Here We Go Again, Travis #2

[noviceny]

RE: Digging a ho (le)

 

I am not sure how I come across on this board, but I have always considered myself a man who errs on the side of compassion. I believe that I would never slander/libel another person and have a very hard time saying hurtful things to another person.

 

That being said, I stand by my review 100%. Travis #2 was a very nice guy and we talked for a long time...however, the description I gave of his body was absolutely accurate. The pics he posts and sends are him...but they were not the body I saw. Unless he is delusional, he is misrepresenting himself...

 

 

BTW, Travis #2 says that he does not do incalls. I didnt say he did. We were at a hotel...

[flguy]

And please don't forget to add Aion from DC and we'll make it a threesome. I would also put money in the pot for this combination and the resulting review.

[LustinGuy]

As someone who has bad the mistake of hiring "Travis" I have to add that KY's comments are absolutely accurate. The description of this guy's body that KY posted is completely consistent with my observation about a year ago. Travis is a scam artist and definitely looks much older than the guy in the pics he uses. Stay away from Travis ir risk sever nausea!

[+ Unicorn]

Well, his website states he's 24, which is apparently, per prior reviews, was what he was stating in 2003, so there can be no doubt but that he's a liar. That being said, I can only shake my head when I see someone hiring an escort with two consistent negative reviews by established reviewers (let alone multiple negative reviews). I see this as an example of how most people will believe what they want to believe even in the face of very strong evidence to the contrary. I guess this is why organized religion is such a big business (the Mormon Church being one of my favorites). Of course, if Travis wanted some credibility, he could submit a torso and face picture of himself holding the latest issue of Newsweek or Time.

[Epigonos]

In some ways much of this discussion seems to me to be a non issue. Any two honest people can have a totally different experience in the same situation or with the same person. An excellent example of this is the different experience Cougar and I had with Aiden of Tampa.

However, isn’t the purpose of this site to provide those of us who hire escorts with an ever expanding record of the performance of those escorts? Now if an escort has only one or two reviews there is considerable room for second guessing those reviewers. However, in the cases of escorts like Anthony Holloway, Brian of Philadelphia and Travis #2 that is hardly the case. These guys have been reviewed negatively time after time by DIFFERENT reviewers. Each of these guys has been consistently criticized individually for the exact same reason by multiple reviewers. Anthony Holloway shows up asks for his money up front and then takes off. Brian of Philadelphia is consistently a flake. Travis #2, thought seemingly a nice guy, doesn’t remotely resemble the photographs he uses in his adds. Thus when someone questions the last negative review of any of these escorts they are not questioning just that single reviewer but a whole group of reviewers. That is of course their right but if that is how they choose to operate it would seems to me that they should discontinue reading reviews here and take their changes hiring whoever they find attractive where ever they find them.

[LustinGuy]

>... in the cases of escorts like

>Anthony Holloway, Brian of Philadelphia and Travis #2 that is

>hardly the case. These guys have been reviewed negatively

>time after time by DIFFERENT reviewers. Each of these guys

>has been consistently criticized individually for the exact

>same reason by multiple reviewers. Anthony Holloway shows up

>asks for his money up front and then takes off. Brian of

>Philadelphia is consistently a flake. Travis #2, thought

>seemingly a nice guy, doesn’t remotely resemble the

>photographs he uses in his adds. Thus when someone questions

>the last negative review of any of these escorts they are not

>questioning just that single reviewer but a whole group of

>reviewers.

 

The point is well taken BUT even mentioning Brian of Philly in the same sentence as Travis #2 is just wrong. Brian is an unbelievably hot gorgeous fun boy who has always shown me a really fun time. The fact that he is occasionally unreliable is unfortunate but nowhere near as reprehensible as this disgusting liar that calls himself Travis.

[LustinGuy]

>... in the cases of escorts like

>Anthony Holloway, Brian of Philadelphia and Travis #2 that is

>hardly the case. These guys have been reviewed negatively

>time after time by DIFFERENT reviewers. Each of these guys

>has been consistently criticized individually for the exact

>same reason by multiple reviewers. Anthony Holloway shows up

>asks for his money up front and then takes off. Brian of

>Philadelphia is consistently a flake. Travis #2, thought

>seemingly a nice guy, doesn’t remotely resemble the

>photographs he uses in his adds. Thus when someone questions

>the last negative review of any of these escorts they are not

>questioning just that single reviewer but a whole group of

>reviewers.

