Negative Reviews

[Guy Fawkes]

x( I get very angry when people use DaddysReviews to threaten or intimidate an Escort. When I find a reviewer using such tactics my trust in them drops to zero. Today I'm beyond mere anger, I've found out that one or more people used a negative review as an excuse to harass, threaten, and intimidate an Escort.

 

So to those people:

 

Let me be clear; neither Hooboy nor myself would ever condone such activity. This has never happened before and I expect it to never happen again. You are not Judge and Jury! You do not have the right to harass or threaten a escort. In my opinion you were unfair, and given the messages you recorded; it is my opinion that you broke the law. I am very disappointed in you.

 

A negative review has caused many a Escort to change their practices for the better and some of these Escorts are now stars in the Industry. You have tarnished the reputation of my Website. You owe that Escort an sincere Apology.

 

Now can I hear a shit load of "I agrees" to hammer the point home to those few that need a clue?

 

Daddy

[GloriousGodfrey]

Not sure who exactly this involves, BUT...

 

What kind of moron uses a review to threaten or intimidate anyone? A good escort sometimes has a bad day but that's hardly an excuse for bad behavior. A bad escort can be weeded out simply by telling the truth about an encounter. "Just the facts, ma'am".

 

The truth will out.

[Bart]

You are of course very correct in your statement. I can only assume you are talking of a person who at this point has a solid reputation, most disappointing to hear. I know how disheartening this can be, two years ago I was received a similar threat in reverse. I was mortified, I had been lax in my judgement and made two critical errors. The escort now retired, thankfully, had obtained personal information used it to obtain his full fee which I was not going to give him and to give a review. He was moderately successful escort.

 

I was able to fake out of the review by writing it letting him read it and then said it must have been lost. I had to change everything from my email address names and so forth. I dare not issue another review under my old name. When guys I meet ask whatever happened to that name, I tell them the story and they all said I should have contacted Daddy, but I just could not. I felt stupid for allowing myself to be duped and I have learned not to be quite as open as I tend to be.

 

I really empathize with the escort in this case and his plight. I am glad that you, Daddy, were able to help him out in this case.

[Guest MickeyMoosie]

Who and what are we talking about?

 

If something was so egregious to make a post about it, shouldn't we all be alerted to the actual case in point?

[Okliehomo]

As you all know, I have never written a negative review and have been chastised for that.... as well, maybe, I should be.

 

While I completely respect Daddy and am so very grateful for this site, I don't quite get how you threaten an escort with a bad review? All escorts walk in the room knowing that that is always on the table......(well, not with me... but maybe, someday )... Is it like, give me my money back or I will lie about you? Drop your rate or I will blast you? See me again or I will light you up? Fuck me for free or I will write a bad review? Bareback or a bad review? I'll tell your bf, your boss, your Mother and then, I will write a bad review? Or the one that I use.... be my bf or I will write a bad review?? No luck with that one, so far. How are they being leveraged? Except, by stalking..... which doesn't work for me, either since I am a shut in. Pretty much.

 

The escort always has the last word here. Why can't he just refute the bad review? Tell his side and as per usual, let the clients make the decision as to the truth.

 

Maybe I am being simplistic, sarcastic and flip... my calling cards... and obviously, this must be an escort that Daddy knows and trusts.... but, so, then, most likely, do we all... at least, by reputation?? ... and that seems to me to be even more reason why one bad review don't spoil the whole bunch, girl.

 

Loved me some Donny Osmond in the 6th grade... back when I was sweet and innnocent.

 

Not my fight.... just asking, respectfully.

 

Okie

[+ Axiom2001]

>Who and what are we talking about?

>

>If something was so egregious to make a post about it,

>shouldn't we all be alerted to the actual case in point?

>

>

>

>

 

 

>shouldn't we all be alerted to the actual case in point?> What's the point? I think "Daddy" wrote his thread clearly enough for us to get the point that he abhors this type of behavior especially if it relates to his website and integrity.

 

So, I, the first one here, strongly agree with his position and the intent of his thread without specifics being spelled out publicly.

[JT Brooklyn]

T O T A L L Y ... A G R E E ! x(

[Guest ryan2552]

Completely Confused but I do agree clients should not use this site for personal revenge nor should escorts.

[+ deej]

Agree.

 

Honest in our judgment, truthful in our reporting. And that's where it ends.

[+ Lucky]

All I know is that I didn't do it! It's unsettling to hear that anyone would.

[kjun]

The original oblique post does not give us a clear understanding of what is supposed to have taken place. How can we make a knowledgeable comment? Perhaps it would have been better to make a comment directly to the alleged evil doers rather than in the manner used. Or, even to tell us exactly what happened.

 

the Cajun

[Okliehomo]

Damn.. I have tried and tried NOT to respond to this... but cannot stop myself, as follows;

 

Your response has nothing whatsoever to do with Daddy's original post and concern. That being, an escort being "threatened and intimidated by a bad review"...(which still makes NO sense to me, see earlier post).. BUT... you went way off script and talked about how it is to be with a paralyzed guy with bed sores. No, I sure don't know what that is like... poor you... but wait... maybe not so much... you were being paid, right ??? And you did know that up front? Or did you just show up at the rest home/hospital and they just buzzed you right in? If so, that might have been a hint.... Nurse with an envelope of $100 bills... And were you still glad to give him some pleasure?? Well, good for you and him...

