Scott Adler

[Guest verymarried]

As a SA junkie, I hated his review to pass without trying to draw Scott and his pro and con followers into a few comments. Okay this reviewer seemed to think Scott as the perfect sort, but with no mention of gag reflexes, deep throat proficiency or anything remotely interesting. Would the next SA reviewer just tell us what the heck they did in bed. It is hardly worth risking peeks at this website in my straight household to read of Scott's conversational skills. And Scott how do I find your blog and have you done anything interesting lately, like jointly cruising cute waiters with your female cousin?

[Guest EuropTravl]

It was frustrating I'll agree. We got the name of the hotel, the restaurant, but not the wine Scott chose. What a jip.

[+ ArVaGuy]

Scott's rate is listed as "0" so I can only conclude that he no longer charges for his services. :+

 

That's very generous of you Scott. }(

[Epigonos]

Ok I will take the bait on this one. If this were the first review of Scott on this site I might agree with verymarried but he has a total of 25 other reviews currently available. Three of those reviews were written by reviewers who are frequent posters on this site KY-TOP, PULSATOR, and myself (Epigonos). All three of these reviews are highly explicit and detailed. The great advantage of multiple reviews is that they allow the reader to obtain a rather complete picture of the escort.

 

Now as to Scott's rate listed as 0 anybody who has read site over the last couple of years will be aware that Scott has always requested that his rate and telephone number not be provided in reviews. Absolutely nothing new there!!!!!

 

Verymarried if you are considering hiring Scott take the plunge. He is definitely worth your time and money. He is a member in good standing of a small select group of outstanding escorts.

[+ Lucky]

The reviewer, EXPAT, is a frequent contributor to these forums, so I guess that if you are realy curious for more details, you can private message him and he will tell you. I am surprised that Scott continues to use that dreadful picture. He does look much better than that in person.

[+ ArVaGuy]

>

>Now as to Scott's rate listed as 0 anybody who has read site

>over the last couple of years will be aware that Scott has

>always requested that his rate and telephone number not be

>provided in reviews. Absolutely nothing new there!!!!!

 

I am well aware of Scott's request on this and was just poking fun. Hence the clown emoticon. :+

 

If I really wanted to stir it up I could have asked if his rate was negotiable. }(

[+ Axiom2001]

I have to agree with E.... Why worry? Scott has more than one review from which one could glean the gist of him, his attributes, and possibly his sexual performances.

 

But, again, remember that each escort reacts to his client based on the chemistry that exists between them.

 

Last year, or possibly the year before, I engaged the services of a well reviewed escort who received stellar comments about being a SUPERB kisser! Well, when he was with me, I was completely baffled by this because with me (and my mouth and breath were sparkling with the upmost hygiene)-- he didn't perform as previously stated in his innumerable reviews. I was completely let down and didn't enjoy our encounter and could not interact with him as I'd yearned.

 

I chose NOT to write a review but was indeed surprised when the escort sent me an email highlighting our time together and indicating cordially that he would be more than willing to see me again! I didn't reply!!

[pierrot]

In fairness to other escorts who are reviewed and as a very basic piece of information, it is not right to allow a review to be posted with no rate given. That is so basic to the needs of the readers that it just simply should be mandatory for publication of a review.

 

I agree with one of the previous posters that the dining experience of the reviewer is of no interest whatsoever. Who reads escort reviews to find out that some guy paid someone to have dinner with with him? Come on. What a silly exercise in futility.

 

I respect Daddy immensely for all the crap he puts up with, but I think he needs to stick to some basic standards for reviews.

[Epigonos]

Pierrot when you state "he (Daddy) needs to stick to some basic standards for reviews" just exactly to what and to whose standards are you refering. I'm certain that Daddy does stick to HIS basic standards for reviews which unfortunately are not necessarily yours or mine. Whether we like it or not Daddy owns and operates this site and has every right to operate it exactly as he wishes. Now if we don't like his standards or the way he operates this site we have every right to stop posting and go elswhere. The bottom line cliche here is "he who pays the piper calls the tune" and on this site Daddy pays the piper and Daddy calls the tune --- PERIOD!!!!!

