-15% was a minority or even 49%, but, what do I know?

 

Best regards,

KMEM

 

Proportion has little if anything to do with whether the number is a minority or majority. For example, a blood alcohol content above .04% is illegal for airline pilots to fly. At and above that level is a high proportion. EZEtoGRU used it correctly.

[KMEM]

Interesting. My dictionary says relation to the whole for one of the definitions. 5% is a small portion of the whole, is it not?

 

As far as BAC is concerned, one cannot live and have 100%. Therefore exactly where .04 is proportionally speaking is subject to interpretation as well as the law. Times change and tolerance for impairment has changed. It used to be .15 was the legal definition of DWI but now it is much less but still different from place to place. A heavy drinker may survive .40 but will suffer some symptons of alcohol poisoning while many folks will die at some lesser level.

 

I think most pilots think there should be zero BAC when flying but "everyone" to include the FAA and the airlines think it necessary to quantify some limit.

 

Best regards,

KMEM

[best hotel]

....i have been closeted and married to a woman, out and in a relationship with a man, and single......i can see no differences in how i was treated or viewed by escorts in any of these circumstances...it seems to me that it is usually about my cock sucking abilities and passion rather than my relationship status......and about chemistry...and generosity.....not my personal life

[MiamiLooker]

Interesting. My dictionary says relation to the whole for one of the definitions. 5% is a small portion of the whole, is it not?

 

That you found one definition doesn't indicate EZEtoGRU was not correct.

 

As far as BAC is concerned, one cannot live and have 100%. Therefore exactly where .04 is proportionally speaking is subject to interpretation as well as the law. Times change and tolerance for impairment has changed. It used to be .15 was the legal definition of DWI but now it is much less but still different from place to place. A heavy drinker may survive .40 but will suffer some symptons of alcohol poisoning while many folks will die at some lesser level.

 

A .40% BAC is quite high, though relative to the whole it is less than 1%. I'm pretty sure most readers can determine if your post attempting to correct EZEtoGRU was something other than a case of Smug.

[KMEM]

That you found one definition doesn't indicate EZEtoGRU was not correct.

 

 

 

A .40% BAC is quite high, though relative to the whole it is less than 1%. I'm pretty sure most readers can determine if your post attempting to correct EZEtoGRU was something other than a case of Smug.

 

I suppose smug is in the eye of the beholder. Stated opinions are likely open to many interpretations; however, when numbers are inserted, perhaps a few of the interpretations are eliminated. How would you interpret your "correction" of me? Smug or not?

 

Best regards,

KMEM

[ChiTown]

My response is actually an honest one. It really doesn't matter to me if the guy is married or not and why should it matter? A married guy is hiring me basically for the same reasons any other guy is. They are treating themselves to an experience that they don't normally don't get. Though I never ask, I've been with plenty of guys who've informed me that they were married. I was married too for many years so I know the dilemmas and challenges they face. If a client tells me he is married, I'll let them know that I was once married too. Giving them that information seems to put them more at ease and insures them that I'm not passing any sort of judgement. It also leads to interesting conversations.

Rex (San Francisco)

415-666-2275

http://www.daddysreviews.com/review/raul_sf

http://hunkymuscles.tumblr.com

 

Thanks Rex,

 

As a married man who hires, I appreciate your response and thought that it was very positive and thoughtfully written.

[MiamiLooker]

I suppose smug is in the eye of the beholder. Stated opinions are likely open to many interpretations; however, when numbers are inserted, perhaps a few of the interpretations are eliminated. How would you interpret your "correction" of me? Smug or not?

 

Best regards,

KMEM

 

Readers can read your response to EZE's post. They can read my response to your post. They can determine where the smug is.

[KMEM]

Readers can read your response to EZE's post. They can read my response to your post. They can determine where the smug is.

 

Indeed. As in your post.

 

Best regards,

KMEM

[+ sf westcoaster]

I have never had an escort ask me me if I were married. However, when through the course of conversation, I have told an escort that I am/was marrried, there has never been a negative reaction.

[gp0560]

Since I can't get my wedding ring off any more, the question seldom comes up. LOL

[doitb4ugo]

Since I can't get my wedding ring off any more, the question seldom comes up. LOL

 

Since I can't get my wedding band on anymore the question seldom comes up...lol.

[Michael Wayne]

I have built my career on married guys. I love them, truly and honestly, and I try to not only satisfy their needs but also be a friend and someone who listens to things they can tell no one else.

