Another 411

[Gar1eth]

I'm looking for a consensus viewpoint on Jax Thorne--hopefully from some trusted long time contributors. I get an unusual vibe from his many reviews. Many are from 1st timers--and a lot aren't that specific.

 

So I'd like to know if any "Regulars" that's regular readers of the Message Center--especially those in NYC or who frequent NYC and are "in the know" have an opinion on Mr. Thorne.

 

Here is his current ad from Rentboy

 

http://www.rentboy.com/location/getrb.asp?rentboy=105907&Location=305

 

Many Thanks in Advance

 

Gratefully--I hope,

 

Gman

[MichiganMan]

I did an overnight with him last November when I was in NY. Good dinner companion, and good in the sack. Mind you...the key word is good...NOT great....overall...a solid B-....would I meet with him again..probably not....just not my type I guess...he did live up to his promises though...

[Gar1eth]

I did an overnight with him last November when I was in NY.

>Good dinner companion, and good in the sack. Mind you...the

>key word is good...NOT great....overall...a solid B-....would

>I meet with him again..probably not....just not my type I

>guess...he did live up to his promises though...

 

 

Thanks MichiganMan--any other opinions.

 

I'd like to know among other things--how good a kisser was he/

 

Thanks again.

 

Gman

[swallows22]

I didn't get a kiss. More like wham, bam. Finished up with a 30 minute massage because the other was done quick smart.

[Guest scortlovr]

I hired him a good 2 years ago, went to his place in the far west 20's. He's quite pleasant and very good looking (although I tend to prefer a touch more rugged and mature)a decent masseur but a better escort (I did a combination of both) a very good kisser and very good at sucking cock. Personally I am not a size queen, so his huge dick (probably close to the advertised 10") was too much for me to handle (no way could he fuck me and I couldn't fit all of it in my mouth). All in all, I'd agree with the other reviewer and give him a good B+.

[FinFangFoom]

>Personally I

>am not a size queen, so his huge dick (probably close to the

>advertised 10")

 

You obviously don't own a ruler - or have ever seen one - ruler, that is.

 

Accurately yours,

 

FFF

[Guest scortlovr]

Perhaps we should both go and measure him together? :+

[Gar1eth]

>I hired him a good 2 years ago, went to his place in the far

>west 20's. He's quite pleasant and very good looking (although

>I tend to prefer a touch more rugged and mature)a decent

>masseur but a better escort (I did a combination of both) a

>very good kisser and very good at sucking cock. Personally I

>am not a size queen, so his huge dick (probably close to the

>advertised 10") was too much for me to handle (no way could he

>fuck me and I couldn't fit all of it in my mouth). All in all,

>I'd agree with the other reviewer and give him a good B+.

 

 

What about for an overnight--think he would be good for that?

 

Gareth

[Gar1eth]

>all,

>>I'd agree with the other reviewer and give him a good B+.

 

>

>What about for an overnight--think he would be good for that?

>

>Gareth

 

 

Bump--I need the info--about overnights--what's the consensus?

 

Thanks

 

Gman

[MichiganMan]

To answer in regards to kissing...a very good kisser,and fairly interactive. I read above a 10 inch tool! NO WAY! In internet advertising inches maybe. But his size is nothing to be ashamed of. My advice in regards to an overnight would be...go for it. He DOES actually answer his emails and was on time...he postponed his Boston trip to accomodate me.....

[Okliehomo]

Gareth,

 

I totally understand your interest in Jax Thorne. I have tried on several occasions to get him out here, but from all that I have read about him, he is not into bottoming...at all and he is not a "muscle guy" ..well built, no doubt, but I think that the much missed Traveller accused him of being, let's just say, not in competition form....

 

Suit yourself, bud, but I think he's not what you are looking for...

 

Okie

[+ glutes]

You may want to ask him if that is a current & accurate picture before you consider a overnight!

Also, use of the 'search' function here can be quite helpful...

 

ncm2169 Sat Apr-30-05 10:24 AM

Member since Jun 04th 2002

2032 posts

 

#52431, "Fake Reviews Watch: First Candidate - Jax Thorne today"

 

 

I posted a while back about seeming to notice a larger than normal number of new Reviews by first time Reviewers which don't pass the smell test. Anyone who's read very many Reviews or who's lurked here for very long knows that there are always fake Reviews, but as I say, I think it's getting out of hand lately.

 

Therefore, I suggest a new fixed thread: Fake Reviews Watch, and my first candidate is today's Review of Jax Thorne (NYC). For that matter, his Reviews #5, #6 and #7 could have been written by the same person.

 

Since I don't have the talent (or the time) to deconstruct them like FFF does, I suggest you take a look for yourselves.

[Mac 100]

I went with Jax Thorne 18 months ago and found him a very nice guy.Very good body not a clock watcher Big Dick (which I love) and made me very welcome.

 

I am often in New York and it can be difficult to get hold of him

 

I am back there from the 10th May for a week and he is on my list of people to see and be done by.

 

I recomend this young man highly and his rate is worth the money.