 

The point is well taken BUT even mentioning Brian of Philly in the same sentence as Travis #2 is just wrong. Brian is an unbelievably hot gorgeous fun boy who has always shown me a really fun time. The fact that he is occasionally unreliable is unfortunate but nowhere near as reprehensible as this disgusting liar that calls himself Travis.

[Guest msclonly]

Wow! I am exhausted from reading all that!

 

But know little more then when I started!

Other then to stay away.

 

I guess that is the bottom line!

 

}(

[+ Oliver]

RE: Digging a ho (le)

 

I can only applaud Tedbear's remarks and add my admiration for KY's integrity (he does not need my support). If you want a traveler's guide to the best escorts, follow his reviews.

 

>The very first time I met him, he was with his boyfriend (the "x-escort" that Travis claims as not existing). They were obviously ery much into each other. And I can personally vouch that the BF had been an escort since I had hired him after having read one of KY's raving posts about him soon after they got together for the first time.<

 

I was there, too, and my observations (and hiring) exactly the same.

 

"N'uff said!"

[woodlawn]

>In some ways much of this discussion seems to me to be a non

>issue. Any two honest people can have a totally different

>experience in the same situation or with the same person. An

>excellent example of this is the different experience Cougar

>and I had with Aiden of Tampa.

 

In your post #40 in the thread "When Two Worlds Collide," you stated of Aiden and another escort, "Both of these gentlemen, and that is what they are, are GREAT AND HONORABLE HUMAN BEINGS." You also referred to Cougar's comments as "self-indulgent martyrdom." If you are now conceding that Cougar was telling the truth when he related how Aiden treated him in a shameful and dishonorable manner on two different occasions, you are singing quite a different tune.

[Epigonos]

Oh here we go again. Woodlawn if you will review ALL of my comments on that thread you will realize that I qualified my GREAT AND HONORABLE HUMAN BEING comment in post 50376 as relating to the two GENTELMEN'S behavior involving me. The self indulgent martyrdom comment came is a different post and related to different issues.

 

Woodlawn please do many of us a favor and move on. You might also consider adding a little more light and a little less heat to your comments. Thanks much.

[augustman]

First I have to admit I love when an escort does deep six a negative review. It is the first thing I read when I see the new reviews.

 

How someone at any point life handles criticism is milestone in that person’s maturity. I have talked to a few newer escorts and pointed out this fact to them that to succeed you must handle the criticism that will come with a polite but to the point response if you do not agree. The fact is I do look at the reviews and responses and draw conclusions from them. Travis and Brian happen to be two people who have not handled it, as they should have. The fact that Travis has had his pictures called into question. He should, as other escorts before him have done in a similar position, is post a new current picture as quickly as possible.

 

It is appropriate to bring Brian up because he too has not handled criticism well. Not the same as calling his pictures into doubt but reliability is right there with importance as is the reality of the pictures. And Brian’s pictures are hot! I have wanted to hire Brian based on his pictures, the good reviews he does have in some cases and he does come to Chicago once in awhile. For a change my common sense judgement won and said the risk is too high on this one when other more reliable guys are out there. I know I have a better time with guys who have a mature personality and age has nothing to do with it either.

 

First thing I was taught when I started out in the service industry “The customer is always right.” Learn to deal with it. It can be a bitch as VM brought up a few weeks ago but find a place to vent but not in the response area. I am amazed more guys do not take advantage of responding. Even if you say, “Boy not one of my best outings, I apologize or offer the client a rate reduction next time out. “ I mean I do this with my customers at work. Rebate on the next order. If the client was a total jerk, take day to sort it out and then respond in a concise manner. Those types of responses, as long as there is more good reviews than bad will not effect my selection process.

 

However, I do love the off the wall responses so please I hope all the guys do not become smart right away.

[woodlawn]

>Oh here we go again. Woodlawn if you will review ALL of my

>comments on that thread you will realize that I qualified my

>GREAT AND HONORABLE HUMAN BEING comment in post 50376 as

>relating to the two GENTELMEN'S behavior involving me.

 

That is not true. The quotation I posted is exact. There is no qualification in it.

 

Readers who enjoy intellectual puzzles can ponder the question of how you can describe an escort as "honorable" and at the same time allow that Cougar's description of his very DIShonorable behavior is true. Is English your second language by any chance?

