Escort Blogs

[hunkymuscles]

As an escort myself, I think his blog is well-written. I see nothing wrong with having ads there, he might as well try to make a little money off the blog. Though I agree, perhaps some more personality can be included, I can relate to a lot of what he writes about.

Hunkymuscles http://www.daddysreviews.com/review/raul_sf

[12go_now]

Realy liked reading this blog.

Fun stories.

Nice design. keep it up!

[Romann]

Just a thought... or a couple.

 

Even if anonymous, I can see reading the blog and thinking, "OMG, he's talking about me." In this business complete discretion and privacy is a good thing.

 

First, not to challenge your opinion/thoughts/words on this topic but how is a blog any different from a client/poster submitting a review about their intimate encounter with hot and juicy sexy details of the salacious man-on-man action? I don't think the two are really any different because in most cases and from my experience, the client/posters submit reviews without the escorts knowledge nor do the escorts have input as to what is disclosed and not disclosed. Also, as long as there is no identifiers linking the escort to the client and assuming the escort is being respectful and discrete about who specifically they're talking about, then I don't feel any harm is done.

 

I had a review not too long ago where a private conversation with the client was disclosed within the review and while many thought it was funny (myself included), I was a bit mortified because again, the discussion was private and later detailed in the review. When I first read it, of course the coffee I was drinking that morning spewed all over my laptop as I was shocked at first but then I laughed about it because no harm was done except for a little embarrassment on my part but oh well. Again, it was no big deal. I've also read reviews that have been just out of this world and so much detail has been built into them that even I was blushing for the escort being reported on. But again, I think it was done as a compliment rather than something which is negative.

 

Reviews and blogs in my opinion are not that far apart and at the end of the day are more entertainment than anything.

 

I recently brought my site online/live back in September when I first moved to Chicago (yes, I am giving myself, website but more specifically, my blog a plug) after working with a wonderful developer/programmer, it was determined that a blog would be in order. I like to write and feel that I'm pretty good at writing so the blog made sense and it also gives me an avenue/forum at which I can speak my mind about aspects of escorting, bad behavior (both clients and escorts) and experiences ranging from hot to matters that I feel are important to escorting but also myself. Last month I did blog on a client that stood me up not once, but twice for an overnight with at the time was for not acceptable reasons of any kind and done in bad behavior. While I didn’t disclose, connect or point at the client or make any reference as to who he was, I did put the entire topic on notice and used my blog as a forum to communicate my frustration with bad behavior on the client’s part. The blog also served as a good tool to communicate to others that while standing an escort up once, twice or however many times, my message was put out to the public that I’m aware and counteracting these types of failed appointments as a matter to protect my business, my time and income derived from escorting considering this is my full time job. My other blog posts have been very light hearted and again, about topics that are/were important to me and what other place to write about it than my blog where I can’t be challenged or cut down for my thoughts on matters important to me and my career.

 

I've talked about a handful of multiple day hires with several clients of mine but before I posted or even started to write the blog entries, I contacted my clients directly and, with their permission began to write about our experience together leaving out sexual detail but rather talk about the events and adventures that we had together. This has proved to be very beneficial in my opinion because a number of hires have come from those blog entries and common comments have been that clients like to read about escort adventures from their point of view rather than just the client's which in most cases revolves around sexual details. I'm not complaining about sexual detailed comments/reviews but with the blog entries, it's more informational rather than sexual.

 

I've always found it interesting that clients freely discuss their escorts (I've had many clients tell me how they heard about me from another client and wanted to hire after hearing all the juicy details), escorts they wouldn't recommend and ones to avoid at all costs for whatever reason. Though, if an escort does a blog then for some reason it's construed as (not in all cases) the escort not adhering to discretion.

 

Just my two cents...

 

Just my thoughts on this matter.

