Vincent Michael - San Antonio

[BigD]

I have been an admirer of this young man for some time, but have never met him. All the gossip in the past about him has been unkind. His new ad in m4rn really gets my attention. The 2nd picture shows him looking better than ever. Hopefully I can copy the site here:

http://www.men4rentnow.com/ds/index.asp?cmd=view&id=122701&Login=VincentMichael

I am not good at that, not sure if that will be a link or not. . So go check it out yourself. Apparently he has seldom left San Antonio in the past, but perhaps now will travel some. If not, I think I may have to travel to SA myself. I want to meet him. Any good news on him lately?

BigD

[+ Lucky]

The very ad you cite lists his travel plans:

 

WI - Milwaukee / Waukesha

06/27/06 - 06/29/06

CA - Los Angeles / Long Beach / Orange County

TX - Dallas / Fort Worth / Arlington

 

Are you sure you weren't just stirring the pot here?

[BigD]

I emailed him last week and he told me he had no plans to come to Dallas,

but invited me to come to San Antonio. As I said in my post, I am considering doing just that. I have clearly stated my interest in meeting Vincent. Your response is accusatory for no apparent reason. Are YOU trying to stir the pot? If not, you owe me an apology.

BigD

[+ Lucky]

If you want to see him so bad, fly him in! Airfares on American Airlines for a R/T San Antonio-Dallas are as low as $103!

[Guest 8mile]

That was a waste of 3 mins.

[Guest DickHo]

Pic #2 makes him look dopey. The other pics are hot.

[Chuck50]

I may get scorned from others but he was a nice guy when i met him. thats all i will say hugs

[alanalt]

I'm with Lucky in that I'm wondering about the point of this post... BigD, you have already indicated your point of view in declaring that the gossip in the past was 'unkind' (and I must say I've rarely encountered 'kind' gossip either here or elsewhere) and end your post with a request for 'good news' on VM. Given that, it's pretty apparent that you've already made up your mind on VM and while there's nothing wrong with that, I'm still left wondering what the point of your message is...?

[alanalt]

I'm with Lucky in that I'm wondering about the point of this post... BigD, you have already indicated your point of view in declaring that the gossip in the past was 'unkind' (and I must say I've rarely encountered 'kind' gossip either here or elsewhere) and end your post with a request for 'good news' on VM. Given that, it's pretty apparent that you've already made up your mind on VM and while there's nothing wrong with that, I'm still left wondering what the point of your message is...?

[digicamman]

>I may get scorned from others but he was a nice guy when i

>met him. thats all i will say hugs

 

Give us a break--he was the one that outed you as a priest and told other confidential information on clients--why would anyone hire him at this point? This chubby, barebacking escort basically told all of his clients to go to hell--he made fun of clients and said how repulsed he was at having to make money that way--again, why would anyone hire him?

[digicamman]

>I may get scorned from others but he was a nice guy when i

>met him. thats all i will say hugs

 

Give us a break--he was the one that outed you as a priest and told other confidential information on clients--why would anyone hire him at this point? This chubby, barebacking escort basically told all of his clients to go to hell--he made fun of clients and said how repulsed he was at having to make money that way--again, why would anyone hire him?

[Guest zipperzone]

>Pic #2 makes him look dopey.

 

Bloated is a better description - like right before he went on Jenny Craig........

[Guest zipperzone]

>Pic #2 makes him look dopey.

 

Bloated is a better description - like right before he went on Jenny Craig........

[BigD]

The definition of the Deli is:

An area to discuss Escorts. That is what we do on this forum. However, I had very narrowly defined the discussion for Vincent Michael by asking for specific information on good news about him. If you have some, share it; if you don't, don't. If you want to discuss something else or create a brouhaha, why not start your own topic?

[BigD]

The definition of the Deli is:

An area to discuss Escorts. That is what we do on this forum. However, I had very narrowly defined the discussion for Vincent Michael by asking for specific information on good news about him. If you have some, share it; if you don't, don't. If you want to discuss something else or create a brouhaha, why not start your own topic?

[LovesYng]

>Give us a break--he was the one that outed you as a priest and

>told other confidential information on clients--why would

>anyone hire him at this point? This chubby, barebacking

>escort basically told all of his clients to go to hell--he

>made fun of clients and said how repulsed he was at having to

>make money that way--again, why would anyone hire him?

 

Why dig up old news, what happen between VM & Chuck should stay between them ;(

 

When in doubt I whip it out :+

[LovesYng]

>Give us a break--he was the one that outed you as a priest and

>told other confidential information on clients--why would

>anyone hire him at this point? This chubby, barebacking

>escort basically told all of his clients to go to hell--he

>made fun of clients and said how repulsed he was at having to

>make money that way--again, why would anyone hire him?

 

Why dig up old news, what happen between VM & Chuck should stay between them ;(

 

When in doubt I whip it out :+

[Boston Guy]

>Why dig up old news, what happen between VM & Chuck should

>stay between them ;(

>

 

Ummmm, respectfully, we "dig up old news" all the time when talking about escorts. If I recall correctly, this is supposed to be an escort review board. Further, what happened wasn't just between them. It involved every one of us who read the information VM posted.

 

If a friend of mine was going to hire an escort who had previously publicly revealed information about other clients, I'd strongly recommend that my friend not hire him. And I'd offer the same opinion here for all to see. It wouldn't matter if the escort was a relative unknown or someone with a high profile. Revealing client information is about as bad as it gets. Doing it publicly in a knowing, determined manner is worse, if that's possible. I'd put it just below bribing your client and murdering him.

