Another Thread about those Re Views!!!!!!

[+ Axiom2001]

For the past month, I have been perusing the reviews as ever before but am NOT really pleased at all by what the reviewee has written. Two, Three, Four, possibly five long sentences and that is all. And general statements to say the least!

 

I wish Daddy would edit a few portions of the "Submit a Review" by stating that a review WILL NOT be published if it is fewer than ten sentences.

 

Guys, I have chosen my selected escorts from reviews where there are details. The best review that I read here took place two years ago in which the writer gave such hot and torrid details that I just had to see the three men in NYC. Unfortunately, one of them is retired now. But the reviewer, from his words, set me afire to the point that I needed a release after I'd read what he'd written. I also concluded at that point that I'd wanted to experience (a 3way) in a somewhat similar manner.

 

There are two guys (partners) in Chicago who have been purported to give a client a very long lasting and memorial experience in the bedroom. Their names escape me, but one parter in African American; the other a Euro American, both hung....

 

Lengthy, specific reviews enhance one's future selections..... :9

 

PS Anonymity is not important here as such: we might know the escort from what's here, and that's limited. Will we ever find out who the client is unless he comes forth and reveals his true self? I write this when one states that he will keep parts of the session private...

[+ deej]

>I wish Daddy would edit a few portions of the "Submit a

>Review" by stating that a review WILL NOT be published if it

>is fewer than ten sentences.

 

Hooboy used to reject "empty" reviews. People bitched and decided not to bother. There are entire sections of other message boards devoted to rejected reviews. (None have ever been posted.)

 

People who take the time to submit a review deserve our thanks. Telling them "NOT GOOD ENOUGH, DAMMIT!, NOT GOOD ENOUGH!" is probably just going to scare them away. We lose.

 

When a "short" review is submitted, at least you know that the guy has been hired and you get an idea whether he satisfied his client. If those are rejected, you don't get that information.

 

If you want porn stories, wander over to http://www.nifty.org and get your jollies. This site is about real people, and not everyone is a writer.

[seaboy4hire]

For those who want better reviews plain and simple stopping bitching about it and get those fingers typing on those keyboards giving as much detail about the time you spent with the escort as possible. And I agree with DJ not everyone is a writer. Lord knows that sometimes my writting is all over the place. Some guys just aren't comfortable giving blow to ass plowing detail.

 

Hugs,

Greg

Greg Seattle Wa seaboy4hire@yahoo.com

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/greg_seattle.html

http://seaboy4hire.tripod.com

[VaHawk]

>I wish Daddy would edit a few portions of the "Submit a

>Review" by stating that a review WILL NOT be published if it

>is fewer than ten sentences.

 

Me too!

 

1. What a HOT FUCKING stud

2. His cock was so big and fat that

3. I thought his cock was masquerading as a Louisville slugger bat

4. And since my asshole is as wide as a catcher's mitt

5. I wasn't sure that big cock of his would be enough wood

6. To slam those big low-hanging balls of his into the webbing

7. AKA my asshole, but, I do so truthfully attest

8. That he fucked me so hard, so put your doubts to rest!

9. My thighs were going into spasms

10. As I shouted out that he was GOD, as I orgasmed

 

DAMN! It wasn't easy coming up with ten lines! That was almost as difficult as finding a man with ten inches!!!!!!

 

>

>Guys, I have chosen my selected escorts from reviews where

>there are details.

 

So, why is that the concern of any other reviewer???? And who are you to dictate to Daddy, that he should ignore valid reviews, that don't give you the "minimum" ten sentences that you require before you lay down $200/hr for an escort encounter?

 

>The best review that I read here took place

>two years ago in which the writer gave such hot and torrid

>details that I just had to see the three men in NYC.

 

So what???????????????? No one, believe me, no one, gives a shit! Unless of course you, yourself, wrote a "minimum 10 sentence" review of your encounter??? If so, then give us the escorts names and the handle and date of your review???

 

>Unfortunately, one of them is retired now.

