Escort pics that really work

[VaHawk]

Now, just my opinion, but talk about a hot pic that really works, just look at the newest one of David Gartner in today's reviews. Why can't all escorts post pics like this? This is one hot shot of a beautiful young man in his white Calvin Kleins and with that baseball cap covering one eye, it imo, just don't get better than this. So much hotter, sexier and appealing that some nudie shot!

 

I just think it is a really well done picture, with a lot of sex appeal and marketing savvy. Well done, David, and you should really thank the photographer! IMO, this is one time where the photographer and the model worked together in perfect tandem to produce a true classic (love the B&W as it only adds to the allure).

 

Hot, hot, hot! Makes me want to book a flight to LA. :9

[Huey]

Hey VaHawk I guess we each view what is hot differently . I do think David is an extremely good looking guy yet I dislike the new picture of him. I feel previous pictures were far hotter and more flattering. Just my thoughts.

[Guest YFSC]

>Now, just my opinion, but talk about a hot pic that really

>works, just look at the newest one of David Gartner in today's

>reviews. Why can't all escorts post pics like this? This is

>one hot shot of a beautiful young man in his white Calvin

>Kleins and with that baseball cap covering one eye, it imo,

>just don't get better than this. So much hotter, sexier and

>appealing that some nudie shot!

>

>I just think it is a really well done picture, with a lot of

>sex appeal and marketing savvy. Well done, David, and you

>should really thank the photographer! IMO, this is one time

>where the photographer and the model worked together in

>perfect tandem to produce a true classic (love the B&W as it

>only adds to the allure).

>

>Hot, hot, hot! Makes me want to book a flight to LA. :9

 

VaHawk -

I see nothing wrong with your posting this comment about this escort. Really. I'm *not* trying to say you shouldn't have posted it. But I wonder why you think it is OK for you to post comments like this obsessing over escorts that *you* like, but you go ballistic when others post about escorts that *they* like (and that apparently you don't happen to).

 

(VaHawk): Always, some self-serving, self-promoting, "kiss the ass of an escort I've never been with but damn he's cute", jerk out there!!! Are you getting a commission, and if so is it monetary or sexual???? I will bet you have never been with this guy, but have some sexual desire/fantasy to do so???

 

Of course, in this case you've been with this escort, right??, and you posted this about him *not* out of "some sexual desire/fantasy" to be with him, right??

 

And this would *not* be a case of a "hot, little...boy...and oooooh, that is so hot I just want to hug, and kiss him and ram my cock up his hole!"

 

And of course your post is *not* promoting, advertising or marketing the escort in any way, since you railed against posts which do that.

 

I believe it was a certain predatory bird from a certain southern state that expressed the opinion

BARF, BARF, BARF, BARF, BARF and 1,000 times over BARF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[+ Lucky]

I'm with Huey on this one. DG is a nice-looking guy, but this somnolent photo wouldn't get me near the phone!

[Uncle Bill]

Me too. He's the type of guy I'm often attracted to, and I don't mind the shorts a bit -- that part is very hot to me (all the cock pics that some guys use are often more of a turn-off than if they were just in nice work-out shorts or a swimsuit -- but not speedos). I just don't think that it's one of David's better pics, and, if it was the only one of him that I'd ever seen, I wouldn't be rushing to the phone as a result of seeing this one (wouldn't even make me note him as someone to look into at a future time).

[+ glutes]

I thought todays 'new picture' was going to be a hottie - but concur it is not! Why do these guys have to look like some retarded -wannabe / homme boy - rap star??

[VaHawk]

Really, if you have this much free time on your hands, then perhaps you should find a hobby, especially one that doesn't involve sex in any way. Taking sentences and and groups of words out of the context of the rest of text, to illustrate an opinion of yours, is really a tiresome trite trick worthy of the anti-gay far right Christian movement.

 

Only you, interpreted it as a promo for the escort, rather than what it was, which was my opinion, as stated at the start, that I thought and still do, that it was a great photograph. That's all, but you believe that is comparable to a months long pr campaign, most likely by those on commission to promote a visit by an escort who I will not deign to mention. All with raving testimonials as to the quality of the escort by wanna be clients. I offered no "self-serving", praising affidavits of this escort's service, but was merely just stating my opinion on a photograph.

 

If you don't like that, then please do just as you did and express your opinions. I must say that I am a little flattered that you took all the time and trouble to cull thru all my postings and cut and paste. Just makes you look even more ridiculous.

