Brett -Again!

[N13]

I had thought that the proponderance of evidence that Brent is a scam artist at worst or a terrible escort at best was settled in the forum a few weeks(?) ago. But here he is again with a rave from a first time reviewer.

 

The guy is a loser! See the previous thread about him.

 

N13

[adriano46]

N13 - I had the same impression. I had seen his pics for the last 2 years or so, was originally interested, then very disinterested, but he keeps coming back for more. Must be true, that a sucker is born every minute.

[josephga]

The majority of those who hire and write reviews never read this board or the threads. The majority go to the sites pick the guy that interest them then hire. Or they might see the guy that interest them then go to the main page of this site and do a review search. But the majority never bother to click on forum and read the dish that's posted here

[bcohen7719]

Holy gullible! I almost fell for this myself. And for newbies like myself, might more experienced website users also post a link to the previous discussions? I'm doing this myself, below. Thanks, guys!

 

BC

 

http://www.companyofmen.org/showthread.php?77948-Review-and-Response-of-Brett-4&highlight=Brett

[kjun]

Remember, if someone did not try new guys we would never get to know about them. To admonish those who give it a go for us is just plain wrong. Thanks to those who try a new guy.

[JT Brooklyn]

Totally Agree! I have great respect for those who do a "Trial Run" more so than those who like to join "Mutual Admiration Societie's" about the same Old Working Guys!

 

Some of these guys we know already how "Wonderful" Blah Blah they are..."New & Fresh" is what keeps the World Moving.....

[CowboyUp]

Remember, if someone did not try new guys we would never get to know about them. To admonish those who give it a go for us is just plain wrong. Thanks to those who try a new guy.

 

You make a great point, KJUN.

[N13]

The problem ws not that someone tried a 'new' guy, but that a 'first reviewer' gave a rave to someone who had been reviewed before and found to be terrible. Having reviewed a number of 'new guys' - some great!, I find it hard to believe a first review by someone who I can't trust because his review is so far off from the previous ones and my own experience.

 

N13

[JackTwist]

Just for clarification: is the "Brett" discussed in this thread one and the same as "Brett #4-NYC" who has received a favorable review today (Wednesday, 2/10/11)?

[Guy Fawkes]

One Mans Treasure is another mans Trash...

 

Now that we've once again established that one man's treasure is another man's trash...

 

http://nextmusiconline.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Beat_Dead_Horse.jpg

[adriano46]

DADDY - that is an hilarious one!!! I too agree with your response, and YES, yet again, we have a first-timer telling us how VUNDERBAR is Brett,

[seeker630]

daddy - that is an hilarious one!!! I too agree with your response, and yes, yet again, we have a first-timer telling us how vunderbar is brett,

 

whack!

 

[N13]

Another rave review from a first time reviewer. Too bad there is no way to block these obviously fake reviews.

[gtx1]

Tried to contact him through his Dallas personna and never received a response

[+ Shoreboy]

I had a terrible time with Brett and wrote about it in a past thread.

 

Daddy's picture is perfect since that is exactly how Brett laid on the bed and I was tempted to poke him to get this slug moving.

 

Total rip-off and I too agree that has to be a false review....beware of Brett