[Luv2play]

I agree. What use is a review if we don't know what was paid for the experience? Particularly from an escort that states that charges will vary with the activities pursued. Which, parenthetically, sounds an awful like prostitution to me and not money for time spent!

[pierrot]

I totally agree that Daddy puts in the work and can/should whatever he feels like. My point was that he has established a reputation for this site as the best place to find honest, useful reviews of escorts that can help those of us who hire to make an appropriate decision for our likes/dislikes/needs, etc.

So I think that Daddy has basically set quite a high standard already by trying to insure that the reviews he posts are by real people and not just self-serving reviews sent in by the escorts themselves.

I am suggesting, however, that Daddy maintain that standard by making the rate box on the review form mandatory. Some of the other parts of the form are already mandatory, and it would further the usefulness of the reviews if Daddy were to make the rate necessary for publication as well.

It goes without saying that Daddy is not beholden to me or anyone else and can do as he likes. But my sense is that Daddy tries very hard to make this site the best of its kind, and this is a way I think he could make it even better.

[Guest PWIT]

Pierrot, mandating what information someone must provide would surely reduce the number of people choosing to share their information and experiences. Would you be willing to live with fewer reviews?

 

I grew up in a culture where money discussions were often considered vulgar. You didn't talk about how much money you made, how much you paid for a house, car, etc. May sound silly, but it is still quite common.

[Guest pj4florida]

While I am not a Scott Adler Junkie I have seen Scott on many occasions in past and yes sexually this is one hot guy. He knows what to do and knows how to keep his clients happy. While I may not longer see him it has nothing to do with him directly.

[EXPAT]

The following is my full review. I did the same review for 2 sites and for some reason I failed to get the final version copied for this site. And as others have mentioned, Scott does not want his rate or phone number published. So for your reading pleasure, he is the entire review:

 

Scott and I had been in communication for a number of weeks but we could never come up with an agreed upon time to get together. I prefer to meet escorts for the first time in a 2 to 3 hour session to get to know them before I move on to longer appointments, but in this case, I made an exception since I knew I was going to be in West Hollywood for Gay Pride. Scott suggested the Chamberlain Hotel which is not far from where he lives. So we agreed on an overnight arrangement. Like others, I had hesitated in hiring Scott because he has been a rather volatile person creating lots of controversy. But that actually intrigued me more because I wondered why that controversy exists. I always like to make my own opinions. So that is basically why I agreed to an overnight for our first meeting. I wanted to get to know him better to make my own judgement. I originally met Scott the first time at a Hooville dinner arranged by another client in WeHo about 3 months ago. I think one of his controversial points is his rates for his time. They are not published and in my first few conversations with him, even I have to admit I was confused by his rates. I know many think his rates are too high. In my experience you really get what you pay for. Some people are on the high end yet don't deserve it. Others are on the high end for a reason, they deserve it. I have to now admit that Scott is among the latter. I think Scott is a bit guarded about who he meets and as a result he may come across more aloof than he really is. Make sure you spend time talking to him before you judge him.

 

We met at my hotel at 7PM and got reaquainted and then walked to Mark's for dinner. I found out that Scott is an only child and he certainly has a lot of the stereotypical traits of an only child, but as I learned that is part of his charm. Having lived in NYC, I was used to fast talkers, but Scott is one of the fastest - literally. Even though he is only 22 / 23 years old, he is well versed on a lot of topics and I really enjoyed the dinner as we discussed the good and bad of MySpace, politics and the upcoming election. Scott also picked out the wine and made a good choice. I also think he made a new friend that evening since he and the waiter were flirting a bit. I should have brought them both back to my room ;-)

 

