Escort Mike in Minneapolis

[Guest ncm2169]

If anyone is considering hiring this escort, I’ll be happy to share some “fair and balanced” observations with you (the Franken version, not the O’Reilly version ;-) ).

 

I had a fair amount of contact with him a few months ago, but it’s now too late to write a Review. However, I’ll share personal insights privately – no need to splash them all over this Board. Email me for further info if you like.

[Kippy]

I've seen Mike four or five times in the last year. It was always a good experience-- I found him thoughtful and more than hot... no reservations here...A bit refreshing in the escort wasteland that the Twin Cities has become. Ahhh for the days of Gopher Line Up!!! Where are those Str8 acting fratboys under 30??????? Peace...

[Guest ncm2169]

Good for you. Unfortunately, others have had unhappy experiences, as well. x(

[Guest Mikel]

Not in that city often, but when I was, I had a very satisfactory experience with him.

 

Wondering why you never wrote a review, and now months later, you feel very compelled to offer insights through this board. What bug do you have up yours? You did no one a favor by ignoring the appropriate place to leave your comments, the review section, and offer ambiguous comments here.

 

I think you have lost your credibility entirely. No one should listen to your comments. You could respond with 1000 excuses as to why months later you are using this forum to offer comments on an escort (different than responding to solicited questions from others)...but they would be just that and nothing more...excuses. I think it is apparent why you had a bad time with the escort...it's you!

 

Next time either...write a review or save your comments on an escort until someone on this board requests them. You'll come acrss as more credible.

 

Mikel

[Guest ncm2169]

I'll match my credibility with any other poster on this board any day of the week, thank you very much. There are countless reasons why clients either don't write Reviews, or hesitate or delay in writing them. It's been discussed here dozens of times. If you think such clients lack credibility, you're attacking some of the most respected client posters here.

 

In your rush to attack me, you perhaps overlooked the fact that after I first saw this escort, I posted some favorable comments about him on this board. When I started this thread, I promised a fair and balanced account of my dealings with him, and that's what I'll provide to anyone who asks.

 

The fact is, I had my reasons for not writing a Review, but it's immaterial what they were. I didn't write one within the time permitted by the ownership of this site, and I regret it. If I could write one now, I would. Since I can't, I'm following through in the spirit of this site, which is to share information about client experiences with escorts. I'm not trying to make a big deal out of it, which is why I prefer to do so discreetly.

 

If anyone is considering hiring this escort and wants to hear what I have to say, they can email me.

[Guest Mikel]

Like I said, "What bug have you got up yours?"

 

Read my comments a second time. You'll see I never criticized anyone for not writing a review or delaying in writing one. I am the most guilty culprit in this regard of anyone. I did not write a review on this escort either! I have NO PROBLEM with people who choose not to write reviews. I appreciate it when people do write reviews.

 

What I criticized is the fact that after choosing not to write a review

(and frankly I'm not interested in your reasons...I'll just presume they are as valid as mine!), you come to this board, months after your encounter, and even though no one is inquiring about the escort, you offer an alleged "objective" opinion. Sorry, buddy. That just sounds suspicious! So, it's not the fact you chose to ignore the opportunity to write I review I find fault with. Rather, it's the fact you offer an unsolicited comment about the person and expect us to believe yyour unrequested comments are "objective" Read the archives of this board. Most users solicit information about escorts. Others then respond to those inquiries. That serves a noble purpose. But not you, you just offer information on an escort even though no one is seeking information. Then you expect me to be naive enough to believe your motives are pure, your motives are objective, your motives are solely for our benefit, in the spirit of his site. Sorry, I've been around the block too many times to believe you! Wake up from your fantasy world. When another reader offered an innocent and pleasant word on the escort, you retorted negatively. Surely, that is the hallmark of "objectivity"! As I said, just read the archives...most do not use the board the way you did.

 

You are not objective, your credibility, at least in this case, is lost.

 

If anyone would like an objective opinion, or at least my opinion, of his escort, you can email me. I want burden you with whatever bugs I've got up my a_ _ ! I promise.

 

Mikel

[+ Lucky]

RE: Open Mike in Minneapolis

 

ncm1269 has posted 854 times. Yet Mikel (27 posts) says ncm loses all of his credibilty here by virtue of this one thread. How does that follow?

Maybe we should let the priest decide.

[+ Charlie]

RE: Open Mike in Minneapolis

 

I think there are problems on both sides here. Mikel has made a valid point about ncm1269's initial post, which also struck me as odd: why would he now start an enigmatic thread offering to reveal information privately, even though he didn't think it was worth revealing in a review at the time? What has happened recently? It certainly suggests that he has something negative to tell about the escort. However, Mikel's conclusion that ncm1269 has lost all credibility is gross overreaction: his credibility is based on a large number of posts on a lot of subjects over a long period of time, not on his questionable judgment in a single post.

[Guest LG320126]

RE: Open Mike in Minneapolis

 

Very well put!

