Reviews 1 1/2 to 3 yrs OLD

[JT Brooklyn]

I have noticed lately, as on Todays Reviews. There are many guys who have Reviews, the "Latest" being actually very Old. Other than sending in a New Photo..Does the Last Review being Old really say anything about the Escort at the "present" time? I personally tend not to consider contacting them, if this is the case...I know the amount of work to try and Update the" State Listings", with "who is" and "who is No Longer" Escorting..I myself have contacted a couple of guys who have moved on to other things, and have notified Hooboy. He has followed thru and emailed me a Thanks for the heads up.. :+ :+ :+

[Hamlet]

Not seeing recent reviews may very well indicate that an escort is out of the business. But I have found it to be the case frequently that some escorts discontinue their advertising at a point in their career when they are cutting back on seeing new clients and basically sticking with their regulars. They have so many regulars because, in fact, they are among the best and most dependable escorts around. These guys are usually in their mid-thirties or older, which may or may not suit your taste. But if you're interested, an email to one of the exceptionally well-reviewed escorts who seem to have disappeared from sight, followed by a phone call, can often lead to a meeting and to a truly exceptional experience. After all, what have you got to lose by trying to make contact?

[orlandoguy]

What you say is very true, and I can't argue with your logic. I find though that if an escort only has 1 or 2 reviews and they're 2 or 3 years old, I'll skip them. In most of these cases, their data/information has not been verified recently either. I don't want to get burned with someone who's not safe or unreliable. Since most of my escort contacts are when I'm traveling, I need to be sure the person is who he says he is and will show up at the appointed time.

[Rick Munroe]

>they are cutting

>back on seeing new clients and basically sticking with their

>regulars. They have so many regulars because, in fact, they

>are among the best and most dependable escorts around.

 

That's a good point, and true, Hamlet. I think it's also true that for some of us who have a heavy load ;-) of reviews, people think, "What can I add to all of that?" so new reviews don't come as often (as we do).

[HooBoy]

We have an ongoing process of regularly contacting all listed escorts for verification of stats, etc. If they wish, they can submit a recent photo which we will publish in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the M4M FAQ. (The link is at the top of the website.)

 

If their email bounces and they do not respond to our phone queries, they are removed from their respective state index to save you the hassle of trying to contact someone who is no longer working.

 

Now that my assistant is back from his holiday vacation, we are playing catch-up in posting pics that were sent in recently. The pictures were taking a back-seat to the reviews for awhile, which accounts for the plethora of "New Pics" that are going up right now.

 

If you notice, they all indicate "New Picure" with the current date to hopefully help people realize it is not an old review that is being posted, it is a new picture. If an escort submits a new picture along with his current stats, it is reasonable to assume he is still escorting and should respond to your email or phone call.

 

HooBoy