Jump to content
THIS IS A TEST/QA SITE

Steven Draker


Chuck50
This topic is 7111 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

RE: Steven Draeker

 

i do not think he ever had a clear face shot on his site. however, from the reviews and various threads he is reputed to be a handsome man (as well as skilled at what he does). while i have not met him, i would like to someday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steven is extremely handsome, top notch escort, with a great personality. Besides, when he is standing in front of you with out a shirt on, removing his skin tight blue jeans and revealing an awesome body in tight calvins, everything looks good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>But, deej, tight pants look good on NO ONE!

 

OMG, I think you are so wrong, tight pants looks so hot on some hot guys. This way I can see the package. Steven is one of the hottest guys I ever seen in tight pants :9 :9

 

When in doubt I whip it out :+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Is this 1970?

>I'm more than slightly disturbed that he's wearing skin-tight

>jeans?

 

Eric,

I am glad that you brought this up.

Whenever I am setting an appointment, I always ask if there is any special look, or attire or garment that adds to the excitement. Almost half of the times, I receive the same request, and I have to say that it amazes me a bit:

 

"I would love to see you on skin-tight jeans and...."

 

Needless to say, no store, chain or reputable brand sells (or have sold in the last two decades) that kind of jeans. I have to ask if loose jeans would do, and I always get an affirmative response.

 

I think that it is not that people want (or own) skin-tight jeans. It is just that "skin-tight" is an adjective that we subconciously add to the noun "jeans" to make them sound sexy... (The image itself fills our minds with perfectly rounded mounds of buttocksly flesh, a generous and almost illegaly protruding basket, and two strong, muscular larger than life legs strongly grounding our stud to the earth...)

 

So, they dont want skin-tight jeans... they want a hot stud, right?

 

(I hope.)

 

If I am wrong, and there are tight-skin jeans being sold in our era, and if you, dear reader actually like tight-skin jeans... please let me know. After all, the client is -almost- always right, remember?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Is this 1970?

>I'm more than slightly disturbed that he's wearing skin-tight

>jeans?

 

Eric,

I am glad that you brought this up.

Whenever I am setting an appointment, I always ask if there is any special look, or attire or garment that adds to the excitement. Almost half of the times, I receive the same request, and I have to say that it amazes me a bit:

 

"I would love to see you on skin-tight jeans and...."

 

Needless to say, no store, chain or reputable brand sells (or have sold in the last two decades) that kind of jeans. I have to ask if loose jeans would do, and I always get an affirmative response.

 

I think that it is not that people want (or own) skin-tight jeans. It is just that "skin-tight" is an adjective that we subconciously add to the noun "jeans" to make them sound sexy... (The image itself fills our minds with perfectly rounded mounds of buttocksly flesh, a generous and almost illegaly protruding basket, and two strong, muscular larger than life legs strongly grounding our stud to the earth...)

 

So, they dont want skin-tight jeans... they want a hot stud, right?

 

(I hope.)

 

If I am wrong, and there are tight-skin jeans being sold in our era, and if you, dear reader actually like tight-skin jeans... please let me know. After all, the client is -almost- always right, remember?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mmmm... being the PB&J in a Juan-Vincent Michael sandwich... oh, sorry, I seem to be drooling again.

 

>I am glad that you brought this up.

>Whenever I am setting an appointment, I always ask if there is

>any special look, or attire or garment that adds to the

>excitement. Almost half of the times, I receive the same

>request, and I have to say that it amazes me a bit:

>

>"I would love to see you on skin-tight jeans and...."

 

They came of age (or perhaps middle age) in the 70s I guess & nothing will free them from the shackles thereof.

 

>I have

>to ask if loose jeans would do, and I always get an

>affirmative response.

 

Thank God!

 

>It is just that "skin-tight" is an adjective that we

>subconciously add to the noun "jeans" to make them sound

>sexy...

 

LOL, papi, it makes them sound fairly revolting!

 

 

>(The image itself fills our minds with perfectly

>rounded mounds of buttocksly flesh, a generous and almost

>illegaly protruding basket, and two strong, muscular larger

>than life legs strongly grounding our stud to the earth...)

 

All it conjures in my mind is sterility and jean-sweat!

I'd much rather see those buttocks in khakis or non-denim pants. The basket can wait until the pants come off. For God's sake, underwear!

 

Besitos!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>If I am wrong, and there are tight-skin jeans being sold in

>our era, and if you, dear reader actually like tight-skin

>jeans... please let me know.

 

Juan, a Levi's 501 can look like "tight-skin" depending on your ASSets ...

but I definitely prefer you naked ! }(

 

Steven Draker ~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...