"Barely legal" fantasy in LA...seeking 18 year-old bottom

[MarcoP]

Hey guys,

 

Need a little help as I’m not familiar with the LA escort scene. An LA client with a “barely legal” fantasy is looking to pair me up for an extended evening with an 18-19 yr. old bottom. Preferably a toned or muscled guy, but not absolutely necessary. Most important is the youth factor/age and someone who's into receiving a good pounding. He's suggested cruising for hustler types on Santa Monica Blvd. to pair me up with...is this a viable option? Frankly, I'd prefer a more "legitimate" working guy to fulfill this guy's fantasy, but I'll accommodate either way. Any suggestions??

 

 

Marco

917-837-5233

http://hometown.aol.com/marcoisnow/

 

http://www.men4rentnow.com/ds/index.asp?cmd=view&id=144077&Login=MarcoP

 

http://www.rentboy.com/location/getrb.asp?rentboy=61728&Location=67

 

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/marco_sacramento.html

[Guest Adono]

>

>.... He's suggested cruising

>for hustler types on Santa Monica Blvd. to pair me up

>with...is this a viable option?

 

No! Too much police attention, and too little chance you'd find what he's looking for anyway. Don't do it.

 

> Frankly, I'd prefer a more

>"legitimate" working guy to fulfill this guy's fantasy, but

>I'll accommodate either way. Any suggestions??

 

Can't help with who is available to fill that role. But felt I had to speak up and keep you away from the boulevard.....

[+ deej]

>He's suggested cruising

>for hustler types on Santa Monica Blvd. to pair me up

>with...is this a viable option?

 

Absolutely not viable. You won't find what you want and your client could end up losing his car. You MIGHT (it's iffy at best) have some luck if you spend some time at Numbers.

 

Call Athan. He's older than "barely legal" (but not by a lot) and you'll sure as hell enjoy the ride. ;-)

[Guest zipperzone]

Hey Deej - back to the old topic of having your car confiscated if you use it for cruising.

 

Just wondering... say you were to park it a couple of blocks away, walk to the blvd., find your hustler, walk him back to your car and then get in it and drive home with him.

 

Would this be looked upon in the same way as curb cruising and could you lose you car under these circumstances too?

[+ deej]

Dunno. I'm no lawyer.

 

But I'd guess if the car is used to commit a crime, it's gone.

 

It would be kinda like robbing a bank and then walking (or running) a block to get to the getaway car. The same car is used.

[RockHard]

"Call Athan. He's older than "barely legal" (but not by a lot) and you'll sure as hell enjoy the ride."

 

Is this the same HIV+ Athan who can't keep his HIV discussions straight? I can't believe anyone would recommend this guy for anything. A pretty face but, obviously, a very disturbed young man. :-(

[+ deej]

You clearly haven't met Athan. He's one of the most grounded individuals I know on this Earth who got caught in a bad situation not entirely of his own making, but he's the only one being held responsible by you and others.

 

I've said it before: the only sensible assumption is that ALL partners are HIV+. Proceed accordingly and practice safer sex. Failing to do so betrays an enormous lack of personal responsibility. Taking ANY partner's word about his status is foolish, whether client, escort, or bar pickup.

 

Given the OP's stated requirements, I'll stay with the recommendation.

[Houston Bonfires]

Rockhard

 

Ethan made his apology and his peace. What does he owe you?

 

That's right, nothing.

 

HB

[RockHard]

More denial.

 

"Ethan made his apology and his peace. What does he owe you?"

 

He doesn't owe me anything because my cock won't go anywhere near that boy's orifices, covered or not. However, if someone dies because Athan lied, it won't be up to me to answer who owes what.

 

What really shocks and stupefies me is what suckers some of you are for a pretty-boy face. Hypocrites, too. The last time I tried, NOTHING goes near my ass unless I SAY SO.

 

Any escort who lets a client stick a bare cock up his ass without discussing HIV (more than once) is an escort with a death wish. If there's one thing age and wisdom have taught me, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably isn't true. If he said this only happened one time, it's probably happened more times than I can bear knowing.

[MarcoP]

RE: More denial.

 

Thanks for the advice on the Santa Monica Blvd. pickups. I suspected it wasn't a good idea and will stick to looking for an escort or finding someone who fits the bill another way. Would love to hear any other suggestions from guys familiar with the LA scene.

 

 

Marco

917-837-5233

http://hometown.aol.com/marcoisnow/

 

http://www.men4rentnow.com/ds/index.asp?cmd=view&id=144077&Login=MarcoP

 

http://www.rentboy.com/location/getrb.asp?rentboy=61728&Location=67

 

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/marco_sacramento.html

[+ deej]

RE: More denial.