After dinner we walked back to the hotel and went to the roofdeck pool lounge and we talked about the city, neighborhood and his experiences in living in West Hollywood. As I said, he is a great conversationalist and I really enjoyed talking with him. As we got too cold for the outside deck, we moved inside to my room. One of the things I look for in a good escort is kissing ability. Scott certainly knows how to kiss. I would have to put him somewhere in the top 5 kissers I have ever had. I also love smooth bodies and Scott also fits that bill. I would have to describe his body type as a cross between A&F and International male model. He also has a beautiful bubble butt which is another major plus for me. Sexually, Scott is truly versatile although I believe he prefers topping, but he is happy either way. He knew I was a top and came prepared for that. I told him that I don't always top the first time I meet with someone. He is DEFINITELY talented orally and he loves to be rimmed. We spent a lot of our time with a lot of body contact, kissing and oral activity. He also brought an interesting anal toy that I used on him :-). As the morning came, I slowly woke him up to find that he had a beautiful morning hard on which I took care of immediately. We went to breakfast at a local Starbucks and said good bye for the day.

 

I plan on seeing Scott again. I recommend that if you are concerned about seeing him because of his reputation, then put it aside, meet with him and I think you will see that he is really a nice guy who happens to be very hot.

[Epigonos]

It is interesting that whenever there is a thread about Scott Adler that thread invariably segues into a discussion of his non posted rates. Speaking here only for myself let me say that an escort's posted hourly, nightly or daily rates are totally meaningless. I ALWAYS communicate with an escort via email the first time. In that first email I state the following -- "I am interested in getting together with you for either lunch or dinner (your choice) and then a couple of hours of play time. Are you available for this type of arrangement and if so what would your fee be?" The answer I receive frequently is very different from what the escort's total hourly rate might be for the time invovled in this type of arrangement. If the escort's rate is within my budget we proceed from there if it isn't I thank him for his time and move on. I have found that many escorts, Scott included, sincerely enjoy having a meal and becomming acquainted with a client. Some don't even charge for the meal time. In conclusion, as far as I'm concerned, the discussion of an escort's fee is not the slightest problem for me simply because, after all, we are discussing a buisness arrangement NOT a social arrangement.

[+ Charlie]

Scott is not unique in not advertising his rates--many ads on Rentboy and other sites just say "rate varies." It's understandable that an escort might want to charge more or less depending on a number of circumstances, such as the kind of activity being sought, convenience of the appointment, travel expenses, etc. He might also want to raise or lower a base rate without having to explain or justify it to someone who says, "But so-and-so said he paid you X amount!" While I agree that a published rate helps me make a quick cut of those I would not consider, it really doesn't help me that much to know exactly how much the reviewer paid, since the escort can always quote me a different rate when I make an inquiry. This is not a business in which we can sue for false advertising (alas!).

[Philly Guy]

My first visit with Scott covered the gamut.

 

I was in LA visiting a foreign student that had spent a year with me. I had short-listed various guys that I wanted to see and ended up calling Scott.

 

Suffice it to say we got into the "rate discussion" and we both almost concluded that we would agree to disagree and not see each other when I said to myself "this guy is such an asshole he must be good!"

 

As it turned out, I learned the conversation was just two Jews negotiating.

 

I was quite happy and saw Scott a second time while in LA (and I saw no one else)and would welcome the opportunity to see him again. He is everything everyone talks about sexually and is clearly a very intelligent guy.

 

I have concluded that escorts come in many flavors and while a mindless idiot with a great body and huge dick that can fuck you into tomorrow for $150 an hour may be needed on one occasion, sometimes someone that is intellectually stimulating will highten the sexual experience particularly if they have the rest of the goods to go along.

 

Scott is worth the money but good God he sure elicits a ton of controversy ;-)

[Louis]

I really don't mind if a person posts the escorts rate or not. I think that there are several things that certain escorts may take into consideration when working out a fee for a particular client, and that fee if based on circumstances could vary from client to client.

I will find out about Scott's rates is the time that I am ready to hire thim.

With regards to the review, it was stated that Scott "is quite versatile"....That's all I need to know, I don't have to know that he can pound me so hard I can't sit for a week, or that he can take every inch a person can give.

