Jason Carter - Stand up guy!

[Jondar]

I was thankful to see Jason's responce to a recent post. I give him credit for being a stand up guy. I've never seen him for an appointment but might consider it with his recent responce!

 

Jason, thanks for being you!:-)

[Guest resorts777]

>I was thankful to see Jason's responce to a recent post. I

>give him credit for being a stand up guy. I've never seen him

>for an appointment but might consider it with his recent

>responce!

>

>Jason, thanks for being you!:-)

 

I had a very similar experience with Josh Weston last year, but he only became a "stand up guy" after I e-mailed him about my disapointment. I agree with the reviewer...stand up would be explaining his situation before taking the money.

[Guest EuropTravl]

Oh, Fin Fang Foom, wherefore art thou???

;(

 

 

 

(we're now praising taking the money and running.......)

[curious2000]

what post are you refering to that Jason responded to? I am lost. What happened that Jason had to stand up to? something to do with taking the money and running?

[seeker630]

Check today's (Oct 2) review of Jason & his response.

[uwsman2]

In response to a newly posted review documenting the shortcomings of his performance on this particular occasion, he posted a response explaining that he shouldn't have taken the appointment, the call came in at a time when he needed cash but he wasn't really rested and 100% ready. He apologized (in this posting) and asked people to consider him based on all his reviews.

 

Now, a REALLY stand-up guy would contact the client and see about making it up to him some way... And maybe Jason did that directly, but there's no indication in his response.

 

Anyway, I had a session with Jason several years ago during his visit to NYC, and I found him to be pleasant, nicely hung, a proficient top, but not a warm and cuddly sort of guy. I put it down to chemistry. With some guys there's chemistry, with some there's not. Some escorts are also skilled actors who can simulate the chemistry. Others are skilled sexual performers but not particularly good actors. And on and on... to each his own.

 

But I thought Jason's response was refreshingly candid. He gave a mediocre performance on this occasion and when called on it, did not try some sort of snappy comeback, but owned up to it. That seems consistent with the personality exhibited by his occasional posts around here. An honest guy.

[+ Lucky]

There was another escort who gave a great response in a thread I read. He's a real stand up guy too. I was gonna hire him but he stood me up! Can't say I wasn't warned!

[Guest EuropTravl]

Listen, I have nothing against him (except that he seems to get a pass for using 6 year old photos) but you can go to the "other" review site and read this excerpt:

 

"It was a total rushed deal. Jason immediatel stripped and jumped into bed. I told him I like some kissing and cuddling and foreplay, but he totally ignored me. After trying twice to make me cum in the first few minutes( I pulled back and tried to get him to slow down) he started to jack himself off and did until he came. He then started to jack me off very roughly and in a big hurry. I had to stop him and get him to lube me some. I came and he escorted me into the bathroom and we washed and dressed and he hurried me out the door."

 

Jason's response was very apologetic and friendly there, too. He's a terrific maker-upper I guess.

 

"Can't say I wasn't warned!"

A-men.

[Guest ncm2169]

Lame, Lucky. But props for trying! }(

[Rick Munroe]

>I give him credit for being a stand up guy.

 

Maybe now he'll get his own sitcom.

[Louis]

If Jason is a good guy, then he should contact the reviewer, and meet up with him again for a lower fee or for no fee at all. Jason even said he did not perform well, so its up to him to square things away with the client. Talk is cheap, if all he is going to do is applogize for taking the client's money without being able to perform.

So it would be very interested if he is going to make good for the bad experience.

Escorts provide a service, and if for some reason the escort can't perform, then that escort should be obligated to rectify the situation, or come to amiable terms where he will see the client a second time to make up for the bad experience.

[Guest EuropTravl]

>Maybe now he'll get his own sitcom.

 

Well, "next time you get a discount" is pretty funny.

 

(Actually, hiring him now would make sense as he doesn't need anymore negative publicity. Sort of reminds me of "The World According to Garp" when the family is looking at a house for sale as a plane flies into it. "We must buy this house now!" says Garp, as something that bad doesn't happen twice.)

[Tommygunzz]

>In response to a newly posted review documenting the

>shortcomings of his performance on this particular occasion,

>he posted a response explaining that he shouldn't have taken

>the appointment, the call came in at a time when he needed

>cash but he wasn't really rested and 100% ready. He

>apologized (in this posting) and asked people to consider him

>based on all his reviews.

>

>Now, a REALLY stand-up guy would contact the client and see

>about making it up to him some way... And maybe Jason did

>that directly, but there's no indication in his response.

 

I agree completely. The apology for a self-admitted, sub-par performance should be sent to the client, not offered to the masses once a review is posted and the escort is "outed". A broken transmisson isn't really a good excuse for taking a fee and then providing a less than par service.

 

>

>Anyway, I had a session with Jason several years ago during

>his visit to NYC, and I found him to be pleasant, nicely hung,

>a proficient top, but not a warm and cuddly sort of guy. I

>put it down to chemistry. With some guys there's chemistry,

>with some there's not. Some escorts are also skilled actors

>who can simulate the chemistry. Others are skilled sexual

>performers but not particularly good actors. And on and on...

