DC ALERT

[MIKEY08]

Personally, I think in-person I could deal with the "freak" the best, but when something happens totally unexpectedly the "caught-off-guard" factor makes it harder to react quickly and effectively when something actually happens. Some of us could handle the freak, while others would freak out upon encountering the freak. Freaky, isn't it?! LOL

 

Mikey

[Rick Munroe]

When I was 5, my next door neighbor (an older man of 9) was seriously into Freakies cereal and the cute little Freakies creatures that came inside the box. I wonder if he grew up to be a freak. I should look him up... }(

 

http://www.mysteryisland.net/freakies.jpg http://www.mysteryisland.net/freakiestoys.jpg

[+ Tom Isern]

"My mental image of what happened was this: The guy was one of three things: armed and dangerous; a "perv"; or a freak (perhaps one heavily into fetishes); and Steven was expecting, based on the communication, more of the mild-mannered "Clark Kent"-type."

 

 

Yikes. So fetishists are "pervs" and "freaks"...the message board has reached another low.

[Guest zipperzone]

>< These Situations come up alot! Probably more with the

>"Working Girls" than with the Working Guys! Has no one ever

>watched "Law & Order" ?

>

>I know a very Successful Traveler who also has a Bat in the

>Hotel Room, should the "wrong thing come up" !

>

>"The Perfect Age"..Somewhere between OLD enuff to know better

>& Too YOUNG to care! LOL >

>

>JT, this is the most egregious example of you shooting off

>your mouth just to read your post. Clearly you have not

>either (a) reached the "perfect age" yet so as to be capable

>of posting something worthwhile, or (b) your mind is going.

>

>Does it ever occur to you to just keep your fucking

>mouth shut?

 

Perhaps you could explain to dumb old me, exactly what is wrong with JT's post? There is nothing wrong with it, providing he is telling the truth, which I'm sure he is.

[Rick Munroe]

>Perhaps you could explain to dumb old me, exactly what is

>wrong with JT's post?

 

I must be dumb, too, because I saw nothing wrong with it. :o

[+ bigjoey]

as a client, i usually only hire reviewed escorts or hire from an agency which should eliminate the risk from my side on hiring a nut case or a guy who will rip me off.

 

however, i have always admired the courage that an escort has to go into an unknown persons hotel room or house. there are dangers there and i have heard the bad stories from esorts over the years. my thanks are to you escort guys for taking the risks you do and providing me with some wonderful times.

 

having done an overnight with steven last year (in dangerous atlanta of all places) i can attest to his being one of the best.

[JT Brooklyn]

RE: Gift of Fear

 

Yup! Some people sure are "Gifted"..

Some Gifts you want..Other's you don't even need! LOL ;-)

[MIKEY08]

You misread and misinterpreted here, Tom.

 

What the above actually says is that an individual heavily, and, once again, emphasizing heavily, into fetishes is a "freak" and "freak" alone. By the way, being a "freak" is not necessarily a bad thing, there is a bit of "freak" after all in all of us. What makes it bad is if an individual showing up is as far as you know a Cark-Kent type or such, mild-mannered, nothing unusual, vanilla more or less; and surprises you, more like shocks you, when all of a sudden you realize that he is a "freak".

 

On a personal note, I am a very open-minded individual; and I see no reason why we cannot celebrate the "freakiness" in all of us.

 

Mikey

[MIKEY08]

Love the colorful illustrations, Rick, the pastel colors of the characters are very, very pretty.

 

Mikey

[alanalt]

>You misread and misinterpreted here, Tom.

>

Maybe he did, but I don't think it was an unreasonable interpretation, since Roget's thesaurus suggests the following synonyms for freak: aberration, abnormality, abortion, anomaly, chimera, curiosity, grotesque, malformation, miscreation, misshape, monster, monstrosity, mutant, mutation, oddity, queer, weirdo. These words don't quite jive with your backpedaling that "being a 'freak' is not necessarily a bad thing". All I can suggest is that if you can't say what you mean in the first place, maybe it's just not worth saying especially since you apparently have no more knowledge about what actually happened than the rest of us (Steven excepted). Indeed, it seems to me you were just throwing your 'own mental images of what happened' for no other apparent reason than to promote your own sense of self-importance, which would seem to be in line with some of your other posts.

