Kent Asian Boy -- Boston/NYC

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Anyone have experience with Kent??

 

http://asianrentboy.com/escort/rent1.htm

 

http://www.rentboy.com/location/getrb.asp?rentboy=2767

[Guest Tristan]

Tampa, funny that you asked. I haven't, but saw him online a long time ago and e-mailed him if he was planning any trip in the near future to Miami/Ft.Lauderdale, which he wasn't. (Actually, I think he had just been to one of those annual big parties in Miami.) His face is mostly hidden, but he's a nice little package with fantastic abs. Maybe, you can use your influence to get him to visit Florida. :-)

[axebahia]

If he is the one that I am thinking of, I had him once. I think he is mixed. He had a surprisingly gifted bubble butt for an Asian. There is a reason he keeps that face hidden though!

[+ Lucky]

Gosh, ad rian, a man of your taste and breeding having someone you thought was of a mixed race must have been real challenging. Fortunately, he had a surprisingly gifted bubble butt (well, for an Asian, that is). What is a surprisingly gifted bubble butt? And are you trying to imply that this guy who may not be the one you hired after all is ugly?

[axebahia]

>Gosh, ad rian, a man of your taste and breeding having

>someone you thought was of a mixed race must have been real

>challenging.

 

No silly, remember I am the guy who defends multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism here, and opposes zionism and apartheid. Got it now?

 

>Fortunately, he had a surprisingly gifted bubble

>butt (well, for an Asian, that is). What is a surprisingly

>gifted bubble butt?

 

Most Asians that I have seen have rather flat butts that don't appeal to me. His was rounded and he used it well, though as I recall he lacked personality.

 

>And are you trying to imply that this guy

>who may not be the one you hired after all is ugly?

 

No, I am pretty sure it's the same guy. Back then, he billed himself as Kent not Asian Kent, and I was surprised by the Asiatic appearance. I would not say ugly, but not my type. I didn't hire him again, but I have had worse and he was a nice kid.

[+ Lucky]

Such backhanded compliments! Now he is not so ugly, just not very personable! So that's why he hides the face!

[Guest Tristan]

We seem to have a little confusion here. From the little you can see of his face, he doesn't appear to be ugly. Besides, it seems to be a function of nature that people blessed with really nice bodies tend to at least have a decent looking face as well. That's based on my unscientific observation of humans with an unknown margin of error. So is the problem really his personality? We know it's certainly not his body!

[+ Lucky]

"So is the problem really his personality?"

 

The only one saying there is a problem here is ad rian. Perhaps he will get his friends woodie and dougie to chime in though...

[axebahia]

>Such backhanded compliments! Now he is not so ugly, just not

>very personable! So that's why he hides the face!

 

So lucky, can one only say supelatives about escorts in your view, or do you admit that some may be better than others?

[axebahia]

>We seem to have a little confusion here. From the little you

>can see of his face, he doesn't appear to be ugly. Besides,

>it seems to be a function of nature that people blessed with

>really nice bodies tend to at least have a decent looking face

>as well. That's based on my unscientific observation of

>humans with an unknown margin of error. So is the problem

>really his personality? We know it's certainly not his body!

 

Let me try to summarize: When I hired him he was not marketing himself as Asian. I don't generally find Asians to be attractive. His body was nice. His facial features were mixed Asian/White. He was not ugly, but I would not call him one of the better looking escorts that I ever hired. He was pleasant, and I had a good but not great time. His personality was subdued but not unpleasant. I did not hire him again. I would not hire him again, but that does not mean that someone else who likes the Asian look and personality might not find him attractive. I did not do a negative review because my experience was not negative. I did not do a positive review because my experience was not superlative. In a word, I am indifferent towards this particuar escort. If I had to recommend escorts in New York, I could probably think of a dozen or so on Campus and Rentboy who I would recommend before thinking of this guy.

[axebahia]

>Besides,

>it seems to be a function of nature that people blessed with

>really nice bodies tend to at least have a decent looking face

>as well. That's based on my unscientific observation of

>humans with an unknown margin of error.

 

I suggest you don't try to test that hypothesis with your own money using Maximum Escorts in NY where they show escorts with great bodies but hide the faces, thus leading to some awkward "at the door" surprises!

[AdamSmith]

Some field data: I hired him a few weeks ago. Good body, as the photos show -- tight, small, well worked-out. Very appealing bubble butt, as noted. Pleasant face, too; if not a runway model, still nice enough.

 

One odd clinker in the experience, though. Some way into things, unprompted by anything before as far as I could tell, he asked if I had a boyfriend. I said yes. He then offered that possibly my hiring meant the relationship was in trouble, and I might want to think about that.

 

To be sure, one's analyst gets a comparable hourly rate for stirring the pot and seeing if some repressed guilt rises to the surface. (Although come to think of it, suggestions to the couch are hardly ever directly judgmental.) But it was a bit startling to hear that from an escort in the middle of things.

 

On reflection, perhaps it was simply youthful naivete on his part about the complexities and contradictions of life, relatedness and everything. But it betrayed a lack of insight and instinct about the nature of fantasy, role-playing broadly, and the experience that people seek through hiring.

 

All this analysis seemed too tedious and summing-to-zero to merit a review. But for this forum: He has the mechanics down, but the emotional and psychological elements that set the great escorts apart were missing, for me.

[+ Lucky]

Are you the same Adam Smith that wrote that stuff about economics?

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Thanks for the info Mr. smith.

 

I don't mind a little analysis if he has "Good body, as the photos show -- tight, small, well worked-out. Very appealing bubble butt, as noted."

 

I'll even pay the usual psychoanalysis fee if the does the three magic deeds -- his couch or mine. }(

[VaHawk]

How did you know??? He is one of those "fat dead people" who has come back to haunt us, after that thread opened the door to the other side.

[axebahia]

>Good body, as

>the photos show -- tight, small, well worked-out. Very

>appealing bubble butt, as noted. Pleasant face, too; if not a

>runway model, still nice enough.

....

>All this analysis seemed too tedious and summing-to-zero to

>merit a review. But for this forum: He has the mechanics down,

>but the emotional and psychological elements that set the

>great escorts apart were missing, for me.

 

That's pretty much the same as my assesment of the situation, but if Tampa Yankee is hot to trott with this guy, he should, and if we are Lucky we can compare notes afterwards.

[AdamSmith]

Agreed.

 

Tampa Yankee, go for it. And let us know.

 

To Lucky, yes, that Adam Smith.

 

The one who seems, on any page, to speak directly about the industry served by this great site.

 

One random example: "... every system which endeavours, either, by extraordinary encouragements, to draw towards a particular species of industry a greater share of the capital of society than what would naturally go to it; or, by extraordinary restraints, to force from a particular species of industry some share of the capital ... is in reality subversive of the great purpose which it means to promote. It retards ... the progress of society towards real wealth and greatness....”

 

Even better:

 

“Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience.”