[Guest IndyMedic2006]

First, not to challenge your opinion/thoughts/words on this topic but how is a blog any different from a client/poster submitting a review about their intimate encounter with hot and juicy sexy details of the salacious man-on-man action? I don't think the two are really any different because in most cases and from my experience, the client/posters submit reviews without the escorts knowledge nor do the escorts have input as to what is disclosed and not disclosed. Also, as long as there is no identifiers linking the escort to the client and assuming the escort is being respectful and discrete about who specifically they're talking about, then I don't feel any harm is done.

 

Romann definitely has a point about clients being free to comment as they see fit and I think as long as there is discretion still maintained by the professional escort, there really isn't an issue. I thought that was the whole point of using screen names pseudonyms.

 

I've also read reviews that have been just out of this world and so much detail has been built into them that even I was blushing for the escort being reported on..

 

I have to agree. There have been several reviews that I have seen from particular reviews that are rather graphic and explicit (almost over the top and boarders on degrading the escort) while I have seen other reviews that give details without being crude and crass.

[Guest GQ Pro]

Thanks for your input about escorts writing blogs. Since I'm not revealing who I am, not mentioning any client's true names, and not giving my location, I don't see any harm in writing a blog about my experiences with clients. I actually think some clients may like to know some escorts may think. Most of what we say to them isn't always how we really feel.....who wants to hear the truth when you are paying around $200/hr

GQ Pro

A link to my blog http://gqpro.tumblr.com/ please feel free to leave your comments there

[cany10011]

GQ Pro...it's always interesting and revealing to see what the "other side" is like. Keep up the good work. I do have a small comment about your most recent article however and will post it on your blog..

[Dave]

hi GQ,

 

you've been promoting this blog for several weeks now, so before i saw this thread (just now) i visited the blog - i think when it was first launched because there were only, like, two posts there then. honestly, at that time i was not so impressed, but what i've concluded is that ANYONE who posts a blog should first get a chunk of posts up before actively getting the word out. anyway i'm really glad i went back to it today. your posts are good! that one about the daddy/son role play was really interesting to read. plus i like that you are being so honest throughout the blog, it shows.

 

i wrote a sex blog for three full years, i think it was from 2005 to 2008 (dates get a bit blurry when working as an escort for a while - LOL). i posted once a week on average. in fact, the damn thing didn't even start from me... i had been telling stories to fuck bud friends of mine for many months before, and they urged me to start blogging. hmmm, in hindsight maybe they just wanted me to shut up!

it became a group blog, a collective of me writing about various parts of my sex life, and four of those friends, writing about their sex experiences with me. sounds very narcissistic, no? thank god i didnt actually conceive the idea. anyway, i wrote about my one-on-one play encounters, my times at sex parties, my client experiences, and my own musings on sex work. a priority was real discretion for my clients. another priority was to keep my own identity separate, so that no one could read it and say "that is Dave the escort from DC." my instinct was that it would not be good for business. on the other hand i felt sometimes that it would be good for business. but - nah... while one potential client might read things and be titillated and think "i have to hire him", another potential client might like one of the posts i wrote but be turned off by another. my blog got pretty piggy - in fact, it was banned by fleshbot (i was told it was "too gross for fleshbot" - which i took as a compliment - LOL!)

 

now that i've stopped writing it - i chose to end it when it was doing well, with a pretty big worldwide readership - i talk about it every once in a while with a client, and have even given the blog address out to them to read. i still wonder if that is a mistake, but i try to use my gut when facing ambivalent situations, and at this juncture it feels right to do so. i think about one day publishing it in a book format, but that's another project for another day - unless a publisher comes a-knocking first.

 

my sex blog was a way for me to share a bit about the escorting world from "our" side. it was also a way for me to vent, the same way that you just wrote about tips. in fact, i think i wrote about tipping too once! although i always wrote honestly (meaning, nothing was ever made up for a good story - this was not fiction, all the stuff really did happen) i was asked a number of times if i was making things up. that was always so interesting to me, that some people can't believe the shit that really happens in the world.

 

when i look back on the blog now, i sometimes cringe at the writing, but i suspect that's something many writers experience when looking back on their own work. still, its a good capsule of me during that time period, and the stuff i experienced. i am proud of the blog and yet by its very nature, it is not something i can freely talk about. like, i suspect my mother would be proud, but i'm not going there.

