Mpls Escort - Is Johann now Remis?

[Guest ncm2169]

Check it out:

 

http://www.men4rentnow.com/ds/search.asp?cmd=view&id=192075&Login=Remis

 

If not, he's Johann's twin, complete with the ever present cap to hide his receding hairline.

 

I'm not interested in a back-and-forth here about him (been there, done that), but the fact that he's advertising as age 25 is astounding; he's been around at least since 2000. x( Oh well, another case of, "If you can fool the people ...".

[JT Brooklyn]

Oh! And this would be the FIRST Time any "Working Guy" changed his Name or used more than one Name...for an AD? LOL

 

Also ALL his Reviews don't seem to reflect any Client problems with his age. Maybe that's because they are too Happy Playing with HIS Large and Pretty Equipment! :9 :9 :9

[curtis20009]

Johann or Remis, well either one or 2 guys, I think they are or he is cute and a nice tool too.

 

If you have any doubts about him, just make sure he knows what you want in advance.

[Guest ncm2169]

JT, first, you know well and good that Reviews that are critical of the escort are rare here, unfortunately.

 

Second, there's a reason why EVERY escort listing site asks for the escort's age. It's because many (most?) clients want to know (at least the approximate) age of the escort.

 

Sure, "they all lie about age" is the accepted wisdom. First, that cynicism fits well with where you live (NYC), but it doesn't always fit with the rest of the country. While we can and should be skeptical, some of us consider an "age range" in our hiring practices. Reviews are helpful in that regard.

 

Brooklyn didn't build the bridge to hot guys. }( I await your apostrophe-laden distorted syntax response, ala Berra's logic.

}(

[Guest ryan2552]

>JT, first, you know well and good that Reviews that are

>critical of the escort are rare here, unfortunately.

>

>Second, there's a reason why EVERY escort listing site asks

>for the escort's age. It's because many (most?) clients want

>to know (at least the approximate) age of the escort.

>

 

ncm wrote: "I'm not interested in a back-and-forth here about him (been there, done that)"

 

Nice to see that you don't want any "back-and-forth."

[Thumper]

Was very nice on the phone a couple years ago, but wanted nearly twice as much to bottom, which to me implies he doesn't enjoy bottoming. It's never fun to fuck an escort who doesn't like to bottom because the entire session becomes a one-upmanship game.

 

Very very upbeat and fun sounding on the phone, however. Were I up for bottoming, I'd see him and I think we'd have a hot time together. Would that I were.

[Guest ncm2169]

< Nice to see that you don't want any "back-and-forth."

 

It's called discussion, nimrod. If you could think before you erupt, you'd realize the discussion was about the subject of age of escorts; it was not about Johann/Remis.

 

Btw, I've been meaning to ask - what persona did you use here before you became Ryan2552? All the clues in your posts tell many of us that you've been around for a while. x(

 

Or, maybe you're just another asshole who discovered a Message Board where he could get off by making random hits on other posters.

 

In case anyone cares (why would they?), I sent Ryan a conciliatory email after the last time he trashed me. It's revealing of his character that he didn't bother to reply. Fuck, even in the worst days of Woodlawn and Doug69, both of them at least replied to me. What a jerk.

[Guest ryan2552]

>< Nice to see that you don't want any

>"back-and-forth."

>

>It's called discussion, nimrod. If you could think before you

>erupt, you'd realize the discussion was about the subject of

>age of escorts; it was not about Johann/Remis.

>

>Btw, I've been meaning to ask - what persona did you use here

>before you became Ryan2552? All the clues in your posts tell

>many of us that you've been around for a while. x(

>

>Or, maybe you're just another asshole who discovered a Message

>Board where he could get off by making random hits on other

>posters.

>

>In case anyone cares (why would they?), I sent Ryan a

>conciliatory email after the last time he trashed me. It's

>revealing of his character that he didn't bother to reply.

>Fuck, even in the worst days of Woodlawn and Doug69, both of

>them at least replied to me. What a jerk.

 

Again your thuggish cyber personality does not move me. It simply confirms what many have known and or are learning about you.

 

I stand by remarks. You didn't want any "back-and-forth." Really? You stated your position on yet another escort you have zero interest in. Then continue to use words like "discussion" to mask the obvious "back-and-forth" that gets you erect.

 

In your case NCM apparently not just the escorts you write about are deceptive, in your opinion, but you certainly are.

[Guest ncm2169]

< Again your thuggish cyber personality

 

Okay, Ryan, I'll play for one more round.

 

I am the thug?????

 

You attacked me here first, when I had no clue who you were, when you were defending the late and NOT lamented TwinkLover28 or whoever the fuck he was. I then emailed you hoping for a truce. You did not respond. And WHO is the thug?

 

It's interesting that you choose not to tell us who you used to be. It's also interesting that your words could be coming right from TBL28's foul mouth. x(

 

That said, I am not up for a flame war. You attacked me. I responded. End of story. }(

 

If you choose to continue to bloviate, have at it. I'm done paying attention to the fatuousness that emanates from your sorry ass.

[Guest ryan2552]

>< Again your thuggish cyber personality

>

>Okay, Ryan, I'll play for one more round.

>

>I am the thug?????

>

>You attacked me here first, when I had no clue who you were,

>when you were defending the late and NOT lamented TwinkLover28

>or whoever the fuck he was. I then emailed you hoping for a

>truce. You did not respond. And WHO is the thug?

>

>It's interesting that you choose not to tell us who you used

>to be. It's also interesting that your words could be coming

>right from TBL28's foul mouth. x(

>

>That said, I am not up for a flame war. You attacked me. I

>responded. End of story. }(

>

>If you choose to continue to bloviate, have at it. I'm done

>paying attention to the fatuousness that emanates from your

>sorry ass.

 

I didn't attack you I pointed out a conflict in your statement vrs. your actions. Which gives one pause to wonder about your intentions.

 

Yes you are a cyber thug.

 

Beyond that I will not play with you. Into your silliness into your psychosis. I'll leave playtime to the message board pros like yourself and the elk that swarm around you. However, if you are a pro you would know your claims, questions and accusations are untrue, foolish and very child-like (respectively).

 

I'm pleased to have become a member of this community back in Nov. '07.