April 24's Coverboy - Ricardo - Vancouver

[+ Axiom2001]

The pic and the stats were sizzzzzzzzzling; his webpage interesting, but the review itself was for "the shits." The writer cited the obvious and the routine but NOTHING that would encourage or entice future clients to see Ricardo who I thought is a "super-hottie!!!!!!" :9 :9 :* :9 :9

[Philly Guy]

>The pic and the stats were sizzzzzzzzzling; his webpage

>interesting, but the review itself was for "the shits." The

>writer cited the obvious and the routine but NOTHING that

>would encourage or entice future clients to see Ricardo who I

>thought is a "super-hottie!!!!!!" :9 :9 :* :9 :9

 

But of course: What happened between us will stay between us, as will whatever might happen again.

 

Please don't threaten us by telling us you won't discuss what happens in the future either!!!!

 

I have been waiting for a credible review on this chap for ages; I guess I have to keep waiting. x(

[Juan Vancouver]

Wait no more...

 

>I have been waiting for a credible review on this chap for

>ages; I guess I have to keep waiting. x(

 

Not a long wait. He has been profusely reviewed by some really reliable reviewers. He just likes to use different names. Here he is in his full latin glory:

 

http://www.daddysreviews.com/area.php?loc=51400-2-31-10&who=mario_toronto

 

I have been wanting to do a duo with him for a while... really yummie.

 

Enjoy!

[+ Axiom2001]

>>The pic and the stats were sizzzzzzzzzling; his webpage

>>interesting, but the review itself was for "the shits." The

>>writer cited the obvious and the routine but NOTHING that

>>would encourage or entice future clients to see Ricardo who

>I

>>thought is a "super-hottie!!!!!!" :9 :9 :* :9 :9

>

>But of course: What happened between us will stay between us,

>as will whatever might happen again.

>

>Please don't threaten us by telling us you won't discuss what

>happens in the future either!!!!

>

>I have been waiting for a credible review on this chap for

>ages; I guess I have to keep waiting. x(

 

 

 

<Please don't threaten us by telling us you won't discuss what happens in the future either!!! TO WHOM are you addressing this statement? If it is meant to apply to the originator of this thread, then it is VERY OFF BASE! Where did I threaten? This is quite ambiguous!

[+ Axiom2001]

RE: Wait no more...

 

Thanks, Juan Vancouver!! :-) Now I have a sense as to rather or not I will be seeing Ricardo. His reviews as Marco were quite revealing vs what I/we received yesterday from the reviewer.

[Rick Munroe]

><Please don't threaten us by telling us you won't discuss what

>happens in the future either!!! TO WHOM are you addressing

>this statement?

 

He was speaking to the reviewer, who wrote, "What happened between us will stay between us, as will whatever might happen again."

[+ Axiom2001]

Thanks, Mr. Munroe, for clarifying the sentence for me. I must have really read that superficial review much more hurriedly than I'd thought before I began the thread! :-)