Today's Review of Brock Lachey

[Guest Tristan]

It never ceases to amaze me that clients read bad reviews, still hire the escort, and then are surprised when things don't go well. I guess dickpower supercedes brainpower. I know that's been said before many times on this site. Brock Lachey had two bad reviews in a row from a relatively small total. Today makes the third.

 

His response does not seem credible, especially in light of a previous response. Brock declined to respond to a third bad review. He claims that he couldn't do anal with the client because the client's dick was too small for the condom. Now this is a new one on me. Other past excuses have included hemorrhoids and that he only does it after he gets to know a client. Now which is it? If he doesn't want to do anal, that's his right. But at $300/hr, he better well make that clear to the client. I would find it hard to accept that all these clients are confused about his rules.

 

Assuming it's a standard size condom, the client would have to be Lilliputian not to be able to make it work. Condoms will conform to anything close to normal. I guess it's possible, but I just don't believe it. This is the second time Brock has claimed that the client really wanted to bareback, and he doesn't do that. Well that may be true. And more power to him. But I don't think that was the reason.

 

One thing I don't get. If the clients claim they had to leave after 20-30 minutes, why did they pay him for the full hour and then complain that they got ripped off for a full hour? At the price he's charging, the fee certainly should have been adjusted.

 

I'm sorry it didn't work out for the most recent client. I would hope he'll take the reviews more seriously next time.

 

- Tristan

[Lookin]

Same thing with the review on Cruz in Minneapolis. He had three prior reviews - all negative. And the previous reviewer had “hired him a couple of times hoping it would be better.” It wasn’t.

 

I guess hope springs eternal.

[+ Unicorn]

It never ceases to surprise me either that people who know about this site will hire who res like that. Exactly what would it take to convince these guys that hiring these chumps would be a bad idea? And that response was so unbelievably stupid. Shutting up about it would have been so much wiser. I guess some guys turn to this line of work because they're so stupid and socially inept that there's nothing else they think they can do.

[buckguy]

There are always guys who get attached to escorts, regardless of reviews---on the basis of looks, etc. It's kindof like guys (and women) who always fall for the wrong person, regardless of what their friends say. Brock is a cutey, but he's expensive for Atlanta, which would have stopped me, even before looking at the reviews.

[+ cougar]

scams and more...

 

I wasn't surprised.

What I really don't understand is why there is not a grouping of some sort for the escorts we all know to be scams or worse.

At times, I feel that Daddy, or who ever the powers might be, just sweep it under the rug or just turn their back to it. It is sad to see guys lose hard earned money with escorts and hurts even more to see that for some escorts this appears to be a pattern. The No Show section is one thing, but escorts who scam, steal or whatever need to have a notation of somekind on their listing that will at least warn the dumbest of us that there are other fish in the sea to choose from.

[coasternut]

RE: scams and more...

 

I, for one, am pleased with the services offered by this site. I believe it would become a little tainted if "the editor" was expected to evaluate reviews in relation to the escort. There is so much more information here than on most sites for a person to make an informed decision about who to hire. Don't put the responsiblity for a foolish hire on anyone other than the person making that hire.

[+ ArVaGuy]

RE: scams and more...

 

Don't put the responsiblity for a foolish hire on

>anyone other than the person making that hire.

 

 

I agree with you on this point.

 

We can't expect the management of this or any other site to hand-hold everyone planning to make a hire. The most egregiously bad guys have their reviews flagged. There's a listing of no shows that seems up to date based on client postings.

 

Further, there are updates and notices posted on the home page warning people continuously about not prepaying in advance for services. But still there are people out there who will wire money to an escort or agency and then bitch about being ripped off. Add to all this continual postings in The Deli from fellow clients and even escorts about questionable reviews and scams.

 

However, I will add one caveat to the above; the archiving of reviews beyond 2003 has made this tool less useful in some instances. It may save on bandwith cost but it’s a disservice to the clients and unfair to the escorts.

[Guest empire]

Brock's bogus reply was one of the funniest I have read in a long time. It's so easy to tell when an escort is full of himself when they don't respond to review they instead respond to the reviewer.

 

The little cock comment was probably the absolute worse reason in the world not to allow this man to fuck him. After all there are a zillion Asians many with little cocks that fuck all the time. Also, high school kids have sex all the time and many have little cocks.

 

Plus there are little cock condoms, for real. Most condom shops sell them next to the XL ones. And as already noted a regular condom would still conform to a small cock most of the time.

 

You would think that Brock wouldn't mind a little cock, this way his ass wouldn't be torn up.

 

The client should have walked away without paying a cent however, he was at brock's place and a lot of problems could have arisen if he didn't pay. Like Brock could be part of the Russian Mafia and have a bunch of friends wildly waving knives around and oh wait that is another thread, sorry.

 

But you guys get the idea. It's better to take a loss .. just pay and leave ... then come here and write a review so we all know what this guy obviously couldn't understand after reading Brock's reviews.

[Guest zipperzone]

>Brock Lachey

>had two bad reviews in a row from a relatively small total.

>Today makes the third.

 

I don't give a hoot about Brock Lachey - if I'm hiring anyone from the Lachey family, it will be Nick or Drew!

[Guest empire]

>

>I don't give a hoot about Brock Lachey - if I'm hiring anyone

>from the Lachey family, it will be Nick or Drew!

>

>

Zipperzone great observation, we finally agree on something

[Guest zipperzone]

>>

>>I don't give a hoot about Brock Lachey - if I'm hiring

>anyone

>>from the Lachey family, it will be Nick or Drew!

>>

>>

>Zipperzone great observation, we finally agree on something

>

 

Empire - we would probably agree on much more than you realize - just because two people have differing opinions on some topics doesn't mean everything is off the table. I'm not a TOTAL prick - just sometimes.