[VaHawk]

Really, if you have this much free time on your hands, then perhaps you should find a hobby, especially one that doesn't involve sex in any way. Taking sentences and and groups of words out of the context of the rest of text, to illustrate an opinion of yours, is really a tiresome trite trick worthy of the anti-gay far right Christian movement.

 

Only you, interpreted it as a promo for the escort, rather than what it was, which was my opinion, as stated at the start, that I thought and still do, that it was a great photograph. That's all, but you believe that is comparable to a months long pr campaign, most likely by those on commission to promote a visit by an escort who I will not deign to mention. All with raving testimonials as to the quality of the escort by wanna be clients. I offered no "self-serving", praising affidavits of this escort's service, but was merely just stating my opinion on a photograph.

 

If you don't like that, then please do just as you did and express your opinions. I must say that I am a little flattered that you took all the time and trouble to cull thru all my postings and cut and paste. Just makes you look even more ridiculous.

[VaHawk]

Well I just wish that everyone could disagree as civilly as Huey, Lucky and glutes. We all have different tastes and views and perspectives on what we think is hot.

 

I still think it is a great photograph. I just love everything about it, the mood, the shading, the look on David's face and just the whole ambience. But as I said, just my opinion, and of all the photos I've seen of David, it is my favorite.

[VaHawk]

Well I just wish that everyone could disagree as civilly as Huey, Lucky and glutes. We all have different tastes and views and perspectives on what we think is hot.

 

I still think it is a great photograph. I just love everything about it, the mood, the shading, the look on David's face and just the whole ambience. But as I said, just my opinion, and of all the photos I've seen of David, it is my favorite.

[Rod Hagen]

Given that I don't have the balls to post a face pic, I'm wondering how a face picture, that obscures half the model's face, can "Really Work"?

[Rod Hagen]

Given that I don't have the balls to post a face pic, I'm wondering how a face picture, that obscures half the model's face, can "Really Work"?

[Rod Hagen]

>Given that I don't have the balls to post a face pic, I'm

>wondering how a face picture, that obscures half the model's

>face, can "Really Work"?

 

..err, 30% of his face.

 

"Having these balls makes

me feel something close to

joy, I think. I must caress

them." -FRIEZA

-Hagen

[Rod Hagen]

>Given that I don't have the balls to post a face pic, I'm

>wondering how a face picture, that obscures half the model's

>face, can "Really Work"?

 

..err, 30% of his face.

 

"Having these balls makes

me feel something close to

joy, I think. I must caress

them." -FRIEZA

-Hagen

[VaHawk]

Well, as I've stated, just my opinion, but I think that is a really hot look. It's mostly just the forehead and one eye that is covered, there is enough of the face showing to see what he looks like. Of course, I don't think it would have the same oomph if it was in color rather than black and white.

[VaHawk]

Well, as I've stated, just my opinion, but I think that is a really hot look. It's mostly just the forehead and one eye that is covered, there is enough of the face showing to see what he looks like. Of course, I don't think it would have the same oomph if it was in color rather than black and white.

[Guest YFSC]

RE: De Nile ain't just a river in Egypt...

 

You failed *totally* to understand. Or, more likely, I think you *did* understand and are just trying to deflect the attention by trying to distort what I said into something else.

 

>Really, if you have this much free time on your hands, then

>perhaps you should find a hobby,

 

Hmmm.... Let's see....

VaHawk: 924 posts since Oct 26, 2002, 7+ months ....... YFSC: 131 posts since Jun 25, 2002, about a year.

Who is it that has "this much free time" or needs a hobby or a life???

 

>Taking sentences and and groups of

>words out of the context of the rest of text, to illustrate an

>opinion of yours, is really a tiresome trite trick worthy of

>the anti-gay far right Christian movement.

 

What I quoted from you was *not* out of context in any way, except that you were saying it about others. I was merely turning *your own words* back on you, to expose the hypocrisy. I was not expressing an opinion, but drawing attention to a *fact,* namely, that everything you said about those other posts and posters was also applicable to you and what you posted here. And I quoted enough of your words to show that it was *not* out of context. You avoided responding to the point. Instead you dragged in completely inappropriate buzzwords like "anti-gay", "far right Christian movement" and anything else you could find to try to inflame passions, obscure the facts and deflect attention. The "tiresome trite tricks" are all *yours*.

