PaulEscortDad - reviewed 8/26

[CT Dick]

This guy has 55 reviews. THAT really caught my eye.

 

On closer examination, 42 are by first timers.

7 are second reviews

2 are third reviews

1 is a fourth review

3 are five or more, and

2 are identical.

 

Wow! Either this guy has trouble getting repeat customers or there is a problem here. x(

 

Dick

[pierrot]

But they are all good reviews. If he weren't good at it, or didn't live up, wouldn't somebody have told us?

[Guest johnmango]

I am interested in PaulEscortDad too - too bad I can't see the face; for me the face is as important as the rest of the body. I do like his hairy body though.

[Luv2play]

I'm not sure I follow your logic. The fact that PaulEscortDad has many reviews by first-time reviewers on this site just tells me that a lot of guys are so taken with his performance that they are "stirred " to sit down and send in a review. I assume they hire other escorts but don't bother submitting reviews, maybe because there is just nothing noteworthy to relate.

 

I know first-time reviewers are sometimes suspect but if there are many, as there are in this case, and they all seem genuinely from different sources, then I think this guy must be doing something right! (I must admit I always enjoy reading of PaulEscort Dad's encounters, I would hire him in a flash if he were in my neck of the woods).

 

The fact that many of his reviewers are first time reviewers here does not mean that PaulEscortDad does not get "repeat" business. Many of these reviewers may see him again, and undoubtedly do if he is so good at pleasing them. I assume they just don't bother sending in repeat reviews as I would not do that either where I saw an escort multiple times unless something had changed in his performance to warrant a new review.

 

That's my take on it.:+

[Guest backbaygayguy]

About lack of repeat reviewers: There might be other factors for first-time reviewers -- maybe they are travelers who can only see the escort once, and that isn’t clear from the review. I’m thinking of the four reviews I’ve done (one in process). These reviews have all been for guys I’ve met while traveling (I guess one review is actually a repeat -- I saw the guy twice on one trip). I will gladly repeat with these guys and review again, when we’re in the same city again.

 

I do hire some guys more than once. One of my favorites, who I’ve seen several times, does not want a review because he doesn’t want more business. The local guys I’ve hired more than once (four times in one case, hoping to develop a longer-term relationship before I gave up), just don’t warrant a review -- I only review for an exceptional experience. (Yeh, I can hear the compaints from people who want more reviews, but I don’t want to clutter up the board with reviews about average meetings; sometimes I try a second meeting just to make sure -- maybe I’m overly optimistic that the experience will be better.)

[AaronScottDC]

>About lack of repeat reviewers: There might be other factors

>for first-time reviewers -- maybe they are travelers who can

>only see the escort once, and that isn’t clear from the

>review. I’m thinking of the four reviews I’ve done (one in

>process). These reviews have all been for guys I’ve met while

>traveling

 

No, that is not what is implied by "first time" reviewers. I would hope that when you wrote your four reviews, that you used the same name or "handle" for each one, right? So, when someone reads your latest review, they will see that you have already reviewed three other guys and can go back and read your accounts of those escorts as well. This is what is meant as being a seasoned reviewer, not reviewing the same escort more than once.

 

When an escort has almost all reviews from first timers, and none from some of the really seasoned reveiwers (guys with 5 plus reviews to their name) it does indeed cast some doubt on the validity of these reviews. Or, at the very least, it makes it difficult for someone who really wants to do their homework on an escort to carry out any cross referencing of the escort's reveiws with other reviews written by the same client.

 

In the case of PaulEscortDad, he used to work here in DC for a while before moving on. The only thing I ever heard about him is that he enjoys working without condoms. In fact, there is another thread here in the message center someplace discussing this very topic. (where is Franco when you need him to do one of his patented searches?) So, if you are into that, then go for it. Just be sure to write a review afterwards...... unless you haven't ever written a review before.....

 

Aaron Scott DC

http://www.erados.com/AaronScottDC

http://www.male4malescorts.com/reviews/aaronscottdc.html

[Guest backbaygayguy]

Aaron, thanks for explaining my blooper (what can I say, must be a bad hair day), and yes, I use the same handle.

