AndrewD - Should an escort ever do this to a client?

[Businessguy]

Exceed Expectation? You Bet'cha!!!! AndrewD of San Diego is my favorite escort. I have seen him many times over the last year and he never disappoints me. I have written a couple of reviews of our escapades so I won't go into details here except to say I saw him again last week and he Wow'ed me again. He is versatile, confident, passionate, mild-to-wild, and totally honorable. Check out his travels in the Excort Travels section and book him when he travels near you.

[Guest zipperzone]

Bogus post

 

Exceed Expectation? You Bet'cha!!!! AndrewD of San Diego is my favorite escort. I have seen him many times over the last year and he never disappoints me. I have written a couple of reviews of our escapades so I won't go into details here except to say I saw him again last week and he Wow'ed me again. He is versatile, confident, passionate, mild-to-wild, and totally honorable. Check out his travels in the Excort Travels section and book him when he travels near you.

 

The "subject" of your post is bogus. What a underhanded way to get members to read your endorsement. One wonders how much he paid you to do this?

[JT Brooklyn]

The "subject" of your post is bogus. What a underhanded way to get members to read your endorsement. One wonders how much he paid you to do this?

Interesting Headline..The Gossip Rags do it alot! I tend to agree in that IF Everytime/Everyone had a Great Time getting Laid by a "Working Guy" and Reported it around here..Even AFTER writing a Review, There would be No Room for other Discussions!

[+ Lucky]

I agree with zipperzone that the headline was a cheap shot. Some businessguy you must be. You didn't do Andrew any service with this approach.

[Businessguy]

Sorry guys

 

Didn't mean to sound like a paid advertizement and certainly didn't want to do any dis-service to AndrewD. Please accept my apologies. Sometimed I just can't help myself.

[+ Lucky]

You're forgiven...at least by me. AndrewD already has a pretty good reputation here, but I'll look forward to your review.

[Guest greatness]

lol it was so funny...I thought it was some kind of warning...

[+ Axiom2001]

I read the title of the thread, its content and the responses that followed, and you know men, it-- the thread and its content-- did NOT bother me in the least!

 

I've met AndrewD ("The Dragon") twice: the second time was last Friday night. I love his company; thus I firmly believe that he HAS NO REASON to pay anyone anything for any endorsements. His personality and expertise say it all.

 

As another has stated, AndrewD has stellar credentials at this site as well as a few others!

It's unfortunate that a few readers and respondents took exception to the thread. But in the final analysis-- it was their prerogative to do such; I just found it somewhat odd in doing so!

[+ Lucky]

Axiom, the objection to the headline is two-fold. One, it is misleading as to the subject matter. It's simply not an honest lead. Second, many people who do not read the thread will assume from the headline that AndrewD has, in fact, done something wrong or outrageous. It referred to him doing something TO a client, not FOR a client. It does him a disservice to have that headline out there. Granted, it was a fairly minor transgression, easily forgiven, but I think we were right to point out its faults.

 

It's common for clients to rave about their time with good escorts, so why not just be up front that you are raving?

[+ Axiom2001]

Thanks for your succinct clarification, Lucky! When I read everything, somewhat hurriedly, I did not give much thought or analysis to the implications! -