Do you ever withhold an excellent review because...

[bcohen7719]

Suppose you have a fantastic time with a great new companion.

 

Are you ever tempted to NOT write a positive review because you don't want to share him with anyone else?

 

Or is that almost insane?

 

BC

[Diverdan]

I would never not provide a good review on someone with whom I had a great time. It's pretty unrealistic to think that withholding a review is going to keep that companion for only yourself. Unless, of course you want to employ him on a full time basis! Sometimes no review is provided if there is nothing new to add to already great reviews, but even then sometimes you will see a review that says basically that.

[Guest greatness]

Spill the beans who is it? (Just kidding~~) Hugs~~~

 

Suppose you have a fantastic time with a great new companion.

 

Are you ever tempted to NOT write a positive review because you don't want to share him with anyone else?

 

Or is that almost insane?

 

BC

[bcohen7719]

1) I'm "expecting" this shortly

 

2) No, I'm not going to spill the beans, but I'm wondering: "Wouldn't

that be bad for this fellow? He's such a sweetheart." I'm seriously

going crazy over this.

 

BC

[+ glutes]

I suspect I am not the only one with 'private stock'. He was found by word of mouth, doesn't need a silly plagiaristic blog or 'reviews'...

[bcohen7719]

I suspect I am not the only one with 'private stock'. He was found by word of mouth, doesn't need a silly plagiaristic blog or 'reviews'...

 

BLESS YOU! I'm not crazy after all. It was just "Private Stock Possessiveness Syndrome."

You have made my day.

 

Best wishes,

 

BC

[justaguy]

I'm assuming the man in question is an escort. If so, he's not 'private stock' even if you don't name names or write a review. When he's not with you, he's with another client. Just as you're free to name his name, so are they. Some of them probably already have. What is 'private stock' is the time the two of you spend together. Focus on that and on enjoying that time. IMO any sense of possessiveness is potentially dangerous, to yourself and the escort. Ditch it.

[Bart]

In genenral, I believe issuing a great review for a gentleman would keep him busy so he would stay in the industry. That said I have met a few fine gentlemen who do like the extra advertising. They are careful to build a select group of gentlemen. Two main reasons being they have a regular job and second keeps the crazies at bay. If you stay below the radar you do receive significantly less junk calls and cancellations.

 

I dont think I have deliberately not written a review in order to keep things quiet. There have been a few guys who have brought the subject of reviews up and I have played dumb.

But none of those was a great outing, okay but really nothing they would be proud of in a review. Now a few very good and have not issued a review on, expecially last year.

[bcohen7719]

I'm assuming the man in question is an escort. If so, he's not 'private stock' even if you don't name names or write a review. When he's not with you, he's with another client. Just as you're free to name his name, so are they. Some of them probably already have. What is 'private stock' is the time the two of you spend together. Focus on that and on enjoying that time. IMO any sense of possessiveness is potentially dangerous, to yourself and the escort. Ditch it.

 

What you say is entire sensible and solid advice. I think it also only human to fall prey to irrationale possessiveness. I'm worrying way in advance--your practical guidelines are very much appreciated.

 

BC

[leigh.bess.toad]

What you say is entire sensible and solid advice. I think it also only human to fall prey to irrationale possessiveness. I'm worrying way in advance--your practical guidelines are very much appreciated.

 

BC

 

BC -- I may have a slightly different take. But the guys I'm with if I enjoy being with them, it means I like them. And I want the people I like to be successful, both financially and in receceiving the recognition they deserve for doing a great job. So, no, I wouldn't withhold a review to keep a private stash. I bet that if you are a good client, who treats them with respect, who lets them know that you enjoy what they do for you, that you won't have any problem getting to be with them. My guess is that clients like that are the ones the escorts are going to go out of their way to keep as good clients.

 

Just MHO

[Guest greatness]

I usually write reviews for every escort I meet. I didn't write for a couple of them because they retired and deleted their ads. A guy just opens his ad only when he is working and then shuts it down and comes back with a different ID so there is no way I could submit a review. I think good escorts need to be recognized. That is good for all of us. I wasted my money a lot on bad escorts and sometimes just paid the escort to send him right back out the door. Reviews help. I don't usually trust reviews on men4rentnow, I do trust reviews from daddys and maleescortreview. Good escorts will be noticed by other clients sooner or later so not writing a review doesn't reflect bad on the escort. So if you don't want to write a review I think that's fine. Hugs~~~

[cany10011]

Daddy...

 

Should we address those with "private stock" as daddy??? lol

[+ glutes]

BLESS YOU! I'm not crazy after all. It was just "Private Stock Possessiveness Syndrome."

You have made my day.

 

Best wishes,

 

BC

 

No BC, you aren't crazy. Check your private messages...

[JT Brooklyn]

Suppose you have a fantastic time with a great new companion.

 

Are you ever tempted to NOT write a positive review because you don't want to share him with anyone else?