[CT Dick]

Here is it October 26 and Paul has FIVE more firest-timer reviews. Three were posted today and two on September 26.

 

What gives? x(

 

Dick

[Luv2play]

Paul is obviously doing something right to be getting so much new business. I know escorts who would kill to have such an full dance card! :7

[sman]

i was in miami for a couple of days and i was planning to meet escortdad, but he was not available... i saw another escort instead who was very bad and on my last day, i met another one tru an agency< miamimalemodels> who was very nice and good. i dont like to write reviews because the escort can be different with every client.

 

i agree, the reviews of escortdad are all very good, and its a pity he does not show his face.

[Luv2play]

I have had various experiences with hiring escorts based on body pics without a face pic. I have never been totally let down as I recall (but I must say some of those faces have become fuzzy over time!). I have been very pleasantly surprised in some cases and in most cases quite satisfied. I understand why escorts would want to protect their identity, especially if their personal circumstances dictate discretion.I actually find it interesting to anticipate what the face might be like when I already have a good idea what the body will be. Sort of like opening a Christmas present!

[HotdadENYC]

The statistics for PaulEscortDad are impressive, but your analysis of those statistics isn't. How do you know, based on that information, that previous reviewers haven't called him back again? For example, many of us travel, see an escort, post a positive review and then don't get back to that particular city or escort.

 

Another point is that many reviewers say they WILL see an escort again, and I believe they do that, but what would compel them to post another review if the experience is as good or if not better as previouly described?

 

If you're interested in Paul's type, then just go for it and don't try to over-analyze it. Personally, I would be more concerned with an escort who has only a few, but mixed, reviews, as that leads me to think about it much more, AS OPPOSED to someone, like Paul, who has obviously brought so many people so much pleasure.

[best hotel]

....this guy really is hot and passionate...if you book him when he is not tired or overbooked.... based on my experience, i believe that his reviews are so numerous is because he asks his clients to write one..very politely with enough charm to rival cary grant..who can say no?...wait a minute...i did...

[Luv2play]

This is disturbing news. You mean you had an experience with PaulEscortDad that did not live up to the glowing reviews? If that man is overextending himself, I blame all the bottoms in Ft Lauderdale for taking advantage of the poor man. Of course, if I were there, I would never dream of doing that... :o

[CT Dick]

Dad, my comment about having getting repeat customers was facetious. Sorry.

 

As a new poster, you probably are not aware of how often we have discussed credibility of reviewers. I, like many posters here, happen to feel that reviews by established reviewers (5 or more) are much more valuable than first timers. Too often, first timers are actually the escort writing his own review.

 

The fact that 78% of this guy's reviews are by first-timers and only 5% are by 5+ reviewers is a red flag.

 

I have no interest in hiring Paul. I originally posted this message to alert readers to what appears to be an abuse of this site. Then, two months later there are five more reviews all by first-timers.

 

Doesn't this stike you as unusual/fishy? x(

 

Dick

[Luv2play]

>Dad, my comment about having getting repeat customers was

>facetious. Sorry.

 

I am sometimes baffled by American "English" and this is one of those times. What does "having getting" mean? Running two imperfect verbs together doesn't make any sense to me. Am I missing something?

[CT Dick]

Oops, sorry Luv. I edited my post and forgot to delete the original verb. I meant "getting" all those reviews.

 

I promise to proofread more carefully next time.

 

Dick

[Nvr2Thick]

>The fact that 78% of this guy's reviews are by first-timers

>and only 5% are by 5+ reviewers is a red flag.

>

 

OK. We've been through the whole first-time review thing about a zillion times on this forum. Hopefully we're all smart enough to take first-time reviews for what they're worth. We all get it. It's possible that Paul is stuffing the box with reviews.

 

It's also possible that he's introducing his clients to the site and encouraging them to review him. If that's the case we should be grateful. Maybe his clients will go on to review other escorts. If any of them post a second review I'll take the reviewer much more seriously. If they post four more reviews maybe you will too.

