Escorts Who Diss the Competition

[Guest ncm2169]

I personally welcome all escorts who post here, as I think it gives us another glimpse into what they're all about.

 

In particular, I'm impressed when an escort posts with helpful info in response to an inquiry about another escort (client writes wondering if escort John Bigcock in Peoria is still escorting because he doesn't answer email, and Tom Morehung in Peoria reports that he bumped into him recently and John told him he took a break but is now available again). Such posts, IMHO, reflect magnanimity and character. :*

 

However, every so often an escort will post something which is derogatory about another specific escort, or other escorts in general. Personally I find such posts childish, unseemly, and blatant brown-nosing.

 

Any other thoughts? :+

[taylorky]

can't imagine how anyone can disagree with you...but sadly some will.

[woodlawn]

RE: Tradition

 

>I personally welcome all escorts who post here, as I think it

>gives us another glimpse into what they're all about.

 

I've always understood that escorts are all about making money. What other insights have you gained by reading their posts?

 

>Any other thoughts?

 

 

Yes. There is an inherent conflict between the purpose of a message board, which is to allow the posting of a wide variety of opinions on any given subject, and the purpose for which some escorts seem to want to use this board, which is to advertise themselves. A typical sequence of events here is for an escort who has not posted before to introduce himself, the introductory post is followed by the usual inane responses such as "You're so hot, I'm getting on the next plane to your city," and at some point a response will appear from a dissatisfied client or someone who finds something offensive or questionable about the escort's posts or ads, at which point the escort will complain about "negative people" or stop posting or both. Escorts in such cases (and there have been plenty of them) seem not to understand that a discussion group simply is not a place where they can advertise without fear that someone will post something that contradicts the message they are trying to deliver.

 

Escorts who behave in the manner you describe are also using the board for advertising, but for negative advertising rather than positive advertising.

 

Perhaps the oldest tradition of Internet message boards and newsgroups is to deprecate anyone who attempts to use the board to make money by advertising goods or services that he sells. I think that is a worthy tradition and I try to honor it.

[Guest ncm2169]

RE: Tradition

 

< I've always understood that escorts are all about making money. What other insights have you gained by reading their posts

 

Well, I alluded to one above. There was a recent inquiry here about an escort in a certain city, and another escort in that city responded similarly to what I stated above. The responding escort could have chosen to turn the inquiry to his advantage, but he chose to be helpful instead. Classy self-marketing? Maybe, but IMHO, that's something more than being "all about money." :7

 

Contrast that with another recent post here from an escort who did nothing more than pile on in a thread where another escort was properly chastised. IMHO, that's the bullseye of being "all about money." It's also just plain tacky. x(

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

RE: Tradition

 

I wouldn't say it's being 'all about the money' in the aformentioned message~

 

As with my post in The Deli (which we may or may not be referring to) regarding Anthony Holloway, it was an honest post from me, but in hindsight possibly a bit kneejerk and harsh. While i admire the great escorts in this industry (and there are MANY who i have given their due), there seem to be some who practically get away with fraud, yet continue to do business as usual.

 

It's no different to me than the whole Cupcake/Nationwide scam. You're promised on thing... You end up with something else completely. Argh.

 

While i didn't use that particular post for advertising purposes, this MC is an awesome way to get your name out there. Yet, with all public forums, it's also full of opinions, some of which aren't shared by myself or other posters. That's what makes this a fun place to post... IF you don't let yourself get tangled up in things and can take everything for face-value. It really doesn't help much if you're a creampuff and expecting everyone in here to cater to your ways of thinking. That's not realistic.

 

In the beginning of my illustrious MC career, i took things WAY too seriously. I couldn't let snide comments roll off my back and i would actually get sad over the fact that guys in here didn't see the points i was trying to make. As time went on, i realized that our differences are what make this place interesting & fun. I toughened up.

 

Why simply agree when you can make a good case against someone else and really contribute to a trail-blazing thread?

 

I really think that's the reason we need guys like VaHawk, Doug69, FFF, BoN and other shit-starters in here: It keeps people on their toes, keeps people talking and generally makes this place a more enjoyable read. Who wants 'The Donny & Marie Show' when you can have 'Melrose Place' at the drop of a hat? *grin*

 

On second thought, maybe Rick would support the whole Donnie & Marie idea. Correct me if i'm wrong Mr. Munore

 

 

Warmest Always,

 

 

 

 

Benjamin Nicholas

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Tradition

 

>I've always understood that escorts are all about making

>money.