[Guest zipperzone]

>>JT, this is the most egregious example of you shooting off

>>your mouth just to read your post. Clearly you have not

>>either (a) reached the "perfect age" yet so as to be capable

>>of posting something worthwhile, or (b) your mind is going.

>>

>>Does it ever occur to you to just keep your fucking

>>mouth shut?

>

>Perhaps you could explain to dumb old me, exactly what is

>wrong with JT's post? There is nothing wrong with it,

>providing he is telling the truth, which I'm sure he is.

 

Well come on ncm2169 - we're waiting with baited breath.

 

What DID you find offensive with JT's post?

[2hard2tame]

>>>JT, this is the most egregious example of you shooting off

>>>your mouth just to read your post. Clearly you have not

>>>either (a) reached the "perfect age" yet so as to be

>capable

>>>of posting something worthwhile, or (b) your mind is going.

>>>

>>>Does it ever occur to you to just keep your fucking

>>>mouth shut?

>>

>>Perhaps you could explain to dumb old me, exactly what is

>>wrong with JT's post? There is nothing wrong with it,

>>providing he is telling the truth, which I'm sure he is.

>

>Well come on ncm2169 - we're waiting with baited breath.

>

>What DID you find offensive with JT's post?

>

 

 

No, I think its only you waiting.

[SmallTownJohn]

Howdy,

 

I travel to DC fairly often & have never encountered any problems, but the guys I see are usually long-time regulars.

 

I'd be interested in hearing more about this encounter. I do think you can post a first name/last initial & area code with exchange & a couple of the last four digits w/o violating any posting rules.

 

During my meetings, if a guy pulled a gun on me, I'd have to think fast. In any other situation, I'd stomp the guy's ass...no doubt!!

[Rick Munroe]

>Eeerrr, in that case, why not describe what happened without

>giving personal details? I'm pretty sure that it will help

>other escorts to stay out of trouble.

 

Good point, Anton. When I was just starting out, I let a guy handcuff me to his spiral staircase for a "posing" session, but then he started smacking me in the face with the back of his hand. I got out of that one in one piece, learned my lesson, and told other escorts about it without giving any personal information other than that it was a guy off Central Park West, in a cluttered apartment full of antiques, who liked to have you pose while he rubbed himself through his pants. I'm sure that was more helpful as a warning than "Something bad almost happened to me, so be careful." :o

[JT Brooklyn]

Well every "Story" should have a Beginning-Middle and End.

 

So far I don't see that happening here?

[MIKEY08]

Very impressive, very impressive.

 

However, as you may have noticed while perusing Roget's, Rick James' allusion in his song to "super-freak" is not a term that appears in that resource. How would you explain that, kind sir?

 

Further, if Rick James is referring to a "monster" or such in his song, I'll most definitely and without any hesitation eat my hat.

 

 

Mikey

[alanalt]

You chose the word freak, which has many pejorative connotations and without qualifying the expression in any way, so I still maintain that it's perfectly reasonable for Tom to have taken your comment the way he did because that's what the word means.

 

If you don't want to be "misinterpreted" then you should be clearer in the first place rather than complaining/backpedaling afterwards.

[BgMstr4u]

I can completely relate to Steven's reticence.

 

Early in my escort hiring career, I had an experience that left me scarred for a long time. It was 25 years ago. I picked up a goodlooking guy in West Hollywood (before it was a city) and he said he had a place to go. Fine. We get out of the car, and into the house. The place is practically gutted. He locks the door behind him, picks up a two by four and comes at me. I was younger then, and pretty strong, I guess, because I made a beeline for a window, smashed it open and jumped out, running as fast as I could back to my car. It took me a long time to get over that.

