Ken Sharp 1st Review

[JT Brooklyn]

Finally Thanks to KY a First Review on this very Hunky Guy!

 

His NOT Kissing may turn some guys off, BUT he sure gets into everything else making up for that slight minus, to us "Vanilla" Types! LOL

 

To My thinking according to the very Good FIRST Review written by a Very Creditable Guy, he's More than Worth the Contact!

 

:P

[Okliehomo]

Hmmmm.

 

Well, a review at last. I had hoped to be the first. KY sure gets around.

 

I have been talking to Ken Sparks (not sure why the name change)since last January 2006. Actually, bought him a ticket for April 2007 and I had to cancel on him at the last minute beause of health problems. Strange about the no kissing. My first email says "Kissing is essential....blah, blah, all about your ass etc..." and he writes back.."I'm your man"...I have been planning on flying him up here the next time that he is in Dallas.

 

I guess, we need to discuss his policy change before we do that. Don't want any awkward moments. Went thru that years ago with Trent Fosters and it ruined the whole deal for me.

 

Okie

[JT Brooklyn]

Oklie..You and KY I'm sure are in a "Tie" for getting around! I am really envious of that fact...You both are very Creditable in your comments also...Keep us Updated on FRANCO/PARIS! HaHa

 

NOW I won't mix up SPARKS & SHARP ANYMORE! Although "Sparkie Boy" looks Hunky as hell! LOL

 

The Kissing can be a "Deal Breaker" I'm sure for alot of guy's.

 

And One thing that "NO Working Guy" should forget to mention is that he DOESN'T get into Kissing! Sometime's they show and have forgotten what was discussed, with Convenient Memory Loss! LOL

 

It's all about being Upfront, which is more than just getting his Dick Sucked at a very nice Profit! LOL

 

The Kiss is usually the First on my Email List! It's not the be all to end all... but Definitely adds to the Fun Mix! LOL

[+ Axiom2001]

"...no kissing?" That came out of the mouth of the somewhat hunk Gio#4 in NYC recently when we were together. I was too through with him. His lack or desire to kiss and his unwillingness to be interactive was a complete waste of my limited funds for fun!

 

Immediately after he left my hotel room and I had showered, etc., I went to the hotel's computer center and wrote a review: it did not go through reporting website address problems. ...found this odd and decided not to rewrite.

 

Kissing is a must with me, and preferably deep from a man who has a pleasant and desirable breath. As some escorts have stated-- the mouth and nips and dick are all connected!

 

(When I returned to California, I sent Gio#4 a rather scalding and candid email in which I informed him of my COMPLETE disappointment with his lack of involvement: he responded rather apologetically; I'd assume he was sincere in his doing this!)

---------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

The desires of an escort not willing to kiss brought the above words from me; I hope you find it relevant to the thread!

[Scorpio]

Okie,

 

As we've discussed before Ken Sparks and Ken Sharp are TWO separate individuals. From what understand Mr. Sparks kisses....Mr. Sharp does not. But I do understand the confusion this time, as the review for Ken Sharp links to Ken Sparks M4RN listing.

 

I couldn't find a current ad for Ken Sharp. Just KY's review on the other site: http://www.maleescortreview.com/index.php?file=escort_review_view&review_id=629&escort_id=207030007

 

The other notably differences between the two: Ken Sparks is taller at 6'1" than Ken Sharp at 5'9"

 

Also, this is not Ken Sharp's first review. He was reviewed many times on the old site as Jason Land, also of Ft. Lauderdale.

 

Scorpio

[Charlus]

This is almost certainly a review of Ken SPARKS, not Ken Sharp. The URL takes you to Sparks's site and the pic looks very like Sparks's body, which I have seen in person. Even the reviewer, like many others on the boards, confuses the two names, it seems.