 

And I bet he thanks God, Allah, Buddah, or whoever he prays to, just for the mere fact that he doesn't have to deal with anyone else who exhibits your attitude.

 

>But the reviewer, from his words, set me afire to the point that I needed a release after I'd read what he'd written. I also concluded at that point that I'd wanted to experience (a 3way) in a

>somewhat similar manner.

 

AAAAHHHH! As I suspected, you get ANGRY and castigate Daddy when he publishes a valid review, that unfortunately for you, doesn't have the minimum 10 lines of pornographic material that you need to stroke off your morning wood.

 

Now, why am I not surprised, that your rant came down to this basic fact????

[Guest Don Cast]

Couldn't agree more with Axiom! What on earth can be the point of all those "reviews" that state what-went-on-between-the-two-of-us-must remain-private? The direct equivalent of a restaurant reviewer saying "it was a great place but I simply can't tell you what I ordered." As pointless as having the Bush gang say "Trust me!"

 

That said, it's also a bummer when the whole point of a review seems to be vainglorious sexual boasting ("I'd cum 4 times") or an amateurish attempt at a stroke-tale. The latter usually relying on all the overused porno tag lines.

 

Sure, it takes a bit of time and effort to convey the TRUE sense of what a specific encounter was REALLY like -- but isn't that what this site should be? It's far too easy to say (and how many times have we heard it?) "he was so much better than his picture."

 

I suspect that those reticent reviewers are far more concerned about protecting their own shame than sparing their escort's.

 

A good (ie truly useful) review has to do its damndest to put the reader into the scene. That requires giving the essential details on BOTH the reviewer and the escort. Not easy! The best multiple reviewers need only give their own info once, but each escort should be described both physically and emotionally so as to answer what is really the essential question for any reader: Would this be a guy I'd want to spend time and money on?

[Guest TNT Ted]

>People who take the time to submit a review deserve our

>thanks. Telling them "NOT GOOD ENOUGH, DAMMIT!, NOT GOOD

>ENOUGH!" is probably just going to scare them away. We lose.

 

>When a "short" review is submitted, at least you know that the

>guy has been hired and you get an idea whether he satisfied

>his client. If those are rejected, you don't get that

>information.

 

Agree completely. There are very few reviews that give NO information. But what little they give is better than having no review at all.

[+ Axiom2001]

All of my reviews during the past four years have been detailed enough for the clients to get an idea as to whether or not they would mess if they got with the particular escorts that I've reviewed. :-)

[JT Brooklyn]

IMHO.. Reviewing is not an easy thing for many to do. The Form in itself tells alot about the Physical description, ALSO some of what the "Working Guy" is available to get into. Of course we all know, not everything is done with everyone! Chemistry can affect that, One way or the Other! Personally, I think a Photo can be very important, for even thinking about a future Hookup!

 

A typical Vanilla, kiss, bod contact, oral-69, maybe Anal Session.. probably wouldn't even take 10 lines to report on!

 

BUT I too find "What Went on between the 2 of us" Very Dam Victorian!

It is 2006 NOT 1906! You Did the Deed, own up to it! LOL

 

Then we have the opposite..every once in awhile, a "Porno Novel" is written, which alot of the times sounds more "Wishful Thinking" than actually to have happened! Personally after Line 10.. I USUALLY STOP READING! But that's me.. This all of course is IMHO! LOL

 

 

 

:7 :7 :7

[pierrot]

I don't find it difficult to review at all. Even without being totally explicit about every thrust and pubic hair, you can write an interesting review. Here are some ideas: 1) Describe the escort in more detail physically than what the form asks, give your opinions and observations that you didn't expect 2)Describe the escort's personality, how he interacts with you, i.e. friendly, cold, bored, aggressive, etc. 3)Describe what the escort is willing to do sexually, and how he performed in your experience. You don't have to give every detail, but it's important to know if he did what you agreed in advance, if he can keep it up, makes an effort to be responsive, and that sort of thing. 4)Be honest, but you don't have to tell anything you think might embarrass the escort or you that is not, in your judgment, an endemic problem.