So I actually liked the review, because it gives more insight into Scott, and when I hire escorts, it really want to experience more than sex. I want to have quality time with a quality person, and from I get from the review is that Scott deliverd to goods, and when looking at other reviews posted about him, he definately wants his clients to have the best experience possible.

[buckguy]

Rates often vary in LA based on distance. I've paid extra for the misfortune of being in Santa Monica or Downtown LA (although the latter really isn't far from WeHo). The rate varies is used by some guys because of different rates for different lengths of time and for anything over an evening (or unusual requests), it tends to get negotiable. One usually gets an idea of this from the reviews (or here). These are fairly concrete and predictable ways of guessing what someone will charge as opposed to the regression equation that Scott apparently does with each client.

 

But for those of us whose budgets are in the real world, even what turns out to be a floating estimate is helpful. I actually haven't found Scott all that off-putting, but I'd rather not get into a good old fashioned negotiation for a relatively straightforward amount of time with someone. Clearly, Scott has his fans, but they could do the rest of us a valuable service by being even a little less coy. Scott's a big boy and can defend himself if people don't like that.

[pierrot]

Well I also "grew up in a culture where money was never discussed," however I don't see how that's relevant here.

I mean the difference between our parents' living rooms and a web site about hiring male prostitutes could hardly be greater. I merely pointed out that certain information is ALREADY mandatory for posting a review (and there are plenty of reviews), and it seems to me that price is of importance to the whole purpose of reviewing.

In this particular case, I don't really care, since Scott Adler is not my type, doesn't live in my city, and I wouldn't hire him even if he did. But if ALL the reviews were to stop including rates, the usefulness of the site would be greatly diminished.

[Guest EuropTravl]

>>In this particular case, I don't really care, since Scott Adler is not my type, doesn't live in my city, and I wouldn't hire him even if he did.

 

Me either, mine either, mine either, and me either.

 

>>Scott does not want his rate or phone number published.

 

An escort not wanting his phone number here I understand. Not wanting a picture posted I understand. But the rate thing I don't, and I guess some escorts get final "script approval" before the review is published? Or direct the script from the beginning? Or write it themselves? I'd guess some do, some do, and a lot do.

 

(Fortunately, my current infatuation is with a certain Brazilian in Sao Paulo who is more than pleased with 1500 dollars for an entire week, with a nice hotel, meals and nice clothes shopping thrown in - thank God the going rate down there from the locals seems to be back to 50 US dollars per "visit" - definetely a buyers market down there)

[Guest verymarried]

I may be getting into turf I should not, but Philly: is Scott really Jewish or is this sort of a humorous persona he has created? I guess I am enfatuated by the thought of a Jewish escort. Did Scott have a Bar Mitzvah and does he refuse to do business on Yom Kippur, as did the once cute hunk Sandy Koufax? I know I am talking about a real person with a real life, but the concept of a Jewish male escort - it just seems like it would have made a great Philip Roth novel or a Tennessee Williams screenplay.

[+ purplekow]

>I may be getting into turf I should not, but Philly: is Scott

>really Jewish or is this sort of a humorous persona he has

>created? I guess I am enfatuated by the thought of a Jewish

>escort. Did Scott have a Bar Mitzvah and does he refuse to do

>business on Yom Kippur, as did the once cute hunk Sandy

>Koufax? I know I am talking about a real person with a real

>life, but the concept of a Jewish male escort - it just seems

>like it would have made a great Philip Roth novel or a

>Tennessee Williams screenplay.

 

I would suggest the author of this read it again and then compose a really nice apology. I am not Jewish but I found this post offensive.

I think your first line indicates that you had an idea that this was inappropriate and went ahead with it anyway. Shameful really.

[Rick Munroe]

>I may be getting into turf I should not, but Philly: is Scott

>really Jewish or is this sort of a humorous persona he has

>created?

 

I can't speak for Scott, but in my case, it is a humorous persona that my mother created.

[JT Brooklyn]

Rick...LOL Nice of you to bring a little something into another Boring S. Adler discussion.

 

Most of them usually go Nowhere, just on and on and on! IMHO...

:P