why was my post moved?

[Guest verymarried]

I took the time to post here to warn others of an escort who did not show after several contacts indicating he would. This website removed my post and all I can find is that it was "moved". Can someone explain to me what I did to warrant being the only post indicated which was removed or "moved" and where was it moved to? thanks

[Scorpio]

I'm not an admin or moderator, but here's my best guess:

 

Your post acknowledged that the review site has a policy against posting No Show reviews. Then you essentially posted a No Show review in the Message Forum, where there is a policy against posting reviews at all. So your post was probably deleted or moved to the moderators forum to be dealt with.

[+ deej]

Nobody has claimed credit for this action which leads me to think it was Daddy himself that moved the thread, and he may be unavailable for comment. You can, however, review his current philosophy on reviews in the message center in the thread recently pinned at the top of this forum:

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?79660-Reviews-on-the-Message-Center...

[Phlmuscle]

I don't see how telling the group about a no show is a review. Basically, it's a warning to others in the forum not to waste their time with this person. It's the same as most posts on here when one asks for the 411 on an escort.

[Greathands]

I don't see how telling the group about a no show is a review.

 

I can understand this perspective, but I can also see it from the other side as well. Having worked with escorts (and also having hired escorts), I can understand that a no show IS a review, because just as you may say the encounter was great or not so great, you can also say the encounter never happened because the escort never showed.

 

It's safe to say that escorts have a much higher percentage of no show or flaky clients than most people realize. I have seen escorts have to deal with endless phone calls and emails, and then have nothing materialize, because the client was either too shy to go through with it ... or worse yet, got off just through the experience of being in contact with an escort.

 

Then there's those individuals out there who seem to have a vendetta against certain escorts. Without the due process, it would be easy for them to tarnish an escort's reputation by making no-show comments falsely.

 

Those are just two reasons I think it's only fair to let the no show review go through the process before it is published.

[instudiocity]

Maybe responding to a 411 about an Escort saying, "I can't tell you anything because he No-Showed me twice." is OK, while anymore than that gets back into reviews.

 

About Reviews, there is a particular vetting system Daddy uses to confirm who the reviewer is, including a phone number before he posts the review. He also has mentioned that he gives an Escort time to respond to the review before posting it - I've noticed most negative reviews are posted with responses from the beginning.

[Guest verymarried]

I have checked Daddy's philosophy on reviews and he seems to cite that he does not like "reviews" on this forum because he is concerned about "stalkers". I have left quite a few messages on this forum over the years, and while some may have been eccentric, none should indicate vendettas, stalking or extreme antisocial behavior. I'm just an ordinary guy who thought I'd return the favor others have given me by giving good advice about which individuals to approach for hiring purposes. I spent some effort on making a contact with an individual who confirmed the appointment and once in his hometown, he never responded. This is not my website, and the owner has the right to do what he wants. I feel unfairly dealt with to have the only post apparent which has been removed.

[seeker630]

I have checked Daddy's philosophy on reviews and he seems to cite that he does not like "reviews" on this forum because he is concerned about "stalkers". I have left quite a few messages on this forum over the years, and while some may have been eccentric, none should indicate vendettas, stalking or extreme antisocial behavior. I'm just an ordinary guy who thought I'd return the favor others have given me by giving good advice about which individuals to approach for hiring purposes. I spent some effort on making a contact with an individual who confirmed the appointment and once in his hometown, he never responded. This is not my website, and the owner has the right to do what he wants. I feel unfairly dealt with to have the only post apparent which has been removed.

 

Other posts have been removed in the past for various reasons, I believe - I don't think you have been singled out.

 

The review site FAQs indicates that Daddy is very wary of 'no show' reviews because they are difficult to verify, and they are considered on a case-by-case basis.

 

No one here knows why your escort failed to show (including yourself, presumably?)

[nate_sf]

I have checked Daddy's philosophy on reviews and he seems to cite that he does not like "reviews" on this forum because he is concerned about "stalkers". I have left quite a few messages on this forum over the years, and while some may have been eccentric, none should indicate vendettas, stalking or extreme antisocial behavior. I'm just an ordinary guy who thought I'd return the favor others have given me by giving good advice about which individuals to approach for hiring purposes. I spent some effort on making a contact with an individual who confirmed the appointment and once in his hometown, he never responded. This is not my website, and the owner has the right to do what he wants. I feel unfairly dealt with to have the only post apparent which has been removed.

 

If you haven't already written a review, I'd encourage you to submit one for the no-show. I'm sure others would appreciate your taking the trouble. Over the long run I'd think a review would be better for these types of advisories since the the thread in the Deli section will eventually get buried in the archives after a while whereas a review will continue to be attached to the escort for anyone looking up his name. I'm not sure how many people go through the archives versus looking up the review, plus as others have mentioned since the reviews are vetted people will have confidence that it's a fair potrayal of what happened and be duly warned.

[+ deej]

I have checked Daddy's philosophy on reviews and he seems to cite that he does not like "reviews" on this forum because he is concerned about "stalkers". I have left quite a few messages on this forum over the years, and while some may have been eccentric, none should indicate vendettas, stalking or extreme antisocial behavior. I'm just an ordinary guy who thought I'd return the favor others have given me by giving good advice about which individuals to approach for hiring purposes. I spent some effort on making a contact with an individual who confirmed the appointment and once in his hometown, he never responded. This is not my website, and the owner has the right to do what he wants. I feel unfairly dealt with to have the only post apparent which has been removed.

