Nick German Muscle Stud NY

[OceanTraveller]

I will be going to New York in a month . I was looking at Nick

German Muscle Stud there. He has good reviews. Does anyone have any

other feedback to share ? This board is a wealth of information and people

have been generous to share !!!:-)

[JT Brooklyn]

IMHO. I did an Overnite with Nick. He is a very Nice, Fun GUY. IF you are looking for "ALOT" of Muscle he is your man. I did Review him when he was Originally visiting NYC. He did do a week Gig at the "G" But the stage not his style. He did enjoy it for the experience though. He has since moved here, while continuing his Education. As with all the guys, just be specific in your interests while hanging out. He has an Auto Response for his emails. BUT will answer you quicker than most guys..Definitely worth checking out..:+ :+ :+

[augustman]

It is good you are checking now because I believe he is very busy. His muscles are real and can be affectionate if you want. I would be very clear about what you want, but I think we all should do that with whomever we hire. He was great top wanted to make sure of my comfort. He has a great ass if you like to rim. I thought he was very customer friendly, responded to both e-mail and phone calls promptly. Nice website to oggle over if you like muscles. I saw him in Chicago in June and my review is posted accordingly. I would love to see him again if he returns to the midwest. The only negative which some guys will have a problem with, which I did not, is that he is a same day multi-client booker. But that was on the road and I do not know what his policy is at home which might be different.

[gayray]

He has an amazing body and a thick dick.

However, he has a very strange, conceited and moody personality (steroids ???). (Despite his good reviews I know of other clients who have had similar experiences with him).

Is AWFUL as a top and very uninteractive during sex. I love muscles, but would NEVER hire him again.

 

If you want real body builder muscle with a heart of gold and zero attitude try Mike/Jackdmuscle.

[Traveler North]

Met him in NYC last year. He was very nice guy. I saw no attitude. Easy to talk to and hot guy for sex. Found him to be great bottom.

Really enjoyed him. Friends had him up to Toronto and thought he was very nice guy. Enjoyed his company. :D

[OceanTraveller]

He said that he kisses . Is he a good kisser ?

Thanks for your responses:-)

[gayray]

Zero kissing.

[Okliehomo]

That's funny. All the reviews say that he does kiss. I have traded emails with the guy and he was always fairly prompt and professional with me. I didn't hire him (yet) because he wanted to raise his overnite rate from $1200 to $1500 because of the travel time to OKC. But he is by no means the first guy from NYC to do that.

 

Okiehomo

[JT Brooklyn]

My experience.. he does not really get into the Kissing.."Passion" is not really his thing. Anyone wanting to do an "Overnite" Better go for for a test drive first...Remember he is all German..NOT a Passionate Latin Type...:+ :+ :+

[uptownmike]

Sooner Baby:

Read the true statements and between the lines of the Brooklyn Brawler. I've hired Nick for an evening ( not totally overnight).

He's polite and desires to please, but he definitely has that German stand-offish and up tight personality. You may get a kiss but you instantly feel is entire body tighten and know he's hating every monent of it. Certainly was a turnoff for me.

 

Yes, his body is very nice. He is tanned in most of his pics, but was not so when I saw him.

 

If you're looking a really passionate guy and great easy going personality to go with it, have you considered Ricky Starr? Ofcourse the body is magnificent. I have done an overnight with him and no question at least one of the top three I have ever been with (probably Number 1) And I have been with several of those praised over the years at muscleservice.com.

 

In any event, I hope whoever you choose is a wonderful experience for you. From Edmond in the North to Norman in the South, Ricky can't be beat.

[noviceny]

>He has an amazing body and a thick dick.

However, he has a very strange, conceited and moody personality (steroids ???). (Despite his good reviews I know of other clients who have had similar experiences with him). <

 

I am one of those clients. Definitely agree with this assessment.

 

>He's polite and desires to please, but he definitely has that German stand-offish and up tight personality.<

 

My experience also. Not the passionate type

[Steven_Draker]

> His muscles are real

 

Something appearing to be real in your eyes could be artificial in someone else's eyes.

[pierrot]

Interesting assessments here. Seems like some highly recommmend him and other don't. Apparently most of those who are less enthusiastic do not write reviews.

[noviceny]

I went back and forth on whether or not I should write a review. Some people even encouraged me to write one, but I wasnt really sure that my experience was not "my fault." I realize that this is someone's life and job and do not want to smear someone unnecessarily.

 

Y'all know that I dont really do much with escorts (at least 99% of them), and Nick was very surprised that I didnt want to do much. I had made it clear before about muscle worship, etc. but he still was willing to do much more. Most people would want this, so I didnt think it was that important to mention.

 

I also thought that the lack of passion was : 1) my fault or 2) not the role of the escort. I dont think he advertised that as one of his selling points and I did not really want that, so why be surprised if I didnt get it.

 

I am still up in the air over whether or not I should have written a review. There are many reasons why I should, but I still would not have felt that I could have accurately described the experience in a way that I could would done it justice.

[swallows22]

Have you ever written a review that was derogatory of the selected ones? I did once and never again. The abuse received is not worth it.

After my first and only experience, if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say it at all.

[+ Italiano]

>Have you ever written a review that was derogatory of the

>selected ones? I did once and never again. The abuse received

>is not worth it.

>After my first and only experience, if you don't have anything

>nice to say, don't say it at all.

 

I had the same experience when last summer I hired a well-known HUUUGE-hung stud in London.

 

I dared to write a review which wasn't totally positive (well, that was MY feeling!) but nevertheless also said very good things about him.

He and an anonymous friend of his wrote me insulting Emails, I couldn't believe it...

 

But this will not stop me to write negative things about someone in the future IF I have to!

