Jan10th review of Sam #2 (London)

[willatwork37]

I posted an honest review of Sam #2 (London) and the site editors found it necessary to edit out the last portion of the review. From what I was told, my theory on an occurence that happened after Sam left could not be proven (Which I did state in the review). I was also told that the editors were threatened by Sam in his response with a law suit if my review was published. So my review was edited and to my shock....so was the escorts response. Just for the record that was hardly my first time. Secondly, yes I might have been a bit nervous at meeting someone new, but just because a client cums, certainly doesn't mean the escort has to rush right out the door 20 minutes after arrival (or maybe as Sam stated "it's a cultural thing" to do that.) Finally, while I respect the editors decision to protect this site by editing some content, I would have appreciated seeing the edited version before it was posted.

[seaboy4hire]

Will this is probably an issue you should take right to daddy since he is the one to my knowledge who posts the reviews. You can reach him at daddy@daddysreviews.com

 

Hugs,

Greg

seaboy4hire@yahoo.com

http://seaboy4hire.tripod.com New page for reveiws http://www.daddysreviews.com/newest.php?who=greg_seattle

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/3307/dsc05257be3.jpg[/img][/url]

I get 90 mpg! You?

Chicago February _-_

[LovesYng]

>Will this is probably an issue you should take right to daddy

>since he is the one to my knowledge who posts the reviews. You

>can reach him at daddy@daddysreviews.com

>

I'm sure that would be a BIG waste of time.

 

When in doubt I whip it out :+

[seaboy4hire]

>>Will this is probably an issue you should take right to

>daddy

>>since he is the one to my knowledge who posts the reviews.

>You

>>can reach him at daddy@daddysreviews.com

>>

>I'm sure that would be a BIG waste of time.

>

>When in doubt I whip it out :+

 

Thought I'd save DJ the time of posting. Although wouldn't surprise me if he already has a similar reply he just copies and pastes during matters like this since similar situations have happened in the past.

 

Hugs,

Greg

 

seaboy4hire@yahoo.com

http://seaboy4hire.tripod.com New page for reveiws http://www.daddysreviews.com/newest.php?who=greg_seattle

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/3307/dsc05257be3.jpg[/img][/url]

I get 90 mpg! You?

Chicago February _-_

[Guest alanm]

Willatwork,

 

Why do you leave the money out so Sam, or any other escort whom you hire, could see it?

 

It's something I never thought was necessary, including when I have hired escorts in London. No escort has ever questioned it.

 

I don't mean this to be a critical comment, since we all have our own styles. Just wondering.

[jeddinger]

I understand your frustration. I recently posted a review (on another site) and it too was edited, in effect, taking the real thunder out of what I was trying to say.

 

I find it unfair that someone can respond (without being edited) and we have no recourse. They'll just deny anything bad happened.

 

I find it amusing that someone would threaten a lawsuit, exposing thier true activities, name, address, etc to law enforcement. What a stupid thing to do. Personally I would have told them to sue and had a field day with it.

[snoopy]

Actually Jeddinger, your John Waters quote is from the film Polyester. I am a huge John Waters fan and even once met Cuddles, the actress who recited the line you quoted. She was operating a small kitschy (sp?) shop in Baltimore's Fells Point neighborhood...but this was over twenty years ago and she has since passed away.

[+ deej]

>I find it unfair that someone can respond (without being

>edited)

 

Who says they're not edited? Where is that written?

 

>and we have no recourse. They'll just deny anything

>bad happened.

 

You have recourse. Write to daddy@daddysreviews.com. The OP did at the time the review was published and apparently wasn't happy with the explanation he was given. He appears determined to drag this escort through the mud no matter what.

 

>I find it amusing that someone would threaten a lawsuit,

>exposing thier true activities, name, address, etc to law

>enforcement. What a stupid thing to do. Personally I would

>have told them to sue and had a field day with it.

 

Since you're claiming expert knowledge here, why wasn't that done? You WERE looking over Daddy's shoulder, weren't you? ;-)

 

If Daddy redacted every review when an escort threatened legal action there wouldn't be much left of the site. LOL

[+ deej]

I don't copy/paste canned replies, but some phrases do tend to type themselves after so many repetitions. ;-)

[jeddinger]

Ooops...ur correct! I'll change it str8 away. Thanks for catching that! I'm a huge fan as well.

[jeddinger]

Looking over your shoulder....um, er...yes, but probably just at the pics!