 

Is the "and only 5% are by 5+ reviewers" statistic in any way meaningful? If second-time, third-time, and fourth-time reviewers are now suspect as well Hooboy may as well just scrap the review content.

 

This foot-stomping about first time reviews is pretty fucking irritating. When I was initially dissed as a first timer by one of the elder statesmen of this site my initial reaction was to submit enough reviews be be considered credible. For others it probably discourages participation. Why bother to submit anything on this site if someone's just going to pick it apart to support his own agenda?

 

Even in quantity first time reviews, while suspect, are not damning. Yes, you've noted some odd activity. In defending your point of view you seem to be trying to somehow prove that the statistics you've compiled on Paul are actually conclusive.

[Guest northernhung]

im sorry but i am in full agreement with CT on this one,,,,as i had initially posted last feb my concern on this...please see:

 

http://babydb.male4malescorts.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=7&topic_id=42379&mesg_id=42379&listing_type=search

 

his reviews always appear in clumps and he creates scenarios which encourage unsafe sex ,,,,,i.e. "paul's neg status made me want to br branded with his dna" etc etc...please see my original post for details

 

i still have not seen any regular poster step up to the plate to confirm any of these glowing reviews,,,,,sorry but IMHO he and his reviews smell pretty damn fishy to me.....

[VaHawk]

" still have not seen any regular poster step up to the plate to confirm any of these glowing reviews,,,,,sorry but IMHO he and his reviews smell pretty damn fishy to me....."

 

All this judgment from someone posting just his 16th post in 20 months time of being a member? Doesn't that in turn, equate your opinions on the mc with the same weight with which you dismiss the opinions of first time escort reviewers in the reviews section?

 

Then don't hire him, which I will venture that you have no intention of doing so, nor ever did have any intention of doing so, regardless of how many reviews he has by first time reviewers. So your posting of your "observations" serve no useful purpose, other than to give you a forum to post your judgments about people you have and never will meet. Why? People who do this, imho, are smellier than a month old dolphin carcass washed up on the beaches of Miami in mid-July.

 

Of course none of the regular posters have stepped up to the plate to confirm the glowing reviews. Why? Because he is EscortDad not EscortTeenTwinkBoy.

 

I agree that all the crap posted about "first time reviewers" often do lead to reviewers not bothering to post any more reviews. And I also feel, that accusatory threads such as this one, based solely on someone's personal feelings, not personal encounters, keep many escorts from participating on this board.

[giovoni]

Beginners shouldn't be welcome in Hooville!!

 

Obviously what Hooboy needs to do is hold all reviews from someone until they've written 5 separate reviews from 5 separate escorts. Then everyone here would be happy. People that don't have the money or experience to constantly review escorts so that every review is either from a 5 time reviewer are just wasting everyone's time here. We all know that Hooboy is totally impotent in confirming that a review is accurate, first time or otherwise and we all know that it's a physical impossibility for an escort to come up with a strategy to get so many people to write reviews. I'm heartened to see that so many people are properly offended at an escort that has the GALL to get people to write reviews who haven't otherwise written them.

 

He really should be lynched.

 

 

Gio in Denver

 

"I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."

[woodlawn]

>Of course none of the regular posters have stepped up to the

>plate to confirm the glowing reviews. Why? Because he is

>EscortDad not EscortTeenTwinkBoy.

 

Good one.

 

>I agree that all the crap posted about "first time reviewers"

>often do lead to reviewers not bothering to post any more

>reviews. And I also feel, that accusatory threads such as this

>one, based solely on someone's personal feelings, not personal

>encounters, keep many escorts from participating on this

>board.

 

I couldn't care less if "many escorts" are kept from participating on this board by this terribly unfair arrangement in which other people get to post whatever opinions they wish even if their opinions are not loaded with compliments for escorts. If they can't deal with the give-and-take of a message board they should stay away. But in all fairness, if first-time reviews have become suspect because a number of them have been discovered to be penned by escorts rather than clients, why blame anyone other than the escorts who wrote them? We shouldn't blame people who have been swindled in the past for being mistrustful, we should blame the swindlers, no?

