Sk8terskort in NY/NJ

[Guest youngblood]

Has anybody had any experience with this guy listed on men4rentnow.com in the NJ (Bergen/Passaic) section?

[Guest gentle guy]

I don't remember reading anything about him here, but he sure looks great! (I just cannot bring myself to write "hot.")

[Guest Beachcomber]

I have seen him several times. He is hot! His pics accurately reflect his appearance. My experience was that he really loves kissing and snuggling, very str8acting, and will top or bottom. He bottomed for me and was really into it.

[Guest youngblood]

It's hard to tell what he really looks like from the photos in his ad, and the reviews there are not nearly as specific as the ones on this website.

 

Can you give any more info on his stats?;-)

[Rick Munroe]

>very str8acting

 

You mean he fucked pussy? He's pussy-whipped? He went shopping for groceries with his wife and kids? Plucked his eyebrows and highlighted his hair (that's what straight guys do these days)? If you're gay and want to say that he's masculine, why not show a little self-respect and just use the word "masculine"? Gay doesn't equal girly.

[Guest ncm2169]

Oh Christ, here we go again. x(

[Guest youngblood]

I hope not! I am only looking for first hand information, not critiques of his ad from other escorts.

[elpaso]

I've hired him...and if those photos are actually him then I'm the King of Siam. When I hired him I was new to this game, and unwilling to turn him away at the door (because it was instantly clear that there was not a match between himself and his pics). So I went ahead. And actually, he's a very nice guy, and a decent bottom, but not anywhere in the zip code of those pics in terms of looks. Be wary. And ask for more photos to make sure you're up for it.

[Rick Munroe]

>I am only looking for first hand information, not

>critiques of his ad from other escorts.

 

I wasn't and would never critique any escort's ad. I was replying to Beachcomber's post. Sheesh.

[Uncle Bill]

I'm waiting for the "self-respecting" (read, "overly sensitive") crowd to throw out the "breeders" epithet again. They used that term in such a loathing way the last time while attacking the use of "straight-acting" that it was just amazing. I'm happy to be both a "breeder" (with two great kids to show for it) and a "straight-acting" bi guy (oops, now we are going to have to argue about whether anyone is actuall "bi" -- my bad).

[Rick Munroe]

>I'm waiting for the "self-respecting" (read, "overly

>sensitive") crowd to throw out the "breeders" epithet again.

 

Don't include me there because I've never used that term or any other word that is used to put anyone else down for being what they are (except when I'm mad at Derek, and then watch out). And I don't think I'm being "overly sensitive" to take offense to a word that perpetuates ages-old negative steretypes that gay men are effeminate and straight men are masculine anymore than you're being overly sensitive about the word "breeder."

[Rick Munroe]

>Oh Christ, here we go again. x(

 

Who are you, Archie Bunker? "Oh Christ, Edith, here we go again! Them coloreds is marchin' for civil rights again, them man-hatin' dykes is demandin' equal pay, and them limp-wristed fruits is tellin' us we can't say "straight-acting" no more." Can you really not see the importance of repeating a message when you're trying to make social change? Yes, this is a light-n-fluffy escort website, but if just one person reads my post and thinks twice next time before using a word that perpetuates bigotry & hate (or at least just thinks), then it's worth it. For some closeted guys out there, this message board might be the only place where they communicate with or see into the minds of "out" gay men. For that reason, I won't stop saying things that I think need to be said. You don't have to read it!

[Guest ncm2169]

No, I'm not Archie Bunker (we've had that conversation before), but for the record, I am a bi-sexual breeder who's str8-acting. As for the term, "breeder," I'm not offended by it...more just amused by it. ;-)

 

As I see it, I have the right to use the term, "str8-acting." You have the right to object to its use. Gentlemen of good will can agree to disagree and move on.

 

My "Oh Christ" comment was a reference to yet another thread being hijacked just because someone (not even the original poster) used the term, "str8-acting."

 

IMHO, my friend, that's taking your objections to the level of sabotage, a far greater sin in my book than using some words one happens not to like.

[Rick Munroe]

>that's taking your objections to the level of

>sabotage, a far greater sin in my book than using some words

>one happens not to like.

 

Sabotage? Sin? Now that's funny. Are the FBI and God gonna come after me now?

 

I think it's silly to say I shouldn't comment on something that matters to me just because it isn't the original topic of a thread. We come here to exchange thoughts & ideas. These threads are like conversations & I don't see why they can't go off on tangents like real conversations do. Life is more fun when you don't try to control it so much (and I'm not trying to "control" anyone by taking aim at the use of "str8-acting"...I'm expressing my opinion).

 

By the way, using the term "straight-acting" to refer to a gay man who is masculine is a hell of a lot more than just "using some words one happens not to like". Kind of sad that you still don't see the point.

[VaHawk]

Hey Rick,

 

You're probably just wasting your time trying to communicate this point to guys like this. They aren't gay, so to them the only thing that constitutes what it is to be gay, is the sexual act itself. Most likely the only interaction they ever have with gay men is for sex. When they do that, I wonder if they would be offended if we called them 'gay acting'? :-(

[Guest ncm2169]

No, the point is, most of us learned in kindergarten the lesson, "Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me."

