Alex & Rob's July 21 Review: Recent Reviews in General

[+ Axiom2001]

Last week we were blessed with only reading reviews here because the managers of the site had gone on a brief summer hiatus. During this time I read one hell of an enticing review about Alex and Rob, two gorgeous men who reside in Orlando, Florida. While I read the details-- I thought: "I must see these two men." Because of the manner in which the review was written (although quite long)-- I know many men here would leap to the opportunity to see them likewise. The writer captured the essence of an escort/client experience.

 

For almost three months now, many of the reviews that have been written here have left little in order for me to be encouraged to engage the services of certain escorts. The shared comments have been vapid and way too, too basic and general, to say the least. The reviews did not reveal much about the experience at all, thus leaving the reader (me) in a quandry. I have been left guessing as to whether or not I'd like to see these men in the future.

 

So, I do hope that future reviewers will begin to write more than five or six general statements in reviewing the men of whose services they have engaged. It would help others as well as me in determining our meetings with the reviewed escorts!!!!

[doitb4ugo]

AXION2001, I agree with you for the majority of reviews. I know when I want to write a review for a fairly popular escort, I am usually in a quandry on how to add something to a well know experience. I tend to not shy away from details but can understand why many do....Sex if often a private thing for most people...Being somewhat of a slut-in-waiting, I would like the whole world to partake of the details...

 

For me, to put together a etailed review takes a good amount of time..I usually need to reflect for 2-5 days before starting then write and re-write for another few days....The time is not all writing, but I need to write quickly nd layoff to go back and review..I realize I am obsessive but it is the only way I can work....

 

Maybe some other poster here will chime in with their thoughts.

 

I had suggested a short time ago that the review template be updated to allow review posters to choose numbers from 1 to 5 for their rating aon a few key components then allow them a box for free form review work...much like a commercial survey you might receive from someone who provided you a service...I think it would help foucus the reviewer and provide abetter means to see over time for example how the escort rated as a "kisser".

 

my thoughts.

[JT Brooklyn]

"Reviews" are just a "Sexual Experience" passed on to others in Writing..Truthful or Not!

 

Those who are Dazzled by Willy Shakespeare as opposed to a WILLY.... I am sure like to be impressed with the "War & Peace" Type Review! They feel it is more for their Money with the Reviewed alleged STUD in question!

 

IF 'Working Guys' had to depend Solely on whether ALL their Clients were turned on by the "written word" previously in a DADDYS Review regarding Sealing a Deal..MOST would starve to death!

 

There are those who "Nit Pick" Reviews to justify keeping their Wallet Closed! I have just said what quite a few "Working Guys" would like to say but alas' BAD FOR BIZ! LOL

[doitb4ugo]

"Reviews" are just a "Sexual Experience" passed on to others in Writing..Truthful or Not!

 

 

 

I agree with most but would like to politely change Truthful or Not! to Helpful or Not or maybe Descriptive of Not!

I am not a believer Naive maybe, that many reviewers make this stuff up...

[uwsman2]

I also frequently take a few days to "digest" an escort experience before posting a review. I've learned my lesson from some early experiences in the "hooboy" period of this site. Posting too quickly leads to errors. That said, I like to make a detailed post because the entire point of the escort reviews is to give the reader some sense of what it was like being with the escort, and you can do that in a few cryptic sentences.

[uwsman2]

Not newbie...

 

By the way, I had enough postings prior to this upgrade to have some sort of exalted titles, but I found that my "sign-in" had cancelled in the upgrade and in the course of signing in picked up a new password, so I am suddenly a newbie again. "A new birth of freedom...." said the man with the beard.

[uwsman2]

Be sure to see Alex and Rob. I experienced them once years ago on a visit to Orlando and it was an unforgettable experience. The two of them together are a wonderful team.

[+ deej]

By the way, I had enough postings prior to this upgrade to have some sort of exalted titles, but I found that my "sign-in" had cancelled in the upgrade and in the course of signing in picked up a new password, so I am suddenly a newbie again. "A new birth of freedom...." said the man with the beard.

 

If your login fails, the reset password option does work (assuming you had a valid email address on file). I know because I tested it with my own ID.

 

If you want your previous ID back (and your post count, and title), just process a password change and let us know in a private message once you're back in. We can now "merge" IDs so we can merge this ID to the old one and have the sum add up to all of its parts.

[+ purplekow]

We can now "merge" IDs so we can merge this ID to the old one and have the sum add up to all of its parts.

 

Will this allow you to merge disconnected parts of one person's personality...you know like merge Jekyll and Hyde or IceFireWizard and....well you get the idea.