>to each his own.

 

Again, my bad for not submitting a review of my own, but my experience with Jason was oddly the same. When I hired Jason I was surprised at the lack of warmth and especially eye contact. He called me "Sir" at the end of every question, and though we hadn't discussed this in advance, I thought it odd for him to offer it up repeatedly. I'm 53 now. I don't need to be reminded of it. If it was out of respect, please show it another way.

 

 

>

>But I thought Jason's response was refreshingly candid. He

>gave a mediocre performance on this occasion and when called

>on it, did not try some sort of snappy comeback, but owned up

>to it. That seems consistent with the personality exhibited

>by his occasional posts around here. An honest guy.

 

 

Overall, I agree a totally honest guy. But, shy, reserved, inhibited (with me, at least), and somewhat suspect for a repeat by admitting that he accepted a full-fee for a mediocre performance.

 

If escorts are professional, then why should a client ever be put into the position of being asked to pay the stated fee for a sub-par performance. And, on top of that, Jason asks for others to accept his mulligan.

[BigD]

Jason is a great guy. I have been with Jason at least a half dozen times and found him to be attentive and responsive, always exceeding expectations. He is a top and has always been functional. That aside, he is just a nice guy.

 

I do think he should updates his pictures, but a recent visit with him evidenced little change in his appearance. I know that he has been escorting for more than a few years; that would tax one's ability to always be on, I assume. In his response he stated he regrets having taken the call on a bad day; we all have bad days.

 

Regardless, he is the best bargain in town. His rates go up when he leaves the city, but in town he quotes 160. You can't beat that. He is attractive and has a very nice dick. Many other locals are shooting for 200 - 250, and my experience has shown that Jason beats most of them in all areas.

 

This is not a review of Jason, and I am not trying to defend him. Maybe I am. He is such a giving person. On this board he has always tried to assist clients visiting Dallas with hints about bars, restaurants, hotels, etc. Most recently he emailed me to advise me of a new escort he thought I might have interest in. The guy is genuine.

[+ deej]

The vultures always circle when an escort gets a bad review and needs to respond.

 

It's always fun to trash the escort. Some guys around here live for that.

 

Reading this one, I wonder if Jason is just taking the easy way out by asking for a mulligan because he knows he can't win if he tells the truth. He's a classy enough guy to take that approach.

 

THAT point of view never gets considered.

[Guest EuropTravl]

>he knows he can't win

>if he tells the truth.

 

Sounds like another obese client with poor hygiene and bad breath I guess.

(He is classy not to have mentioned it.)

[+ deej]

>>he knows he can't win

>>if he tells the truth.

>

>Sounds like another obese client with poor hygiene and bad

>breath I guess.

>(He is classy not to have mentioned it.)

 

None of those attributes were mentioned, of course. It would be pointless and Jason would be crucified for mentioning them. He likely knows that.

 

Bringing up those attributes at is YOUR thing and has nothing to do with Jason.

 

But none of his detractors in this thread are leaving even the slightest bit of room for that analysis of the situation.

 

Note that I have no dog in this hunt. I've never met Jason. My only knowledge of him is through this site. I don't know for sure if we've ever even traded a single private email.

 

I won't decide either way. But I will leave wiggle room in my mind for a guy that has more good karma than bad.

[MichiganMan]

I'm sure he wasn't too tired to take payment for his services....

[swallows22]

And you wonder why blokes do not submit negative reviews.

 

How in God's name did the reviewer go to someone who was obese, dirty, obnoxious, uneducated, etc, etc.

 

I have been submitting reviews for over six years, but i learned very early that you NEVER submit a bad review because you end up paying for it.

[Kippy]

Aaaaaaaahhhhhh the bruised apple rots! I've never hired Jason but did speak on the phone with him several years ago about hiring him. He was curt and sounded a bit "bratty"-- never what I'm looking for in an escort and so I looked elsewhere. This kid has been around a long time and I hope he has a back up plan/career in mind because I think his shelf life is overas an "A" list excort.

 

Peace,

 

Kipp :+

[Philly Guy]

>I have been submitting reviews for over six years, but i

>learned very early that you NEVER submit a bad review because

>you end up paying for it.

 

What's the point in only posting positive reviews? An honest negative review will weed out the frauds and the scammers.

 

I posted a negative review about a "never before" reviewed escort(it never made it to Daddy's {I guess that's no surprise} but it did make it to MER) and the escort responded in the typical "poor hygiene bad breath manner"; all bullshit but at least I hope that other's were able to save their money based on my "factual" review.

 

If I read a rebuttal that has a "poor hygiene bad breath" response, and chose to hire the escort anyway, I would walk into the situation knowing I am gambling.

[mark]

I've been involved in the escort-play "game" for many years, and have not had repeat sessions with very many different guys. Two of these are no longer in the business; but I've seen Jason Carter probably half a dozen times and just wanted to say that I've completely enjoyed each and every session. He's gone out of his way to accommodate my screwy travel arrangements, and most times answers his phone...which I appreciate.