 

the blog did become the 2009 finalist (one of three worldwide) for "best sex blog of the year" at the erotic awards in england. i was honored. i was invited to the uk for the awards. three days before the final vote by the judges, the blog became entangled in a legal problem for one of my best friends who was mentioned all over it - he was also one of the contributers, and he was something of a sex celebrity in nyc - so i chose to take it offline. it remained offline for about 10 months. the judges never even saw it in those last few days, and the title went to one of the other two finalists.

 

i guess my point there is that although it is fun and interesting, a blog can also become a problem. in this case it wasnt a problem for me, but for him with his ex wife. its amazing how complicated things can get, so quickly. wow - this seems to have become a downer of a post; i didnt mean that. also didnt intend for it to be so bloody long! what i really meant to say was, i think you are doing a fine job. keep up the good work, stud!

[hunkymuscles]

I have gone to his blog several times already. I've found the blog has a very appealing look and is written in good taste. I hope more clients read it so they get an idea of what escorts think sometimes

Rex San Francisco http://www.daddysreviews.com/review/raul_sf

[Guest GQ Pro]

hi GQ,

 

you've been promoting this blog for several weeks now, so before i saw this thread (just now) i visited the blog - i think when it was first launched because there were only, like, two posts there then. honestly, at that time i was not so impressed, but what i've concluded is that ANYONE who posts a blog should first get a chunk of posts up before actively getting the word out. anyway i'm really glad i went back to it today. your posts are good! that one about the daddy/son role play was really interesting to read. plus i like that you are being so honest throughout the blog, it shows.

 

Dave,

Thanks for checking out my blog and your encouraging words...I took a look at your blog as well...very hot!

GQ Pro

A link to my blog http://gqpro.tumblr.com/

[Guest GQ Pro]

I just wanted to say thanks to everyone who has checked out my blog. I've gotten a lot of positive feedback and really to appreciate it. I've gotten some good negative feedback as well. I've been able to take some of the negative feedback to make my blog even better. I've also discovered that some people were offended by some of what I've written. I know I can't please everyone, if I did the blog would be too vanilla. I want the blog to remain an honest insight into my thoughts and experiences of an escort.

Thanks for checking out my blog, "Secret Escapades of a Gay Gigolo" http://gqpro.tumblr.com/

GQ Pro

[bcohen7719]

First, not to challenge your opinion/thoughts/words on this topic but how is a blog any different from a client/poster submitting a review about their intimate encounter with hot and juicy sexy details of the salacious man-on-man action? I don't think the two are really any different because in most cases and from my experience, the client/posters submit reviews without the escorts knowledge nor do the escorts have input as to what is disclosed and not disclosed. Also, as long as there is no identifiers linking the escort to the client and assuming the escort is being respectful and discrete about who specifically they're talking about, then I don't feel any harm is done.

 

I had a review not too long ago where a private conversation with the client was disclosed within the review and while many thought it was funny (myself included), I was a bit mortified because again, the discussion was private and later detailed in the review. When I first read it, of course the coffee I was drinking that morning spewed all over my laptop as I was shocked at first but then I laughed about it because no harm was done except for a little embarrassment on my part but oh well. Again, it was no big deal. I've also read reviews that have been just out of this world and so much detail has been built into them that even I was blushing for the escort being reported on. But again, I think it was done as a compliment rather than something which is negative.

 

Reviews and blogs in my opinion are not that far apart and at the end of the day are more entertainment than anything.

