3 days in row, 3 negative reviews from GaTwoSome

[Decatur Guy]

I'm very suspicious. Three days in row, GaTwoSome has reviewed someone from Atlanta, and each time, they weren't happy. And they weren't happy for the same reason each time:

 

The escorts couldn't get it up to fuck them, and when they wanted to fuck the escort, the escort "whined" about being a bottom.

 

Seriously, WTH? This is plain bizarre that three times in a row, they had remarkably similar but bad experiences with escorts. And it's virtually the same encounter, with the same descriptions of what went down (or didn't) and the same wording to describe the disappointment. I smell something rotten in the state of Denmark.

[Kevin Slater]

Good catch. Worse yet, GATwoSome's first three reviews (all positive) appear on March 10 and 11 of this year, just 19 days ago. Sort of a quick period in which to post so many reviews.

 

I'd be tempted to wonder if any of these supposed bad sessions actually ever happened had the first negatively reviewed escort not responded that it had (but not as the review describes).

 

Perhaps three negative reviews in succession say more about the reviewer than the escorts, but I agree that something more nefarious may be at play.

 

Kevin Slater

[Decatur Guy]

Good catch. Worse yet, GATwoSome's first three reviews (all positive) appear on March 10 and 11 of this year, just 19 days ago. Sort of a quick period in which to post so many reviews.

 

I'd be tempted to wonder if any of these supposed bad sessions actually ever happened had the first negatively reviewed escort not responded that it had (but not as the review describes).

 

Perhaps three negative reviews in succession say more about the reviewer than the escorts, but I agree that something more nefarious may be at play.

 

Kevin Slater

 

It was the third "whining bottom" reference that raised a flag with me ... something's afoot.

[Gar1eth]

It was the third "whining bottom" reference that raised a flag with me ... something's afoot.

 

i recently had an evening where the guy advertised as top/versatile--then I get there--we start things and he tells me I'm too thick and he won't really let me enter all the way. I leave--disgusted but without cumming. I am still horny, so I meet up with an escort who said he was a power bottom--pretty much same scenario happened. Now with the 1st guy--ok he's more of a top--I could maybe understand (and let me say--while I do not have a thin tallywacker--it's not that wide/fat). The second guy with his claims of being a power bottom were upsetting--although he was a smaller Asian guy--maybe he was more used to being with other smaller framed type guys. In any case I could have written 2 bad reviews about what happened in one night.

 

SO while improbable this guy has had that many bad experiences--it can happen.

 

Gman

[Guest Spanker01]

I missed these reviews, so I will go back and read same, and if I have something to add, will do.

 

Spanker

[Bart]

Well it is hard to say how this all came about because these reviews 2-Sept and 1-Oct are from some time ago. The third one the escort does not deny he met with them. He does not deny the activity so I am not sure if grouping these as a set up really applies. The response does not say the two some lied or misrepresented themselves. Of course the response also says he does not believe in reviewing personal connections like this. The escorts have the opportunity to respond. I guess one can only ask if they attempted to send in the reviews sooner and they were lost or they were just cleaning up back files.

 

If you ask me if anything GaTwoSome has to do a better job of screening who they should hire because they are particular about what they want.

 

I think the oddity of having three in a row might come better from the powers that be. Daddy is not fond of negativity, so I am sure if he felt there was an issue with the person doing the reviews he would investigate it.

 

I also find it amazing that a few negative reviews finally are issued we get hot and bothered. If a new person were to read the reviews daily for a year before they hire, they might get the impression the odds of having a below par time are extremely rare and I dont think that is true.

[Decatur Guy]

To me, it's not the fact that someone dares to post three negative reviews -- it's just three so similarly worded ones with the exact same kind of problem so close together. It's odd. It strains credibility.

[gcursor]

2-edged sword

 

I don't think I could ever post a negative review. It's just not in me unfortunately. I just don't have the stomach for it. I just can't change somebody's life with the stroke of the keyboard like that. I guess it's how I've been brought up. Probably the same reason why I say "I'm sorry" when I think I've offended people in the slightest.

 

Also reviews are a 2-edged sword. People may cheer me if I put one up for somebody they like and I may be scorned forever for saying something else. Besides I do research before seeing people and although that may not catch everybody, it drastically cuts down on potential issues.

 

 

I'm very suspicious. Three days in row, GaTwoSome has reviewed someone from Atlanta, and each time, they weren't happy. And they weren't happy for the same reason each time:

 

The escorts couldn't get it up to fuck them, and when they wanted to fuck the escort, the escort "whined" about being a bottom.

 

Seriously, WTH? This is plain bizarre that three times in a row, they had remarkably similar but bad experiences with escorts. And it's virtually the same encounter, with the same descriptions of what went down (or didn't) and the same wording to describe the disappointment. I smell something rotten in the state of Denmark.

