Well, I would like to give this beauty the benefit of a doubt-but????

[bigguyinpasadena]

Todays reviews of Brock Lachey http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/brock_lachey_atlanta.html and the one previous are both by well known posters,one of which is a known screen name here on the MC.Their reviews vary WIDELY from the previous reviews(3)which are all by first time reviewrs.

So this leads to some questions.Are the first three reviews bogus,and the known reviewrs lured in by the 3 good to great reviews?

Did something happen to Brock during the period between review number three and number four which would lead to such a reversal in performance,punctuality,and attitude?

Or did the last two reviewers meet with him(at two seperate dates)when Brock was just not 100 % healthwise(I would think if a 'scort was advertising as a bottom or versitile then accepting a date while having a problem with hemmaroids would be unwise-but it has happned to me also,and the scort was quickly shown the door without compensation!)nor in the best of moods?

If the first 3 reviews are bogus,and I have no way of knowing one way or the other,then this represents a great lesson to those scorts who do post bogus reviews,sooner or later you will be found out.

[augustman]

At $300 a pop, the guy better be up front about everything before arriving. If not up to it, than cancel. If client showed up with a rash do you think the escort would go forward with the meeting. The previous review I may give a little break, the holidays and the explanation from the escort could explain. That one I will give the benenfit of the doubt But from a regular reviewer in no. 2. I'll pass. I would not hire anyone at $300 if they have mixed reviews. I am shocked the reviewer even let the meeting go more than 5 minutes.

 

Escorts love to say you get what you pay for, well not in this one, unless you wanted to catch something.