[Guest Mikel]

RE: Open Mike in Minneapolis

 

Okay...

Sorry if I am over-reacting to your credibility. Charlie and Lucky have valid perspectives. I apologize.

 

I really never meant to suggest your overall credibility was lost. I am sorry if I was not clear enough about that. I honestly did not even mean it as a personal attack...although after re-reading my post...it sounds arrogant, even to me! Sorry again, really.

 

But the credibility in reference to this one escort...I still just think is lost. I suspect your opinion about Mike in Minn is much more subjective than objective. Does that invalidate everything else you have previously expressed or will express in the future...most certainly not.

 

Now, in the future, if I say something that seems more subjective than objective, please tell me. I deserve it from you! (lol) And if I won't admit it..I invite you to keep after me!

 

Your opinion is still valued...and your contributions to this site have most certainly benefitted many readers.

 

Peace...

 

Mikel

[Guest ncm2169]

I’m happy that others who’ve hired this escort but didn’t review him are now willing to share info, as I am. Sharing client info about escorts is the primary purpose of this site, and it’s just what I’m trying to do, albeit belatedly. I'm in no way suggesting I have the “definitive word” or the “last word” on this escort.

 

Also, I never said my comments would be “objective” – by definition, all reviews and comments by clients about escorts are subjective. I did say, however, that my comments would be “fair and balanced” based on my experiences with him. “Fair and balanced” means both the good and the bad.

 

As for attacks on my motives, I find them as tiresome as attacks on my credibility. My motives, as alluded to above, are simple. I had considerable interaction with this escort. I should have written a Review. I didn’t do so. I regret that, so I’m now doing what I think is appropriate. If some find fault with my approach, so be it.

 

You all have a good evening. :*

[Guest ncm2169]

RE: Open Mike in Minneapolis

 

:*

 

It's all good. Thanks.

[KY_TOP]

>Next time either...write a review or save your comments on an

>escort until someone on this board requests them. You'll come

>acrss as more credible.

>

 

I have found ncm to be extremely credible and value his opinion on Escorts and other matters. Just because one doesn't write a review doesn't mean one should not warn others if new info arises about an Escort. ncm plainly states to e-mail for info instead of him putting that info here. Too much info appears to be a review and some of us know how that is frowned upon.

 

Now about Mike, I also did not write a review of him during my visit to Mpls a few months ago. My encounter with him was the most bizarre encounter I have had with an Escort and he was a NO SHOW with me. It resulted in multiple hours of drama with his friend contacting my room multiple times wanting to know were Mike was at because he had dropped him at my hotel. Mike was actually missing for several hours and never made it to my room. I did not submit a review because when he finally contacted me several hours later it was obvious he had some personal problems. He wanted me to schedule a new time to meet him and I refused. I did offer to just meet and talk with no money exchange and he did not take me up on that offer. So as far as ncm's credibility on this guy, I trust it.

[BuckyXTC]

In ncm's defense, let me share a scenario that happened to me, that illustrates why one may come to a different conclusion about an escort, but not write a review.

 

Some months ago, I saw an escort who I thought was really top notch. I'd still rank him as one of the best I've seen to date, in most every way. I saw him multiple times and wrote a glowing review of the first time I saw him, and it remains accurate. Turns out this escort and I have a mutual acquaintaince, who informed me that the escort had chlamydia and anal warts while he was seeing clients, including me. I got tested and came out in the clear, but needless to say, I was not a happy camper. The escort in question left the business, and as far as I know, is no longer escorting, though he told me he would be happy to continue seeing me if I was interested (this was before I knew about the infections). The rules of this site preclude a client from submitting a second review of the same escort until a year has passed, or at least that is my understanding.

 

So, in my way of thinking, there are possible legitimate reasons why ncm has raised an issue, without the need of folks automatically questioning his motives for doing so. I think he raised the issue in a way that allows folks who want his opinion to seek it privately, without a public hashing out of the problem.

 

I will grant that clearly there are persons who might do this for the wrong motives, but I have no reason to see ncm as being one who falls into that category. His credibility is high with me, even in spite of differences we have had in various discussions here. Just one more opinion, for what its worth.

[+ Charlie]

RE: Open Mike in Minneapolis

 

Both of you have just raised your credibility in my eyes.

[+ Charlie]

The one-year-between-reviews rule was instituted, I believe, to prevent the piling on of reviews of an escort by a single client (obviously, some get around it by using different email addresses and handles). It does present a problem in situations where a later experience is very different in character from the one that inspired the first review. I would emale Hooboy directly to discuss this in a case where a client has a good reason to seriously re-evaluate an escort; I know that in the past he has occasionally removed negative reviews at a reviewer's later request (he has announced it when he has done so), so he might be willing to make an exception for a positive review to be balanced by a later one.

[Guest Mikel]

I sure learn a lot on this site.

 

I respect all of your comments.

 

It's great to have one's perspective broadened, isn't it?!