 

I'm not a demanding client...if a guy can't/won't stay hard, or if there's anything else unpleasant about him, I just won't see him again. Jason accommodates my idea of a sexy session every time I see him. I'll undoubtedly see him again.

[uwsman2]

Well, exactly my point in the comment I posted. It's about chemistry between the escort and the client. Sometimes it's there and sometimes it isn't. Some guys click together and some guys don't. Some escorts have that something extra that makes them click with a vastly wider range of guys, and they will probaby be the most successful in the long run. Others can't get turned on unless the client is within their personal "hot guy" range and unless they find a few mutually turned-on regulars will probably not get enough repeat business to keep at it very long.

 

That's why I read every review on this site, negative or positive or neutral, with a grain of salt, remembering it's based on the impressions arising out of a particular encounter between particular guys on a particular day. Some escorts whom I've found a total turn-on were reviewed by guys here who found them a total turn-off. I've had a mediocre time with some guys who are very well reviewed here. It's individual.

 

What I find most helpful about the reviews are the factual aspects of the reporting. I wish every review made completely clear whether the meeting was at the escort's place or the client's place (or hotel). I wish every review provided some indication whether the escort looks like their picture on this site (if it's an escort with a picture, of course) or on the escort's Rentboy or other ads, and whether the stats in their advertising are accurate.

 

Hearing about the interaction between the escort and the client can tell me something about the escort's personality, but then the escort is reacting to that particular client, who may be very different from me in many ways.

 

So I don't automatically pass by an escort who's gotten a bad review here. I think about what the client complained about, and maybe it would be a turn-off to me, and might even be a turn-on. I've submitted negative reviews on escorts sometimes, and of course the escorts sometimes responded to the review in a typically defensive way trying to shift the blame for the disappointing session on to me. So I take that with a grain of salt - after all, the escort has the last word unless I post something in the forum here, and I've almost never been moved to do that, unless I thought the escort was a total scammer and I just wanted to warn people off.

 

So this talk about don't post a negative review or all the vultures will circle around and pick you or it to pieces --- so what. We're pretty much all posting anonymously here anyway, so who cares.

 

What makes this site so valuable is being able to share chatter about one of our obsessions -- male escorts -- and form impressions about the guys we'd like to meet and the guys we'd like to give a miss....

[Epigonos]

I agree with many of the points that uwsman2 makes. Additionally I look very carefully at the clients self description. I am 66 years old and a review written by a 40 year old client does not necessarily reflect how an escort is going to react to someone my age. I place far more weight on a review written by a client near my own age.

I also find that, at my age, I am far more likely to have a successful get together with escorts in their 30's and 40's than ones in the late teens or 20's. I can, however, think of some notable exceptions to that statement ie. Scott Adler/LA, Aaron Mark/Las Vegas and Benjamin Nicholas/San Antonio

I also find it interesting that many reviews tell us far more about the client than about the escort.

[+ ArVaGuy]

Fear of Escort Wrath in Reviews

 

>And you wonder why blokes do not submit negative reviews.

>

>How in God's name did the reviewer go to someone who was

>obese, dirty, obnoxious, uneducated, etc, etc.

>

>I have been submitting reviews for over six years, but i

>learned very early that you NEVER submit a bad review because

>you end up paying for it.

 

 

 

I'd have to say this is an absurd assertion. If you are that scared of what an escort might say about you in a reply to a negative review then you might as well not submit any at all. It’s easy to write a positive review but unfortunately it’s a bit harder to write a negative one.

 

However, as a client who relies on the reviews here, and on other sites, I consider it part and parcel of what it means to participate here to contribute the process. And if that means writing a negative review and risking "escort wrath" in a reply then so be it.

 

It’s due to the reviews here that I have met some very high quality guys. And I've also avoided more than a few bad experiences. But I've also had a few bad experiences because of the supposedly glowing reviews of a few guys who based on the experience were not worthy of the accolades. Consequently I've had to write several negative reviews over the seven years of utilizing this site.

 

And when writing those reviews I've been well aware that it was likely the escort would reply blaming me for the issues and possibly falling back on that old poor hygiene canard or some other lie. And in one instance the escort did just that and lived down to the expectation. But I am not about to let the fear of such an action by a lousy guy control how I contribute to this site.

 

The reply to a negative review reveals more about the escort than it does the client in many instances. You would think some of these guys would figure this out. It's also amazing how a negative review can suddenly be followed by one or two very positive reviews that seem to refute the negative one point for point. Sometimes it’s rather obvious these are bogus.

 

Even some quality guys here have had negative reviews. The classy ones have replied in a manner that avoids playing the hygiene card or some other negative about the client. Taking responsibility in these instances IMHO makes the escort look better than he otherwise may come across in the review.

 

There's also no need to be concerned about any escort's partisans who may attack or dissect a negative reviewer on these boards. To me that's also a part of participating as a reviewer. We all have different experiences and therefore varying opinions. It's all part of the process and being honest in our judgments as Hooboy used to say.

 

So if you are going to let an escort provide you with lousy service and choose not to submit a review for fear of "paying for it" then that's allowing one's self to be taken advantage of twice. Once for the lousy experience and twice for the fear of what the escort might say. That is an absurdity from my perspective.