[seeker630]

Well it is hard to say how this all came about because these reviews 2-Sept and 1-Oct are from some time ago. The third one the escort does not deny he met with them. He does not deny the activity so I am not sure if grouping these as a set up really applies. The response does not say the two some lied or misrepresented themselves. Of course the response also says he does not believe in reviewing personal connections like this. The escorts have the opportunity to respond. I guess one can only ask if they attempted to send in the reviews sooner and they were lost or they were just cleaning up back files.

 

If you ask me if anything GaTwoSome has to do a better job of screening who they should hire because they are particular about what they want.

 

I think the oddity of having three in a row might come better from the powers that be. Daddy is not fond of negativity, so I am sure if he felt there was an issue with the person doing the reviews he would investigate it.

 

I also find it amazing that a few negative reviews finally are issued we get hot and bothered. If a new person were to read the reviews daily for a year before they hire, they might get the impression the odds of having a below par time are extremely rare and I dont think that is true.

 

Good points, Bart. While things may have happened more or less as described in the reviews, the tone and style of the writing suggest to me that the reviewers are probably 'difficult' clients, and there's a certain arrogance that may well be apparent to those they hire as well.

[fosterchow]

I agree in principle with GCursor - I do not like to post negative reviews. I think when chemistry or misunderstanding or some other kind of situation obtains when a client and escort don't have a good time, you shrug your shoulders and move on. However, in one respect, I do not agree with GCursor. A negative review should be written when an escort steals from a client. I wrote a negative review a few months ago when a sadly misguided young man, whom I had liked a lot, "borrowed" money from me in advance of a scheduled date, and then never showed up and never made any attempt to repay me the $3,000. I think other potential clients should know about those escorts so that they do not become so badly burned as I was.

[+ purplekow]

I agree in principle with GCursor - A negative review should be written when an escort steals from a client. I wrote a negative review a few months ago when a sadly misguided young man, whom I had liked a lot, "borrowed" money from me in advance of a scheduled date, and then never showed up and never made any attempt to repay me the $3,000. .

This young man is not misguided. There area many things he is, misguided is not one of them. He is a thief. He is a con artist. He is a miscreant. He is not misguided. He was guided to some quick easy cash, he took it and never looked back. Fosterchow, in order to tread any more lightly in future statements, your fingers will not be able to touch the keyboard.

[Decatur Guy]

Well, there they go again. FOR FOUR DAYS IN ROW, GaTwoSome has found an escort not to their liking. This is oddly fucked-up. What's the deal here?

[Gar1eth]

I agree in principle with GCursor - I do not like to post negative reviews. I think when chemistry or misunderstanding or some other kind of situation obtains when a client and escort don't have a good time, you shrug your shoulders and move on. However, in one respect, I do not agree with GCursor. A negative review should be written when an escort steals from a client. I wrote a negative review a few months ago when a sadly misguided young man, whom I had liked a lot, "borrowed" money from me in advance of a scheduled date, and then never showed up and never made any attempt to repay me the $3,000. I think other potential clients should know about those escorts so that they do not become so badly burned as I was.

 

I am going to have to disagree in principle to GCursor. It's one thing for an escort experience to not go well perhaps due to incompatibility. Sometimes an escort/client relationship sounds like it would go great in the abstract--but at the time of meeting--things don't go the way everyone had planned. But there are other times--not just when someone has stolen from you--where the escort substantially misrepresents himself--either in how he looks--or in living up to what he promises to do. When misrepresentation happens--a negative review shhould be done. Hiring has always been, and now even more so, an expensive 'proposition'. I don't want to waste my money on a lousy experience when I might have been stayed away if only a negative review had been written.

 

Gman

[Gar1eth]

I agree in principle with GCursor - I do not like to post negative reviews. I think when chemistry or misunderstanding or some other kind of situation obtains when a client and escort don't have a good time, you shrug your shoulders and move on. However, in one respect, I do not agree with GCursor. A negative review should be written when an escort steals from a client. I wrote a negative review a few months ago when a sadly misguided young man, whom I had liked a lot, "borrowed" money from me in advance of a scheduled date, and then never showed up and never made any attempt to repay me the $3,000. I think other potential clients should know about those escorts so that they do not become so badly burned as I was.

 

I am going to have to disagree in principle to GCursor. It's one thing for an escort experience to not go well perhaps due to incompatibility. Sometimes an escort/client relationship sounds like it would go great in the abstract--but at the time of meeting--things don't go the way everyone had planned. But there are other times--not just when someone has stolen from you--where the escort substantially misrepresents himself--either in how he looks--or in living up to what he promises to do. When misrepresentation happens--a negative review shhould be done. Hiring has always been, and now even more so, an expensive 'proposition'. I don't want to waste my money on a lousy experience when I might have stayed away if only a negative review had been written.