 

I recently brought my site online/live back in September when I first moved to Chicago (yes, I am giving myself, website but more specifically, my blog a plug) after working with a wonderful developer/programmer, it was determined that a blog would be in order. I like to write and feel that I'm pretty good at writing so the blog made sense and it also gives me an avenue/forum at which I can speak my mind about aspects of escorting, bad behavior (both clients and escorts) and experiences ranging from hot to matters that I feel are important to escorting but also myself. Last month I did blog on a client that stood me up not once, but twice for an overnight with at the time was for not acceptable reasons of any kind and done in bad behavior. While I didn’t disclose, connect or point at the client or make any reference as to who he was, I did put the entire topic on notice and used my blog as a forum to communicate my frustration with bad behavior on the client’s part. The blog also served as a good tool to communicate to others that while standing an escort up once, twice or however many times, my message was put out to the public that I’m aware and counteracting these types of failed appointments as a matter to protect my business, my time and income derived from escorting considering this is my full time job. My other blog posts have been very light hearted and again, about topics that are/were important to me and what other place to write about it than my blog where I can’t be challenged or cut down for my thoughts on matters important to me and my career.

 

I've talked about a handful of multiple day hires with several clients of mine but before I posted or even started to write the blog entries, I contacted my clients directly and, with their permission began to write about our experience together leaving out sexual detail but rather talk about the events and adventures that we had together. This has proved to be very beneficial in my opinion because a number of hires have come from those blog entries and common comments have been that clients like to read about escort adventures from their point of view rather than just the client's which in most cases revolves around sexual details. I'm not complaining about sexual detailed comments/reviews but with the blog entries, it's more informational rather than sexual.

 

I've always found it interesting that clients freely discuss their escorts (I've had many clients tell me how they heard about me from another client and wanted to hire after hearing all the juicy details), escorts they wouldn't recommend and ones to avoid at all costs for whatever reason. Though, if an escort does a blog then for some reason it's construed as (not in all cases) the escort not adhering to discretion.

 

Just my two cents...

 

Just my thoughts on this matter.

 

Romann makes some good points. It may be difficult to defend an "absolute stand" on issues of confidentiality, although this may sound contrary to traditional escort values as I understand them. Priests are supposed to maintain confidentiality in all confessions, but what do they do when a potential criminal confesses his plans? I'm not sure. In the gay world, there are some leaders in the anti-gay movement who are particularly harmful to large numbers of vulnerable persons. These may include leaders in the reparative therapy field, by which I mean those who try to re-train

gay or questionning teens or older from homosexuality to heterosexuality with

disastrous results leading to suicide or lives of misery. You may argue that these clients do have the rights of privacy. But that may not be an absolute moral or ethical stand in every single case. The answers are not easy. As Justice Jackson warned during the Nuremburg Trials, "The Constitution is not a suicide pact."

 

BC

[Guest GQ Pro]

GQ Pro...it's always interesting and revealing to see what the "other side" is like. Keep up the good work. I do have a small comment about your most recent article however and will post it on your blog..

Thank you for your comments Cany10011. If you guys get a chance, please check out my latest entry on my thoughts about discretion. I'm also finishing up another entry where I write about some of the reasons escorts are hired.

GQ Pro "Secret Escapades of a Gay Gigolo" http://gqpro.tumblr.com/ please feel free to leave your comments there. Thank you

[Guest GQ Pro]

I just posted another blog entry titled, " Stereotyping Clients." If you have a chance, please check it out and feel free to post your comments there as well.

Thanks,

GQ Pro Secret Escapades of a Gay Gigolohttp://gqpro.tumblr.com/

[Guest IndyMedic2006]

A little pretentious

 

GQ up this point I was enjoying your blog, but I can’t say as I liked this last blog entry, and in fact, I found it rather rude and offensive and to me it painted you as a snobby and quite pretentious. It also sound to me that you do not have a great deal of respect for your clients if you are repeatedly referring to them over and Over and OVER again as old, fat & ugly and then to say, "no offense to the old, fat and ugly, but you know who you are!?" Are you unable to write about clients who arent nesseccarily the ideals in a more positive light instead of denigrating them? Why don’t you just go around kicking all the clients in the junk that you find less then appealing and hang signs around their next that say TOO OLD, TOO FAT & TOO UGLY TO LIVE was enjoying your blog a great deal up this point and I have to say my respect for you and your project went right the window for this reader.Thanks you!

 

I just posted another blog entry titled, " Stereotyping Clients." If you have a chance, please check it out and feel free to post your comments there as well.