[VaHawk]

"But in all fairness, if first-time reviews have become suspect because a number of them have been discovered to be penned by escorts rather than clients, why blame anyone other than the escorts who wrote them? We shouldn't blame people who have been swindled in the past for being mistrustful, we should blame the swindlers, no?"

 

In all fairness, I agree, but only if it can be proved that such reviews were indeed penned by the escort. Without such proof, coming here to the deli and posting speculation as fact, is just that, speculation, and not fact. It is doubly so, when the poster has never met the escort that he is accusing of penning his own reviews.

 

Well, if the swindler is a "poor boy from a disadvantaged economic background", then he should be excused, as he is just a product of his culture and the victim is responsible for being a victim. Of course, the validity of that reasoning, is directly proportional to the southerness of the latitude of the crime scene. The further south it is, the more excusable it is.

[Guest northernhung]

>>""Of course none of the regular posters have stepped up to the plate to confirm the glowing reviews. Why? Because he is EscortDad not EscortTeenTwinkBoy>>

 

hmmmm...interesting point considering that a quick glance at the escorts with the most reviews that appear in the newest review section in the last few days all tend to be in their mid 20's to late 30's....not exactly what i define as twink material......but perhaps the age difference for you personally makes someone 35 a twink,,,,,,its all relative i suppose,,,,,

 

josh big texan.....age 33....33 reviews

john(orlando) ....age 35.....65 reviews

rod hagen............age 30's.....44 reviews

frank williams....age 37.....20 reviews

 

in fact it seems that the twink quotient overall tends to be the minority of what reviewers repeatedly review according to my observations,,,,,,so your point seems a bit obtuse to me

 

as for the crack about me only posting 16 posts in 20 months ,,,i try to use the board sparingly even though i read it every week...sorry if im not up to the 2418 posts that you are.......i neither have the time or inclination to constantly post my two cents .....perhaps when i am retired(like you perhaps?) and have more time on my hands posting on this board will become more of an option,,,,,but i sincerely hope i will have better things to do at that point than bitch at other posters for expessing an opinion ....are we not allowed to question an escorts claims?? sometimes this leads to positive results for everyone i,e, mike grey's recent proof about his current shape,,,,i dont think anyone doubts his stats now that he has posted recent pics,,,,and all this from someone having an issue with a review...tsk tsk......,,,,,,so i invite paul escort dad to come forward and respond himself.........because until he does i still have serious questions concerning the majority of his reviews...and i think that

C T Dick has every reason to be suspect

 

>>>I agree that all the crap posted about "first time reviewers" often do lead to reviewers not bothering to post any more reviews. And I also feel, that accusatory threads such as this one, based solely on someone's personal feelings, not personal encounters, keep many escorts from participating on this board.Then don't hire him, which I will venture that you have no intention of doing so, nor ever did have any intention of doing so>>>

 

i am not attempting to review him in any way,,,,,,,and as far as the crap about you assuming i was never interested in hiring him,,,,,,actually i was until i started seeing so many threads about unsafe behavior and realised on closer inspection the similarity and proliference of first time reviewers,,,,,this sent up a red flag for me immediately so i posted an inquiry as C T did after i noticed this

 

>>So your posting of your "observations" serve no useful purpose, other than to give you a forum to post your judgments about people you have and never will meet. Why? People who do this, imho, are smellier than a month old dolphin carcass washed up on the beaches of Miami in mid-July.>>

 

when did a question or reasonable inquiry become a judgement? im glad i didnt mention anything about my opposition to the war in Iraq,,,,,,i'm sure that would make me an unpatriotic judgemental smelly beached whale according to your logic since i have never been to Iraq and have no intention of going there to see for myself.....sometimes one can only base opinions on what one reads,,,,,,and god knows we have had to read between the lines regarding the war AND paul escort dad's reviews on this sight

[VaHawk]

It's so pleasant when poor writing skills are second only to poor reading skills.