 

 

> The

>self indulgent martyrdom comment came is a different post and

>related to different issues.

 

As I said, those were words you used to describe comments Cougar made in regard to his experiences with Aiden. No point in lying about it, your words are right there for everyone to see.

 

 

>Woodlawn please do many of us a favor and move on. You might

>also consider adding a little more light and a little less

>heat to your comments. Thanks much.

 

Considering the vicious and hateful remarks you made to me in the "When Two Worlds Collide" Thread, I can't imagine why you think I would ever do you a favor. And considering the namecalling in your posts in that thread, your request for "a little less heat" is nothing but sheer hypocrisy. If you don't approve of personal attacks on this board then stop using them yourself, you hypocrite.

[SamtopinSTL]

Thanks for the info. As I did not know KY, or his reputation, as I do now, I simply asked the question. I have my answer. I had no plans to hire Travis, anyways.

[JT Brooklyn]

Travis has a photo he sends out now, with SAME Body pose with Head shot. BUT Face portion looks very "worked" on..He says it is from LATE 2004? But that Body photo has been around a long time! I now think all Travis #2 Questions have been answered.. :+ :+ :+

[CT Dick]

a recent witness

 

Arthur, thanks for coming up with a different view of Travis.

 

This whole discussion began with a comment about his appearance. You commented on his personality and his response-style but not what he looks like.

 

Is this an accurate, recent photo of him?:

http://www.male4malescorts.com/images05-01-04/travis2nyc11-4-04.jpg

 

Dick

[arthur]

RE: a recent witness

 

It is a very accurate picture. Travis works out at the gym about five times a week and he has to be the strongest escort I've ever been with (which for me is a turn on). So far I've been with Travis three times, have enjoyed myself very much each time and am looking forward to our next session together.

ag

[HotdadENYC]

RE: a recent witness

 

It may be an accurate picture, but I'm not so sure that its recent, at least based on prior reviews and comments.

 

Personally, I don't care since I have no intention of hiring him.

 

But if Travis is serious about reclaiming at least a sliver of credibility, then he should post a picture that includes a verifiable date reference and by all means, he should remove the hat. I recall there were some comments about hat wearing as well.

 

I am happy for those of you who met with Travis and enjoyed his offerings. I am equally sympathetic to those who met with Travis and were left unfulfilled by the experience. Clearly, Travis is not a man for all clients.

 

hd NYC

[KY_TOP]

RE: a recent witness

 

With all due respect. There is NO WAY that guys chest looks like that picture.

[flguy]

Hey KY, What is the possibility that Arthur is Travis#2??? From all the reviews he must at least be possibly visibly impaired? Me thinks I smell a rat. Again, lets see a current, unretouched pic holding today's NY Times. If Travis can't do that then we KNOW all we suspect is true.

[Guest SilverDollar]

KY TOP is 100% right. I suspect flguy is too.

[noviceny]

Again, I dont say mean shit on message boards, but now I am getting annoyed.

 

THIS GUY LOOKS NOTHING LIKE HIS PICS...THEY ARE FROM ANOTHER TIME.

 

READ MY DESCRIPTION IN MY REVIEW...I DONT WANT TO REPEAT IT HERE CAUSE I THINK ITS OVERKILL AND MEAN TO CRITICISE THE WAY SOMEONE LOOKS...HOWEVER, I WILL GIVE ANOTHER MORE INTENSE DESCRIPTION IF I MUST

[Txpaytoplay]

You know, with reading everything on this topic...and the reviews, even if this guy did send more pictures I would find it very difficult to set an appointment with him. I guess I would be leary with all this smoke.....there has to be a fire somewhere....

 

Excuse the southern expression.:-)

[arthur]

Dear.... "flguy"....

How much would you care to personally wager as to whether or not Arthur is the same person as Travis #2 (visually impared or not)?

ag

[flguy]

Upon rereading many Travis #2 reviews, it makes me wonder if there are two different people being reviewed. Or is the picture on Hooboy different than the one everyone else is looking at? Sorry Arthur, but I know KY Top, your profile is disabled and it makes things look fishy. Also your review is in complete opposition (as are others) to many of the negative reviews. Like I said, makes me think there are two completely different people calling themselves College Farm Dude.