BN Review #43

[LB Traveler]

Anyone else think that this this review is BS. Sounds like a cheap porn story with the names changed. I think Ben is a terrific guy but doubt even he would do something like this. Any thoughts? Ben can you confirm or deny?

[Guest skrubber]

My knowledge of Ben is that he rarely turns anything down but this seems over the top. You are right, it is written like some cheap porn novel.

[Lankypeters]

I stopped reading midway. Story sounds fantasy-based, entirely.

 

Lankypeters

[+ Lucky]

The reviewer is fosterchow, someone whose reviews I have liked in the past. I suppose one could read his other reviews and see how consistent they are in terms of what he likes to do with this one, but I don't care to go to that much trouble. I couldn't even finish this review. After complaining about some of the short reviews, I can't complain that one is too long!

 

Credible? Yeah, why not? We all like something different now and then, don't we?

[Guest alanm]

I did look at some of his other reviews, which tend to be much shorter.

This is his second review of BN. The first review also included bondage.

 

I've heard some amazing stories from escorts over the years about scenes clients have dreamed up. It is highly unusual for those experiences to show up in reviews, but anything is possible. My guess is that someone read the earlier review and expanded on that experience.

On the other hand, wouldn't Daddy have checked very closely before posting the review.

[Zippy]

>On the other hand, wouldn't Daddy have checked very closely

>before posting the review.

 

 

No.

[OneFinger]

Fosterchow has a review history and seems to have an established relationship with BN.

 

I don't see any reason to doubt the review.

 

On the other hand, it certainly didn't hold my attention and I wouldn't base any hire decision strictly on a single review.

 

-------------

"We need to have more respect for each other. Things have just gone really crazy, out of control. ... We're on a very weird kind of cycle." Stevie Wonder

[djroth]

I think that the fact that the review has posted is confirmation enough. Like others i thought the review is much too wordy and overly dramatic and i couldn't finish it, but i don't think that's any reason to doubt it's authenticity. The reviewer, in my opinion,is letting anyone else who may be interested in that kind of activity know that Ben can handle it. For those people it's probably fascinating reading. Having some experience with Ben, i find that he loves pleasing his clients and giving them what they want(within reason)from vanilla to something way beyond, obviously, and that's what makes him so good!

[KY_TOP]

In the past BN's reviews seemed to be very short on things of a sexual nature. Seems that changed abit with this review and another that was also posted. I am known to get into a bit of detail when reviewing but I must say this one went way past me.

 

Not sure this review would make me more or less likely to hire Ben. But, I bet it does bring alot of request that he has never seen before. It takes alot of trust to get into this sort of thing, hopefully he is prepared for that and the requests he will now get.

[+ Hoover42]

I just don't understand why people get so excited over dildos. Does Wikipedia.org have anything to say about this?

[+ Lucky]

Note to self: When greeting Ben (or fosterchow), do NOT kiss on lips!

[jackhammer91406]

Was this supposed to be a real review? People still hire this kid?

Surely it was meant as a joke right?

[Funseeker 22]

>Anyone else think that this this review is BS. Sounds like a

>cheap porn story with the names changed. I think Ben is a

>terrific guy but doubt even he would do something like this.

>Any thoughts? Ben can you confirm or deny?

 

Totally agree with poster that this is a porn fantasy review.

I know BN doesn`t like poppers and he certainly isn`t giving his beautiful ass up for this fantasy with the $amount shown. :9

[Guest alanm]

Several days have gone by with no reply from Ben disputing the review.

Guess it was real, not a porn fantasy.

[+ glutes]

From the Right Reverend Nicholas, to Bondage Ben.

Guess he got his 15 minutes of fame...

[+ Lucky]

Well, Ben may have done a few things that I might not have, but so does everybody else cuz we all like different things. So he had a good time, pleased a client in the process. What is it to any of us other than entertainment? I enjoyed the review (which I finally read all through) and I enjoy teasing Ben. Yet I can't see that he did anythng bad that would tarnish his reputation. As it is, he seems to have rocketed back to the top of the discussion. So good for him.

 

Now, granted, we haven't heard the definitive opinion from RockHard yet...

[Guest alanm]

Lucky,

 

My only issue with the review was whether or not fosterchow wrote it.

