The 35th Review of CharlesRod of San Francisco (My Reflection)

[+ Axiom2001]

Since 2003 I have been seeing the wonderful CharlesRod of San Francisco. Today as I read his 35th review, I began to reflect and to recall our many times together during these past five years. As a result of his most recent review, I concur wholeheartedly with the candid and interesting comments of the reviewer. He was "right on the dime" in his analysis of the experience that he had with Charles.

 

Charles is one man and escort who seemingly and genuinely enjoys what he does with and to another man. When one is with him, one can definitely relish his expertise and him as a person, as Charles exudes genuineness, and I applaud him for that.

 

 

Charles is the epitome of everything one desires in an escort.

 

I thank reviewer 35 for the excellent read which provided me some moments to reflect as well as to recapitulate my previous experiences with CharlesRod.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Incidentally, Charles's dote is 8 to 8.5. I don't consider myself an oralist in the least, for I have had difficulty with large endowments, but Charles, although long but not that unbearably wide, I can take it to its root and really enjoy, esp. that lusciously encased head as well as that knob itself.

[Rick Munroe]

>Charles is the epitome of everything one desires in an

>escort.

 

So, he's a twink-bodybuilder-daddy-jock-top-bottom-

dominant-submissive-vanilla-latino-white-black-asian-

smooth-hairy-tall-short-cut-uncut kind of guy?

 

>Incidentally, Charles's dote is 8 to 8.5.

 

What's a "dote"? I know the verb, but the only meaning I could find for a noun was "decay of wood:" http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dote

Is that a euphemism for erectile dysfunction? :+

 

>I don't consider

>myself an oralist in the least

 

So, you prefer sign langauge? (An oralist is a deaf person who communicates through lipreading and speech.)

[Philly Guy]

>>Charles is the epitome of everything one desires in an

>>escort.

>

>So, he's a twink-bodybuilder-daddy-jock-top-bottom-

>dominant-submissive-vanilla-latino-white-black-asian-

>smooth-hairy-tall-short-cut-uncut kind of guy?

>

>>Incidentally, Charles's dote is 8 to 8.5.

>

>What's a "dote"? I know the verb, but the only

>meaning I could find for a noun was "decay of wood:"

> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dote

>Is that a euphemism for erectile dysfunction? :+

>

>>I don't consider

>>myself an oralist in the least

>

>So, you prefer sign langauge? (An oralist is a deaf person

>who communicates through lipreading and speech.)

 

 

I can't stop laughing Rick :-) :-) :-)

 

BTW - What is a dote?

[+ Axiom2001]

>>Charles is the epitome of everything one desires in an

>>escort.

>

>So, he's a twink-bodybuilder-daddy-jock-top-bottom-

>dominant-submissive-vanilla-latino-white-black-asian-

>smooth-hairy-tall-short-cut-uncut kind of guy?

>

>>Incidentally, Charles's dote is 8 to 8.5.

>

>What's a "dote"? I know the verb, but the only

>meaning I could find for a noun was "decay of wood:"

> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dote

>Is that a euphemism for erectile dysfunction? :+

>

>>I don't consider

>>myself an oralist in the least

>

>So, you prefer sign langauge? (An oralist is a deaf person

>who communicates through lipreading and speech.)

 

 

 

 

The term "dote" is the Brasilian Portugese equivalent of "dick" or "cock" or "pole" or "pipe...."

 

 

As for the rest of Mr. Munroe's attempt to correct me, I've decided to ignore and NOT dignify. Humor: for some it is; for others IT IS FAR FROM!

[Rick Munroe]

>The term "dote" is the Brasilian Portugese

>equivalent of "dick" or "cock" or

>"pole" or "pipe...."

 

Silly me; I keep forgetting that this is a Brazilian website. (Btw, it's "Brazilian" with a "z," just like Liza, and it's "Portuguese" with a "u," just like...um, Lucy.) I know you're a stickler for proper spelling, so I like to hold you to your own high standards.

 

>As for the rest of Mr. Munroe's attempt to correct me, I've

>decided to ignore and NOT dignify.