 

Not exactly alms for the poor.... about $1000?? especially, with the medical kink thrown in. How generous of you. Charity does begin at homo...

 

And, in closing, at long last.... when it comes to reviews on this site, which I dearly love, escorts always get the last word. No matter what...." we are drunk, we have bad breath, we stink in all other areas, we are peculiar and fussy, we are "obese AND

overweight" (see above).. And I am all of that, and Worse...... just ask poor David... nobody knows, the troubles he's seen.....

 

Why anyone let's me even pay them is beyond me. (Deep sigh)

 

Okie

[jasoncarter_dfw]

...

>Why anyone let's me even pay them is beyond me. (Deep sigh)

>

>Okie

 

 

I will be in Tulsa next weekend and will gladly accept your gracious compensation ;-)

 

- Jason Carter - Dallas, TX

- jasoncarter53@hotmail.com

- (972) 365-0120

[Okliehomo]

You are so sweet to offer, and the thought of you in a Speedo, at full mast, in Palms Springs at Oliver's, almost makes me want to get on a plane...

 

Sadly, I have to work next weekend. All of it, dammit!!!! School is back in session, and those crazy kids will want fries with their BiG Macs, won't they????? I am the fry king.

 

Okie

[willatwork37]

I appreciate this site and agree that no one should give an untruthful review. That being said, truthful negative reviews should be posted. I have posted 7-8 reviews over the years with the majority being positive. My one negative review in which I was literally ripped off was completely edited by the powers that be on this site. I am an honest person that doesn't lie cheat or steal, yet my words were altered and then the escort was allowed to reply making me look frivilous. Oh yes, then as if to beat a dead horse, Deej had to chim in stating that I was determined to drag this escort through the mud no matter what.

[+ nycman]

I agree escorts shouldn't be blackmailed with the threat of a bad review.

 

I also agree with Okie...I find it a little hard to understand what exactly transpired.

 

P.S. Will, it's great to read your words again.

[Guy Fawkes]

<Sigh> I'll attempt to clarify.

 

1) I consider threatening an escort with a negative review to be extremely bad practice.

 

2) On the basis of a single negative review on the site, somebody made multiple threatening calls to the an escort.

 

3) Details are not necessary, there is no situation where that would be acceptable.

 

Daddy

[TruthBTold]

Daddy, I think that like everybody else on the site, I have to give my respect and thanks for keeping this site running an allowing everyone to have a say about all sorts of things. That being said, I have to also agree with some posts here.

 

You chose to post a message that tells everyone on the site not to harrass escorts by making threats of bad reviews, however you gave absolutely no details about what took place. Above all, except for a very general outline, you did not state what the harrassment entailed. If you thought the events were bad enough that everyone should be forewarned about the behavior, then you should have told us what the behavior was. At the same time, you could have left out any truly unnecessary details, e.g., exactly when it took place or who took part.

 

If, on the other hand, you did not think it important for everyone to know what the threats entailed, then you should not have said anything at all to the general readership. You could have just told those who took part and let it be.

 

I know that most people think that everyone should know what behavior is unforgivable online, but reading some of the postings here will show you that not everyone does. Thus detailing the specifics of certain unacceptable behavior is not always a bad thing. Thanks.

[TruthBTold]

Daddy, after reading my post I realized that I forgot the most important point: I wholeheartedly agree that it is wrong for anyone to use these reviews to get something from an escort they do not deserve or "pay an escort back" for something that happens during a session.

[JT Brooklyn]

Daddy..IMHO.. I'm positive the Working Guy in question isn't the "First or Last" Guy to be reminded that a Good or Bad Word on Daddys Site might tip the balance on his Rent Payment for the month.

 

I'm sure this card is played BY SOME when the Rate Negotiations take place. Actually this is the whole reason behind THE RESPONSE Clause! As far as further "Client Contact" that really is the Problem of the "Working Guy" to Work Out, NOT anyone on the Review Site.

 

The Reviews are FREE BUT unfortunately sometimes the Client Hassle is the Price Paid by the Working Guy.

 

I a few years ago sent in a very nice Review for some Working Guy now Retired, who at the time was very Popular in the South East.

I mentioned one little "minor detail" I found a little off putting, well the Manure Hit the Fan! He went Balistic with ME! Quote "I NEVER have had a Bad Review after all this time Blah Blah..For the Next 4 months he was getting Glowing Reviews with guys he was with up to a Year Previously, Coincidence I think not. But my point is IF the Guy in question doesn't want his NAME mentioned, just a Blast towards who knows who? It really Doesn't make all that much sense? IMHO as always.

;-)

[gregory]

>1) I consider threatening an escort with a negative review to

>extremely bad practice.

>

>2) The on the basis of a single negative review on the site,

>somebody made multiple threatening calls to the an escort.

>

>3) Details are not necessary, there is no situation where that

>would be acceptable.

