A New Way of Reviewing Escorts!!!!!!!!

[+ Axiom2001]

A few months back, I implored the writers of threads and responses here to write in detail about their time that they've had with the escorts with whom they have been. Well, to date, I have a change in mind and heart as well as request.

 

If you have read my previous reviews of escorts, namely those who reside in the San Francisco Bay Area as well as in Brasil and Argentina, you might have noticed that they have principally been in much detail. Well, I have changed my view on future written reviews.

 

One's time with the men who are reviewed here is strictly PRIVATE. I now conclude that I and others can write about the experience in such a way to give future clients an idea about the escorts.

 

Last Saturday I had a wonderful hour in San Francisco with an escort who lives in NYC and writes at least two or three sites here. He and I had a time that I found to be worthwhile and pleasing. Not only did he possess a strikingly-gorgeous body but a personality to match. He and I meshed (as far as I could tell), and from there I began to think about what I'd write for the guys who read at this website and forum.

 

On Sunday I wrote the review; I think that the readers will glean a good sense as to their wanting to solicit the services of this man.

To conclude, I am now satisfied with specifics minus the details in reviews. :-) :-)

[Charlus]

Could you help me understand the difference between "specifics" [good] and "details" [bad]?

[+ Axiom2001]

Specifics= top or bottom or versatile, kink, kisses deeply, open to a variety of sexually fulfilling activities.

 

Details= He fucked me until I... I rimmed his tight hole until he squealed... (Only examples-- doesn't mean that I imbibe in such...

 

That's the gist of what my thread entailed. If one goes into detail, he writes five or more paragraphs. But if he writes some specifics, then his review will yield the amount of space and words that we've primarily gotten in most of the reviews which have been included in the reviews during the past six months.

[+ deej]

>Could you help me understand the difference between

>"specifics" [good] and "details" [bad]?

 

Jackie Collins novel vs. gay porn screenplay.

[JT Brooklyn]

LOL...Plus there are "Working Guys" who have a Specific M/O usually when it comes to the "Conversation" , Sexual Postions etc...

 

Some even like to Talk about "Past" Experiences the Client has had. Which has nothing to do with the "Present" Experience"! But it is a Time Filler!

 

A "detailed" Report of what was talked about etc, will not be much appreciated by the Working Guy, who uses The Same M/O Repeatedly, being Read by some Guy beforehand. His "Mystery" Factor is pretty well shot!

 

Then there's the "Chemistry Factor", which is a whole different issue! BAD Chemistry usually No Review... :P

[+ Axiom2001]

"Bad chemistry means NO review!!" :P I agree completely, JT. From the time that I have been forced to hire, I have had about four to five bad experiences: thus I have not taken the time to review the guy because with me he might have been a complete "dud"-- but with another or others, he might be that super-stud for which they sought!

 

Anyway guys, give the new format and content some serious thought! Since the reviews are apparently getting slower and slower in being posted and have indeed been rather limited as to the number per day, I'm beginning to lose interest...

[JT Brooklyn]

AX..Exactly. Unfortunately the True Duds..Do Luck out, as they are given the benefit of the Doubt! Rarely to be Reviewed!

 

If a Guy is "Goodloooking and has a Nice Bod", how could he be a DUD?

 

Let me tell you, there are Plenty of DUDS who Fit that description!

 

So for alot of Guys, "Less is More" in a Review, suits them fine...

As long as the "Name and Contact Info" is Correct! L O L

:P

[Guest zipperzone]

>Since the reviews are apparently getting slower and

>slower in being posted and have indeed been rather limited as

>to the number per day, I'm beginning to lose interest...

 

Same here and it doesn;t seem likely that this will improve. Plus.... if the reviews become more vanilla, more people will pass over them completly. If I wanted to read Nancy Drew or the Hardy Boys I'd go to the children's library