Posting Escort's Pictures ~ Which do you prefer???

[Valley Boys]

I'm just curious, and would like the opinion of you guys, since you all are the "end users" at it were.

 

I'm referring pictures posted on web sites, for either an escort service or on Rent Boys, M4RN and so on.

 

What type of pictures do you prefer to see posted, and more importantly, why??

 

Do you prefer pictures NOT showing the escorts equipment; showing it in a teasing way; showing everything, and if everything, hard or soft. Or do you prefer something else I didn't list.

 

Believe it or not, I do respect your opinions when expressed in a mature adult manner

 

Thank you in advance to those who respond.

 

Dj

[Holden]

When looking to hire an escort, I want to see what they look like. That includes a face pic. I also want to see a body pic and yes "the equipment, soft and hard). This saves alot of time and effort. If, for whatever reason, the escort doesn't want to include that in his ad, I expect him to send thru email after my initial inquiry. If they are not forthcoming with it, then I suspect something is amiss and I end the inquiries.

[DelawareGuy]

I think a full nude shot is good; I do understand some escorts work on the side, so not putting up a face shot on a web site is OK in that context, but I would expect one in a private e-mail.

[Chairmans Pig]

Order of preference

1. Face and bod

2. Face only

3. bod w/equipment

4. bod w/o equipment

5. equipment

 

CP

[JT Brooklyn]

D.J. IMHO.. Naturally #1..Face (When Possible) 2.BODY (Torso or Full) 3.Butt (ALWAYS A Nice Deal Maker!) 4."Equipment" in Tightey Whiteys or Speedo.. I am sure #4 for the "SIZE IS A MUST" among us, is #1.. "Maximum Escorts" has the Best Photos, but again ALL or Most of these Guys, have very Worked out Bodies, So a Hot Photo is easy! BUT ALSO "NO Face" Shots which can be a determining Factor to some! :+

[Epigonos]

I tend to allow a great deal more latitude regarding facial appearance than I do regarding body type. Thus a face shot is not a requirement for me. I hire, only, guys with muscular gymnast types bodies so a full torso shot is a must. I full frontal nude is also great but not an absolute requirement.

I really wish that escorts would present themselves with GOOD/EXCELLENT quality photographs. I am amazed at the number of absolutely rotten photographs that some escorts use. I have to agree with J.T. Brooklyn that the Maximum Agency, in New York, does one hell of a great job presenting their escorts photographically

[Guest skrubber]

Face is a definate, full body with equipment is great, erect adds to it. Anice butt shot is always welcome.

[orlandoguy]

A nice face pic is a must for me -- better when it's the face and upper body. I actually like to see some pictures clothed or semi-clothed. Face and chest with no shirt is my favorite. I don't care whether the "equipment" is shown or not -- I like to see pics that depict more of the escort's personality than a dick shot.

[tarrat]

For me a face picture is a must. Body shot, at least waist up is also important. I like a nice butt shot, but it's not a 'deal breaker'. As far as equipment shots, not a necessity for me, I can live without it, but I won't consider anyone I have not seen a face shot of.

[Rick Munroe]

>I

>have to agree with J.T. Brooklyn that the Maximum Agency, in

>New York, does one hell of a great job presenting their

>escorts photographically

 

I'll pass that along to Stephen, co-owner of Maximum and also our best friend. He takes all their photos, and has offered to take shots of Derek and me (I guess we'll let him).

[Txpaytoplay]

>Order of preference

>1. Face and bod

>2. Face only

>3. bod w/equipment

>4. bod w/o equipment

>5. equipment

>

>CP

 

 

I second this notion!

:-)

[Guest RandyRon]

First, the quality of the picture is the most important. Some of those on M4Rentnow are so bad you have no idea about their species let alone what they look like. A guy I see regularly has pictures on that site that are so bad I would never have hired him the first time if I had seen him there first. For some reason, black guys have the worst pictures. I think whoever takes their pictures can't adjust the camera properly and the guy seems to blend into the background.

 

Now for a minority (I think) opinion. I like to see a guy partially clothed, leaving some mystery for when I might get to open the package. A pose that shows an open shirt, an unzipped fly or at most the guy in his tighty whities is the most provocative for me. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a prude and I certainly like looking at big dicks and nice firm hairy butts. It's just that they leave no mystery to be explored.

[JT Brooklyn]

Randy..Definitely, I am always Amazed that some of these "Workin Guys" don't put more effort into getting the Best Photos they can. Especially if you don't show your Face, You better show SOMETHING that is in "Focus & Interesting"! Photos don't cost all that much. They don't have to have Talvin D. Type "Quality" Pro- Photos which are the Best Around.. B U T .. Common give us "Something" worth Contacting you about! Especially at these Rates, they Quote....LOL :+

[+ cougar]

Got to have a face shot, and a clear and focused body shot, at least from the waist up. Aside from that I always ask the age of the pictures, some still have pictures posted that are several years old.

Pictures are one thing, but one of the most important things i want to know are the CURRENT and REAL stats.

[tazmanian5230]

JT,

Maybe you can offer your photo services for free to better the quality of escort photos....

ORRR maybe a trade agreement...Sounds like a good deal.

[1sf]

I concur. I love Maximum's site and am fond of several of their guys, esp. Victor.

[VaHawk]

The pic policy on your site is good the way it is?

 

Me personally, I love those skinny little boys who post pictures of their red legs crossed in a suggestive position!

[JT Brooklyn]

Taz. "In NYC NOTHING is Free" How does it go... "It takes $$ To make $$" Talvin,Mike/St Louis/,Trent Fosters.. The List is Long,of the "Workin Guys" Who do realize,you should "Always" put your Best Image Out There! As we know from some of the Great Past "G" Photos..Ask VDN he owns ALL of 'em......LOL :+

[JT Brooklyn]

Mself being "Gay" By "definition" I like Other "Men". "Chicken" needs way to much "Flavoring" to make it Interesting. Not to mention the "Legalities" Involved. Which some people "Sadly" find out Eventually..:+

[noviceny]

I like candid shots...the stylized/stylish pics are great, but ya know the guy has dieted for them and may even have makeup on for them. A candid photo shows him as you will probably see him and is easy to get since they can even take them themselves.

 

Only exception is Talvin D. His monthly pics are so close up and non-stylized that you really get a sense of what he will look like

[Valley Boys]

WOW!! I'm very impressed by the wonderful answers I received

from all of you. Thank you so much for your openness and

clear & concise answers. They are ALL a great help.

DJ

[mature4yngr]

A face pic is a must as well as a clear "package" shot. No face photo..no hire. I have even had escorts refuse to send me a face pic via email and assure me that "I will not be disappointed".

[pierrot]

It depends on what you're selling. If you're a top and you're claiming a 10" dick, you'd better show it if you expect me to believe it. If you're primarily a bottom, let's see those buns. If your biggest attraction is a big muscled physique, show it. Etc.

Show what you are advertising as your principal physical asset, because, in spite of some of the reviews that rattle on about what a nice guy this one or that one is, most of us are hiring based on some physical trait or traits that really turn us on. Being nice is a plus, but you can't tell that from a photo.