 

Since escorts charge a monetary rate for their services, you deduce that we must be "all about" making money? If that's true, then every worker in every job and profession on the planet, with the exception of whoever took over for Mother Theresa, must be "all about" making money. Some people hate their jobs, some just get through them, and some love what they do, but most people are concerned with getting paychecks, getting healthcare, getting paid vacations, etc. An escort can truly enjoy what he does and still charge money for it. Tough concept to grasp, huh?

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Tradition

 

>On second thought, maybe Rick would support the whole Donnie &

>Marie idea. Correct me if i'm wrong Mr. Munore

 

I would have been totally into it, until I found out they are anti-gay-marriage. How about the Captain and Tennille instead? :+

[woodlawn]

RE: Tradition

 

>>I've always understood that escorts are all about making

>>money.

 

>Since escorts charge a monetary rate for their services, you

>deduce that we must be "all about" making money?

 

No, Rick, that is not how I deduce that escorts are all about making money. And by saying that is how I deduce it you are once again returning to your habit of making up something, claiming I said it, and then criticizing me for saying it. That really is incredibly dishonest of you. And to think that just a few days ago you were lambasting Four Aces for being dishonest because he contacted various escorts using two different descriptions to find out about their attitudes toward overweight clients. You are not in a position to lecture anyone on the subject of honesty, so you really should stop it.

 

> Some people hate

>their jobs, some just get through them, and some love what

>they do,

 

And some people are so anxious to make money that they will even post jokes about having sex with their own mothers in order to get attention from prospective customers. Do we know anyone who would stoop that low?

[+ Lucky]

Anton, Benjamin, and Rick are all escorts whose posts here have made me think better of them. So keep it coming, guys.

[FrancoDiSantisxxx]

The Other Shoe Drops

 

>I personally welcome all escorts who post here, as I think it

>gives us another glimpse into what they're all about.

 

As is his case about once every blue (or perhaps, blue-black) moon, Little Woody has hit his head on the nail once more: often escorts post here to promote themselves. Why this should come as a surprise to anyone reminds me of how easily shocked some characters were in the film Casablanca.

 

This site is not entirely about escorting and not entirely about sex, even. So there is a lot of different and, often, interesting and informative posting on a number of topics. I always appreciate the information that would be difficult to find or which calls upon the experience and knowledge of others (for example, technical questions regarding computers or information answers about travel, lodging, places to visit, etc.) Sometimes, the posts are just conversational: a film or book which might be interesting, a tv or film actor who someone finds appealing, and so forth. In some of these instances, escorts often posts and often provide information which may not necessarily promote them directly, but perhaps in answering they (as in the case of, for example, post by Boston Guy and Will), they elevate what others might think of them for the tenor or information provided.

 

However, as is readily apparent to anyone, a large number of escorts do not post or stop posting fairly soon after. Or they limit their posts to a few, safe, selected topics.

 

This is also part and parcel of the environment Little Woody touched on but did not discuss, which is that in discussion forums such as this a large number of people hide behind their amusing/fake nom and sometimes simply engage in, as someone else put it, "shit stirring."

[woodlawn]

RE: The Other Shoe Drops

 

>As is his case about once every blue (or perhaps, blue-black)

>moon, Little Woody has hit his head on the nail once more:

>often escorts post here to promote themselves. Why this should

>come as a surprise to anyone

 

And then there are escorts like Franco who, due to the fact that their age and physical condition have taken them out of the group of escorts that most clients find desirable, don't come here to promote themselves any longer. They come here merely to express the resentment they feel toward clients in general for preferring young, pretty escorts to aging, chubby ones.

[woodlawn]

RE: Tradition

 

>Hi Woodlawn,

 

>>I've always understood that escorts are all about making

>money. What

>>other insights have you gained by reading their posts?

 

>>And by saying that is how I deduce it

>>you are once again returning to your habit of making up

>>something, claiming I said it, and then criticizing me for

>saying it.

>

 

>But then what is it what you were trying to say with the first

>sentence I just quoted?

 

Where in my post do you see me saying, as Rick alleged, that simply because escorts receive money in return for what they do I deduce from that fact that they are all about making money? And if you do not see such a statement in my post, then where did it come from?

 

>Because I wonder if I read the first sentence in the same way

>as Rick did. And since Rick seemed to make up something else

>from it, there's a good chance that I did the same.

 

Again, you cannot find in my post the statement Rick claimed I made. So where did it come from if not from my post?

 

>Nobody wants misunderstandings,

 

On the contrary, it is quite common on this message board for people who cannot think of a way to refute an argument that they read to make up a statement that the other person never wrote, claim he wrote it, then address that statement instead of what the other person actually wrote. It happens all the time.

 

>Would you do me that favor?