 

Axiom, you have no problem berating people on here when you feel they have misused a word, as you did most recently in the GayTorrents thread, where you announced that everyone who used "invite" as a noun was incorrect, even though they weren't:

 

http://mc.daddysreviews.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=119050&mesg_id=&page=&mode=full

 

but you don't seem to like it when you yourself are corrected. And that was my point. Maybe now you see how others might feel when you correct or scold them. Personally, I really don't care if somebody misspells a word or uses poor grammar, because I'm more interested in the ideas they're expressing. If you start to constantly correct people, some of them will simply stop posting, because who wants to feel like they're back in the 4th grade? I think that we should always do everything we can to encourage more (and new) posters, and one way is to let everyone express themselves in their own way. Now, of course, you might say that your way of expressing yourself is to proclaim your intellectual superiority over others, and that is your right. But my way of expressing myself is to have a laugh at the expense of others' pomposity. :+

[NorthWoods]

"If you start to constantly correct people, some of them will simply stop posting, because who wants to feel like they're back in the 4th grade? I think that we should always do everything we can to encourage more (and new) posters, and one way is to let everyone express themselves in their own way."

 

 

Wise words, sir. Thank you.

 

-North

[Guest zipperzone]

Right on Rick - couldn't have said it better myself. However, there are some posters who practically beg to be corrected. They are often the ones with no sense of humor. If you can't laugh at yourself, life will be a long tedious journey.

[Guest ript4hire]

Witty, insightful, and showing remarkable restraint. AND he has a hot

ass. What's not to love?

 

Come over here Rick - after all the tongue lashing you've received on

this board over the years, I think it is high time you got one that you

ENJOYED :9

 

Eric

[JT Brooklyn]

Rick.I could not have expressed it better! As a matter of fact I know I couldn't....

 

I have been "accused" many times of being very hard to read when Posting! But with a "good sense of Humor" also a "IF They don't like it attitude"..JT is still here, while many of the High Minded Boring Dictionary Types are long gone!

 

With your "Buns Babe"..you say whatever you want! No Corrections coming from JT!

! :9 :9 :9

[+ ArVaGuy]

>

>Axiom, you have no problem berating people on here when you

>feel they have misused a word, as you did most recently in the

>GayTorrents thread, where you announced that everyone who used

>"invite" as a noun was incorrect, even though they

>weren't:

>

> http://mc.daddysreviews.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=119050&mesg_id=&page=&mode=full

>

>but you don't seem to like it when you yourself are corrected.

> And that was my point. Maybe now you see how others might

>feel when you correct or scold them. Personally, I really

>don't care if somebody misspells a word or uses poor grammar,

>because I'm more interested in the ideas they're expressing.

>If you start to constantly correct people, some of them will

>simply stop posting, because who wants to feel like they're

>back in the 4th grade? I think that we should always do

>everything we can to encourage more (and new) posters, and one

>way is to let everyone express themselves in their own way.

>Now, of course, you might say that your way of expressing

>yourself is to proclaim your intellectual superiority over

>others, and that is your right. But my way of expressing

>myself is to have a laugh at the expense of others' pomposity.

> :+

 

 

http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c262/cpapa8162/Avatar%20Options/applause.gif

[+ Axiom2001]

Rick, you don't know all of the answers! I prefer to spell Brasil and Brasilian as the natives although I have been mistaken as being one while I have traveled there many times.

 

Secondly, I would like for you to find in the archives the many times that I have "berated" and "put down" individuals. I've made CONSTRUCTIVE comments about a few spellings in the past as well as perhaps that word "invite" which SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVITATION! All of this was done tactfully, too, btw!

 

Too bad you like to try your adolescent repartee here for laughs and at the expense of SERIOUS individuals who happen to be positive in mind and spirit!

 

But you, and the others who have sided with your antics, can go straight to Hell as far as I am concerned. I will continue to write and say whatever and begin to ignore your infantile attacks under the guise of being helpful and humorous!

[Rick Munroe]

>Wise words, sir.

 

Maybe I should change my name from Smart Ass to Wise Ass.

[Rick Munroe]

>If you can't

>laugh at yourself, life will be a long tedious journey.

 

You're so right, and it works for couples as well as individuals. Derek and I laugh at each other all the time, and the time has really flown!