The reason for reviewing is to give others an idea of whether the escort is someone they would want to hire. Things like "I'll keep the details to myself" are useless. Try to say something original. If you think about it, it's not difficult.

[+ Axiom2001]

P... (...don't remember the exact spelling)-- you captured the essence as to what I failed to do. Thank you for such succinct suggestions when it comes to one's writing a review at this site. :9

[+ deej]

Now if one of you could figure out how to get the message to reviewers who don't read the message center (which is the lion's share), that would be great.

[Guest zipperzone]

I think part of being a good escort is the packaging. Madison Avenue knows how important packaging is, be it soap suds, men's jocky shorts or after shave lotion.

 

That's why I always enjoy a discription (detailed is better) of what the escort is wearing either when he arrives at your place or when he opens his door to greet you.

 

Some reviewers also believe in this and give us thumbnail sketches of how their treat was packaged. Just like on Christmas morning, it's always more fun to unwrap the presents with the big bows and silver balls on them!

[JT Brooklyn]

deej. LOL.. NO Doubt about that! You can just about tell that, by the Reviews that are written. Plus the Working Guys who don't want a Review for whatever reason. There are quite a few, believe it or not in NYC...:7

[twinklover]

"Part II - Review Information - Keep It To Your Experience ONLY

No advertising bullet points, please. Also, we already know his pictures do not do him justice. And before you begin, if you do not want to share with us pertinent details of YOUR experience, please do not waste your time."

 

This is right in the "Submit a Review" form. I wish this admonition were observed invariably in practice. But we do get other useful information from a review based simply on the other required fields, including the fact that the escort was recently hired and is apparently available.

[Guest ncm2169]

Frankly, I'm more concerned about clients who don't write about bad experiences - it's been often noted here that many (most?) clients don't like to say negative things and would rather just stay silent. x( At least a brief and vague review is better than nothing.

 

As a side note: I've been reading online restaurant reviews lately, and the same phenomenon seems to prevail - nearly ALL the reviews are positive.

[JT Brooklyn]

ncm...

IMHO and from Personal Experience,in writing quite a few Reviews all Positive, probably due to Luck...

Except for ONE with a Slight Criticism concerning an Overnite.. which did get a "Real Cute Spin" (BS) in the Working Guy's Response AND Coincidental Follow-up Reviews from his Fan Club, who allegedly spent time with him "Before" I did! LOL to hopefully "Bury my Experience" in his Review List!

 

I can understand why guy's will not bother with Negative Review's, when they know the "Response" will only be to Deny ALL. Filing the Form is time consuming, and in that situation it can seem a waste of it! IMHO of course..:7

[augustman]

Sorry but todays review of Lars is a perfect example of a review that is short of what is needed. The gentleman did not want to go into details but simply said he did everything I requested which was what? The review lists kissing as dry, many many guys that can be a major negative, so is that what the client wanted or did not even address. So a brief list even if it is a simple as "we did everything I requested:

anal-he topped me

leather-he was gorgeous

kissing-not my style but lips looked good

ass-was nice

 

As you can see no getting off here but short to the point. No writing skill required but escort and possible clients get something out of it.

[Guest TNT Ted]

While I like to read a juicy, detailed review as much as the next guy, I don't think M4M should reject those reviews that have scant information. As already noted, at least we know the escort is still escorting, and that the reviewer got what he wanted (or didn't if that's the case). Which is good information.

 

Rather, if there's any change to the review policy, I'd like it to be M4M's insistence that a contact phone number be provided. That has certainly kept my reviews from being published. I wonder how many others have been so discouraged.

[+ Axiom2001]

Today's review of Bruno Gaucho from Sao Paulo is the type of review that I really enjoy reading and one that would encourage as well as entice me to seek his services if he, the escort, were my "type." In this case, I definitely would go for it!!!!!! :9