 

BTW, your remarks that I quoted were *not* directed at the other escort, they were directed at posters who were offering him some support, which you chose to label as promotion and to attack. The escort in question merely posted that he had a new email address, new pictures on his website, and information on his website about his forthcoming trip to the US. Countless other escorts have posted the same kinds of information, including even requests to comment on their websites, which you and others even did. Nevertheless, you attacked this escort for posting in a more discreet way than they did. Then Loves Bubble Butt offered moral support to the escort, told him not to let it bother him, and to keep posting.. Then kjun said Put more susinctly: Stuff it VaHawk. And, I like you. And then you attacked them with the words that I quoted. That's what the thread says. Look it up if you don't believe me.

 

>Only you, interpreted it as a promo for the escort, rather

>than what it was, which was my opinion, as stated at the start,

>that I thought and still do, that it was a great photograph.

 

WRONG on two counts. 1. I didn't interpret it as motivated in that way, and I said that there was nothing wrong with your posting the comment. 2. *ANY* mention of an escort, especially one like the one you made, constitutes a promo, whether the mentioner intended it or not. I don't and didn't claim that you made your post *intending* it as a promo, and I honestly don't think that you did intend it that way. And you are entitled to express your opinion or your delight. But whether you intended it that way or not, it is a *fact* that it *does* constitute advertising for the escort. In the same way, some others were expressing their opinions about an escort, which you attacked them for, after *you* decided by fiat what their intentions were, regardless of what they really may have been. You didn't give them the same consideration that you now claim for yourself. When others expressed their opinions you labeled it as promotion and attacked it; when you do the same or similar you label it as opinion. And whether you intended it or not, everything that you accused others of before is present in your post here.

 

And you apparently didn't notice or chose to ignore my opening statements to the effect that there was nothing wrong with your posting your comment. But you are trying to make it sound like I waa objecting to your expressing your opinion. Sorry, that dog won't hunt.

 

My point, which you are trying to duck by mischaracterizing it, is *not* that you shouldn't have posted this remark or that I don't agree with it. (In fact, I have said nothing about whether I agree or disagree with your opinion of the photo.) My point is that you shouldn't attack others for making comments about escorts that they like and you apparently don't, and that your having done so is hypocritical. And the tag line that I appropriated *from you* was a comment on the disparity between your earlier statements and your current behavior, not on the photograph or your expressing an opinion about it.

 

>That's all, but you believe that is comparable to a months long

>pr campaign, most likely by those on commission to promote a

>visit by an escort who I will not deign to mention.

 

You don't *really* belive that any escort pays a commission to anyone here, do you? If you do, you have a much bigger problem than I thought. As for the exaggerated "months long pr campaign," most of that was occasioned by posters like you who were attacking the escort, not by posters who may have been trying to promote him. Some pr campaign.

 

>All with raving testimonials as to the quality of

>the escort by wanna be clients.

 

FIND ONE. JUST ONE. There aren't any. In all that garbage there isn't one. At best you have deceived yourself into thinking so in order to justify your attacks. Time to "PUT UP OR SHUT UP."

 

If you remember the posting about that other escort *honestly* instead of with popularized catch pharses and inventing what sounds good for your argument, you will remember that *most* of it was in the nature of bitching about his rates and his minimum, and of counterposts reacting to the bitching on those themes. There were NO "testimonials" of any kind, let alone "raving" ones. But that didn't stop you from claiming before, and here again, that there were. There were NO self-serving", praising affidavits of this escort's service. There were just posters coming to his defense after he was attacked. But that didn't stop you from attacking the posters who were simply expressing their opinion, just as you want to do here.

 

>I must say that I am a little flattered that you took all the

>time and trouble to cull thru all my postings and cut and paste.

 

You shouldn't be so flattered. It really didn't take much time or trouble at all to point out the hypocrisy of the situation. And I didn't have to cull through all <your> postings and cut and paste. EVERYTHING I quoted is from JUST ONE post, *not* taken out of context and *not* taken out of order. All I did was omit the parts that were specifically about the other escort.

I'm glad you added this remark, though. It shows you were embarrassed at being confronted with your own words.

[Guest YFSC]

RE: De Nile ain't just a river in Egypt...

 

You failed *totally* to understand. Or, more likely, I think you *did* understand and are just trying to deflect the attention by trying to distort what I said into something else.

 

>Really, if you have this much free time on your hands, then

>perhaps you should find a hobby,

 

Hmmm.... Let's see....

VaHawk: 924 posts since Oct 26, 2002, 7+ months ....... YFSC: 131 posts since Jun 25, 2002, about a year.

Who is it that has "this much free time" or needs a hobby or a life???

 

>Taking sentences and and groups of

>words out of the context of the rest of text, to illustrate an

>opinion of yours, is really a tiresome trite trick worthy of

>the anti-gay far right Christian movement.