 

Apparently some here were absent that day.

 

I've spent most of a lifetime in political and other activism trying to change laws, and, in many cases, behavior (sometimes with success, sometimes failing, but always trying). That's what counts. Words are just that...words. In my not-inconsiderable experience, those who complain loudest about words are arm-chair crusaders.

 

Rick, you don't like the term, "sabotage" to describe hijacking a sincere post/thread by someone who never used "the offending term?" OK, how about, "just plain rude?" Yes, this Message Board is an ongoing conversation, but it's also about serious people looking for information. Those people deserve the right to get their answers without their posts being hijacked. Apparently you think your right to object to certain words/terms trumps their right to get the info they're looking for.

 

For Chrissakes, grow some skin. After that, regale us with your tales of real activism. I'm sorry, but sitting on your very photogenic ass hijacking threads on this Message Board to make your point doesn't cut it with me. :+

[Guest ncm2169]

Sorry, youngblood, I feel for ya. I've had my own threads hijacked over this issue. It SUX !! x(

[Guest ncm2169]

Sorry. Maybe I should have said "tails of real activism." }(

[Rick Munroe]

>most of us learned in kindergarten the

>lesson, "Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will

>never hurt me."

 

Again, you're totally missing the point. This isn't about calling someone a "faggot" (or "nigger" or "chink" or "hebe", etc)...it's about perpetuating steretypes (gays are fem, blacks are lazy, asians excel at math, jews are cheap, etc). Maybe I just had a better kindergarten teacher than you.

 

>Those people deserve

>the right to get their answers without their posts being

>hijacked. Apparently you think your right to object to certain

>words/terms trumps their right to get the info they're looking

>for.

 

Who stopped youngblood from getting the information he wanted? Two people who knew the escort in question replied. Either nobody else has anything to add, or doesn't care. You seem to think I have some magical power to control who posts what but I really don't. I'm not a moderator. And incidentally, if this is hijacking, I'm not doing it alone. What do you think you're doing...giving information about Sk8terskort?

 

>I'm sorry, but sitting on your

>very photogenic ass hijacking threads on this Message Board to

>make your point doesn't cut it with me.

 

Perhaps that's how some of us feel about you sitting on your very closeted ass, telling out gay men that there's nothing wrong with homophobia. I have no problem with closeted guys (as I've said, I'm turned on by married men, etc) but it's really arrogant of you to tell us that "words are just words" when you're too afraid to utter the words "I'm bi" to people in your life (not to anonymous message board members).

[Rick Munroe]

http://www.markheayn.com/con6_muscleman-violin.jpg

[KY_TOP]

This argument got sort of long the last time. But, I really like the picture. Very good hijack. Got another that shows more of his chest?:9

[Rick Munroe]

>Got another that shows

>more of his chest?

 

I thought you were an ass man. }(

[Guest ncm2169]

Rick, I repeat:

 

>I'm sorry, but sitting on your

>very photogenic ass hijacking threads on this Message Board to

>make your point doesn't cut it with me.

 

I've been on many of the "front lines", electorally and otherwise. I know my credentials. I've gotten off my not-particularly-photogenic-ass. I've paid my dues. I sure as hell won't take a back seat to you in that regard.

 

I also repeat: grow some fuckin skin (I know you can't rewind the bris, but there may be other options). }(

 

Save your fight for the really important battles, and the real energy neccessary for them. Don't blow it all on a banal sandbox duel, unless that's all your skills can handle.

 

And, yes, I've participated in this hijack, regrettably. Your "sucking in" skills are once again ably demonstrated. Notwithstanding this current repartee, I'd still like to experience them...ummm, in person. Somehow, I think I'd enjoy one more than the other.

[KY_TOP]

>>Got another that shows

>>more of his chest?

>

>I thought you were an ass man. }(

 

Just because I like to Fuck doesn't mean I don't like a good chest. In fact when choosing an Escort I always try to figure out what kind of nipples he has from his pictures. If you ever read one of my reviews I usually mention Nipples:9

[Rick Munroe]

>Save your fight for the really important battles, and the real

>energy neccessary for them.

 

Who are you to decide what battles are important? I think that educating people is an important step toward obtaining equality. As far as I'm concerned, every effort we make with even one person is important. Besides, you have no idea what "battles" I fight or have fought, anyway...all you know of me is what I choose to post, so stop making assumptions. And I haven't expended much energy on this; I'm certainly not losing sleep over the use of "straight-acting." This message board is really funny: when I post dumb, fluffy, PR-type stuff, I get crap for it, and when I post more serious or political stuff, I get crap for it, too. You'd think I'd just stop posting but for some odd reason, I still get pleasure out of this place.

 

>And, yes, I've participated in this hijack, regrettably. Your

>"sucking in" skills are once again ably demonstrated.

 

Ahh...good one. Blame me for your actions. Do you ever take responsibility for anything in your life?