Fosterchow had already written a shorter review of BN. None of fosterchow's other escort reviews were more than a paragraph or so. I assume that escorts who charge what Ben charges are called upon to do many things that do not end up in the reviews. Apparently, this time

the review was more graphic that most.

 

What is an issue is Ben's latest blind item in his blog, specifically a HIV positive escort in LA. Ben eliminates Scott Adler from the blind item, but no one else. Everyone equates the Rico Report with trash, yet BN goes on his merry way.

 

Alan

[VaHawk]

>What is an issue is Ben's latest blind item in his blog,

>specifically a HIV positive escort in LA. Ben eliminates Scott

>Adler from the blind item, but no one else. Everyone equates

>the Rico Report with trash, yet BN goes on his merry way.

 

Do you always anoint yourself as the spokesman for everyone else in the world? If you do, then please, let it go, as you have not been so anointed, and I speak only for myself, but one is all it takes, right?

 

WGAS (that's an acronym for Who Gives A Shit!) about "Ben's latest blind item in his blog" or considers it an "issue", except you? Really, chill a little, and don't take everything so seriously!

 

And BTW!!!!, Mr. Spokesperson (notice that I said person not man), I for one DO NOT CONSIDER the Rico Report as trash!, so once again you assume to speak for us all. I enjoy the Rico Report, as it is so much fun, and light-hearted in its observations, which is something ENJOYABLE, unlike your dire and doom, holier than thou, damning observations! x( (Kotex come with a string for a reason, so pull the damn string sometime!). :7

[Guest skrubber]

Nice response Hawk.

[jackhammer91406]

Your membership in the Rico Mutual admiration society is well noted, both by you and by his heaps of praise on almost everything you post here.

 

But do you consider it entertainment or just another sick, twisted mean spirited queen venting on the internet?

 

I find an occasional remark on Rico's blog funny and spot on. Maybe that's because I agree with him on some of those things I guess. but It hardly seems necessary to pray for, beg for, and run pools for bad things to happen to any human being in order to be entertainment.

 

When he begins to spout off about people I know personally, and I see how far he is from the truth, it makes me sad.

The fact that he likes to refer to his observations as REALITY or worse, truth, just makes him and his supporters like you more laughable. Someone should have the stop watch going and keep careful track of his 15 minutes.

[+ deej]

>None of fosterchow's other escort reviews were more than a

>paragraph or so.

 

Maybe he's been reading the steady complaints here in the MC about reviews that don't give enough detail. }(

[JT Brooklyn]

Jack..LOL :7

[Guest empire]

I've seen several mentions of the RicoReport but cannot find the site. I tried the obvious ricoreport.com but that can't be what you're describing as it isn't a site online.

 

Please post a link.

[+ Hoover42]

Is this it?

 

http://www.ricoreport.blogspot.com/

 

...Hoover

[VaHawk]

>Your membership in the Rico Mutual admiration society is well

>noted, both by you and by his heaps of praise on almost

>everything you post here.

 

As is your platinum status as a founding member of the LA Sob Sisters Society. We all know how all those sisters rise up to defend, protect and praise each other, while vilifying in a "ladylike", if not quite, "gentlemanly" manner, everyone else, who isn't a member of the society.

>

>But do you consider it entertainment or just another sick,

>twisted mean spirited queen venting on the internet?

 

As I stated previously, I consider the site entertaining. Isn't entertainment its primary purpose as stated in the site's profile? My, my, my such "gentlemenly comments".

 

>When he begins to spout off about people I know personally,

>and I see how far he is from the truth, it makes me sad.

 

Doesn't take much to make you sad, huh? Perhaps you, as an actor, should audition for the role of Pagliacci?

 

But, the real problem is having meetings and get togethers with people from an internet message board. Once you get to know the people personally, then it detracts from your effectiveness to freely participate in the spirit of an "anonymous message board", defeating the purpose, and turning it into a private chat room, that is boring to 99% of everyone else who participates. Sound like anyplace you know?

 

>The fact that he likes to refer to his observations as REALITY

>or worse, truth, just makes him and his supporters like you

>more laughable. Someone should have the stop watch going and

>keep careful track of his 15 minutes.

 

WTF, look who's calling who laughable! Forget the earlier suggestion to audition for Pagliacci, as perhaps an audition to play Bozo would be more successful.

 

Best wishes always, as may your hammer always be jacked and your jack never be hammered.

 

VaHawk22201