 

What I quoted from you was *not* out of context in any way, except that you were saying it about others. I was merely turning *your own words* back on you, to expose the hypocrisy. I was not expressing an opinion, but drawing attention to a *fact,* namely, that everything you said about those other posts and posters was also applicable to you and what you posted here. And I quoted enough of your words to show that it was *not* out of context. You avoided responding to the point. Instead you dragged in completely inappropriate buzzwords like "anti-gay", "far right Christian movement" and anything else you could find to try to inflame passions, obscure the facts and deflect attention. The "tiresome trite tricks" are all *yours*.

 

BTW, your remarks that I quoted were *not* directed at the other escort, they were directed at posters who were offering him some support, which you chose to label as promotion and to attack. The escort in question merely posted that he had a new email address, new pictures on his website, and information on his website about his forthcoming trip to the US. Countless other escorts have posted the same kinds of information, including even requests to comment on their websites, which you and others even did. Nevertheless, you attacked this escort for posting in a more discreet way than they did. Then Loves Bubble Butt offered moral support to the escort, told him not to let it bother him, and to keep posting.. Then kjun said Put more susinctly: Stuff it VaHawk. And, I like you. And then you attacked them with the words that I quoted. That's what the thread says. Look it up if you don't believe me.

 

>Only you, interpreted it as a promo for the escort, rather

>than what it was, which was my opinion, as stated at the start,

>that I thought and still do, that it was a great photograph.

 

WRONG on two counts. 1. I didn't interpret it as motivated in that way, and I said that there was nothing wrong with your posting the comment. 2. *ANY* mention of an escort, especially one like the one you made, constitutes a promo, whether the mentioner intended it or not. I don't and didn't claim that you made your post *intending* it as a promo, and I honestly don't think that you did intend it that way. And you are entitled to express your opinion or your delight. But whether you intended it that way or not, it is a *fact* that it *does* constitute advertising for the escort. In the same way, some others were expressing their opinions about an escort, which you attacked them for, after *you* decided by fiat what their intentions were, regardless of what they really may have been. You didn't give them the same consideration that you now claim for yourself. When others expressed their opinions you labeled it as promotion and attacked it; when you do the same or similar you label it as opinion. And whether you intended it or not, everything that you accused others of before is present in your post here.

 

And you apparently didn't notice or chose to ignore my opening statements to the effect that there was nothing wrong with your posting your comment. But you are trying to make it sound like I waa objecting to your expressing your opinion. Sorry, that dog won't hunt.

 

My point, which you are trying to duck by mischaracterizing it, is *not* that you shouldn't have posted this remark or that I don't agree with it. (In fact, I have said nothing about whether I agree or disagree with your opinion of the photo.) My point is that you shouldn't attack others for making comments about escorts that they like and you apparently don't, and that your having done so is hypocritical. And the tag line that I appropriated *from you* was a comment on the disparity between your earlier statements and your current behavior, not on the photograph or your expressing an opinion about it.

 

>That's all, but you believe that is comparable to a months long

>pr campaign, most likely by those on commission to promote a

>visit by an escort who I will not deign to mention.

 

You don't *really* belive that any escort pays a commission to anyone here, do you? If you do, you have a much bigger problem than I thought. As for the exaggerated "months long pr campaign," most of that was occasioned by posters like you who were attacking the escort, not by posters who may have been trying to promote him. Some pr campaign.

 

>All with raving testimonials as to the quality of

>the escort by wanna be clients.

 

FIND ONE. JUST ONE. There aren't any. In all that garbage there isn't one. At best you have deceived yourself into thinking so in order to justify your attacks. Time to "PUT UP OR SHUT UP."

 

If you remember the posting about that other escort *honestly* instead of with popularized catch pharses and inventing what sounds good for your argument, you will remember that *most* of it was in the nature of bitching about his rates and his minimum, and of counterposts reacting to the bitching on those themes. There were NO "testimonials" of any kind, let alone "raving" ones. But that didn't stop you from claiming before, and here again, that there were. There were NO self-serving", praising affidavits of this escort's service. There were just posters coming to his defense after he was attacked. But that didn't stop you from attacking the posters who were simply expressing their opinion, just as you want to do here.

 

>I must say that I am a little flattered that you took all the

>time and trouble to cull thru all my postings and cut and paste.

 

You shouldn't be so flattered. It really didn't take much time or trouble at all to point out the hypocrisy of the situation. And I didn't have to cull through all <your> postings and cut and paste. EVERYTHING I quoted is from JUST ONE post, *not* taken out of context and *not* taken out of order. All I did was omit the parts that were specifically about the other escort.