Thanks,

GQ Pro Secret Escapades of a Gay Gigolohttp://gqpro.tumblr.com/

[doitb4ugo]

I have to agree with Indy on this one.....I was sadened to read about your attitude toward your clients. If this is the viewpoint of many escorts, I really need to rethink my hiring....Being old, fat, and ugly is not the worst thing in life...I think you have just proved that.

[Guest IndyMedic2006]

AMEN Brother Rich! Can I get a witness?!?

 

It is kind of hard to come together and how out hopes of a strong unified gay community when such a small subculture of that same gay community has members that look down on others of that same subculture with distain and lack of respect. How can we come together as one people when it is seems so easy for one to so nonchalantly call people derogatory names. There is such a feeling of the author being pretentious, hopefully unintentional, but present none the less. I would have hoped we had come just a little farther and a little closer as such a unique group of gay men.

[gp0560]

GQ up this point I was enjoying your blog, but I can’t say as I liked this last blog entry, and in fact, I found it rather rude and offensive and to me it painted you as a snobby and quite pretentious. . . . I was enjoying your blog a great deal up this point and I have to say my respect for you and your project went right the window for this reader.Thanks you!

 

What he said!

[NYTomcat]

was enjoying your blog a great deal up this point and I have to say my respect for you and your project went right the window for this reader.Thanks you! [/font]

 

Well amen. While I try to read into what gqpro is saying that clients come in all shapes and sizes the way the blog is worded makes it clear his attitude toward clients is not one that would interest me.

[leigh.bess.toad]

AMEN[/color][/b] Brother Rich! Can I get a witness?!?

 

It is kind of hard to come together and how out hopes of a strong unified gay community when such a small subculture of that same gay community has members that look down on others of that same subculture with distain and lack of respect. How can we come together as one people when it is seems so easy for one to so nonchalantly call people derogatory names. There is such a feeling of the author being pretentious, hopefully unintentional, but present none the less. I would have hoped we had come just a little farther and a little closer as such a unique group of gay men.

 

I hate to pile on, but I have to agree with my esteemed colleages. I don't know if I'm old, but this could make me feel like it. I don't know if I'm fat -- hell, Twiggy thought she was fat. Ugly -- well I've shattered a few mirrors in my day, made a few babies cry, caused children to run and hide in horror. And like TC I think I know what he was trying to say. But if that is the way that the escorts think, then maybe I should spend the rest of my life intimately familiar with my best friend -- Lefty.

[Dave]

when i saw the title of the post (Stereotyping Clients) i immediately thought, uh-oh... this can’t be good.

 

i’ve read it several times now. at first, i too thought it was a disrespectful post. then i read it again, and wondered if you MEANT to say one thing, but you just fucked up. i suspected that in an effort to write cleverly, you in fact wrote yourself into a corner. on my third and subsequent readings of it, i realized that although you talk about “old, fat and ugly men,” and then say you were wrong (and later say the best sex you had with clients those you weren’t attracted to - gee) in fact you were NOT saying you were wrong about your old, fat, ugly grouping... you simply don’t know when to make a new paragraph! i feel like i’ve now seen how fucked up this post really is (sorry all you previous commentors, it took me THAT long to get to where you all were. i suppose i was being the devil’s advocate.)

 

GQPro, i *think* i get some of your points. you had preconceived ideas about who would hire, but you realize now you were wrong - it’s not only the subgroups you previously assumed would hire, it’s also all these other subgroups: married guys on the DL, partnered guys who no longer have an active sex life, business travelers, etc.

 

at the very end of your post, you wrote, “Through escorting I’ve discovered that clients don’t fit a stereotype and that not everyone hires an escort because that’s the only way they can have sex.” and yet - you just stereotyped all those other people, didn’t you?

 

yes, GQPro, it is a big world out there. i think anyone who escorts for a decent length of time learns that EVERYONE hires. i don't mean literally everyone, but yes, every type of person, every culture group, every job category, every race, every age, every sexual orientation, and so on. i remember my own realization of that, and i’ve talked with lots of escorts - both male and female - who went through the same epiphany. i feel it’s one thing to realize that “everyone” hires escorts, it’s another thing to stereotype people. sometimes generalizations are helpful in this world, so that we can make sense of it. but i think one must be careful not to box people in too narrowly.