 

I don't owe you any favors. I haven't forgotten several rather unpleasant things you said to me the last time we both participated in a thread.

[+ Oliver]

Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

Woodlawn –

A few weeks back, I likened you to Mr. Darcy (before his transformation) from Pride and Prejudice, which you somehow took as a compliment. I believe you have now become more like Mr. Wickham.

[Guest alanm]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

It's an insult to a literary character, any literary character, to compare him to woodlawn. I have only been using this site for 4 years, a relative newbie, but in that time Franco has contributed 100s of interesting postings. He is one of the few escorts who has been able to post regularly on this site, without hurting his business because even when you disagree with him Franco's logic the message is still understandable and not offensive.

 

As for the attach on Franceo, it is hard to count the demons going

in around in his head ... As I have said before on this site, a shrink would have trouble understanding what would lead somone to post such a hurtful unnecessary attack.

[woodlawn]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

>Woodlawn –

>A few weeks back, I likened you to Mr. Darcy (before his

>transformation) from Pride and Prejudice, which you

>somehow took as a compliment. I believe you have now become

>more like Mr. Wickham.

 

 

Any reason why I should give a shit?

[woodlawn]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

>It's an insult to a literary character, any literary

>character, to compare him to woodlawn.

 

>As for the attach on Franceo, it is hard to count the demons

>going in around in his head ... As I have said before on this

>site, a shrink would have trouble understanding what would

>lead somone to post such a hurtful unnecessary attack.

 

Uh huh. And of the course the vicious, hateful remarks you have made about me in two recent threads are NOT "hurtful unnecessary attacks." What is it about this message board that makes people like you believe you can criticize others for doing EXACTLY the same thing you do without anyone noticing what bloody hypocrites you are? It's quite a mystery.

 

By the way, after that post of yours claiming that "no one cares" about the opinions I contribute here, I received several invitations in the thread on which posters people would most like to host for dinner and conversation. Post some more of your vapid insults -- perhaps I'll be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize this time.

[+ Lucky]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

"Any reason why I should give a shit?"

 

Yes. It will be the main course at your dinner!

[Flower]

RE: Tradition

 

Just tell us the basis for your above statement:

"I've always understood that escorts are all about making money. What other insights have you gained by reading their posts? " --- if you can!

[Flower]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

>By the way, after that post of yours claiming that "no one

>cares" about the opinions I contribute here, I received

>several invitations in the thread on which posters people

>would most like to host for dinner and conversation. Post

>some more of your vapid insults -- perhaps I'll be nominated

>for the Nobel Peace Prize this time.

>

In your dreams, sweetie. And as for the dinner deal, I think they mistook "host" for Roast."

[Rick Munroe]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

>I received

>several invitations in the thread on which posters people

>would most like to host for dinner and conversation.

 

That is so funny. I mean, we all know woodlawn lives for the attention he receives on this anonymous board, but when he comes right out and tosses his hair back like he just did here, it's really quite amusing. What's also amusing is that he usually mocks the triviality of threads like the "dinner conversation" one, but not when he gets stroked in one of those threads. This is good stuff! :7

[MiamiLooker]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

>By the way, after that post of yours claiming that "no one

>cares" about the opinions I contribute here, I received

>several invitations in the thread on which posters people

>would most like to host for dinner and conversation. Post

>some more of your vapid insults -- perhaps I'll be nominated

>for the Nobel Peace Prize this time.

>

 

You accepted Bucky's dinner invitation. When's this going to take place?

[woodlawn]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

>You accepted Bucky's dinner invitation. When's this going to

>take place?

 

What business is it of yours?

[woodlawn]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

> In your dreams, sweetie. And as for the

>dinner deal, I think they mistook "host" for Roast."

 

 

How's your ex-wife doing?

[woodlawn]

RE: Not Darcy, but Wickham

 

>"Any reason why I should give a shit?"

>

>Yes. It will be the main course at your dinner!

 

It's brilliant repartee like the above that keeps me coming back to this board again and again.

[woodlawn]

RE: The BIggest Balloon

 

>That is so funny.

 

I'm not sure someone like you who makes jokes about having sex with his own mother is the best judge of what's funny, Rick. When she eats your ass, as you told us in the "Family Over Client" thread, what side does she start on? Do you shave first?

 

 

>I mean, we all know woodlawn lives for the

>attention he receives on this anonymous board,

 

No, Rick, you're making shit up again, as you so often do. The real story is that ever since I was a young lad (just a few short years ago) I have always felt a powerful urge, when I see a big fat balloon full of hot air, to stick it with something sharp. And you are simply the biggest, fattest, fullest balloon that has entered my field of vision in a good long time.