I'm glad you added this remark, though. It shows you were embarrassed at being confronted with your own words.

[Chuck50]

RE: De Nile ain't just a river in Egypt...

 

a little imagination in life is hot and sexy. HUGS Chuck

[Chuck50]

RE: De Nile ain't just a river in Egypt...

 

a little imagination in life is hot and sexy. HUGS Chuck

[VaHawk]

RE: De Nile ain't just a river in Egypt...

 

Feel free to cut and paste any of my words to justify your points, because believe me I am never embarrased at anything. That's what comes with the territory of a message board. Since you don't seem to understand my words I'll use a picture this time.

 

http://www.stupid-boy.com/smilies/cwm/cwm/piss2.gif U.

 

Play ground lady says it's your turn if you wish.

[VaHawk]

RE: De Nile ain't just a river in Egypt...

 

Feel free to cut and paste any of my words to justify your points, because believe me I am never embarrased at anything. That's what comes with the territory of a message board. Since you don't seem to understand my words I'll use a picture this time.

 

http://www.stupid-boy.com/smilies/cwm/cwm/piss2.gif U.

 

Play ground lady says it's your turn if you wish.

[Trixie]

RE: photo frenzy

 

VaHawk, I'm here to tell you that the photo in question, at least to my tastes, is a winner. I totally agree with you. Now, I'd only give it a B+ (My inner art-critic has issues with the compostion, exposure, and cluttered backgroud-

that black circle simply should not be there)...

But the pose is wonderful! It'slanguidly erotic without being bluntly sexual, and heavy-lidded, half hidden eyes staring dead-on at the viewer are very suggestive. This photo also tells of David himself. From reading the reviews, it's apparent he's a runner, and the pic accents his long, lean legs and flat belly (Anyone who has a concave belly whilst seated in this manner definitely is not stuggling with body fat).

The cocked hat suggests a youthful, streetwise and waifish personality, which may or may not be true to his character, but presents an appealing image.

All in all it's an enchanting photo. Not to everyone's tastes, to be sure, but we all have different ideas of what's sexy. Speaking strictly for myself, I do get somewhat tired of technicolor pix of sun-baked gymrats striking a manly pose in some out-door location. (No doubt seconds before they run squealing back to the car because they thought they saw a mosquito.)

It's nice to see a variety of bodies and faces on this site posed in a variety of manners. True, each picture is lose some people, and gain the interest of others. For instance... dare I say it? I think every picture i've seen on this site of Talvin Dimacchio makes him look utterly boring and plastic in his perfection. I'm sure he's a very nice person, certainly he's handsome. but, he just doesn't seem... real.

In any case, VaHawk, stick to your guns! Davey's a cutie!

La Belle Trixie

[Trixie]

RE: photo frenzy

 

VaHawk, I'm here to tell you that the photo in question, at least to my tastes, is a winner. I totally agree with you. Now, I'd only give it a B+ (My inner art-critic has issues with the compostion, exposure, and cluttered backgroud-

that black circle simply should not be there)...

But the pose is wonderful! It'slanguidly erotic without being bluntly sexual, and heavy-lidded, half hidden eyes staring dead-on at the viewer are very suggestive. This photo also tells of David himself. From reading the reviews, it's apparent he's a runner, and the pic accents his long, lean legs and flat belly (Anyone who has a concave belly whilst seated in this manner definitely is not stuggling with body fat).

The cocked hat suggests a youthful, streetwise and waifish personality, which may or may not be true to his character, but presents an appealing image.

All in all it's an enchanting photo. Not to everyone's tastes, to be sure, but we all have different ideas of what's sexy. Speaking strictly for myself, I do get somewhat tired of technicolor pix of sun-baked gymrats striking a manly pose in some out-door location. (No doubt seconds before they run squealing back to the car because they thought they saw a mosquito.)

It's nice to see a variety of bodies and faces on this site posed in a variety of manners. True, each picture is lose some people, and gain the interest of others. For instance... dare I say it? I think every picture i've seen on this site of Talvin Dimacchio makes him look utterly boring and plastic in his perfection. I'm sure he's a very nice person, certainly he's handsome. but, he just doesn't seem... real.

In any case, VaHawk, stick to your guns! Davey's a cutie!

La Belle Trixie

[+ glutes]

RE: photo frenzy

 

Trixie, you are La Belle!

You pointed out aspects of Messr. Gartner very well, the legs are sexy. To each his/her own, I don't like wannabe Emmenm photos - as probably most members on the MC would agree.