[augustman]

First Stephen you were right, I should rephrase my comment to say his physique matches his pictures. How he developed the muscles I would not know, but believe they are not air and when holds you and when you lay on him they do exist.

Second, due to interpetation of expectations, Ocean Traveller be specific about what you want, I really do think Nick tries hard to be customer friendly and meet your needs and in the end is that not what are expectations depend upon.

Finially I have wondered what to do with a review when it is not really negative but just did not live up to your expectations. I have had several meetings that I just do not know what went wrong but left disappointed but the escort met all the physical requirements and maybe felt negative was not the right way to describe it, but you know you are not going back. To this point I have only done positve reviews, I can think only two I might have done negative but was concerned because I am married. But there are those in between ones which are okay but still something was missing so those I put down to chemistry and feel best not review because the escort mostly fulfilled his part of bargain. I put those down to live and learn.

[noviceny]

Auggie,

 

I like the way you put that...I have felt the same way. There was definitely no chemistry (on my part) with Nick, but he seemed to be interested in getting with me. I think that it is not common for guys to not want to do more, and thats where I think he needed to focus, even though I had spoken about it before.

 

I am very careful about what I write, when I am writing seriously. I try to be balanced in my judgement and try to put my emotionality on hold. I will often err on the side of silence, if I am not certain that I can express myself in a way that people can get an accurate depiction of the events.

[nice guy]

I have not been with Nick German Muscle. The thread of this topic has morphed to one of whether to write negative reviews of someone who delivered on what he said he'd do, but somehow it still was not a satisfying experience. I started a thread like this a few months ago, called "Negative Reviews" and I became convinced from the responses there (and my own realization since then), that CLIENTS SHOULD WRITE A REVIEW FOR EVERY SESSION! Whether it's great, good, okay, not good or awful -- it's the only way this site will be robust. Posting only positive reviews is NOT helpful to prospective clients. It's like looking in the newspaper (if anyone does that anymore) for which movie to go to, and above each movie they have quotes from critics that praise that movie. No negative quotes are provided. At least there, you understand that if there is no quote given, it means there were no good ones!

 

I'm straying from my main point here, but I really think it's fair to write a review even if the escort HAD the body he claimed, DID suck/fuck/kiss like he claimed, etc., but the session still was not satisfying. Remember, the world is not black and white, or comprised of only great reviews and scathing reviews. Where are the shades of gray here? People need to see those because if there are many of them for an escort, clients will get a feel that something is not quite right with this escort even if he can walk the walk. It's important information. If the review is not glowing, just state the facts without postulating that it could be YOUR fault! A good escort will sense how much the client is enjoying himself, even asking if necessary.

 

If a client leaves a session disappointed, this should reflect on the escort, particularly if there is more than one review where this happens. You can do this in the rating too. Did he live up to his physical description? Yes. Did he live up to what he promised? Yes. Rating? Satisfactory. Hire Again? No. Then explain the session, what you did, but explain why you felt the session was okay but not great. "He talked too much; didn't seem to enjoy it when we kissed; not as masculine as he seemed in the picture, etc." Whatever you felt was the reason. Just be honest and don't be intentionally hurtful or disrespectful to the escort. After all, like Will Rodgers said (was it him?): "You can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you CAN'T please all of the people all of the time." Let's face it, every escort with tons of reviews should have at least one review that doesn't read like a paid advertisement, or else you started doubting the validity of the reviews almost as much as a White House press release.

[noviceny]

True and so I will from now on

[augustman]

Nice guy you have valid points. First we should stay on subject with Nick, Ocean Traveller, some like me liked him, others like gayray did not. Your choice now. As to average reviews, nice guy I will give it try, I have one I can do, it will be more negative though. You are right on just listing all positive reviews because there is a guy I had in August that I had a C- meeting with that just has glowing reviews. I was not feeling bad about not issuing the average review because I thought he was gone, but sure enough there he was this week in the traveling escorts my fault not to warn.

[nice guy]

Okay Auggie -- I'll stay on subject! After this posting! Actually, I think the two topics are intertwined. Why? Because the original poster wouldn't have posed this question if EVERYONE who was with Nick had posted a review. I was close to hiring Nick last year until I read a posting from gayray about him. I'm glad I did, because to me, a great phsyique is far less important than the passion behind it. I also recall that in gayray's case (who by the way, is a very handsome german guy himself), he corresponded with Nick subsequent to the meeting to discuss why the session was disappointing. Like many of us, writing negative reviews is difficult (we don't want to hurt someone), and gayray wanted to just talk to Nick about it. Seems that the "feedback" gayray provided was not taken constructively, leaving him more upset than before. At that point, too much time had passed and he couldn't submit a review based upon HooBoy's rules. My point (yes, I have one) is to post a review immediately while the afterglow or afteranger is still warm.

[pierrot]

There's no reason not to write a review that has both positive and negative elements. I've done it myself several times. In fact, I think those are the most believable reviews, since most encounters are not all one way or the other. Look at it this way, a few honest negatives just make the positives even more believable -- you know for sure when you read the review that it's not a fake sent in by a friend or the escort himself.

What I've refrained from are cutting comments that have no point or that are gratuitously insulting.

Regarding Nick, he was on my list to get to at some point. Now I'm unsure. Sounds like he's upfront about what he offers and lives up to it, but that he doesn't click with some people.

[+ deej]

>After all, like Will Rodgers said (was it him?): "You can please

>some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of >the time, but you CAN'T please all of the people all of the time."

 

I think it's "You can FOOL some of the people..." and I always thought it was Abraham Lincoln.

 

Yup, just checked in Bartlett's.

 

Either way, it's equally applicable to this discussion. LOL

[nice guy]

So I got the quote right except for using the word "please" instead of the word "fool." Funny. You're right, it still is applicable. From now on, the version with "please" in it can be attributed to Mr. Nice Guy!