 

Point 2 is what bothers me the most. The very idea that someone would make threatening phone calls on the basis of a single (or even multiple) negative reviews is troublesome to me. Why would one do this? It makes no sense. No one deserves being threatened that way (or any way).

 

I am not involved in the case that Daddy is addressing here. I want to make sure that this is understood up front. I have posted several reviews on this site under a different username, on several escorts whom I have enjoyed. All of my posted reviews have been glowingly positive. When I've been with an escort who was less than stellar I have simply figured that they were having an off day or that they just didn't like being with me or some other issue and I've just moved on. I don't normally obsess on things and I don't like negative reviews.

 

Only ONCE have I written a negative review: it was a "No Show" and "No Contact" report on an otherwise highly professional and well respected escort. I considered posting it because I wanted to let those that use the site know that, after having made extensive plans to meet, this escort not only didn't show but never responded back to multiple attempts (both e-mail and cell phone) at communication after his not showing. I gave the escort a chance to respond to my concerns via e-mail without me posting the review, and even then I didn't receive any response. It was as if I was being ignored, and that was very frustrating.

 

So, I sent it to Daddy and got back a sharp rebuke about me trying to threaten an escort with a negative review. In all honesty, I had never considered it a threat to invite an escort to respond to my concerns PRIOR to my posting a negative review, but apparently that was what I was doing. Since I had no desire to threaten, I dropped it and hoped that the escort wouldn't ignore other clients who had spent time and money to arrange and travel half way across the country for an appointment only to be stood up.

 

However, because Daddy's response to me was CCed to the escort, and that CCed response included a copy of my many e-mails to the escort and the proposed review, apparently the escort finally saw and read them and attempted to contact me. The end result was that, even if I had been able to, there would have been no reason to post the review. I wished that escort well, and do to this day.

[Guest MickeyMoosie]

><Sigh> I'll attempt to clarify.

>

>1) I consider threatening an escort with a negative review to

>be extremely bad practice.

 

We all agree but it's a no-brainer so there would be no point in making a post about this.

 

 

 

>2) On the basis of a single negative review on the site,

>somebody made multiple threatening calls to the an escort.

 

Once again, a no-brainer. If there's a specific person who's doing it then contact that person directly - what's the point of creating a post about it?

 

 

>3) Details are not necessary, there is no situation where that

>would be acceptable.

 

Exactly, so what's the point in pointing out the obvious? Unless, there's more to the story that makes it unique and compelling. But because you've made a big deal out of the obvious and then say you don't need to give details, you're confusing everyone.

 

It would be like making a post saying that you thinks it's horrible to slit an escort's throat and kill his cat. Yeah, we know. So, what's the point?

[GloriousGodfrey]

>><Sigh> I'll attempt to clarify.

>>

>>1) I consider threatening an escort with a negative review

>to

>>be extremely bad practice.

>

>We all agree but it's a no-brainer so there would be no point

>in making a post about this.

>

>

>

>>2) On the basis of a single negative review on the site,

>>somebody made multiple threatening calls to the an escort.

>

>

>Once again, a no-brainer. If there's a specific person who's

>doing it then contact that person directly - what's the point

>of creating a post about it?

>

>

>>3) Details are not necessary, there is no situation where

>that

>>would be acceptable.

>

>Exactly, so what's the point in pointing out the obvious?

>Unless, there's more to the story that makes it unique and

>compelling. But because you've made a big deal out of the

>obvious and then say you don't need to give details, you're

>confusing everyone.

>

>It would be like making a post saying that you thinks it's

>horrible to slit an escort's throat and kill his cat. Yeah, we

>know. So, what's the point?

 

Obviously, no one on here is more qualified here to judge a "no -brainer" than someone with no brain. This, of course, would make you and Lucky our resident experts.

 

The fact that YOU don't understand the point of Daddy's post speaks volumes as to the level of your idiocy and your troll like nature. Please start your own thread on the things you don't understand. I am sure Daddy will happily cut you a deal on the sheer amount of bandwidth it would take to list all those things. In the meantime, please return to the underside of whatever bridge you crawled from.

[Guest MickeyMoosie]

>Obviously, no one on here is more qualified here to judge a

>"no -brainer" than someone with no brain. This, of

>course, would make you and Lucky our resident experts.

>

>The fact that YOU don't understand the point of Daddy's post

>speaks volumes as to the level of your idiocy and your troll

>like nature. Please start your own thread on the things you

>don't understand. I am sure Daddy will happily cut you a deal

>on the sheer amount of bandwidth it would take to list all

>those things. In the meantime, please return to the underside

>of whatever bridge you crawled from.

 

 

 

Well, I guess she told me!

[+ Charlie]

I must admit to still being confused about who did what to whom. It sounds like someone threatened to give an escort a negative review here, and someone (the escort?) told Daddy. Or did someone (a reader?) call the escort and threaten him with something because of what was said in a negative review? Did the escort reply to a negative review and get a threatening call from the author of the review? I don't necessarily want to know who any of the principals are, just what happened; otherwise, I feel like a child warned not to be bad, without being told what Santa Claus believes is bad (note: I think all of the possibilities I have mentioned above are bad).