 

(Note that I've already said I have no idea why your post was removed.)

 

What happened to you with the no-show sucked, we all agree there. We've, all of us, spent a lot of chinwag time over the last 12 years agreeing on that.

 

But I'm not following the reason your posts should get special treatment. Is it because, well, because?

[Guest verymarried]

I'm not sure that I am asking for "special treatment" as Deej suggests. Most other posts in this section appear to describe experiences with an escort. Mine seems to do the same thing except that I can see that I originated the comment instead of responded to someone else's inquiry. Perhaps that is the rule I have violated. Oh well, I'll get over it but I probably will visit this site a little bit less. Thank you for your comments.

[uwsman2]

As someone who has been posting here almost from the beginning of hooboy, I can tell you that posting a no-show review here in the forum is the wrong place to post it for various reasons that have been stated. It provides little reference value since the place people go to look up particular escorts is the review section. And, as noted, what goes in the review section has been vetted by daddy with some confirmatory action. A no-show comment about an escort is potentially quite damaging to the escort's reputation, so daddy wants to be sure comments along those lines don't stand in the archives without vetting.

 

"describe experiences with an escort" talks about the interaction with the escort during the session

"mine seems to do the same" is an over-generalized comparison, since your only interaction predated the session (which never occurred)

 

Not visiting the site as much is your choice, but I think you are overplaying this complaint.

And as somebody who has been stood up by escorts in the past, I feel your pain and fully sympathize. But the point has been well made above that you don't know why the escort didn't show. It could have been for reasons totally beyond his control under circumstances where he was unable to communicate with you, or he could have been behaving opportunistically (taken another client) or just irresponsibly, but unless you know the reason why, perhaps you can see why daddy would be unhappy about posting something negative about the escort without that information.

[gregkidman]

Once, I described my adventure where I saw three escorts in quick succession in one night. I thought by telling the story with trials and tribulations, others will derive pleasure from reading it. Within hours, it was removed. My only guess was that the posting seemed to be a review instead of an adventure.

[wayout]

Once, I described my adventure where I saw three escorts in quick succession in one night. I thought by telling the story with trials and tribulations, others will derive pleasure from reading it. Within hours, it was removed. My only guess was that the posting seemed to be a review instead of an adventure.

 

Did your posting about your adventure specifically identify the escorts by name or was it generic? If the former, then I can understand it being seen more as a review but the latter, IMHO, would be more relaying an adventure.

[instudiocity]

First, you didn't have an experience with an escort. Second, no one can verify a post, but a review has verification criteria.

 

Then you've made 116 posts (3 on this thread) in 6 years? And you speak of visiting 'this site a little bit less'? Granted, you may read the site more frequently than you post, but really? That's supposed to sting?

 

I'm not sure that I am asking for "special treatment" as Deej suggests. Most other posts in this section appear to describe experiences with an escort. Mine seems to do the same thing except that I can see that I originated the comment instead of responded to someone else's inquiry. Perhaps that is the rule I have violated. Oh well, I'll get over it but I probably will visit this site a little bit less. Thank you for your comments.

[best hotel]

Wasn't there a "no show' list on this site at one point?

[gregkidman]

Did your posting about your adventure specifically identify the escorts by name or was it generic? If the former, then I can understand it being seen more as a review but the latter, IMHO, would be more relaying an adventure.

I mentioned the escorts by name. However, if I made it generic, then the story loses its 'flavor'. See below for an example.

 

With names:

"As K.S. pounded my ass, I saw stars while J.M. gives a blowjob to R.A."

 

In generic form:

"As the escort with a big dick, highly reviewed, pounded my ass, I saw stars while the other escort, also highly reviewed, with a big dick gives a blow job to the third escort/porn star with a big dick."

 

 

All I can say, is that I was just telling a story. If I were doing a review, I would be using different words for the review than I would for a story.

 

Review: "He gave an excellent blowjob but it was brief"

 

Story: "His blowjob sent shivers down my spine, despite its brevity."

[seeker630]

 

All I can say, is that I was just telling a story. If I were doing a review, I would be using different words for the review than I would for a story.

 

Review: "He gave an excellent blowjob but it was brief"

 

Story: "His blowjob sent shivers down my spine, despite its brevity."

 

What constitutes a 'review' ( especially a useful view has been much discussed and opinions vary, but I think it is more than a matter of style.

There are a significant number of reviews written in your 'story' style ( tho not quite as literary. I'm guessing that any detailed account of an encounter with an identifiable escort is going to be pulled.

 

The line between

[Guest Spanker01]

best hotel,

 

yes there was back in hooboy's day as I remember

[Kevin Slater]

Wasn't there a "no show' list on this site at one point?

 

Yeah, but not only did it no show, it left without you noticing. It probably stole your wallet, too.

 

Kevin Slater

[Guest verymarried]

instudiocity: I'll leave it to others to decide who is stinging whom. I just made a comment to help others.

[instudiocity]

... Oh well, I'll get over it but I probably will visit this site a little bit less. ...

 

instudiocity: I'll leave it to others to decide who is stinging whom. I just made a comment to help others.

I'm still trying to figure out how that top comment was 'helpful'.