 

The second time was once when I met a charming fellow at Numbers, and took him home with me. He turned out to be better in the personality than in the body department. When he took off his shirt, he was in worse shape than I was. I should have driven him back right then, even though it was a good 45 minutes to an hour. I didn't. Somehow we got through the night, but the next morning I noticed my checkbook was in a slightly different place. I took a good look and sure enough, one check was missing. He wiped out the account. Fortunately, I notified the bank immediately and they were on the lookout for that check. I got the money back. Three cheers for Bank of America.

 

The third time was when I met another charming fellow, who went by the name of Dakota, at the Town House, about 5, 6 years ago. Again, back to my place. We get in the apartment, and threats, physical roughing up. I don't remember how I got him out. I've blocked it.

 

These events were different, but all the same in that they were terrifying, and I could not even rationally analyze them for years. Many things learned, of course. Like never leave your checkbook, or any other financial instrument, lying around. But the fallout from them has been terrible. I cannot count the number of times I have begun to be in touch with even well reviewed and reputable escorts and have pulled back in fear. And the times when I do make contact and meet, which are not often (and now you know why), I am always afraid, which means I really don't relax very well. And I would add that as I read the contributions to the board here, I am always measuring them by their conflict content. There are some guys who really look great, but I just don't want to get involved with hostile people anymore, even if their anger is confined to political posts. It may not be fair, but it's unavoidable for me now.

 

So, Steven, whatever happened with you, know you're not alone.

[+ Lucky]

BgMstr, we have no idea if whatever Steven is warning us about is in any way related to incidents such as you describe. For all we know, he got a shock from an electrical outlet, or ran out of toilet paper. That's the whole issue people are raising about his warning: it is so unspecific as to be worthless. Sceptics might think he is just looking for attention and I would be hard put to disagree with him as long as he wants to be so nebulous.

 

I do join you in hoping that violence does not come to any escort or client. What happened to you, and your sharing it with us, is a far more cautionary warning than anything Steven has related. If, in fact, he was put in any danger I would hope for his safety, for whatever we disagree about here, his safety is important to me.

[MIKEY08]

My name is Mikey; and I am not a freak.

 

I assure you that I will remember all you have shared with me, wise gent.

 

 

Mikey

[alanalt]

Edited out your marriage proposal, eh. Just as well because if we were the last 2 people on earth I'd be taking a vow of celibacy...

 

Good night!

[bartleby]

I'm with Lucky. Young Mr. Draker knows well enough that posting the details of what happened to him is not a violation of the rules of the message center. Stating that it would be makes him appear somewhat disingenuous.

 

What troubles me is that Mr. Draker seems more interested in being on center stage and holding the spotlight by his aloofness than he does in sharing any real information that might be helpful to his colleagues and friends. Any publicity is good publicity, right? This all seems a page from the playbook of Benjamin Nicholas.

 

Until Mr. Draker comes forward with real details, I'll continue to suspect that the scamp has manufactured a bit of a publicity stunt. I hope I'm wrong about that. And I hope the sexy boy with the hot bod is okay.

[+ glutes]

I am beginning to wonder if Mr. Draker is hesitant to post anything because the incident involves a Hoovillian.

He emntioned that a detailed post would get pulled...

[Guest zipperzone]

>I am beginning to wonder if Mr. Draker is hesitant to post

>anything because the incident involves a Hoovillian.

>He emntioned that a detailed post would get pulled...

 

How could that make a differance? I'm sure he would not be stupid enough to identify him so we would never know if he was a member or not.

 

Personally I feel that if he is not prepared to be more forthcoming, he should have kept his mouth shut in the first place.

[Guest zipperzone]

BigMstr4U:

 

I know the feeling. It's only happened to me twice (both times in Montreal) but the fear does tend to linger.

 

For some time now I have owned a Doberman. He is an absolute pussy and would gladly help a thief out the door with the silver. But....

anyone I bring home has no way of knowing that and I find that the mere fact that the dog is present is a deterrent to anyone who may have another agenda.