 

Gman

[instudiocity]

Seriously, who writes a review with "They spent the first 30 minutes attempting to prepare for anal receptive activity, but they were unable to achieve this. Neither was able to achieve an erection for oral or anal insertive activity."

 

That's way too sophisticated language to describe boners, sucking, fucking and being fucked. Where do the GA2Some work? NASA?

[Kevin Slater]

Where do the GA2Some work? NASA?

 

I am beginning to suspect that they may work in a profession far older than that.

 

Kevin Slater

[+ Shoreboy]

It is hard for me to write a negative review even though I have done so....but in that case it was a dreadful experience and I felt that I needed to warn others.

 

But in the case of GA2Some....man is there any pleasing them? If I was an escort the are two people I would truly avoid. I guess with some people there just ain't anything or anyone that will please them

[gcursor]

Sorry and attention

 

Okay...I was primarily addressing reviews similar to the one we're discussing here. So if something that severe happened then that would crush me and I'd think about a negative review at that point....I wanted to apologize to the forum members for the misunderstanding.

 

As for the poster who keeps posting the negative reviews, I think he just wants some attention is all.

gc

 

I am going to have to disagree in principle to GCursor. It's one thing for an escort experience to not go well perhaps due to incompatibility. Sometimes an escort/client relationship sounds like it would go great in the abstract--but at the time of meeting--things don't go the way everyone had planned. But there are other times--not just when someone has stolen from you--where the escort substantially misrepresents himself--either in how he looks--or in living up to what he promises to do. When misrepresentation happens--a negative review shhould be done. Hiring has always been, and now even more so, an expensive 'proposition'. I don't want to waste my money on a lousy experience when I might have stayed away if only a negative review had been written.

 

Gman

[jawjateck]

Bart's right on here. These boys don't know what they are doing, and have no idea how to sort, sift, and hire a quality escort, which is a very tough assignment in ATL anyway. So as long as they keep doing the same thing, they will get the same poor result. Insane huh? And at this rate, we have about 50 more negative reviews ahead until these boys get a clue. I agree with others...the reviews are worded strangely, quite self-servingly, and tell more about the reviewers than the failings of the escorts.

[Guest Spanker01]

I think it would be fascinating if one or both of these two guys came on the Deli, and described what it is exactly they are looking for. I wont hold my breath for that to happen, but if it did happen, maybe someone would be kind enough to give them some tips. Something just doesn't feel right and without a lot more data, I can't put my finger it.

 

Spanker

[seeker630]

I think it would be fascinating if one or both of these two guys came on the Deli, and described what it is exactly they are looking for. I wont hold my breath for that to happen, but if it did happen, maybe someone would be kind enough to give them some tips. Something just doesn't feel right and without a lot more data, I can't put my finger it.

 

Spanker

 

They did write four POSITIVE reviews on March 10 of escorts already well-reviewed here: MikyNOLA, Damien, Adam Kent & Scott Spears ( http://www.daddysreviews.com/cruise/2011-03-10 ) Also a positive review of Derrick Hanson on March 14.

Intersting that the Damien review is written from a single-client perspective rather than their usual 'we'.

 

This, to me, gives their negative reviews more credibility.

[Decatur Guy]

They did write four POSITIVE reviews on March 10 of escorts already well-reviewed here: MikyNOLA, Damien, Adam Kent & Scott Spears ( http://www.daddysreviews.com/cruise/2011-03-10 ) Also a positive review of Derrick Hanson on March 14.

Intersting that the Damien review is written from a single-client perspective rather than their usual 'we'.

 

This, to me, gives their negative reviews more credibility.

 

Yeah, having positive reviews does cast it in a different light. But the whole thing -- the odd language, the similar letdowns, the bunching up of reviews -- it's all so damn "queer." (in the pre-1960s since of the word).

[OrdinaryJoe]

I'll just point out, and my work in statistics probably sets me up to get bothered by things like this, that all 4 negative reviews were the first reviews each of those escorts received. And now I see all of the good reviews were of escorts previously reviewed. I have no idea what that means, but it strikes me as....interesting.

[seeker630]

I'll just point out, and my work in statistics probably sets me up to get bothered by things like this, that all 4 negative reviews were the first reviews each of those escorts received. And now I see all of the good reviews were of escorts previously reviewed. I have no idea what that means, but it strikes me as....interesting.

 

I noticed that as well and intended to point it out but forgot. I was going to comment on it as a possible validation of the review site - perhaps one lesson that should have been learned by the reviewers (although, to be fair, sometimes there aren't any well-reviewed guys available when & where you're ready to hire.)

[Fishman]

Hey, guys. I just spent 30 minutes typing a LONG response to this, especially since I have been in contact with them over the past few weeks...and when I posted it, the site let me know that I had been logged out.

 

And I lost the post.

TECHNOLOGY.

 

Anyway, I have to run for now, but I will post at length later today.

Synopsis: I think they are legit.

 

More later,

Mar