[Rick Munroe]

>Witty, insightful, and showing remarkable restraint. AND he

>has a hot

>ass. What's not to love?

 

The same can always be said of you, but substitute "enormous slab of meat" for "hot ass." Thanks.

 

>Come over here Rick - after all the tongue lashing you've

>received on

>this board over the years, I think it is high time you got one

>that you

>ENJOYED

 

LOL I've enjoyed 'em all, but that's an invitation I can't refuse.

[Rick Munroe]

>I have been "accused" many times of being very hard

>to read when Posting!

 

I really love the way you write, with all of your idiosyncrasies. I'm always attracted to the unique and uncommon (that's why I married Derek). Like they write in high school yearbooks: don't ever change.

[Rick Munroe]

>I would like for you to find in the archives the

>many times that I have "berated" and "put

>down" individuals.

 

I never said that you "put down" anybody. But if I have to choose an example of your hostility, I guess I would go with: "But you, and the others who have sided with your antics, can go straight to Hell as far as I am concerned."

 

>I've made CONSTRUCTIVE comments about

>a few spellings in the past as well as perhaps that word

>"invite" which SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVITATION!

 

Actually, as was demonstrated to you in that thread, "invite" is an accepted colloquial expression for "invitation," which appears in most dictionaries. (And there's no need to shout, btw; I'm an oralist and can read lips).

[Guest zipperzone]

>But you, and the others who have sided with your antics, can

>go straight to Hell as far as I am concerned. I will continue

>to write and say whatever and begin to ignore your infantile

>attacks under the guise of being helpful and humorous!

 

God! your tedious.....

 

Bet you wear your hair in a bun.

[Rick Munroe]

>But you, and the others who have sided with your antics, can

>go straight to Hell as far as I am concerned.

 

On second thought, this isn't a bad idea. I think it would be pretty cool to spend forever in a fiery, sweaty nether world with the likes of Eric, JT, Philly Guy, NorthWoods, zipperzone and ArVaGuy. I'm already imagining some activities we could pursue to wile away eternity (to start, I'd take Eric up on his offer!). }(

[Bilbo]

Too late, Rick. I'm afraid that you and the rest of that list have shown your true nature too often on this board. You have little or no chance of making it into Gehenna. Indeed, I wouldn't be at all surprised if (perhaps after another reincarnation or two, perhaps right away) y'all wind up in that section of the Elysian Fields where the gay boys play on manicured hills all day!!

Anyway, while I personally haven't minded this particular thread stealing, wouldn't it be nice if somebody else said something else about CharlesRod? I picture this paragon a little miffed that he is being ignored. I know I would be. LOL

[JT Brooklyn]

Rick "Ya got that Darn Right"! You and Eric would Definitely Turn me into a Voyeur for Starter's!

 

Yup... I guess it is Time though to get back to the Original Post! ;-)

[+ Axiom2001]

>Too late, Rick. I'm afraid that you and the rest of that list

>have shown your true nature too often on this board. You have

>little or no chance of making it into Gehenna. Indeed, I

>wouldn't be at all surprised if (perhaps after another

>reincarnation or two, perhaps right away) y'all wind up in

>that section of the Elysian Fields where the gay boys play on

>manicured hills all day!!

>Anyway, while I personally haven't minded this particular

>thread stealing, wouldn't it be nice if somebody else said

>something else about CharlesRod? I picture this paragon a

>little miffed that he is being ignored. I know I would be.

>LOL

 

 

 

"...wouldn't it be nice if somebody else said something else about CharlesRod?"

 

Thanks, man! The whole intent of the thread was to solicit additional ideas and comments about CharlesRod and not have some self-appointed ______ attempt to edit my writing.

 

I think it is now time to return to the purpose of the thread. ...enough of the blatant highjacking!

[AdamSmith]

>there are some posters who practically beg to be corrected.

 

Careful, you'll get this thread moved into the Fetish Forum!

[AdamSmith]

>a fiery, sweaty nether world

 

Rick, your synonyms for the Smart Ass know no end!

 

(As it were.)

 

:+

[Guest zipperzone]

>>there are some posters who practically beg to be

>corrected.

>

>Careful, you'll get this thread moved into the Fetish Forum!

 

Now THAT'S funny :-)