 

 

Mac

[cityguy]

Jax is tall, dark, very handsome, very hung, well-built, personable, sexy and very interactive - exactly what I like. He is also reasonably priced for New York. (If there are any other escorts in NYC with similar attributes, I would be happy to see them too!).

 

I have seen Jax four times, and cannot wait for number 5 on my next visit to New York.

 

 

cityguy

[skibum]

I saw Jax for the first time when he recently visited DC. WOW-I agree with cityguy’s description-he really is tall, dark and model handsome. He is very interactive and a great kisser. I was hesitant to take his huge dick this time, but I plan to go for it the next time I see him. I highly recommend him!

[KNM]

I have to agree with these. I recently saw Jax for the first time and was very impressed. He may not have a six pack as the pics might imply, but he is still extremely attractive, very interactive, and a great kisser and cuddler to boot!

 

Has anyone considered the possibility that there may be so many first time reviewers (like me -- although my review hasn't been posted yet) because Jax is so impressive that people who wouldn't normally bother to submit a review may feel motivated to do so after experiencing Jax?

 

KNM

[Bart]

KNM you are right with this group there is no pleasing them. I wrote maybe ten days ago I was reluctant to issue a couple of reviews because I would be the proverbial first time reviewer. Here we go again trash on the first time reviewer, so I ask the working guys what is the point of issuing a review if no one is going to respect the review posted. Several posters said oh do not worry just go ahead and post them.

 

Like the reviews of big red, I wonder why bother when they become dissected for fodder on the forum. Regardless of the anonymity stature of the reviewers and posters, I am still not keen on being the next thread titled Another First Time Reviewer.

 

Yet numerous times I hear aren't there any new guys and where are all the reviews. I have already invested 1/2 hour in the review I am writing because I want it to have the right amount of information.

[Gar1eth]

>KNM you are right with this group there is no pleasing them.

>I wrote maybe ten days ago I was reluctant to issue a couple

>of reviews because I would be the proverbial first time

>reviewer. Here we go again trash on the first time reviewer,

>so I ask the working guys what is the point of issuing a

>review if no one is going to respect the review posted.

>Several posters said oh do not worry just go ahead and post

>them.

>

>Like the reviews of big red, I wonder why bother when they

>become dissected for fodder on the forum. Regardless of the

>anonymity stature of the reviewers and posters, I am still not

>keen on being the next thread titled Another First Time

>Reviewer.

>

>Yet numerous times I hear aren't there any new guys and where

>are all the reviews. I have already invested 1/2 hour in the

>review I am writing because I want it to have the right amount

>of information.

>

I think y'all are being too sensitive about being 1st time reviewers especially since the review process is anonymous--it's not like we know any of you and are going to picket your place of employment or residence if we don't like the review. Plus you don't have to use the same alias that you use in the Message Center to review under. Then if you don't mention it in the Message Center, no one will know that it was your review.

 

All the reviewers had a 1st review at one time, and there have always been similar discussions on the Message Center about reviewers sometimes about 1st timers and sometimes even about experienced reviewers.

 

The reason 1st time reviewers are sometimes suspect is not because we don't think they know what they are talking about. It is because those of us who have been around here for awhile have seen obviously fake reviews posted either by the escort himself or possibly a friend of the escort. Therefore your credibility increases the more you post--and posting multiple reviews for the same escort does not really help your case. That's why when an escort has only or even mainly 1st time reviewers there is always the question of whether they are real reviews.

 

Case in point I initially thought that Jax's reviews were a bit strange because he has been around for years--so you would think there would have been more reviews from some of the prolific reviewers of this site. However along with the reviews, I received enough confirmatory corroborating comments from this Message Center (although not all were complimentary to Jax--the majority were favorable)to decide that I wanted to hire him. I ended up not hiring him only because of scheduling problems.

 

Now we get to Big Red's reviews. We are not nitpicking them because they are 2 1st time reviewers. We are discussing them because the reviews have all the hallmarks of having been written by the same person under 2 different aliases. We obviously can't swear to that--but there are enough similarities in the 2 reviews that make multiple people very suspicious.

 

And besides what is the purpose of a Message Center but discussion? This would be a pretty boring place without it.

 

Gman :+ :+ :+

[pierrot]

My experience with Jax Thorne about 2 yrs ago:

Looks: Very tall, probably 6'2", not highly defined gym built body, but very naturally muscled, like men who get their muscles from sports rather than weight-lifting. Very big thighs from playing rugby or soccer (he's a New Zealander). Thick dark hair, and a handsome face. Overall I found him very attractive.

Age: Probably 32 or so. Not a twink by any means, but a very hot young man.

Equipment: Well hung, probably a real 7.5 - 8 inches (not the porn inches advertised here by most escorts). Very nice larger than normal cock (but not the exaggerated 10', and not as big as, say Jason Markus or Christopher from Denver).

Personality: Nice guy, pleasant conversationalist.

Experience: My one reservation was that, although he was plenty hard for oral sex, he lost wood when fucking. I don't know whether he had done another trick that day, or it was just a one time event, but he did not keep a hard on long enough to complete the experience for me. He is an excellent masseur.

Bottom line: Probably worth a try if you like tall, big, masculine young men who are not twinks or body-builders.