 

I can confirm some of the comments about Sparks made above. I hired him for an overnight when he was visiting a city near my location at the end of last year. The arrangements were easy to make. In a message describing what I was looking for, I included, as I always do, very prominently, that kissing is very important to me. He said to me that everything that I had requested "sounded good" to him. When we met, he very obviously did not want to kiss me so I soon gave up trying to my considerable frustration, as he is very good looking and sexy. I had told him that I was not into anal, and he replied that he wasn't either, so the review's describing his enthusiastic bottoming came as a surprise. On the whole I did not find him very interactive. My session with him was one of the most disappointing since I started hiring over a year ago. And I would not hire him again, even though I got an email recently from him informing me that he was going to be back in my area.

 

I know, I know, I should have written a review!:-)

[Scorpio]

I'm not sure how the pictures were confused in this review, but I'm fairly certain that the reviewer was not confusing the two. The reviewer was reviewing Ken SHARP, as the same review appears on the other review site with pictures of Ken SHARP and a link to Ken SHARP's now defunct M4RN ad.

[Charlus]

OK, now I'm less certain which guy the review is really of. The pic looks very like Sparks's body. However an email friend has just pointed out to me that the reviewer describes the escort's head as "shaved", which suggests Sharp, who at one time at least had a shaved head, and not Sparks, who has blond hair, one time in a mohawk, apparently. And the evidence from the previous comment suggests that it is Sharp, not Sparks. Could we get a clarification from the reviewer? If it is Sharp, however, why is there no face pic, since Sharp's ads in past, if my memory serves, included face pics, while Sparks's ads never did/do? Somebody has screwed up here.

 

Let me be clear that my remarks in my previous post refer to SPARKS, not Sharp, whom I've never met.

[Charlus]

PS. From all the continual confusion between these two guys on this board and on the MuscleService boards, one of these two needs to change his stage name.

 

PPS: I had originally thought the review was of Sparks because the review describes the escort as a traveling escort whose base city is Fort Lauderdale. Whether this is true for Sharp I don't know, but it does accurately describe Sparks.

[Gar1eth]

>PS. From all the continual confusion between these two guys

>on this board and on the MuscleService boards, one of these

>two needs to change his stage name.

>

>PPS: I had originally thought the review was of Sparks because

>the review describes the escort as a traveling escort whose

>base city is Fort Lauderdale. Whether this is true for Sharp

>I don't know, but it does accurately describe Sparks.

 

 

Gentlemen, and --well I guess Gentlemen of the Jury:

 

With the evidence from the other review site having Ken Sharp's (aka Jason Land's ) inactive ad attached to the review along with the report that he is versatile but usually prefers to top and that I don't believe Ken Sparks bottoms--I say we must concusively concur that the review is talking about Ken Sharp and not Ken Sparks in spite of the aforementioned misplaced Ken Spark website on this very (Daddy's) Review Site.

 

I can only attribute the error in the website to the fact that even Homer (Daddy) nods.

 

And in case you were wondering--

 

"The phrase "Homer sometimes nods'' or "even Homer nods'' means that even someone who is the best at what they do can turn in a subpar performance. It is a translation of a line from "Ars Poetica'' by the Roman poet Horace. The sense of "nod'' meant here is not the downward motion of the head used to indicate a "yes'' response to something, but the drooping of the head as an indication that someone is about to "nod'' off to sleep.

Homer was an epic poet, a giant of Greek literature, and the creator of the Iliad and the Odyssey, but Horace obviously felt that that even such a gifted and admired figure was not always at his best.''

 

Thank you, I rest my case.

 

Judicially yours,

 

Gman ;-) ;-) ;-)

[Okliehomo]

Somebody seems to have recognized the mixup between the two because any reference to Ken Sparks (including his pic..that I am certain was him) is now gone.

 

Personally, I am grateful for the confusion. It has sent up a few red flags for me about Ken Sparks. Love his body and he does have a great butt, and the boy is movie star handsome from the face pics that I have seen, but no kissing and not very interactive and no anal?? Really. Have suspected that he was a little bit gay for pay, and this seems to confirm it.

 

Obviously, further communication is needed. Will let you all know more when I do.

 

Okie

[+ purplekow]

>I can only attribute the error in the website to the fact that

>even Homer (Daddy) nods.