 

what would you do if you get an older guy, who regularly has 4 or 5 revolving younger fuck buddies, who hires you just for a change of pace? how would you categorize him? or what about a guy who’s 50 pounds overweight by society’s standards, is happily partnered with a good sex life, but figures he would hire someone like you - to explore a fetish that his partner doesn't share? how would you stereotype him?

 

i think your post might have been way more interesting if you had written more about the men in your first stereotyping category: your “old, fat and ugly” men, and how you’ve evolving - albeit slowly - in your attitude towards them. perhaps you could continue to work at dissolving your own stereotypes of them, in a public format.

 

you also wrote, “I’ve learned that having good sex can happen with almost any type of guys. It’s not always about physical appearance. It’s more about sexual chemistry between two people.”

 

let me step back for a moment: if you want to continue to write a blog, you might want to spend a few minutes proofreading it - or having someone else do that - before you publish it online.

“... with almost any type of guys.” i think you meant “guy”

“...I would had been extremely flattered.” i think you meant “have”

“...I may of not been physically attracted to.” i think you meant “have” here, too.

 

but back to the content of the 2nd paragraph up from here - your “good sex” quote. as you have more sex with more people, you may also realize that good sex is not just about appearance OR chemistry. it’s also about communication, it’s about letting go, it’s about spontaneity, and - surprise, surprise - it’s about dropping preconceived ideas of your partner.

[Guest IndyMedic2006]

when i saw the title of the post (Stereotyping Clients) i immediately thought, uh-oh... this can’t be good.

 

i’ve read it several times now. at first, i too thought it was a disrespectful post. then i read it again, and wondered if you MEANT to say one thing, but you just fucked up. i suspected that in an effort to write cleverly, you in fact wrote yourself into a corner. on my third and subsequent readings of it, i realized that although you talk about “old, fat and ugly men,” and then say you were wrong (and later say the best sex you had with clients those you weren’t attracted to - gee) in fact you were NOT saying you were wrong about your old, fat, ugly grouping... you simply don’t know when to make a new paragraph! i feel like i’ve now seen how fucked up this post really is (sorry all you previous commentors, it took me THAT long to get to where you all were. i suppose i was being the devil’s advocate.)

 

GQPro, i *think* i get some of your points. you had preconceived ideas about who would hire, but you realize now you were wrong - it’s not only the subgroups you previously assumed would hire, it’s also all these other subgroups: married guys on the DL, partnered guys who no longer have an active sex life, business travelers, etc.

 

at the very end of your post, you wrote, “Through escorting I’ve discovered that clients don’t fit a stereotype and that not everyone hires an escort because that’s the only way they can have sex.” and yet - you just stereotyped all those other people, didn’t you?

 

yes, GQPro, it is a big world out there. i think anyone who escorts for a decent length of time learns that EVERYONE hires. i don't mean literally everyone, but yes, every type of person, every culture group, every job category, every race, every age, every sexual orientation, and so on. i remember my own realization of that, and i’ve talked with lots of escorts - both male and female - who went through the same epiphany. i feel it’s one thing to realize that “everyone” hires escorts, it’s another thing to stereotype people. sometimes generalizations are helpful in this world, so that we can make sense of it. but i think one must be careful not to box people in too narrowly.

 

what would you do if you get an older guy, who regularly has 4 or 5 revolving younger fuck buddies, who hires you just for a change of pace? how would you categorize him? or what about a guy who’s 50 pounds overweight by society’s standards, is happily partnered with a good sex life, but figures he would hire someone like you - to explore a fetish that his partner doesn't share? how would you stereotype him?

 

i think your post might have been way more interesting if you had written more about the men in your first stereotyping category: your “old, fat and ugly” men, and how you’ve evolving - albeit slowly - in your attitude towards them. perhaps you could continue to work at dissolving your own stereotypes of them, in a public format.