[+ deej]

Will this allow you to merge disconnected parts of one person's personality...you know like merge Jekyll and Hyde or IceFireWizard and....well you get the idea.

 

It will. The Gang-of-one currently using a dozen or so identities will likely be the first experiment.

[instudiocity]

Yyyyyyeeeeeessssss!!!!!!

[JT Brooklyn]

Luv It PK! IF the Former "JT BKLYN" said that he probably would have gotten a Time Out! LOL

[Guy Fawkes]

If your email is incorrect, send me an email to tell me your correct email. (Hey, I'm being sleep depraved; Stop giggling!)

 

I'll nudge the system so that you can get the new password.

 

I'm still catching up because of a hardware problem, so please be patient it may take a few days before I get the Round Tuit. (If I find out who stole my Tuit they're going to Getit!)

 

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3489/3281059576_af46fdc183_o.jpg

[orbital sander]

Last week we were blessed with only reading reviews here because the managers of the site had gone on a brief summer hiatus. During this time I read one hell of an enticing review about Alex and Rob, two gorgeous men who reside in Orlando, Florida. While I read the details-- I thought: "I must see these two men." Because of the manner in which the review was written (although quite long)-- I know many men here would leap to the opportunity to see them likewise. The writer captured the essence of an escort/client experience.

 

For almost three months now, many of the reviews that have been written here have left little in order for me to be encouraged to engage the services of certain escorts. The shared comments have been vapid and way too, too basic and general, to say the least. The reviews did not reveal much about the experience at all, thus leaving the reader (me) in a quandry. I have been left guessing as to whether or not I'd like to see these men in the future.

 

So, I do hope that future reviewers will begin to write more than five or six general statements in reviewing the men of whose services they have engaged. It would help others as well as me in determining our meetings with the reviewed escorts!!!!

 

So can we expect "suggestions" from you on how/what we should post in the forum as well???

[JT Brooklyn]

orbital...Indubidably!

[+ Axiom2001]

DAMN, fellows, you (I'd like to think...) inadvertently hijacked this thread. PLEASE resume addressing the topic of REVIEWS per the thread's title and my initial entry!!!

[seeker630]

DAMN, fellows, you (I'd like to think...) inadvertently hijacked this thread. PLEASE resume addressing the topic of REVIEWS per the thread's title and my initial entry!!!

While I agree with your sentiments, I remember that this topic & discussion has been raised several times before, and I don't have a sense that the previous discussions had much impact.

 

I don't get the sense that the majority of posters here actually write reviews, and some of them seem to have a pretty low opinion of their worth.

[instudiocity]

I don't get the sense that the majority of posters here actually write reviews, and some of them seem to have a pretty low opinion of their worth.

 

Yup, Yup, and frequently forget, "You're the BEST YOU, the world will ever see."

[orbital sander]

DAMN, fellows, you (I'd like to think...) inadvertently hijacked this thread. PLEASE resume addressing the topic of REVIEWS per the thread's title and my initial entry!!!

 

Threads do not seem to be as controllable as you would like....Perhaps your expectations are too high.

[JT Brooklyn]

Threads do not seem to be as controllable as you would like....Perhaps your expectations are too high.

 

Usually when Threads make a "sharp left" with more than ONE Post in another direction it's because the subject matter has been discussed to the "satisfaction" of those who were following it ORIGINALLY!

 

Since none of us are "Paid Employees" Required to "Chit-Chat on Subjects.. an Originator of a Thread really does not know "IF and When" it will run its course! BUT run its course it will! And most Originators DEAL WITH IT!

[orbital sander]

Usually when Threads make a "sharp left" with more than ONE Post in another direction it's because the subject matter has been discussed to the "satisfaction" of those who were following it ORIGINALLY!

 

Since none of us are "Paid Employees" Required to "Chit-Chat on Subjects.. an Originator of a Thread really does not know "IF and When" it will run its course! BUT run its course it will! And most Originators DEAL WITH IT!

 

Agreed, and well said.

I do not need anyone here to tell me what / how to write in the forum or in a review (unless I am breaking rules), this is not Jr. high english and we do not need a "schoolmarm".

[+ purplekow]

In defense of the original poster, it is certainly within the purview of the the OP to ask to return to topic. He did so politely. No one has heeded his request. I do agree that the review cited was quite compelling and I wish I had the talent to write such a well composed review. My last review was not accepted as it seemed to not meet the standards of the reviews previously written. The review in total was: Sean Knight He fuk gud.