 

>Any escort who lets a client stick a bare cock up his

>ass without discussing HIV (more than once) is an escort with

>a death wish.

 

I'd remove the qualification. But the same can be said for anyone who willingly participates in anonymous unsafe anal sex. Doesn't matter if it's an escort or client.

 

Unfortunately, it only seems to matter to you that an escort was involved. The clients bear no responsiblity whatsoever according to you.

 

>If there's one thing age and wisdom have taught me

 

You missed out on one of those.

[RockHard]

RE: More denial.

 

"Unfortunately, it only seems to matter to you that an escort was involved. The clients bear no responsiblity whatsoever according to you."

 

I have no idea why you would make such a false declaration, deej. First, this is a site that reviews "escorts" (in case you haven't noticed) and, second, I believe I've been quite vocal on this board about customer's responsibility regarding barebacking, sex parties, pedophilia, etc. Please stop attributing false notions and presumptions to me.

 

When it comes to one-on-one sex, with escorts or not, it always takes two to tango unless rape is involved. I have no positive comments about the customer who wrote the Athan "outing" review but he's not the one earning a living by selling his ass and he's not the one controlling the service transaction.

 

"I've said it before: the only sensible assumption is that ALL partners are HIV+."

 

So, deej, is it less sensible to assume that every escort will lie about his HIV status to get paid?

 

It seems to me, some old men here have "selective assumptions" and need to check their wisdom chart.

[Quincy]

Don't know if he's still a working boy or still in LA but Erik #2 is one hot bottom. Baby face and ripped body. This was about 2 or 3 years ago, however....

[+ deej]

RE: More denial.

 

>So, deej, is it less sensible to assume that every escort will

>lie about his HIV status to get paid?

 

It's immaterial unless you're looking for reasons to fling mud.

 

If you assume your partner is poz, it doesn't matter what he SAYS about his status.

[RockHard]

Silence is denial.

 

"It's immaterial unless you're looking for reasons to fling mud."

 

It's never "immaterial" to open the door of dialogue and establish a level of trust between anonymous men about to engage in sex. Responsible men (escorts) do this. Dialogue is a much better method of seeking the truth than relying on silent assumptions.

 

Yes, there are NO absolutes and NO guarantees: with life comes risks. However, if an escort is going to assume that I am HIV+, he will be wrong. And I have had responsible escorts provide me believable proof of their HIV- status.

 

Of course, that doesn't mean I'm going to ask an HIV- man to permit me to fuck him without a condom or engage in any high-risk behavior. But the dialogue does bring us closer to feelings of love and respect and the session will play out differently.

 

If it's "truth" you're seeking, there are better ways of seeking it than by exercising silent (or false) assumptions. If truth is of no interest to you, you could easily place yourself at higher risk, especially in the heat of the moment.

 

My comments have nothing to do with "flinging mud." This homey don't play that.

[+ deej]

RE: Silence is denial.

 

>However, if an escort is going to assume that I am HIV+, he will be

>wrong. And I have had responsible escorts provide me believable proof

>of their HIV- status.

 

They may be wrong in the assumption, but they won't be tempted to make a mistake.

 

And what miracle iron-clad proof have you found? Any test proves that on a given day they could pass the test. They could have sero-converted on the way out the door after having the test done. They may even still think they were neg, but be poz and at their most infectious.

 

Go ahead and discuss it. And make decisions based on those assumptions all you like. I'll stick with the assumption and take the decisions off the table.

[Guest Jesse Dane]

RE: More denial.

 

It's interesting to hear you guys argue over this. I have to say I agree with deej in the remark of assuming that all your partners are positive. You have no idea how many guys I have known who do not disclose their status. I can think of at least 5 escorts off the top of my head. I won't share who these people are because that is not my place or right. But there are a lot of them out there, so it is always important to be safe.

 

I don't think anyone can understand how scary it is to be an escort and to get your HIV+ results. You're sitting there in that room and not only do you have to deal with the fact this is happening to your health, but you're also faced with what it means to your career. I fell apart when it happened to me and the first thing I thought about was that maybe I shouldn't tell anyone. Just keep going along with things as if nothing had changed. But as you guys on here know I couldn't do that and shared with everyone about it and thankfully the response from people was one of love and hope and I have been able to continue escorting.

 

So while I agree that it is wrong to not inform your partners, I completely understand and empathize with those who do not. After you get an HIV+ diagnosis there is a long process of learning and changing that happens and for many guys it takes some time before they are able to be open about disclosure. Some guys even want to, but are just mentally and physically unable to get the words out.

 

Everyone just needs to make sure that they protect themselves in any situation where they are not with a trusted partner (and even then I'd be cautious).