[+ Tygerscent]

First I feel about their shoulders, then their necks and biceps, then I feel about their chest and then their butts and then... I feel just fine about married guys.

What's more is they seem to feel fine about the people they play with.

American society seems to, in general, not be fine with the reality that men can and will have sport sex and even meaningful relationships, sexual or otherwise, but still come home when all is said and done.

Even studies of other species finds them to be perhaps socially monogamous but not sexually monogamous or genetically monogamous.

Imagine where a species would be if it didn't mix up the gene pool enough to survive all of the effects and affects of Life and the environments around it? Why are there more then one type of human being, plant, ant, butterfly? Perhaps infidelity is a necessary and important thing in life for life itself to continue? Maybe the question is something like: "Who invented the concept of sexual monogamy and why?" Is it just a human concept or is it a real situation?

It's an interesting concept, (Monogamy), and so often simply accepted as a real standard of functioning relationships as opposed to it being understood as a concept.

ie., ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sexuality )

Social monogamy refers to two persons/creatures who live together, have sex with each other, and cooperate in acquiring basic resources such as food, clothes, and money.

Sexual monogamy refers to two persons/creatures who remain sexually exclusive with each other and have no outside sex partners.

Genetic monogamy refers to two partners that only have offspring with each other.

Marital monogamy refers to marriages of only two people.

 

[edit]Varieties of monogamy

 

Recent discoveries have led biologists to talk about the three varieties of monogamy: social monogamy, sexual monogamy, and genetic monogamy. The distinction between these three are important to the modern understanding of monogamy.

Monogamous pairs of animals are not always sexually exclusive. Many animals that form pairs to mate and raise offspring regularly engage in sexual activities with partners other than their primary mate. This is called extra-pair copulation.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Sometimes these extra-pair sexual activities lead to offspring. Genetic tests frequently show that some of the offspring raised by a monogamous pair come from the female mating with an extra-pair male partner.[4][5][17][18] These discoveries have led biologists to adopt new ways of talking about monogamy:

"Social monogamy refers to a male and female's social living arrangement (e.g., shared use of a territory, behaviour indicative of a social pair, and/or proximity between a male and female) without inferring any sexual interactions or reproductive patterns. In humans, social monogamy equals monogamous marriage. Sexual monogamy is defined as an exclusive sexual relationship between a female and a male based on observations of sexual interactions. Finally, the term genetic monogamy is used when DNA analyses can confirm that a female-male pair reproduce exclusively with each other. A combination of terms indicates examples where levels of relationships coincide, e.g., sociosexual and sociogenetic monogamy describe corresponding social and sexual, and social and genetic monogamous relationships, respectively." (Reichard, 2003, page 4)[19]

Whatever makes a pair of animals socially monogamous does not necessarily make them sexually or genetically monogamous. Social monogamy, sexual monogamy, and genetic monogamy can occur in different combinations.

When applying these terms to people, it's important to remember that social monogamy does not always involve marriage. A married couple is almost always a socially monogamous couple. But couples who choose to cohabit without getting married can also be socially monogamous.

 

Interestingly enough, polyamory is not fully addressed in the above references... perhaps showing us further that we have a lot more to learn about sexuality in general, human or otherwise.

 

Tyger!

tygerkink@yahoo.com

503.719.9274

http://www.tygerscent.biz

http://www.daddyreviews.com/review/tyger_portland

http://www.maleescortreview.com (Tygerscent in Portland, Oregon)

http://www.rentmen.com (AAAtygerscentXXX in Portland Oregon)

http://www.men4rentnow.com (tygerscent in Portland, Oregon)

I was just wondering how escorts REALLY feel about married guys. I've been on some gay chat sites where the gay guys really bitch and moan about married guys. And it made me wonder how escorts felt about them.

 

Thanks!

[ErieBear]

Thanks all for your responses. I had no idea that this thread would have this many comments. I greatly appreciate all your thoughts and it makes me feel a bit better!

[+ FreshFluff]

Interestingly enough, polyamory is not fully addressed in the above references... perhaps showing us further that we have a lot more to learn about sexuality in general, human or otherwise.

 

Women just aren't interested in having multiple partners in most cases. Most of the research, along with the joke about lesbians and the u-haul on the second date, underscores that.

 

(Yeah, there are a few exceptions, such as women who are unhappy in their main relationship and find another man who is an upwards trade--richer, more powerful, smarter than the boyfriend. But these are the exceptions that prove the rule: I've seen three women in this situation (no, not me), and every one wished the "upward trade" guy could become a monogamous boyfriend.)