 

you also wrote, “I’ve learned that having good sex can happen with almost any type of guys. It’s not always about physical appearance. It’s more about sexual chemistry between two people.”

 

let me step back for a moment: if you want to continue to write a blog, you might want to spend a few minutes proofreading it - or having someone else do that - before you publish it online.

“... with almost any type of guys.” i think you meant “guy”

“...I would had been extremely flattered.” i think you meant “have”

“...I may of not been physically attracted to.” i think you meant “have” here, too.

 

but back to the content of the 2nd paragraph up from here - your “good sex” quote. as you have more sex with more people, you may also realize that good sex is not just about appearance OR chemistry. it’s also about communication, it’s about letting go, it’s about spontaneity, and - surprise, surprise - it’s about dropping preconceived ideas of your partner.

 

I will agree with Dave that there are several good points made in the blog posting but they quickly got lost in what I have continued to refer to as the writers redundancy. I understood and comprehended that his "stereotype" is old, fat and ugly the first time he wrote it, but did not understand the necessity of repeat that phrase 5 or 6 more times throughout the blog posting. But I felt the part at the end where he mentions that sex with this stereotype of his isn’t as bad as he thought it would be really tells me that the writer has very little respect for his client and that for him it is all about the money and gives no consideration to the client’s needs and wants. Yes, the writer may be evolving in this viewpoints on his clients and these stereotypes, but it sounds like they are evolving far too slow. I for one wouldn’t want to hire an escort such as him nor would I enjoy a simple lunch with such a guy because I wouldn’t want to have to worry about how I was being judged or wonder which category or categories I was being placed in.

 

I have been lucky enough to find an escort that accepts me for me, makes me feel good about myself, does not judge; ever, makes sure that all my needs and wants are met, and he easily allows me forget about the fact that he is my paid companion. I feel at ease for the first time in my life being naked with him. He is just my companion/friend when we are together. I could never be at ease or comfortable with GQpro. I know GQPro is new to the business but it seems to me that he has alot to learn.

[josephga]

I use to know this guy that escorted in Atlanta for about 10 years. I was invited to a dinner party that he was having once and his past came up in the conversation and he joked around about wanting to write a book about the 10 years he spent in escorting. He sat right there at the dinner table and told us all how he and his bf would peak out the upstairs window when a client was due to show. And how they would chuckle and laugh at the fat old ugly guys as they walked to the front door ( his words not mine) They might not put it in a so open blog But what GQPRO wrote does happen more than people think.

[Dave]

I use to know this guy that escorted in Atlanta for about 10 years. I was invited to a dinner party that he was having once and his past came up in the conversation and he joked around about wanting to write a book about the 10 years he spent in escorting. He sat right there at the dinner table and told us all how he and his bf would peak out the upstairs window when a client was due to show. And how they would chuckle and laugh at the fat old ugly guys as they walked to the front door ( his words not mine) They might not put it in a so open blog But what GQPRO wrote does happen more than people think.

 

and that's what separates the cream from the milk

[ChiTown]

A point well taken

 

 

Romann definitely has a point about clients being free to comment as they see fit and I think as long as there is discretion still maintained by the professional escort, there really isn't an issue. I thought that was the whole point of using screen names pseudonyms.

 

 

 

I have to agree. There have been several reviews that I have seen from particular reviews that are rather graphic and explicit (almost over the top and boarders on degrading the escort) while I have seen other reviews that give details without being crude and crass. [/color][/font]

 

I agree with both Romann and IndyMedic. I do think that it might be appropriate for a client to run a review past the escort involved before submitting the review for publication.

 

I think we all need to be a bit more sensitive to our escort's sense of privacy and hope that I've always managed to do so. There is certainly a fine line between what's suitable for print and what is not.

[leigh.bess.toad]

every type of person, every culture group, every job category, every race, every age, every sexual orientation, and so on.

 

OK Dave and others -- just out of curiosity, to test Dave's theory that every job category can and does hire escorts, do you know of other escorts who hire escorts? I can imagine it but I'm just wondering if you've actually known it to happen?