 

I wouldn't care if the escort broke his trust last week, last month or two years ago. I wouldn't care if he retired and came back professing to have learned from his mistakes. I wouldn't care what he looks like.

 

Once an escort has broken this trust, I do not believe he can be trusted to hold it again. Who's to say that he won't suddenly decide to post details about his very next client? Sorry, but "trust me" doesn't work in the face of this kind of deceit.

 

So, if anyone happens to think it's "old news", I don't give a damn. I would have brought it up if someone else hadn't done so first. Otherwise, we're just saying that it's ok for an escort to out his clients publicly. So long as he says he's sorry, all we be forgiven.

 

Not with me. There are too many hot escorts out there. I see no reason whatsoever to hire someone who has so manifestly proven that he cannot be trusted.

 

BG

[Boston Guy]

>Why dig up old news, what happen between VM & Chuck should

>stay between them ;(

>

 

Ummmm, respectfully, we "dig up old news" all the time when talking about escorts. If I recall correctly, this is supposed to be an escort review board. Further, what happened wasn't just between them. It involved every one of us who read the information VM posted.

 

If a friend of mine was going to hire an escort who had previously publicly revealed information about other clients, I'd strongly recommend that my friend not hire him. And I'd offer the same opinion here for all to see. It wouldn't matter if the escort was a relative unknown or someone with a high profile. Revealing client information is about as bad as it gets. Doing it publicly in a knowing, determined manner is worse, if that's possible. I'd put it just below bribing your client and murdering him.

 

I wouldn't care if the escort broke his trust last week, last month or two years ago. I wouldn't care if he retired and came back professing to have learned from his mistakes. I wouldn't care what he looks like.

 

Once an escort has broken this trust, I do not believe he can be trusted to hold it again. Who's to say that he won't suddenly decide to post details about his very next client? Sorry, but "trust me" doesn't work in the face of this kind of deceit.

 

So, if anyone happens to think it's "old news", I don't give a damn. I would have brought it up if someone else hadn't done so first. Otherwise, we're just saying that it's ok for an escort to out his clients publicly. So long as he says he's sorry, all we be forgiven.

 

Not with me. There are too many hot escorts out there. I see no reason whatsoever to hire someone who has so manifestly proven that he cannot be trusted.

 

BG

[Boston Guy]

I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. It seems to me that the information posted in this thread is relevant to your topic. You asked for information about VM and you got it.

 

I do understand that you were hoping for "good" information, meaning, I guess, positive information. But the definition of good information varies from person to person. I don't happen to think that good information is only that which is fawning. More precisely, it would seem to me that warning a prospective client not to hire a particular escort because he cannot be trusted to hold client information confidential not only constitutes good information but is entirely in keeping with the description of this forum and the mission of M4M itself.

 

BG

[Boston Guy]

I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. It seems to me that the information posted in this thread is relevant to your topic. You asked for information about VM and you got it.

 

I do understand that you were hoping for "good" information, meaning, I guess, positive information. But the definition of good information varies from person to person. I don't happen to think that good information is only that which is fawning. More precisely, it would seem to me that warning a prospective client not to hire a particular escort because he cannot be trusted to hold client information confidential not only constitutes good information but is entirely in keeping with the description of this forum and the mission of M4M itself.

 

BG

[digicamman]

>However, I had very narrowly defined the discussion for

>Vincent Michael by asking for specific information on good

>news about him.

 

Actually, why not just admit you were trying to curry favor with an escort for your own purposes by getting him some free advertising? You obviously had no personl need for the information you were seeking--especially since you were seeking only "good" stuff--if you wanted it for your own benift, you'd be seeking it all.;-)

[digicamman]

>However, I had very narrowly defined the discussion for

>Vincent Michael by asking for specific information on good

>news about him.

 

Actually, why not just admit you were trying to curry favor with an escort for your own purposes by getting him some free advertising? You obviously had no personl need for the information you were seeking--especially since you were seeking only "good" stuff--if you wanted it for your own benift, you'd be seeking it all.;-)

[Houston Bonfires]

Chuck is my friend. One of his most endearing qualities is his ability to forgive and his overall sense of live and let live. I admire his ability and strive most days to approach his wisdom in such matters. Chuck, as he noted has forgiven any past transgressions by VM and has moved on. I accept that and unlike Boston Guy and digicamman have no axe to grind with VM. In fact, much like BigD I anticipate contacting and if he agrees, seeing VM in the near future. I too have been fascinated by his charm and conversant skills. I will overlook mistakes he has made in the past and understand that we all fall short of perfection. Strangely when I think of VM I find myself thinking with my "big head" and not my below the waist fantasy head.

 

Just wanted to submit another view among all the negativity.

 

HB

[Houston Bonfires]

Chuck is my friend. One of his most endearing qualities is his ability to forgive and his overall sense of live and let live. I admire his ability and strive most days to approach his wisdom in such matters. Chuck, as he noted has forgiven any past transgressions by VM and has moved on. I accept that and unlike Boston Guy and digicamman have no axe to grind with VM. In fact, much like BigD I anticipate contacting and if he agrees, seeing VM in the near future. I too have been fascinated by his charm and conversant skills. I will overlook mistakes he has made in the past and understand that we all fall short of perfection. Strangely when I think of VM I find myself thinking with my "big head" and not my below the waist fantasy head.

 

Just wanted to submit another view among all the negativity.

 

HB