>

>And in case you were wondering--

>

>"The phrase "Homer sometimes nods'' or "even Homer nods''

>means that even someone who is the best at what they do can

>turn in a subpar performance. It is a translation of a line

>from "Ars Poetica'' by the Roman poet Horace. The sense of

>"nod'' meant here is not the downward motion of the head used

>to indicate a "yes'' response to something, but the drooping

>of the head as an indication that someone is about to "nod''

>off to sleep.

>Homer was an epic poet, a giant of Greek literature, and the

>creator of the Iliad and the Odyssey, but Horace obviously

>felt that that even such a gifted and admired figure was not

>always at his best.''

>

>Thank you, I rest my case.

>

>Judicially yours,

>

>Gman ;-) ;-) ;-)

 

 

I am glad you explained that because I thought when I read the sentence "Even Homer nods", oh a mistake, Homer doesn't nod, "Homer says: "Doh!".

[Charlus]

Okie,

 

Much of Ken Sparks's conversation with me revolved around various past adventures with girlfriends, so "gay for pay", whether it is actually what he is or not, is very much the image he intends to project.

[JT Brooklyn]

The "KEN DOLL" Confusion has alway's been around. They BOTH have Great Bods, very similar from what I've seen.

 

I'm thinking maybe "JASON LAND" should just make a comeback. LOL

 

 

Whatever the reason for the Name change, getting away from the XXX Past Relationships etc.. His Video email Travel Announcements are Hot!

 

I also Received an email NYC Announcement from Ken Sparks! He looks Hot in his Tightey Whities! This Guy is not Chopped Liver either!

[Okliehomo]

Call me crazy,(or just really, really, really gay) but all that "girl talk" is the biggest turnoff in the world for me. Trent Fosters did the same thing and so did Marcel Deon (Dion? Not sure)...and I was always like, "Well, you've still got a guy's tongue in your ass, don't you?"

 

Very disappointed about Ken Sparks, though. Thanks for saving me all that $$$, boys.

 

Okie

[Charlus]

Okie,

 

I agree, the girlfriend talk is a major turn-off. I can't imagine what compels some guys to do this (although Sparks is the only guy I've hired who did it) other than to impress on their clients how "straight" they are.

[Okliehomo]

And like straight is a good thing? Please.

 

I had a BF once who had been married and had kids. Biggest queer in the world and he had fucked hundreds of guys even during that blessed union and somehow, he always seemed to think that he was a little less "gay" than me.....because he had fucked a woman and made a baby...and I was like, "Well, I did it once, too, but it was altogether too slimy for me.." And thank God, there was no baby as a result.

 

Put up with it from a BF, but not about to from a guy that I am paying. Though, I must say, escorts have cost me less than he did. And as a real kick in the shorts, he is now an elected official of this great nation.

 

Ain't that America?

 

At least, I am not bitter about it.

 

Okie

[JT Brooklyn]

I do think some of the Guys who get into the I'm "Straight or Bi" Conversations do actually think their Client's do like to hear it for the "Fantasy Scenario".

I usually say Nothing or move the conversation along to Hows about a little 69 AND GET OVER YOURSELF!

 

The Conversation I really have NO INTEREST in is when a Guy will start giving me a "Blow by Blow" Description of his Last very busy 24 hrs and how busy he will the next 24 hrs. "War Stories" as some call them, are not of any interest to me! BUT that's just JT, other's I am sure are Fascinated by them! LOL :P

[+ purplekow]

>>The Conversation I really have NO INTEREST in is when a Guy

>will start giving me a "Blow by Blow" Description of his Last

>very busy 24 hrs and how busy he will the next 24 hrs. "War

>Stories" as some call them, are not of any interest to me! BUT

>that's just JT, other's I am sure are Fascinated by them! LOL

> :P

 

If the conversation is part of seduction then it is fine. If it is more like, I had a great day yesterday and will have some fun later on and right now I am here with you, well that's a different story.

 

So, I am good with: "I want you to fuck me harder and deeper and make me forget about that muscle bound stud I was just with."

 

Not so good: "Man I was just with a muscle bound stud and he was amazing. Are you done yet?"