 

Or is that almost insane?

 

BC

 

The Odds are any Working Guy that "cums close" to Fantastic will have a certain amount of Regulars to begin with!

 

Keeping a Goodlooking Boyfriend isn't always easy..never mind a guy who's making good $$ "Working It"! Unless your the Sugar Daddy Type!

 

I do have a P/T Friend who brings a smile to my face once a month and likes his "Down Low and No Reviews" association with me. Which is about as "Private Stock" as I'm ever gonna get.

[cany10011]

Does that defeat the purpose of a message board in which members share their experiences whether good or bad. Solicited or unsolicited?

 

I suppose you could withhold that info but if it is a listed escort, someone else will have to try him and post a review. Otherwise, if he's your own private stock, then the question shouldn't be raised in my opinion... it just makes people wonder....

 

 

 

QUOTE=bcohen7719;697252]Suppose you have a fantastic time with a great new companion.

 

Are you ever tempted to NOT write a positive review because you don't want to share him with anyone else?

 

Or is that almost insane?

 

BC

[Epigonos]

For the first time, since I started participating on this site, I am detecting, what appears to be, a sense of possessiveness on the part of some clients regarding the escorts they hire. If this is indeed true then it is basically unhealthy. In fact it is downright, emotionally and possibly even physically, dangerous and delusional. Escorts are businessmen and like other businessmen in our lives we can develop friendships with them, we cannot, however, develop exclusive relationship with them.

 

I see a small group of escorts on a somewhat regular basis. Over the past few years we have become professional friends. These guys are outstanding human beings as well as being outstanding practitioners of their profession. Since I like, respect, admire, and enjoy these men I wish for them nothing but the very best in both their private and professional lives. I have no influence over their private live nor should I. However, one way I can assist them to increase their professionally success is by writing and posting excellent reviews of our time together. I sincerely believe I owe them this if for no other reason than for the pleasure to have given me.

[Guest Magnus]

BC, I debated joining this thread, because the point of a private stash to never admit that you have one....

Yes, I see a few guys who do not have reviews. However, I know them well enough to know that they are doing quite well without the extra "advertisement". Otherwise I would post a review to help them get the recognition they deserve; I'd probably make sure they knew I had done it, so I could get a bit of credit .

On the other hand, if an inquiry was made about one of them on this forum I would probably reply to it, or send the poster a private message. I don't say that to try to get you to "spill it" about your discovery, but we are all members of this site's community by choice. So I'd like to help a fellow member the same way I'd like them to help me. That's why I think there's a difference between not posting a review and replying to an inquiry in this forum.

The other thing to remember is that we do not all have the same tastes. There are plenty of guys with excellent reviews on this site and in this forum who I wouldn't go home with if they were paying me.

[bcohen7719]

Magnus:

 

Excellent, excellent insights...Many thanks!

 

Just to share my own experiences: 1) I have none. My "first time" is

coming up very soon. Were it not for several private messages from this forum,

this would never have come about. I am grateful beyond words, many kind people from this community; 2) Several published reviews for someone who was almost to be my "first time" were, in my opinion, possible fakes. Some very kind members

of this community also forewarned me. I don't want to go into details, because there is no way to prove this one way or another.

 

So I think you are 100% correct about peer-to-peer helping. Your philosophy of mutual generosity says a lot about yourself, as well.

 

With appreciation,

 

BC

[+ glutes]

BC, I debated joining this thread, because the point of a private stash to never admit that you have one....

Yes, I see a few guys who do not have reviews. However, I know them well enough to know that they are doing quite well without the extra "advertisement".

 

Well done Magnus. My private 'stash' is totally word of mouth, and is so good he does not need (or want) to advertise. 'Possiveness' is total malarkey, he depends his clients wouldn't give out his name and number without ourselves screening good clients for him. Would I send a 400 pound oaf, a gay Republican (note: oxymoron), or a drunk & surly pilot to him? Of cousre not.

[cany10011]

Similarly, the philosophy about "Private Stock Possessiveness Syndrome" says a bit about the poster....

 

 

 

Magnus:

 

Excellent, excellent insights...Many thanks!

 

Just to share my own experiences: 1) I have none. My "first time" is

coming up very soon. Were it not for several private messages from this forum,

this would never have come about. I am grateful beyond words, many kind people from this community; 2) Several published reviews for someone who was almost to be my "first time" were, in my opinion, possible fakes. Some very kind members

of this community also forewarned me. I don't want to go into details, because there is no way to prove this one way or another.

 

So I think you are 100% correct about peer-to-peer helping. Your philosophy of mutual generosity says a lot about yourself, as well.

 

With appreciation,

 

BC

[bcohen7719]

Similarly, the philosophy about "Private Stock Possessiveness Syndrome" says a bit about the poster....

 

Cany10011:

 

I was actually trying to make fun of psychiatry...please forgive the failure!

 

Best wishes,

 

BC