paul hung dad's reviews in florida

[Guest northernhung]

not to rain on anyone's parade but i was just wondering if anyone had noticed a certain alarming consistancy in his reviews,,,after scanning all 35 reviews....28 of which are first time reviewers,,,,several go into slightly disturbing details of unsafe behavior:

 

#35-He glided his entire bare cock in my hot hole, stretching me open and buried all 9 inches deep inside of me. (we are both negative)

 

#32-since we were both hiv-, I wanted him to breed me

 

#30-I swallowed his cum, something I quit doing since the AIDS crisis.

 

#29-I asked Paul to come in my mouth and he do so by jerking a big glob of spunk in my mouth

 

#25-Paul's negative status and his size were exactly what I was seeking.....I felt the heat of him spilling into my body....It was a tremendous feeling to be marked with Paul's DNA

 

#7-He also made it very clear that he had recently tested negative for HIV and STDs, the more reason why I was so interested in him

 

these all come from first time reviewers.....now the swallowing cum thing,,,whatever,,,risky i suppose but tolerable,,,,,,,but i find it a little strange that every other review seems to decree paul's "negative status" and the clients need "to be bred"

 

maybe i'm completely off target.....just sounds to me like this escort may be sending these reviews in himself to encourage his clentele to engage in unsafe sex with him for whatever reasons he may have,,,,,,i really have never read another review of any other escort repeatedly engaging in unsafe sex,,,especially one who claims to be negative...i am also not putting down anyone who chooses to bareback with a stranger even though i dont understand it,,,,,,,,so lets not turn this into a barebacking debate

 

maybe im all wromg and this is normal since i am not very experienced in the world of hiring.....i welcome anyones thoughts

 

thanks

[Guest YFSC]

>maybe im all wromg and this is normal since i am not very

>experienced in the world of hiring.....i welcome anyones

>thoughts

 

I don't know anything about this escort or his reviews, so I'm not commenting on that.

 

But your sentiments are not "all wrong," and this is *not* "normal," at least in my experience. But at least it is all up front and open, so that anyone who doesn't like the idea of what he has apparently been doing will be forewarned.

[Luv2play]

I agree with you that we don't want to get into yet another debate on the barebacking issue since this has been hashed over many times already on this site. But as for escorts who do offer barebacking services, well, there is a demand for them. It may be hard to fathom for many but I suppose clients who are already HIV+ constitute part of this client base. Then there are those who engage in risky behaviours but do not get themselves tested and "would rather not know".

 

Some of the reviews on this site overtly refer to barebacking experiences with escorts (I recall one reviewer who consistently states that he seeks out escorts who will barebottom for him). Others have reviewed escorts who openly advertise their bareback activities either on their personal web sites or on bareback sites such as bareback.com. In yet other cases, certain escorts have been reviewed in an inconsidtent way, where some clients have commented on how safe they were and others have described risky behaviours with the same escort.

 

So, what is one to conclude? Well, for me, I just accept that there are escorts available to fulfill whatever desires clients may have, not just in the bareback area but with respect to other activities as well. "Chacqu'un a son gout" or "each to his own".

[pierrot]

Interesting. I was just considering hiring this guy. I hadn't picked up on this. I'm not interested in unsafe sex, and if he's been doing it, then I'll think again. Other escorts I've been with have been very careful, and I appreciate it.