Jump to content
THIS IS A TEST/QA SITE

Todays reviews--older, muscles, hairy chests, and lots of prior reviews


thgbmi
This topic is 6776 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Being a guy who likes young guys, smooth, and swimmers build todays reviews offerred no potential escorts, and possibly it is just an obxervation that is not valie, but haven't the reviews turned in the direction of older guys with huge numbers of already posted reviews??Why is that--did the twink lovers all drift off to the other site??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a twink lover so I am perfectly happy with the reviews today. But I will say that it's interesting to read reviews of guys I've hired -- and how consistent the opinions can be. In today's reviews, I've hired Mike Grey and Omar in New York. Today's reviews of them are totally the kind of thing I experienced with them: Mike Grey is unbelievably hot and a dependable sexual machine. Omar is a hot guy, but a not consistent and doesn't necessarily give you the whole experience you want.

In general, you do well to stick with the guys who have really good reputations.

PS, regarding the original message here, I don't know what "other" web site you mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree that Mike Grey has had consistently good reviews for a number of years. The one bad one I recall stated that his body was out of shape and Mike responded with a photo taken with a newspaper cover taken that day to show that his body was as great as ever;totally blew away the phony negative review!

 

Omar also seems to have the potential to be a great top but is inconsistent. I would probably pass on him.

 

The only reservation I would have about Mike is his long hair;I much prefer short hair or even a shaved head to long hair. But I suppose I could block that out in favour of the great pounding that I would be getting!}(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO..Mike Grey is definitely One of The Best NYC has to offer.

Looks, Experience.. a real nice Guy. For those into getting the "South Forty Plowed", they Cum no better!

 

Personally I think there's just more Guy's Working It "Above the Twink Range". Alot of Twinks, lose their "Twinkle" kind of fast in NYC for many reasons. So the Reviews will reflect the Above Twink Majority! :7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been with both Rick and Derrick and plan to see both of them (together instead of singularly)one of these days when they are back in San Francisco or when I manage to get to NYC. And for almost three years now, both Mike Grey and Omar (both based in NYC now)have "set me on fire" with much desire after I've read their reviews and my having viewed their pics. Both guys have even corresponded to me through emails;when Omar lived in Phoenix but was in NYC his first time, he rang me only to be told that I lived in California.

 

Personally, I was pleased with today's reviews be they devoid of any "twinks." I was disappointed with the pic of "Today's CoverMan"-- though; thus I didn't read his review/s. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete Ross (SF), is one so-called "twink" that has my libido raging to experience. I found him to be so desiring when I viewed the dvd Passport to Paradise in which he's the lone anglo amongst some of the hottest Latino male-to-male dvd/vid stars. At one point in the dvd when he is having his ass ripped, he yells out, "Fuck me!!"... seemingly to really, really enjoy the event in which he finds himself. This whole scene is ole so steaming! And he's one of the few "twinks" that get my interest.

 

BTW he was featured "Coverman of the Day" back in February of this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HonkingGoose

>Just curious, was this Mike Grey's first barebacking review?

>

I didn't see a reference to barebacking. What am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>I didn't see a reference to barebacking. What am I missing?

 

The reviewer's handle is "assboi4barecck". No mention of condoms, while the following is said:

 

"he turned me over and entered his long heavenly uncut fuck pole into my ass. as quickly as he entered - he pulled out and turned over onto his back and lay there as i sucked his cock"

 

"when he finally came - i was in heaven. as he pulled out of me, he was heaving and gasping for air. i licked his dick, tasting everything"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest HonkingGoose

>>I didn't see a reference to barebacking. What am I

>missing?

>

>The reviewer's handle is "assboi4barecck". No mention of

>condoms, while the following is said:

>

>"he turned me over and entered his long heavenly uncut fuck

>pole into my ass. as quickly as he entered - he pulled out and

>turned over onto his back and lay there as i sucked his cock"

>

>"when he finally came - i was in heaven. as he pulled out of

>me, he was heaving and gasping for air. i licked his dick,

>tasting everything"

>

>

I see your point--it can easily be read as barebacking. Too bad if he barebacks, he is really hot looking, particularly the uncut cock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO. There's something about This FIRST TIME Reviewer..It reads more like he's writing more out of "wishful thinking" than actual happening! LOL

 

I'm sure Mike will hear about this Latest So Called Fan Letter!

 

 

What's up with this Guy's "Handle"... Here's my email address? :7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I was disappointed with the pic of "Today's CoverMan"-- though; thus I didn't read his review/s."

 

WOW, not like there was much of a choice, huh? As such, I guess Daddy just decided to go with the newbie.

 

Really, this whole thread is what do you call it again?, oh yeah, right, "IDIOTIC". :7

 

Bitching about this site posting legitimate reviews of older escorts and implying that doing so is some kind of "conspiracy", or "exodus due to discontent" just because you are a twink lover, is just SOOOO Michael Moorish! Not to mention IDIOTIC, or did I mention that already??? :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that would help very much. I have no idea whether he barebacks or not but I know other escorts who have denied barebacking on this site and I know for a fact that they do, because they told me so when I asked, They just didn't want to go public with it. So let's not kid ourselves. People will believe what they want to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luv. Help very much? The Reviewer obviously wrote the Review to Titilate the Reader's... and "RELIVE" his Hot Experience!

 

Personally "forgetting to mention" the use of Party Hats, I'm sure was just done in the Heat of his "Memory Process"..

 

All of us who do Review, will make a point of mentioning the use of "Party Hats", or we would be having this discussion about every TOP Reviewed Everyday! LOL

 

Anybody meeting Mike,knows he only Plays Safe! :7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>I've been with both Rick and Derrick and plan to see both of

>them (together instead of singularly)one of these days when

>they are back in San Francisco or when I manage to get to NYC.

 

We'd like that rematch! (We'll be back in SF next week, as a matter of fact.) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...